[h-cost] Era with Heaviest undergarmants - TV query

2011-09-02 Thread Chris Harrison
Hello Bay Area Costumers! I loved the costume bazaar last weekend and was 
delighted to pick up a great Dickens Faire outfit (and a membership to the 
group). Now, a question from a friend of mine is a scout/producer for a company 
that makes tv shows for Discovery, TLC, etc. (see below) Can anyone help? I 
don't want to bog down the list with responses if this is really basic, so feel 
free to email me off the list. Thanks!
 
- Forwarded Message -
From: Shera Jenne sh...@shera.tv
To: Chris Harrison ch...@yahoo.com
Sent: Friday, September 2, 2011 6:57 AM
Subject: Advice

Hey there Chris!
Wish you were near. I have so many things to ask you! ha ha. 

Do you know anything about Victorian undergarments? Weird question, huh. I am 
writing up a proposal and I am trying to figure out the time period in which 
women wore the MOST undergarments... as in number of items and/or heaviest. I 
think I read somewhere that at their height women were wearing 19 pounds of 
undergarments under their dresses. But I can't find that definitively. I know 
you specialize in more middle ages stuff... (or medieval?) but since costumery 
is an area of interest I thought it might be something you'd know a little bit 
about. 
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Era with Heaviest undergarmants - TV query

2011-09-02 Thread penhal...@juno.com
I would say that the early Victorian period especially the late 1840's would be 
the heaviest era for undergarments. By that time the corset was re-emerging as 
a longer, more heavily boned object and ladies wore lots of 
underskirts/petticoats to achieve the bell skirted look which was in fashion. 
If I remember my readings correctly (at work and away from my books) a really 
fashionable woman might wear upwards of 15 skirts. When the crinoline was 
introduced in the 1850's it was hailed as a liberator becuase women could go 
without the weight and encumbrance of all the petticoats. Karen DezomaSeamstrix

-- Original Message --
From: Chris Harrison ch...@yahoo.com
To: h-costume@mail.indra.com h-costume@mail.indra.com
Subject: [h-cost] Era with Heaviest undergarmants - TV query
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 08:05:17 -0700 (PDT)

Hello Bay Area Costumers! I loved the costume bazaar last weekend and was 
delighted to pick up a great Dickens Faire#65533;outfit (and a membership to 
the group). Now, a question from a friend of mine is a scout/producer for a 
company that makes tv shows for Discovery, TLC, etc. (see below) 
Can#65533;anyone help? I don't want to bog down the list with responses if 
this is really basic, so feel free to email me off the list. Thanks!
#65533;
- Forwarded Message -
From: Shera Jenne sh...@shera.tv
To: Chris Harrison ch...@yahoo.com
Sent: Friday, September 2, 2011 6:57 AM
Subject: Advice

Hey there Chris!
Wish you were near. I have so many things to ask you! ha ha. 

Do you know anything about Victorian undergarments? Weird question, huh. I am 
writing up a proposal and I am trying to figure out the time period in which 
women wore the MOST undergarments... as in number of items and/or heaviest. I 
think I read somewhere that at their height women were wearing 19 pounds of 
undergarments under their dresses. But I can't find that definitively. I know 
you specialize in more middle ages stuff... (or medieval?) but since costumery 
is an area of interest I thought it might be something you'd know a little bit 
about. 
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

57-Year-Old Mom Looks 25
Mom Reveals $5 Wrinkle Trick That Has Angered Doctors!
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4e60f32ebb48b110d5bst05duc
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Era with Heaviest undergarmants - TV query

2011-09-02 Thread Ann Catelli
That is my thought also, 1840s or 50s before the hoop--lots and lots of 
starched petticoats, especially, with full corsets  chemises.

Ann in CT




From: penhal...@juno.com penhal...@juno.com

I would say that the early Victorian period especially the late 1840's would be 
the heaviest era for undergarments. By that time the corset was re-emerging as 
a longer, more heavily boned object and ladies wore lots of 
underskirts/petticoats to achieve the bell skirted look which was in fashion. 
If I remember my readings correctly (at work and away from my books) a really 
fashionable woman might wear upwards of 15 skirts. When the crinoline was 
introduced in the 1850's it was hailed as a liberator becuase women could go 
without the weight and encumbrance of all the petticoats. Karen DezomaSeamstrix

-- Original Message --
From: Chris Harrison ch...@yahoo.com

 question from a friend of mine is a scout/producer for a company that makes tv 
shows for Discovery, TLC, etc. (see below) Can�anyone help? 
- Forwarded Message -
From: Shera Jenne sh...@shera.tv
To: Chris Harrison ch...@yahoo.com
Sent: Friday, September 2, 2011 6:57 AM
Subject: Advice

Do you know anything about Victorian undergarments? Weird question, huh. I am 
writing up a proposal and I am trying to figure out the time period in which 
women wore the MOST undergarments... as in number of items and/or heaviest. I 
think I read somewhere that at their height women were wearing 19 pounds of 
undergarments under their dresses. But I can't find that definitively. I know 
you specialize in more middle ages stuff... (or medieval?) but since costumery 
is an area of interest I thought it might be something you'd know a little bit 
about. 
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Era with Heaviest undergarmants - TV query

2011-09-02 Thread Cin
I'd ditto the 1840  very early 50s just before the hoop comes in.
For a particularly unique example, Queen Victoria, when she was very
young, commented on the excess weight of her parlementary robes.

That said, I'm also going to put in a bid for late Elizabethan court
style in drum farthingales as the 2nd runner-up.  I know  some of you
are gonna poo-poo this, but with a velvet or satin kirtle  skirts,
all of which is fully lined sometimes, interfaced, guarded,
embroidered in metal  beaded to a fair-thee-well. Even the precious
metal embroidery is heavy.  It's how embroiderers were paid, in many
cases, by weight of the metal applied.  Then. once those beaded outer
skirts  jewels  things get tossed on the drum, we're talking heavy.

I supposed much of it matters as to where you draw the definitional
line of undergarments. Kirtles, even those with portions meant to be
seen are under open gowns, loose gowns are, by some lights,
underwear.

Whatever the answer, it's a pretty silly question. You can pretty much
find exceptionalism anywhere or anywhen you look for it.  Does mean
that the rank  file wore it.  And while it's an amusing question for
costumers, the answer really isnt much use either.
--cin
Cynthia Barnes
cinbar...@gmail.com



On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 8:14 AM, penhal...@juno.com penhal...@juno.com wrote:
 I would say that the early Victorian period especially the late 1840's would 
 be the heaviest era for undergarments. By that time the corset was 
 re-emerging as a longer, more heavily boned object and ladies wore lots of 
 underskirts/petticoats to achieve the bell skirted look which was in fashion. 
 If I remember my readings correctly (at work and away from my books) a really 
 fashionable woman might wear upwards of 15 skirts. When the crinoline was 
 introduced in the 1850's it was hailed as a liberator becuase women could go 
 without the weight and encumbrance of all the petticoats. Karen 
 DezomaSeamstrix

 -- Original Message --
 From: Chris Harrison ch...@yahoo.com
 To: h-costume@mail.indra.com h-costume@mail.indra.com
 Subject: [h-cost] Era with Heaviest undergarmants - TV query
 Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 08:05:17 -0700 (PDT)

 Hello Bay Area Costumers! I loved the costume bazaar last weekend and was 
 delighted to pick up a great Dickens Faire#65533;outfit (and a membership to 
 the group). Now, a question from a friend of mine is a scout/producer for a 
 company that makes tv shows for Discovery, TLC, etc. (see below) 
 Can#65533;anyone help? I don't want to bog down the list with responses if 
 this is really basic, so feel free to email me off the list. Thanks!
 #65533;
 - Forwarded Message -
 From: Shera Jenne sh...@shera.tv
 To: Chris Harrison ch...@yahoo.com
 Sent: Friday, September 2, 2011 6:57 AM
 Subject: Advice

 Hey there Chris!
 Wish you were near. I have so many things to ask you! ha ha.

 Do you know anything about Victorian undergarments? Weird question, huh. I am 
 writing up a proposal and I am trying to figure out the time period in which 
 women wore the MOST undergarments... as in number of items and/or heaviest. I 
 think I read somewhere that at their height women were wearing 19 pounds of 
 undergarments under their dresses. But I can't find that definitively. I know 
 you specialize in more middle ages stuff... (or medieval?) but since 
 costumery is an area of interest I thought it might be something you'd know a 
 little bit about.
 ___
 h-costume mailing list
 h-costume@mail.indra.com
 http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
 
 57-Year-Old Mom Looks 25
 Mom Reveals $5 Wrinkle Trick That Has Angered Doctors!
 http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4e60f32ebb48b110d5bst05duc
 ___
 h-costume mailing list
 h-costume@mail.indra.com
 http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume