Re: Information Required For PostgreSQL HA
there might be professional paid services how to migrate to F5. but I'm afraid it is wrong place to ask for such kind of services. чт, 19 янв. 2023 г. в 13:07, Willy Tarreau : > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 06:40:30AM +, Zahid Haseeb wrote: > > ENVIRONMENT DETAIL > > We have setup high availability environment for KONG API Gateway > product. We > > used two kong applications and two postgresql databases and placed a > haproxy > > load balancer between kong application and postgresql database. Every > product > > used in this environment is opensource. Now we want to replace only > > opensource haproxy product with an existing fortigate/F5 load balancer > > instead of haproxy. Is it possible. please advise > > That's probably one of the funniest request we've received here in many > years :-) > > You're basically asking those who make the product that you use if you > can replace it with another product they don't know, and this, without > even any detail on your config so that even if some participants here > would have knowledge on multiple products, they wouldn't be able to > respond. Also, you should be aware that members of this list tend to > value opensource, so explaining that you want to replace your opensource > product with a proprietary one is not going to give you a lot of help > I'm afraid. > > Good luck in your fun adventures anyway! And if you manage to do it, > do not forget to document it publicly, explaining what that would > bring you, beyond paying for something you previously had for free! > > Willy > >
Re: Information Required For PostgreSQL HA
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 06:40:30AM +, Zahid Haseeb wrote: > ENVIRONMENT DETAIL > We have setup high availability environment for KONG API Gateway product. We > used two kong applications and two postgresql databases and placed a haproxy > load balancer between kong application and postgresql database. Every product > used in this environment is opensource. Now we want to replace only > opensource haproxy product with an existing fortigate/F5 load balancer > instead of haproxy. Is it possible. please advise That's probably one of the funniest request we've received here in many years :-) You're basically asking those who make the product that you use if you can replace it with another product they don't know, and this, without even any detail on your config so that even if some participants here would have knowledge on multiple products, they wouldn't be able to respond. Also, you should be aware that members of this list tend to value opensource, so explaining that you want to replace your opensource product with a proprietary one is not going to give you a lot of help I'm afraid. Good luck in your fun adventures anyway! And if you manage to do it, do not forget to document it publicly, explaining what that would bring you, beyond paying for something you previously had for free! Willy
Information Required For PostgreSQL HA
ENVIRONMENT DETAIL We have setup high availability environment for KONG API Gateway product. We used two kong applications and two postgresql databases and placed a haproxy load balancer between kong application and postgresql database. Every product used in this environment is opensource. Now we want to replace only opensource haproxy product with an existing fortigate/F5 load balancer instead of haproxy. Is it possible. please advise
Re: Support arbitrary PROXY protocol v2 TLVs as samples
Hi again, I checked my patch file from a few weeks ago using the recommended checkpatch.pl [1] and realized that the indentation was off as well as some other small things. To make this easier to review, I fixed all the issues mentioned by checkpatch (except for editing MAINTAINERS, I don't think we're quite there yet). The implementation was not changed. Apologies for not checking this earlier. Please let me know if there's anything else I can do. Regards, Johannes [1] http://www.haproxy.org/coding-style.html 0001-wip-MINOR-proxy_protocol-add-tlv-value-captures.patch Description: 0001-wip-MINOR-proxy_protocol-add-tlv-value-captures.patch
