RE: [Help] How can I use haproxy with ssl

2013-12-27 Thread Lukas Tribus
Hi,


 My Linux is
 [...]
 Description: CentOS release 5.10 (Final)
 [...]
 and Installed openssl-1.0.1e

Please decide now: would you like to use the openssl from your
repository or do you want to build it on your own? There is no
point in troubleshooting 2 different problems at the same time.

Please always respond to the mailing list.




Regards,

Lukas 

example of agent-check ?

2013-12-27 Thread Simon Drake
Hi Guys,

I have been looking at the agent-check functionality.

I started out using windows agent, trunked haproxy code and the config
example from Malcolm Turnbull here :
http://blog.loadbalancer.org/open-source-windows-service-for-reporting-server-load-back-to-haproxy-load-balancer-feedback-agent/

However I saw the agent-check had been added to the latest build 1.5-dev21,
so I have started using that.However the config example doesn't seem to
want to work with the latest official


* build. Haproxy doesnt moan about the config, but it doesnt seem to be
using the check or logging any information about it.*


*Would it be possible to post an example showing the correct haproxy config
to use with the agent-check.*


*By the way I saw the mailing list post recently about the changes to the
agent-check, using state and percentage, and I think that the right way to
go.*


*Thanks for your help and a great haproxy.*
*Simon *


Re: example of agent-check ?

2013-12-27 Thread PiBa-NL

Simon Drake schreef op 27-12-2013 17:07:

/

/
/Would it be possible to post an example showing the correct haproxy 
config to use with the agent-check.


/
/By the way I saw the mailing list post recently about the changes to 
the agent-check, using state and percentage, and I think that the 
right way to go./

For me this config works:
serverMyServer 192.168.0.40:80  check inter 5000 
agent-check agent-inter  agent-port 2123  weight 32


I've tried a few small tests with it, and while bringing a server to 
'down' or 'drain' seemed to work, i was missing the 'up' keyword, only 
100% seems to bring a server back alive. So if your monitoring 
100-%CPUusage and sending that 1on1 back to the agent on a server with 
99% cpu capacity available wont come back up..