lloda skribis:
>> On 11 Jan 2023, at 18:37, Thompson, David wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12:34 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>>
>>> What could be convenient though is ‘bytevector-copy’ (no bang), which
>>> would combine ‘make-bytevector’ + ‘bytevector-copy!’.
>>
>> 'bytevector-copy' already exists, or do you mean some different
>> implementation of it?
>>
>> - Dave
>
> The current bytevector-copy takes a single argument.
Right, what I had in mind is one that would take an offset and size; I
hadn’t realized the name was already taken.
Thanks,
Ludo’.