Re: WebSockets

2014-04-04 Thread Ludovic Courtès 
Neil Jerram n...@ossau.homelinux.net skribis:

 I'm interested in adding support for WebSockets
 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6455) to Guile's web modules.  Is
 anyone else interested in - or possibly already working on - that?

Sounds like good idea!

Ludo’.

WebSockets

2014-04-02 Thread Neil Jerram 

Hi there,

I'm interested in adding support for WebSockets 
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6455) to Guile's web modules.  Is anyone 
else interested in - or possibly already working on - that?


Thanks,
Neil

Re: WebSockets

2014-04-02 Thread Nala Ginrut 
On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 10:29 +0100, Neil Jerram wrote:
 Hi there,
 
 I'm interested in adding support for WebSockets 
 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6455) to Guile's web modules.  Is anyone 
 else interested in - or possibly already working on - that?
 

I was planing to implement websocket in Artanis web-framework and
there's half-baked code. Then I realized it's better to integrate with
the server, but Artanis hasn't written its own server. So it's
appreciated if anyone can do the job. ;-)

BTW, I think it's a chance to have crypto modules in guile-core since
websocket needs both sha-1 and base64.

 Thanks,
  Neil

Re: WebSockets

2014-04-02 Thread Neil Jerram 

[Now guile-user only, since that seems appropriate]

On 2014-04-02 11:08, Nala Ginrut wrote:

On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 10:29 +0100, Neil Jerram wrote:

Hi there,

I'm interested in adding support for WebSockets
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6455) to Guile's web modules.  Is 
anyone

else interested in - or possibly already working on - that?



I was planing to implement websocket in Artanis web-framework and
there's half-baked code. Then I realized it's better to integrate with
the server, but Artanis hasn't written its own server. So it's
appreciated if anyone can do the job. ;-)


Wow, Artanis looks quite sophisticated and I'm wondering now if I should 
use it for my work instead of (web ...) directly.  I need to take a 
closer look.


One immediate thing that I noticed: some of its API is different from 
(web ...) but not obviously better or at a different conceptual level.  
For example, your route context seems conceptually equivalent to (web 
request).  Is this just because you first wrote Artanis before (web ...) 
was available?


Regards,
  Neil

Re: WebSockets

2014-04-02 Thread Nala Ginrut 
2014年4月2日 PM7:54于 Neil Jerram n...@ossau.homelinux.net写道：

 [Now guile-user only, since that seems appropriate]


 On 2014-04-02 11:08, Nala Ginrut wrote:

 On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 10:29 +0100, Neil Jerram wrote:

 Hi there,

 I'm interested in adding support for WebSockets
 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6455) to Guile's web modules.  Is anyone
 else interested in - or possibly already working on - that?


 I was planing to implement websocket in Artanis web-framework and
 there's half-baked code. Then I realized it's better to integrate with
 the server, but Artanis hasn't written its own server. So it's
 appreciated if anyone can do the job. ;-)


 Wow, Artanis looks quite sophisticated and I'm wondering now if I should
use it for my work instead of (web ...) directly.  I need to take a closer
look.


I'm glad you like it!
But oh, shame on me!  So many people are interested in it but I haven't
done a better database handling.
Anyway, you can build a site if you can play sql directly.
Although it works now, I haven't released it yet. Because I want to release
the first version with better config and database module.
The latest branch is wip-sql-mapping. There will be some changes compare to
master. :-)

 One immediate thing that I noticed: some of its API is different from
(web ...) but not obviously better or at a different conceptual level.  For
example, your route context seems conceptually equivalent to (web request).
 Is this just because you first wrote Artanis before (web ...) was
available?


Actually, route context is a Artanis specific local environment of each
request.
It's used to store info of features in Artanis, and passing necessary info
in Artanis environment only, like url-remapping, sql-mapping, cookies inner
processing...all the parts unrelated to http standard.
The http requests are handled by (web ...), and it's just encapsulated in
route context. So their function doesn't duplicate.

 Regards,
   Neil