Re: [GRASS-PSC] [GRASS-dev] RFC4 discussion call

[Scott Mitchell]

Since I'm in there anyway editing a couple of minor grammatical fixes, I've 
deleted that sentence based on this latest exchange plus the fact that it makes 
sense to me. But I'm doing so in the comfort of knowing that my edits can be 
easily reverted, so don't hesitate if there's reason.

> On Jan 6, 2015, at 05:35, Moritz Lennert  wrote:
> 
> On 06/01/15 11:25, Martin Landa wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> 2014-12-30 0:29 GMT+01:00 Markus Neteler :
>> 
 I agree with Maris that no feedback should be interpreted as agreement.
>> 
>> I would also agree with that. It would be reasonable also to set some
>> deadline for discussion and then to propose voting. What do you think?
>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/4_ReleaseProcedure?action=diff&version=7&old_version=6
>> 
>> I did cosmetics changes [1].
>> 
>>> I found that a "tbd" is still there.
>> 
>> I would suggest to simply delete this sentence. Creating extra branch
>> for such purpose seems to be not necessary to me. Any opinion on that?
> 
> +1
> 
> Moritz
> 
> ___
> grass-psc mailing list
> grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org 
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc 
> 
___
grass-psc mailing list
grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc

Re: [GRASS-PSC] [GRASS-dev] RFC4 discussion call

[Moritz Lennert]

On 06/01/15 11:25, Martin Landa wrote:

Hi all,

2014-12-30 0:29 GMT+01:00 Markus Neteler :


I agree with Maris that no feedback should be interpreted as agreement.


I would also agree with that. It would be reasonable also to set some
deadline for discussion and then to propose voting. What do you think?

http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/4_ReleaseProcedure?action=diff&version=7&old_version=6


I did cosmetics changes [1].


I found that a "tbd" is still there.


I would suggest to simply delete this sentence. Creating extra branch
for such purpose seems to be not necessary to me. Any opinion on that?


+1

Moritz

___
grass-psc mailing list
grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc

Re: [GRASS-PSC] [GRASS-dev] RFC4 discussion call

[Martin Landa]

Hi all,

2014-12-30 0:29 GMT+01:00 Markus Neteler :

>> I agree with Maris that no feedback should be interpreted as agreement.

I would also agree with that. It would be reasonable also to set some
deadline for discussion and then to propose voting. What do you think?
> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/4_ReleaseProcedure?action=diff&version=7&old_version=6

I did cosmetics changes [1].

> I found that a "tbd" is still there.

I would suggest to simply delete this sentence. Creating extra branch
for such purpose seems to be not necessary to me. Any opinion on that?

Thanks for feedback in advance, Martin

[1] 
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/4_ReleaseProcedure?action=diff&version=12&old_version=7

-- 
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.eu/mentors/landa
___
grass-psc mailing list
grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc