Re: [gmx-users] distance restraints between different chains
I think pulling code can solve the problem, http://manual.gromacs.org/documentation/current/user-guide/mdp-options.html#com-pulling On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 12:04 PM Oscar Hernandez Alba wrote: > Dear all, > > > > I am trying to run MD with a protein with four different chains. When > I > convert this structure to gromacs, I have four different molecules in the > topology file. I would like to use distance restraints between specific > atoms of different chains. I have created the itp file with the information > of the atoms involved in distance restraints. However, when I run the MD > simulation with distance restraints I always get the same error message : < > you have inserted topology section "distance_restraints" in a part > belonging > to a different molecule than you intended to >. Can someone help me with > this problem ? I do not what is the exact place of the < > distance-restraints > > section in the topology file. > > > > Thank you very much. > > > > Oscar > > -- > Gromacs Users mailing list > > * Please search the archive at > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before > posting! > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or > send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. > -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
[gmx-users] distance restraints between different chains
Dear all, I am trying to run MD with a protein with four different chains. When I convert this structure to gromacs, I have four different molecules in the topology file. I would like to use distance restraints between specific atoms of different chains. I have created the itp file with the information of the atoms involved in distance restraints. However, when I run the MD simulation with distance restraints I always get the same error message : < you have inserted topology section "distance_restraints" in a part belonging to a different molecule than you intended to >. Can someone help me with this problem ? I do not what is the exact place of the < distance-restraints > section in the topology file. Thank you very much. Oscar -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
[gmx-users] Distance restraints at topology file between gromacs-5.1.4 and gromacs-2018.4
Hi, Gromacs users and developers Actually, I used distance constraint for each chain.itp file. (for example, I added following for chainA.itp /chainB.itp/chainC.itp and so on [distance_restraints] ; i j ? label funct lo up1 up2 weight 155 17621 0 2 0 1.834174633 2.834174633 1 174 11281 1 2 0 1.948664904 2.948664904 1 ……… It was ok for gromacs-5.1.4 for running. But, in the gromacs-2018.4, it shows following error. All distance restraint parameter entries in the topology should be consecutive So, I tried to remove those distance constraint from all the itp file. Then, it runs well at gromacs-2018.4 And, I put distance restriants to only chainA.itp. Then, it runs well at gromacs-2018.4 And, additionally, I started to put distance restraint to chainB.itp. It started to shows the error All distance restraint parameter entries in the topology should be consecutive (Maybe it means all the separated each chain distance restriants should be in the same file. Is it right?? ) I believe gromacs-2018.4 has changed some setting. I searched this issue in the internet, but I found no answer. Any suggestion would be needed (urgently). Sincerely, Jaewan Jang -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Re: [gmx-users] Distance restraints on two TYR OH groups so that they are together
I altered distance restraints according to your comment into: [ distance_restraints ] 195 281 1 1 1 0.4 0.44 0.48 1000Still get same issue that 195 and 281 even move away from each other. Here link to all files again, hopefully it will not be distorted. http://www.mediafire.com/file/ruaxx6nbj2qpvm6/MD_4AK0_test_pub.tar.bz2 How can I drag 195 and 281closer with distance restraints? (not necessary as close as 0.2 nm) On Wednesday, March 15, 2017 2:54 PM, Justin Lemkulwrote: On 3/15/17 6:28 AM, Vytautas Rakeviius wrote: > Hello, I try to add distance restraints on two TYR OH groups so that they are > together in the end like this: > > [ distance_restraints ] > 195 281 1 1 1 0.2 0.22 0.24 1000 > But it does not work at least over time frame I tested, they even go further > away from each other. > > Here I share my all files:MD_4AK0_test_pub.tar.bz2 That's not a valid link. If you're trying to keep 2 oxygen atoms at a distance of 0.2 nm, that's well within the (likely) repulsive wall of the LJ potential, as well as being repulsive from the perspective of the electrostatics. You'll either need a massive biasing force to keep them close, or develop a different way to keep them at such a distance. Why are you imposing this bias, and at such a short distance? -Justin > System is small and easy to run (gmx grompp -f md.mdp -c npt.gro -t npt.cpt > -p topol.top -o md_0_1.tpr && gmx mdrun -deffnm md_0_1)What I am doing in > wrong way? > > | > | > | > | | | > > | > > | > | > | | > MD_4AK0_test_pub.tar.bz2 > MediaFire is a simple to use free service that lets you put all your photos, >documents, music, and video in a si... | | > > | > > | > > > -- == Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D. Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences School of Pharmacy Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629 University of Maryland, Baltimore 20 Penn St. Baltimore, MD 21201 jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441 http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul == -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Re: [gmx-users] Distance restraints on two TYR OH groups so that they are together
On 3/15/17 6:28 AM, Vytautas Rakeviius wrote: Hello, I try to add distance restraints on two TYR OH groups so that they are together in the end like this: [ distance_restraints ] 195 281 1 1 1 0.2 0.22 0.24 1000 But it does not work at least over time frame I tested, they even go further away from each other. Here I share my all files:MD_4AK0_test_pub.tar.bz2 That's not a valid link. If you're trying to keep 2 oxygen atoms at a distance of 0.2 nm, that's well within the (likely) repulsive wall of the LJ potential, as well as being repulsive from the perspective of the electrostatics. You'll either need a massive biasing force to keep them close, or develop a different way to keep them at such a distance. Why are you imposing this bias, and at such a short distance? -Justin System is small and easy to run (gmx grompp -f md.mdp -c npt.gro -t npt.cpt -p topol.top -o md_0_1.tpr && gmx mdrun -deffnm md_0_1)What I am doing in wrong way? | | | | || | | | | | MD_4AK0_test_pub.tar.bz2 MediaFire is a simple to use free service that lets you put all your photos, documents, music, and video in a si... | | | | -- == Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D. Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences School of Pharmacy Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629 University of Maryland, Baltimore 20 Penn St. Baltimore, MD 21201 jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441 http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul == -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
[gmx-users] Distance restraints on two TYR OH groups so that they are together
Hello, I try to add distance restraints on two TYR OH groups so that they are together in the end like this: [ distance_restraints ] 195 281 1 1 1 0.2 0.22 0.24 1000 But it does not work at least over time frame I tested, they even go further away from each other. Here I share my all files:MD_4AK0_test_pub.tar.bz2 System is small and easy to run (gmx grompp -f md.mdp -c npt.gro -t npt.cpt -p topol.top -o md_0_1.tpr && gmx mdrun -deffnm md_0_1)What I am doing in wrong way? | | | | || | | | | | MD_4AK0_test_pub.tar.bz2 MediaFire is a simple to use free service that lets you put all your photos, documents, music, and video in a si... | | | | -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Re: [gmx-users] distance restraints in mdp
Please don't reply to the entire digest. Copy the relevant portions and use a proper subject line. On 3/8/16 8:19 PM, Sana Saeed wrote: dear Justin Lemkuli already run that without restraints, it has no problems. even i used the gro file from the simple 5ns MD but still have these same errors and warnings. when i set Lincs constraints to all-bonds , simulation finishes fine but by using alchemical_analysis.py for free energies it gives errors and warnings. (Warning: states 29 and 37 have the same energies on the dataset.) i used 42 lambdas and about 32 states are having same energies. and when i set constraints to h-bonds then LINCS warnings. i tried to use different options for pressure coupling also because i read somewhere it also affects simulation. i am quite confused where the problem is. is it possible to send you topology file and you have a look?Thanks in advance Now we're talking about half a million different things. When reporting a problem, please keep it simple. It's impossible for anyone on this mailing list to be inside your head and know what you've done. If you want to troubleshoot distance restraints, we can do that. But let's take things one at a time. If you want to share files, please upload a tarball of *all* input files: coordinates, topology(ies), any relevant .mdp file(s), and a run script that lists all of your commands, exactly in sequence as you typed them. Please do not send this information privately; share with the list so others can contribute (I'm frankly swamped lately and have little time to delve deeply into such issues but I'll try to make a little time). -Justin -- == Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D. Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences School of Pharmacy Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629 University of Maryland, Baltimore 20 Penn St. Baltimore, MD 21201 jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441 http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul == -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Re: [gmx-users] distance restraints in mdp
On 3/7/16 10:35 PM, Sana Saeed wrote: i am performing protein ligand binding free energy calculation MD. i have applied distance restraint to 1 pair of atoms. now when i am running md it gives me LINCS warnings. first i thought it is because of wrong geometry so i changed complex, now i am doing it for Lysozyme+JZ4. but still same warning. i am confused about the distance restraints to be introduced in mdp file. disre = simple/ensemble? i read in manual, but still confused. i tried both with "simple it gives me LINCS warning and with ensemble it says that this version of gromacs doesnt support it. i am using 5.1 gromacs. Then simplify further and make sure the system runs without restraints or anything else. Just normal MD. Start simple to avoid chasing the wrong problem. -Justin -- == Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D. Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences School of Pharmacy Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629 University of Maryland, Baltimore 20 Penn St. Baltimore, MD 21201 jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441 http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul == -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
[gmx-users] distance restraints in mdp
i am performing protein ligand binding free energy calculation MD. i have applied distance restraint to 1 pair of atoms. now when i am running md it gives me LINCS warnings. first i thought it is because of wrong geometry so i changed complex, now i am doing it for Lysozyme+JZ4. but still same warning. i am confused about the distance restraints to be introduced in mdp file. disre = simple/ensemble? i read in manual, but still confused. i tried both with "simple it gives me LINCS warning and with ensemble it says that this version of gromacs doesnt support it. i am using 5.1 gromacs. Sana Saeed Khan, -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Re: [gmx-users] Distance Restraints
Dear Steve, First of all you should take a look in all mdp options regarding distance restraints: http://manual.gromacs.org/archive/4.5/online/mdp_opt.html#nmr I am not 100% familiar with dist res in version 4.5.4 but without dirse=simple for example I think you will not have any distance restraints because you will be using the default value which is disre=no I guess. Regarding the location of the distance restraints it can be placed after all the parameters of your molecule. Otherwise I think grompp will give an error. Finally, and probably the main reason for my reply, I wonder if what you want is a distance restraints or an actual bond between the Zn and the S atoms (four I guess). Diogo Vila Viçosa Em qui, 7 de mai de 2015 às 18:58, Steve Seibold steve...@ymail.com escreveu: I have a two peptide system with my second chain B having as part of its topology file (and sequence) a Zinc ion. That is, the Zinc ion is literally part of the chain so, that when I generate my itp files using pdb2gmx I get topol_proteinA.itp, topol_proteinB.itp (i.e. no topol_Ion.itp)...I do this because the distance restraint I want is between the Zinc and its coordinated sulfur atoms. I believe I need the Zn and the Cys SG atoms part of the same molecule...here, chainB. I have read the distance restraint info. in the manual 4.5.4; however, I am still unsure about how to implement it. I have gotten to the point where I use genrestr to generated the itp file having the distance restraint matrix. Now, when I #include this (restraint) file in the topology.top or in the topol_proteinB.itp, I get an error saying that the restraint file is in the wrong location when I use the grompp to make a tpr file.I have also place in disre_fc = 1000 in my mdp file Can someone be explicit about what I am doing wrong...I did get the position restraint to work, but am having trouble here. Thanks, Steve -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
[gmx-users] Distance Restraints
I have a two peptide system with my second chain B having as part of its topology file (and sequence) a Zinc ion. That is, the Zinc ion is literally part of the chain so, that when I generate my itp files using pdb2gmx I get topol_proteinA.itp, topol_proteinB.itp (i.e. no topol_Ion.itp)...I do this because the distance restraint I want is between the Zinc and its coordinated sulfur atoms. I believe I need the Zn and the Cys SG atoms part of the same molecule...here, chainB. I have read the distance restraint info. in the manual 4.5.4; however, I am still unsure about how to implement it. I have gotten to the point where I use genrestr to generated the itp file having the distance restraint matrix. Now, when I #include this (restraint) file in the topology.top or in the topol_proteinB.itp, I get an error saying that the restraint file is in the wrong location when I use the grompp to make a tpr file.I have also place in disre_fc = 1000 in my mdp file Can someone be explicit about what I am doing wrong...I did get the position restraint to work, but am having trouble here. Thanks, Steve -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
[gmx-users] Distance restraints
Dear All, I'm trying to keep distance restraints between few atoms, and for that I have done the following, In the topology file, I have inserted a block specifying the details of pairs -- ; Include forcefield parameters #include ./amber99sb-ildn.ff/forcefield.itp ; Include chain topologies #include Protein_chain_A.itp #ifdef DISRES [ distance_restraints ] ; ai aj type index type’ low up1 up2 fac 3722 3760 10 1 0.19 0.22 0.23 1.0 3722 3765 11 1 0.19 0.22 0.23 4.184 3723 3759 12 1 0.19 0.22 0.23 1.0 3723 3766 12 1 0.19 0.22 0.23 1.0 #endif #include Protein_chain_B.itp ; Include water topology #include ./amber99sb-ildn.ff/tip3p.itp #ifdef POSRES_WATER ; Position restraint for each water oxygen [ position_restraints ] ; i funct fcxfcyfcz 11 1000 1000 1000 #endif ; Include topology for ions #include ./amber99sb-ildn.ff/ions.itp [ system ] ; Name Protein in water [ molecules ] ; Compound#mols Protein_chain_A 1 Protein_chain_B 1 SOL 24565 NA 2 --- Next in the npt.mdp file I have used the following keywords, define = -DDISRES disre = simple disre_fc= 1000 Now, while running the simulations, after few ps the distances are increasing by 2-3 Ang. Could anyone please suggest me something related to this? I went through an old discussion related to the same issue here, http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.gromacs.user/51387 Thanks and regards, Tarak -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
[gmx-users] Distance Restraints set for water-ion cluster in gas phase (vacuum)
Dear gromacs usres, I want to run nvt simulation of water-ion cluster (Na+(H2O)250) in gas phase (vacuum) at higher temperature ( bigger than 200 K). But the cluster will collapse at high temperature. So the distance restraints is used to restraint the water molecules and the ion Na+ not to keep together as a cluster. But there are so many atoms to set the distance constraint in the topology. So how can I set set the distance constraint in the topology easilier? How to set the distance restraint between the atoms and center of mass of the water-ion cluster? Thank you very much! Yong Liu liuyong_1...@dicp.ac.cn -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Re: [gmx-users] Distance Restraints set for water-ion cluster in gas phase (vacuum)
On 10/13/14 4:48 AM, liuyong_1...@dicp.ac.cn wrote: Dear gromacs usres, I want to run nvt simulation of water-ion cluster (Na+(H2O)250) in gas phase (vacuum) at higher temperature ( bigger than 200 K). But the cluster will collapse at high temperature. So the distance restraints is used to restraint the water molecules and the ion Na+ not to keep together as a cluster. But there are so many atoms to set the distance constraint in the topology. So how can I set set the distance constraint in the topology easilier? How to set the distance restraint between the atoms and center of mass of the water-ion cluster? The spherical flat-bottom potential is much easier to use in this case. See manual section 4.3.2 (version 5.0). -Justin -- == Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D. Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences School of Pharmacy Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601 University of Maryland, Baltimore 20 Penn St. Baltimore, MD 21201 jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441 http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul == -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Re: [gmx-users] Distance restraints does not work?
Thanks Justin. I was concerned about that the distance could increase so much above 0.4 (I had the feeling from the equation that the penalty was larger above up2(0.4)). 50.0000.4642269 100.0000.4505744 But anyway when I checked the interactions to Zn I found a competing interaction with an oxygen that could play a role. When I got rid of that and decreased up2 to 0.3 I got what I wanted. /Emma -- View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/Distance-restraints-does-not-work-tp5013284p5013341.html Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.