Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-08 Thread wren ng thornton

Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:

Thomas Schilling nomin...@googlemail.com writes:


http://i.imgur.com/kFqP3.png   Didn't know about CSS's rgba to
describe transparency.  Very useful.


It's a vely nice!! (in a Borat voice)


+1. Both for the design, and for the content.

--
Live well,
~wren
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-07 Thread Iavor Diatchki
Hi everyone,

thanks for your efforts to improve the site!  To be honest, I don't
really like the current design, so here are some suggestions that
might help:

* I find the color scheme a bit bleak;  I'd prefer something more colorful.
* Some graphics might improve the overall style.
* We need to be more consistent in the use of fonts: the current
design has text in almost all combinations of blue, black, orange,
bold, italic, and normal, and at least 3 different font sizes.  This
makes the page complex and somewhat disorganized.
* I realized that this is just a mock-up but there seems to be a lot
of duplication in the content (e.g., multiple links to the Haskell
platform, online interpreter, hackage, GHC).  Avoiding unnecessary
duplication might lead to a simpler and more organized page.
* It would be nice if the page layout provided more visual cues to
separate the bits of the page that are likely to change a lot (e.g.,
news  events) from the more static bits (e.g., downloads,
documentation, community resources, etc.).  Perhaps the more static
bits could be factored into some kind of menu?

Hope that this helps,
-Iavor




On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Antoine Latter aslat...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Thomas Schilling
 nomin...@googlemail.com wrote:
 Ok, last revision for tonight:  http://i.imgur.com/d3ARq.png

 I'm no web design guru, but this is definitely better than what we
 have now. Good job on it.

 Antoine
 ___
 Haskell-Cafe mailing list
 Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-07 Thread Thomas Davie

On 7 Apr 2010, at 02:53, Ben Millwood wrote:

 On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:22 AM, Thomas Schilling
 nomin...@googlemail.com wrote:
 I have
 set a maximum width on purpose so that it doesn't degrade too badly on
 big screens.
 
 I've never really trusted this argument - it's not required that the
 browser window occupy the entire screen, so why not let the user
 choose how wide they want their text?

Unfortunately, because the majority operating system has such bad window 
management that all users do make their windows take up the entire screen.

:(

Bob___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-07 Thread Miguel Mitrofanov

Doesn't seem right. IMHO, the necessity of making windows NOT fullscreen is an 
indication of bad design.

Thomas Davie wrote:

On 7 Apr 2010, at 02:53, Ben Millwood wrote:


On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:22 AM, Thomas Schilling
nomin...@googlemail.com wrote:

I have
set a maximum width on purpose so that it doesn't degrade too badly on
big screens.

I've never really trusted this argument - it's not required that the
browser window occupy the entire screen, so why not let the user
choose how wide they want their text?


Unfortunately, because the majority operating system has such bad window 
management that all users do make their windows take up the entire screen.

:(

Bob___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-07 Thread Neil Brown

Thomas Schilling wrote:

Here's a matching Wiki style:  http://i.imgur.com/XkuzH.png

  


I like your designs (I liked the blue and orange version, but all the 
colour schemes seem fine).


For the wiki design, it would be good to re-think and cull those links 
at the top of the page.  For example, I don't think that random page 
needs to be in the top bar.  With several other links it's not clear to 
me what they do.  Perhaps it's just me, but wiki community and 
special pages doesn't suggest what they do or why I would want to 
click them, and related changes also puzzles me as to what it might 
be.  The recent changes and page history links seem redundant.


The Haskell wiki has some useful content but the pages are cluttered 
with these links.  Simply removing a few of these links (while we're 
redesigning the site anyway) would enhance the pages' usability.


Thanks,

Neil.



___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-07 Thread Magnus Therning
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:12, Neil Brown nc...@kent.ac.uk wrote:
 For the wiki design, it would be good to re-think and cull those links at
 the top of the page.  For example, I don't think that random page needs to
 be in the top bar.  With several other links it's not clear to me what they
 do.  Perhaps it's just me, but wiki community and special pages doesn't
 suggest what they do or why I would want to click them, and related
 changes also puzzles me as to what it might be.  The recent changes and
 page history links seem redundant.

Special pages is rather useful for administrators, but not *that*
useful for regular users I guess.  Would it be possible to put it
easily accessible for administrators (people who are allowed to add
users), but hide it away a bit for non-admins?

/M

-- 
Magnus Therning(OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus@therning.org  Jabber: magnus@therning.org
http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-07 Thread Daniel Fischer
Am Mittwoch 07 April 2010 04:09:17 schrieb Gregory Crosswhite:
 While I think that (d) is a valid concern, it is also important not to
 let the perfect be the enemy of the good.  If we agree that the proposed
 web site layout is sufficiently better than the current one and is good
 enough aesthetically, then I think we should go ahead and switch to the
 new layout and *then* start thinking about how we could make it

Good plan.

 *completely amazing* like the Ruby web site,

www.ruby-lang.org ?

Sure, that looks pretty good, but completely amazing?

 because if we demand
 completely amazing for our *first* try then I fear that all that will
 happen is that nothing will change because the bar will have been set
 too high.

 Cheers,
 Greg

___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-07 Thread Thomas Schilling
Yup, I have to agree.  The Ruby web site certainly is the best web
site for a programming language that I've come across, but it's
certainly not amazing.  I like the python documentation design, but
their home page is a bit dull.  Anyway, here's another variation, this
time with more colour:

http://i.imgur.com/Lj3xM.png

The image is about 80k (while the website alone is  10k) so I hope
there won't be any bandwidth issues.  Regarding the particular
contents:

  (a) I won't post another version for every tiny wibble.  You know,
you can actually post text via email (yes, really!) so if anyone has
improvements for how the sections should look like, post the suggested
alternative contents on this list.

  (b) A little redundancy is no problem at all.  I try to follow the
inverted pyramid model: put all the important information at the top,
and add more details below.  If that leads to a small amount of
duplication so be it.

  (c) As mentioned before, we don't want a perfect home page, we
simply want a better one.  Incremental improvements can be made later
on.

  (d) Who actually *can* update the homepage?  Ian, Ross, Malcolm, Simon M?

  (e) I don't have an iPhone, *Droid, or iPad, so I'd need some help
testing on any of those.

  (f) The design is not fixed width, and most sizes are specified in
terms of font size or percentages.  I merely added a max-width
restriction so that it still looks decent on maximised screens.  I
tried to remove it, but that just doesn't look good anymore.

On 7 April 2010 14:19, Daniel Fischer daniel.is.fisc...@web.de wrote:
 Am Mittwoch 07 April 2010 04:09:17 schrieb Gregory Crosswhite:
 While I think that (d) is a valid concern, it is also important not to
 let the perfect be the enemy of the good.  If we agree that the proposed
 web site layout is sufficiently better than the current one and is good
 enough aesthetically, then I think we should go ahead and switch to the
 new layout and *then* start thinking about how we could make it

 Good plan.

 *completely amazing* like the Ruby web site,

 www.ruby-lang.org ?

 Sure, that looks pretty good, but completely amazing?

 because if we demand
 completely amazing for our *first* try then I fear that all that will
 happen is that nothing will change because the bar will have been set
 too high.

 Cheers,
 Greg

 ___
 Haskell-Cafe mailing list
 Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe




-- 
Push the envelope.  Watch it bend.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-07 Thread Daniel Fischer
Am Mittwoch 07 April 2010 18:53:28 schrieb Thomas Schilling:
 Yup, I have to agree.  The Ruby web site certainly is the best web
 site for a programming language that I've come across, but it's
 certainly not amazing.  I like the python documentation design, but
 their home page is a bit dull.

Agreed. But I prefer dull over too flashy, so don't exaggerate.

 Anyway, here's another variation, this time with more colour:

 http://i.imgur.com/Lj3xM.png

Not bad, but the black background for the Haskell is an advanced ... 
blurb is ugly. Having the text directly on the background image would be 
better, I think.


   (b) A little redundancy is no problem at all.  I try to follow the
 inverted pyramid model: put all the important information at the top,
 and add more details below.  If that leads to a small amount of
 duplication so be it.

+1 A little redundancy can be a great help sometimes, just keep an eye on 
the amount of duplication.


   (c) As mentioned before, we don't want a perfect home page, we
 simply want a better one.  Incremental improvements can be made later
 on.


Again: Aye, very much so.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-07 Thread Gregory Crosswhite
Ooo, I really like this revision;  it is a major improvement in your design!  I 
particularly like the picture you chose for the top, and the new way that you 
have laid out all of the boxes and made the bottom right box a different shade 
so that it is easier to distinguish it as a different column.  Also, I concur 
with your use of the inverted pyramid model, even if it comes at the expense 
of a little redundancy.

My only quibble is that I don't like the fact that the summary text at the top 
has a font background color, so that there are in essence several boxes around 
the text of different sizes and with space in between the lines.  I recognize 
that the purpose of the font background was to help the text contrast with the 
picture behind it, but it would be nicer if there were a better solution, such 
as by putting a box around all of the text and then filling that with color (so 
there aren't boxes of different sizes containing the text and empty spaces 
between the lines), or by putting a translucent box around the text so that we 
can still see the background but it's faded a bit so that the text still shows 
up.

Cheers,
Greg

On Apr 7, 2010, at 9:53 AM, Thomas Schilling wrote:

 Yup, I have to agree.  The Ruby web site certainly is the best web
 site for a programming language that I've come across, but it's
 certainly not amazing.  I like the python documentation design, but
 their home page is a bit dull.  Anyway, here's another variation, this
 time with more colour:
 
 http://i.imgur.com/Lj3xM.png
 
 The image is about 80k (while the website alone is  10k) so I hope
 there won't be any bandwidth issues.  Regarding the particular
 contents:
 
  (a) I won't post another version for every tiny wibble.  You know,
 you can actually post text via email (yes, really!) so if anyone has
 improvements for how the sections should look like, post the suggested
 alternative contents on this list.
 
  (b) A little redundancy is no problem at all.  I try to follow the
 inverted pyramid model: put all the important information at the top,
 and add more details below.  If that leads to a small amount of
 duplication so be it.
 
  (c) As mentioned before, we don't want a perfect home page, we
 simply want a better one.  Incremental improvements can be made later
 on.
 
  (d) Who actually *can* update the homepage?  Ian, Ross, Malcolm, Simon M?
 
  (e) I don't have an iPhone, *Droid, or iPad, so I'd need some help
 testing on any of those.
 
  (f) The design is not fixed width, and most sizes are specified in
 terms of font size or percentages.  I merely added a max-width
 restriction so that it still looks decent on maximised screens.  I
 tried to remove it, but that just doesn't look good anymore.
 
 On 7 April 2010 14:19, Daniel Fischer daniel.is.fisc...@web.de wrote:
 Am Mittwoch 07 April 2010 04:09:17 schrieb Gregory Crosswhite:
 While I think that (d) is a valid concern, it is also important not to
 let the perfect be the enemy of the good.  If we agree that the proposed
 web site layout is sufficiently better than the current one and is good
 enough aesthetically, then I think we should go ahead and switch to the
 new layout and *then* start thinking about how we could make it
 
 Good plan.
 
 *completely amazing* like the Ruby web site,
 
 www.ruby-lang.org ?
 
 Sure, that looks pretty good, but completely amazing?
 
 because if we demand
 completely amazing for our *first* try then I fear that all that will
 happen is that nothing will change because the bar will have been set
 too high.
 
 Cheers,
 Greg
 
 ___
 Haskell-Cafe mailing list
 Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Push the envelope.  Watch it bend.
 ___
 Haskell-Cafe mailing list
 Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


[Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-07 Thread Simon Michael

On 4/7/10 9:53 AM, Thomas Schilling wrote:

Yup, I have to agree.  The Ruby web site certainly is the best web
site for a programming language that I've come across, but it's
certainly not amazing.  I like the python documentation design, but
their home page is a bit dull.  Anyway, here's another variation, this
time with more colour:

http://i.imgur.com/Lj3xM.png


This is not as simple as your first which I responded to, but it's rather nice!

Quibbles, I would try to:

- make the brown image full width, like the page header - re-establish the 
clear top and bottom division

- lose or deemphasize as much as possible the blue background of the blurb text - I know why it's there but it's way 
ugly at present


- lose the italics in the blurb text, or make it all italic

- bring back the serif font ?

___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-07 Thread Thomas Schilling
http://i.imgur.com/kFqP3.png   Didn't know about CSS's rgba to
describe transparency.  Very useful.

On 7 April 2010 18:19, Gregory Crosswhite gcr...@phys.washington.edu wrote:
 Ooo, I really like this revision;  it is a major improvement in your design!  
 I particularly like the picture you chose for the top, and the new way that 
 you have laid out all of the boxes and made the bottom right box a different 
 shade so that it is easier to distinguish it as a different column.  Also, I 
 concur with your use of the inverted pyramid model, even if it comes at the 
 expense of a little redundancy.

 My only quibble is that I don't like the fact that the summary text at the 
 top has a font background color, so that there are in essence several boxes 
 around the text of different sizes and with space in between the lines.  I 
 recognize that the purpose of the font background was to help the text 
 contrast with the picture behind it, but it would be nicer if there were a 
 better solution, such as by putting a box around all of the text and then 
 filling that with color (so there aren't boxes of different sizes containing 
 the text and empty spaces between the lines), or by putting a translucent box 
 around the text so that we can still see the background but it's faded a bit 
 so that the text still shows up.

 Cheers,
 Greg

 On Apr 7, 2010, at 9:53 AM, Thomas Schilling wrote:

 Yup, I have to agree.  The Ruby web site certainly is the best web
 site for a programming language that I've come across, but it's
 certainly not amazing.  I like the python documentation design, but
 their home page is a bit dull.  Anyway, here's another variation, this
 time with more colour:

 http://i.imgur.com/Lj3xM.png

 The image is about 80k (while the website alone is  10k) so I hope
 there won't be any bandwidth issues.  Regarding the particular
 contents:

  (a) I won't post another version for every tiny wibble.  You know,
 you can actually post text via email (yes, really!) so if anyone has
 improvements for how the sections should look like, post the suggested
 alternative contents on this list.

  (b) A little redundancy is no problem at all.  I try to follow the
 inverted pyramid model: put all the important information at the top,
 and add more details below.  If that leads to a small amount of
 duplication so be it.

  (c) As mentioned before, we don't want a perfect home page, we
 simply want a better one.  Incremental improvements can be made later
 on.

  (d) Who actually *can* update the homepage?  Ian, Ross, Malcolm, Simon M?

  (e) I don't have an iPhone, *Droid, or iPad, so I'd need some help
 testing on any of those.

  (f) The design is not fixed width, and most sizes are specified in
 terms of font size or percentages.  I merely added a max-width
 restriction so that it still looks decent on maximised screens.  I
 tried to remove it, but that just doesn't look good anymore.

 On 7 April 2010 14:19, Daniel Fischer daniel.is.fisc...@web.de wrote:
 Am Mittwoch 07 April 2010 04:09:17 schrieb Gregory Crosswhite:
 While I think that (d) is a valid concern, it is also important not to
 let the perfect be the enemy of the good.  If we agree that the proposed
 web site layout is sufficiently better than the current one and is good
 enough aesthetically, then I think we should go ahead and switch to the
 new layout and *then* start thinking about how we could make it

 Good plan.

 *completely amazing* like the Ruby web site,

 www.ruby-lang.org ?

 Sure, that looks pretty good, but completely amazing?

 because if we demand
 completely amazing for our *first* try then I fear that all that will
 happen is that nothing will change because the bar will have been set
 too high.

 Cheers,
 Greg

 ___
 Haskell-Cafe mailing list
 Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe




 --
 Push the envelope.  Watch it bend.
 ___
 Haskell-Cafe mailing list
 Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe





-- 
Push the envelope.  Watch it bend.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-07 Thread John Van Enk
Hot.

On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Thomas Schilling nomin...@googlemail.comwrote:

 http://i.imgur.com/kFqP3.png   Didn't know about CSS's rgba to
 describe transparency.  Very useful.

 On 7 April 2010 18:19, Gregory Crosswhite gcr...@phys.washington.edu
 wrote:
  Ooo, I really like this revision;  it is a major improvement in your
 design!  I particularly like the picture you chose for the top, and the new
 way that you have laid out all of the boxes and made the bottom right box a
 different shade so that it is easier to distinguish it as a different
 column.  Also, I concur with your use of the inverted pyramid model, even
 if it comes at the expense of a little redundancy.
 
  My only quibble is that I don't like the fact that the summary text at
 the top has a font background color, so that there are in essence several
 boxes around the text of different sizes and with space in between the
 lines.  I recognize that the purpose of the font background was to help the
 text contrast with the picture behind it, but it would be nicer if there
 were a better solution, such as by putting a box around all of the text and
 then filling that with color (so there aren't boxes of different sizes
 containing the text and empty spaces between the lines), or by putting a
 translucent box around the text so that we can still see the background but
 it's faded a bit so that the text still shows up.
 
  Cheers,
  Greg
 
  On Apr 7, 2010, at 9:53 AM, Thomas Schilling wrote:
 
  Yup, I have to agree.  The Ruby web site certainly is the best web
  site for a programming language that I've come across, but it's
  certainly not amazing.  I like the python documentation design, but
  their home page is a bit dull.  Anyway, here's another variation, this
  time with more colour:
 
  http://i.imgur.com/Lj3xM.png
 
  The image is about 80k (while the website alone is  10k) so I hope
  there won't be any bandwidth issues.  Regarding the particular
  contents:
 
   (a) I won't post another version for every tiny wibble.  You know,
  you can actually post text via email (yes, really!) so if anyone has
  improvements for how the sections should look like, post the suggested
  alternative contents on this list.
 
   (b) A little redundancy is no problem at all.  I try to follow the
  inverted pyramid model: put all the important information at the top,
  and add more details below.  If that leads to a small amount of
  duplication so be it.
 
   (c) As mentioned before, we don't want a perfect home page, we
  simply want a better one.  Incremental improvements can be made later
  on.
 
   (d) Who actually *can* update the homepage?  Ian, Ross, Malcolm, Simon
 M?
 
   (e) I don't have an iPhone, *Droid, or iPad, so I'd need some help
  testing on any of those.
 
   (f) The design is not fixed width, and most sizes are specified in
  terms of font size or percentages.  I merely added a max-width
  restriction so that it still looks decent on maximised screens.  I
  tried to remove it, but that just doesn't look good anymore.
 
  On 7 April 2010 14:19, Daniel Fischer daniel.is.fisc...@web.de wrote:
  Am Mittwoch 07 April 2010 04:09:17 schrieb Gregory Crosswhite:
  While I think that (d) is a valid concern, it is also important not to
  let the perfect be the enemy of the good.  If we agree that the
 proposed
  web site layout is sufficiently better than the current one and is
 good
  enough aesthetically, then I think we should go ahead and switch to
 the
  new layout and *then* start thinking about how we could make it
 
  Good plan.
 
  *completely amazing* like the Ruby web site,
 
  www.ruby-lang.org ?
 
  Sure, that looks pretty good, but completely amazing?
 
  because if we demand
  completely amazing for our *first* try then I fear that all that will
  happen is that nothing will change because the bar will have been set
  too high.
 
  Cheers,
  Greg
 
  ___
  Haskell-Cafe mailing list
  Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
  http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
 
 
 
 
  --
  Push the envelope.  Watch it bend.
  ___
  Haskell-Cafe mailing list
  Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
  http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
 
 



 --
 Push the envelope.  Watch it bend.
 ___
 Haskell-Cafe mailing list
 Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


[Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-07 Thread Johannes Waldmann
Ivan Miljenovic ivan.miljenovic at gmail.com writes:

 I hate websites/blogs/etc. that only take up a fraction of the
 screen width 

+1

Although this battle seems lost.

Web 2.0 is actually a synonym for useless whitespace right and left. 

J.W.


___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-07 Thread Gregory Crosswhite
Nicely done!

On Apr 7, 2010, at 11:35 AM, Thomas Schilling wrote:

 http://i.imgur.com/kFqP3.png   Didn't know about CSS's rgba to
 describe transparency.  Very useful.
 
 On 7 April 2010 18:19, Gregory Crosswhite gcr...@phys.washington.edu wrote:
 Ooo, I really like this revision;  it is a major improvement in your design! 
  I particularly like the picture you chose for the top, and the new way that 
 you have laid out all of the boxes and made the bottom right box a different 
 shade so that it is easier to distinguish it as a different column.  Also, I 
 concur with your use of the inverted pyramid model, even if it comes at 
 the expense of a little redundancy.
 
 My only quibble is that I don't like the fact that the summary text at the 
 top has a font background color, so that there are in essence several boxes 
 around the text of different sizes and with space in between the lines.  I 
 recognize that the purpose of the font background was to help the text 
 contrast with the picture behind it, but it would be nicer if there were a 
 better solution, such as by putting a box around all of the text and then 
 filling that with color (so there aren't boxes of different sizes containing 
 the text and empty spaces between the lines), or by putting a translucent 
 box around the text so that we can still see the background but it's faded a 
 bit so that the text still shows up.
 
 Cheers,
 Greg
 
 On Apr 7, 2010, at 9:53 AM, Thomas Schilling wrote:
 
 Yup, I have to agree.  The Ruby web site certainly is the best web
 site for a programming language that I've come across, but it's
 certainly not amazing.  I like the python documentation design, but
 their home page is a bit dull.  Anyway, here's another variation, this
 time with more colour:
 
 http://i.imgur.com/Lj3xM.png
 
 The image is about 80k (while the website alone is  10k) so I hope
 there won't be any bandwidth issues.  Regarding the particular
 contents:
 
  (a) I won't post another version for every tiny wibble.  You know,
 you can actually post text via email (yes, really!) so if anyone has
 improvements for how the sections should look like, post the suggested
 alternative contents on this list.
 
  (b) A little redundancy is no problem at all.  I try to follow the
 inverted pyramid model: put all the important information at the top,
 and add more details below.  If that leads to a small amount of
 duplication so be it.
 
  (c) As mentioned before, we don't want a perfect home page, we
 simply want a better one.  Incremental improvements can be made later
 on.
 
  (d) Who actually *can* update the homepage?  Ian, Ross, Malcolm, Simon M?
 
  (e) I don't have an iPhone, *Droid, or iPad, so I'd need some help
 testing on any of those.
 
  (f) The design is not fixed width, and most sizes are specified in
 terms of font size or percentages.  I merely added a max-width
 restriction so that it still looks decent on maximised screens.  I
 tried to remove it, but that just doesn't look good anymore.
 
 On 7 April 2010 14:19, Daniel Fischer daniel.is.fisc...@web.de wrote:
 Am Mittwoch 07 April 2010 04:09:17 schrieb Gregory Crosswhite:
 While I think that (d) is a valid concern, it is also important not to
 let the perfect be the enemy of the good.  If we agree that the proposed
 web site layout is sufficiently better than the current one and is good
 enough aesthetically, then I think we should go ahead and switch to the
 new layout and *then* start thinking about how we could make it
 
 Good plan.
 
 *completely amazing* like the Ruby web site,
 
 www.ruby-lang.org ?
 
 Sure, that looks pretty good, but completely amazing?
 
 because if we demand
 completely amazing for our *first* try then I fear that all that will
 happen is that nothing will change because the bar will have been set
 too high.
 
 Cheers,
 Greg
 
 ___
 Haskell-Cafe mailing list
 Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
 
 
 
 
 --
 Push the envelope.  Watch it bend.
 ___
 Haskell-Cafe mailing list
 Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Push the envelope.  Watch it bend.

___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-07 Thread Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
Thomas Schilling nomin...@googlemail.com writes:

 http://i.imgur.com/kFqP3.png   Didn't know about CSS's rgba to
 describe transparency.  Very useful.

It's a vely nice!! (in a Borat voice)

  (e) I don't have an iPhone, *Droid, or iPad, so I'd need some help
 testing on any of those.

I have a Symbian phone, so I can probably help you out there.

-- 
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com
IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-06 Thread Johan Tibell
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Simon Michael si...@joyful.com wrote:
 On 4/2/10 5:28 AM, Thomas Schilling wrote:

 How about something more colourful?

 http://i.imgur.com/7jCPq.png

I really like the simplicity of the Cassandra page:

http://cassandra.apache.org/
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Haskell+Cassandra was: RE: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-06 Thread Dr . Martin Grabmüller
Maybe a bit off-topic, but as Johan mentioned the Cassandra web site...

Are there any Haskellers out there using Cassandra with Haskell?

Thanks,
  Martin

 -Original Message-
 From: haskell-cafe-boun...@haskell.org 
 [mailto:haskell-cafe-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Johan Tibell
 Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 11:36 AM
 To: Simon Michael
 Cc: haskell-cafe@haskell.org
 Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design
 
 On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Simon Michael 
 si...@joyful.com wrote:
  On 4/2/10 5:28 AM, Thomas Schilling wrote:
 
  How about something more colourful?
 
  http://i.imgur.com/7jCPq.png
 
 I really like the simplicity of the Cassandra page:
 
 http://cassandra.apache.org/
 ___
 Haskell-Cafe mailing list
 Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
 
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: Haskell+Cassandra was: RE: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-06 Thread Johan Tibell
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Dr. Martin Grabmüller
martin.grabmuel...@eleven.de wrote:
 Maybe a bit off-topic, but as Johan mentioned the Cassandra web site...

 Are there any Haskellers out there using Cassandra with Haskell?

Not yet but I plan to write a binding for it if I ever get time. :)
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: Haskell+Cassandra was: RE: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-06 Thread Sean Leather
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 11:47, Johan Tibell wrote:

 On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Dr. Martin Grabmüller
 martin.grabmuel...@eleven.de wrote:
  Maybe a bit off-topic, but as Johan mentioned the Cassandra web site...
 
  Are there any Haskellers out there using Cassandra with Haskell?

 Not yet but I plan to write a binding for it if I ever get time. :)


Apparently, somebody used it long enough to write this:
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/cassandra-thrift

Sean
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-06 Thread Thomas Schilling
Well, they make the wannabe-designer mistake of using justified text
in HTML, even worse, for columns just 3 words wide.

The overall layout, is pretty nice though.  It's essentially the
standard Web 2.0 layout (compare http://basecamphq.com/,
http://www.blinksale.com/, http://www.analysis-one.com/, etc.).  The
key design elements are (IMO):

  - Put the important stuff at the top and separate it visually from
the other stuff.  The important things are:  (1) the quick summary
of Haskell, (2) the Get Haskell button, (3) link to Learn Haskell
/ Try Haskell

  - We may have a second row/column of secondary important stuff, like
community, project hosting, more implementations, the top learning
materials, etc. links to Haskell users

  - News, Events, etc. can go further down

I'm not particularly attached to any particulars of my suggested
design.  I just thought I'll try to encourage to move away much
further from the current wiki-like and somewhat dull design.

On 6 April 2010 10:36, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Simon Michael si...@joyful.com wrote:
 On 4/2/10 5:28 AM, Thomas Schilling wrote:

 How about something more colourful?

 http://i.imgur.com/7jCPq.png

 I really like the simplicity of the Cassandra page:

 http://cassandra.apache.org/
 ___
 Haskell-Cafe mailing list
 Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe




-- 
Push the envelope.  Watch it bend.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-06 Thread Daniel Peebles
I'm definitely not a design/color person, but has anyone considered using
kuler.adobe.com as a source of nice color schemes, since we seem to have
an issue coming up with attractive combinations?

On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Thomas Schilling nomin...@googlemail.comwrote:

 Well, they make the wannabe-designer mistake of using justified text
 in HTML, even worse, for columns just 3 words wide.

 The overall layout, is pretty nice though.  It's essentially the
 standard Web 2.0 layout (compare http://basecamphq.com/,
 http://www.blinksale.com/, http://www.analysis-one.com/, etc.).  The
 key design elements are (IMO):

  - Put the important stuff at the top and separate it visually from
 the other stuff.  The important things are:  (1) the quick summary
 of Haskell, (2) the Get Haskell button, (3) link to Learn Haskell
 / Try Haskell

  - We may have a second row/column of secondary important stuff, like
 community, project hosting, more implementations, the top learning
 materials, etc. links to Haskell users

  - News, Events, etc. can go further down

 I'm not particularly attached to any particulars of my suggested
 design.  I just thought I'll try to encourage to move away much
 further from the current wiki-like and somewhat dull design.

 On 6 April 2010 10:36, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
  On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Simon Michael si...@joyful.com wrote:
  On 4/2/10 5:28 AM, Thomas Schilling wrote:
 
  How about something more colourful?
 
  http://i.imgur.com/7jCPq.png
 
  I really like the simplicity of the Cassandra page:
 
  http://cassandra.apache.org/
  ___
  Haskell-Cafe mailing list
  Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
  http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
 



 --
 Push the envelope.  Watch it bend.
 ___
 Haskell-Cafe mailing list
 Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-06 Thread Thomas Schilling
Well, I used http://www.colorschemedesigner.com/

On 6 April 2010 16:20, Daniel Peebles pumpkin...@gmail.com wrote:
 I'm definitely not a design/color person, but has anyone considered using
 kuler.adobe.com as a source of nice color schemes, since we seem to have
 an issue coming up with attractive combinations?

 On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Thomas Schilling nomin...@googlemail.com
 wrote:

 Well, they make the wannabe-designer mistake of using justified text
 in HTML, even worse, for columns just 3 words wide.

 The overall layout, is pretty nice though.  It's essentially the
 standard Web 2.0 layout (compare http://basecamphq.com/,
 http://www.blinksale.com/, http://www.analysis-one.com/, etc.).  The
 key design elements are (IMO):

  - Put the important stuff at the top and separate it visually from
 the other stuff.  The important things are:  (1) the quick summary
 of Haskell, (2) the Get Haskell button, (3) link to Learn Haskell
 / Try Haskell

  - We may have a second row/column of secondary important stuff, like
 community, project hosting, more implementations, the top learning
 materials, etc. links to Haskell users

  - News, Events, etc. can go further down

 I'm not particularly attached to any particulars of my suggested
 design.  I just thought I'll try to encourage to move away much
 further from the current wiki-like and somewhat dull design.

 On 6 April 2010 10:36, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
  On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Simon Michael si...@joyful.com wrote:
  On 4/2/10 5:28 AM, Thomas Schilling wrote:
 
  How about something more colourful?
 
  http://i.imgur.com/7jCPq.png
 
  I really like the simplicity of the Cassandra page:
 
  http://cassandra.apache.org/
  ___
  Haskell-Cafe mailing list
  Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
  http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
 



 --
 Push the envelope.  Watch it bend.
 ___
 Haskell-Cafe mailing list
 Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe





-- 
Push the envelope.  Watch it bend.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-06 Thread Jeff Heard

There's colourlovers.com as well



On Apr 6, 2010, at 12:41 PM, Thomas Schilling  
nomin...@googlemail.com wrote:



Well, I used http://www.colorschemedesigner.com/

On 6 April 2010 16:20, Daniel Peebles pumpkin...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm definitely not a design/color person, but has anyone considered  
using
kuler.adobe.com as a source of nice color schemes, since we seem  
to have

an issue coming up with attractive combinations?

On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Thomas Schilling nomin...@googlemail.com 


wrote:


Well, they make the wannabe-designer mistake of using justified text
in HTML, even worse, for columns just 3 words wide.

The overall layout, is pretty nice though.  It's essentially the
standard Web 2.0 layout (compare http://basecamphq.com/,
http://www.blinksale.com/, http://www.analysis-one.com/, etc.).  The
key design elements are (IMO):

 - Put the important stuff at the top and separate it visually from
the other stuff.  The important things are:  (1) the quick summary
of Haskell, (2) the Get Haskell button, (3) link to Learn  
Haskell

/ Try Haskell

 - We may have a second row/column of secondary important stuff,  
like

community, project hosting, more implementations, the top learning
materials, etc. links to Haskell users

 - News, Events, etc. can go further down

I'm not particularly attached to any particulars of my suggested
design.  I just thought I'll try to encourage to move away much
further from the current wiki-like and somewhat dull design.

On 6 April 2010 10:36, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Simon Michael si...@joyful.com  
wrote:

On 4/2/10 5:28 AM, Thomas Schilling wrote:


How about something more colourful?

http://i.imgur.com/7jCPq.png


I really like the simplicity of the Cassandra page:

http://cassandra.apache.org/
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe





--
Push the envelope.  Watch it bend.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe







--
Push the envelope.  Watch it bend.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-06 Thread Thomas Schilling
Another attempt:  http://i.imgur.com/ENvl7.png

On 6 April 2010 10:36, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Simon Michael si...@joyful.com wrote:
 On 4/2/10 5:28 AM, Thomas Schilling wrote:

 How about something more colourful?

 http://i.imgur.com/7jCPq.png

 I really like the simplicity of the Cassandra page:

 http://cassandra.apache.org/
 ___
 Haskell-Cafe mailing list
 Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe




-- 
Push the envelope.  Watch it bend.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-06 Thread Max Bolingbroke
This is a very nice design. However shouldn't other pages e.g. the
wiki template be redesigning to match as well? If this is not going to
happen, then I would almost prefer sticking to the current design for
consistency's sake.

On 6 April 2010 20:11, Thomas Schilling nomin...@googlemail.com wrote:
 Another attempt:  http://i.imgur.com/ENvl7.png

 On 6 April 2010 10:36, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Simon Michael si...@joyful.com wrote:
 On 4/2/10 5:28 AM, Thomas Schilling wrote:

 How about something more colourful?

 http://i.imgur.com/7jCPq.png

 I really like the simplicity of the Cassandra page:

 http://cassandra.apache.org/
 ___
 Haskell-Cafe mailing list
 Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe




 --
 Push the envelope.  Watch it bend.
 ___
 Haskell-Cafe mailing list
 Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-06 Thread Thomas Schilling
Here's a matching Wiki style:  http://i.imgur.com/XkuzH.png

On 6 April 2010 20:35, Max Bolingbroke batterseapo...@hotmail.com wrote:
 This is a very nice design. However shouldn't other pages e.g. the
 wiki template be redesigning to match as well? If this is not going to
 happen, then I would almost prefer sticking to the current design for
 consistency's sake.

 On 6 April 2010 20:11, Thomas Schilling nomin...@googlemail.com wrote:
 Another attempt:  http://i.imgur.com/ENvl7.png

 On 6 April 2010 10:36, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Simon Michael si...@joyful.com wrote:
 On 4/2/10 5:28 AM, Thomas Schilling wrote:

 How about something more colourful?

 http://i.imgur.com/7jCPq.png

 I really like the simplicity of the Cassandra page:

 http://cassandra.apache.org/
 ___
 Haskell-Cafe mailing list
 Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe




 --
 Push the envelope.  Watch it bend.
 ___
 Haskell-Cafe mailing list
 Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe






-- 
Push the envelope.  Watch it bend.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-06 Thread Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
Thomas Schilling nomin...@googlemail.com writes:

 Another attempt:  http://i.imgur.com/ENvl7.png

I like the layout, but hate the colour scheme.

-- 
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com
IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-06 Thread Thomas Schilling
On 6 April 2010 22:39, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thomas Schilling nomin...@googlemail.com writes:

 Another attempt:  http://i.imgur.com/ENvl7.png

 I like the layout, but hate the colour scheme.

Wow, hate is a very strong word.  In any case, though, I'm pretty
sure it'll be impossible to please everyone.  FWIW, I used this:
http://www.colourlovers.com/palette/694737/Thought_Provoking

If we can agree on the general layout, though, I can create some
colour scheme variants.  I know this stuff is very subjective, but I
would appreciate constructive feedback.

/ Thomas
-- 
Push the envelope.  Watch it bend.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-06 Thread Ivan Miljenovic
On 7 April 2010 08:40, Thomas Schilling nomin...@googlemail.com wrote:
 On 6 April 2010 22:39, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 I like the layout, but hate the colour scheme.

 Wow, hate is a very strong word.

OK, I dislike the colour scheme.  Happy now? ;-)

-- 
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com
IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-06 Thread Thomas Schilling
On 7 April 2010 00:57, Ivan Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 7 April 2010 08:40, Thomas Schilling nomin...@googlemail.com wrote:
 On 6 April 2010 22:39, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 I like the layout, but hate the colour scheme.

 Wow, hate is a very strong word.

 OK, I dislike the colour scheme.  Happy now? ;-)

That's still not constructive.  I.e, is it the black, the gray, the orange?

I played around with some more colours, but eg. blue link colour makes
the site feel too cold.  Using more intense colours for the bar at the
top becomes distracting very quickly.  A background other than white
is either hard to read, or highly dependent on the screen.  E.g., a
nice bright beige on one screen can look too yellowish on another
screen.

Anyway, here's something with a bit more colour:  http://i.imgur.com/LpQmH.png

/ Thomas
-- 
Push the envelope.  Watch it bend.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-06 Thread Ivan Miljenovic
On 7 April 2010 10:02, Thomas Schilling nomin...@googlemail.com wrote:
 On 7 April 2010 00:57, Ivan Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
 OK, I dislike the colour scheme.  Happy now? ;-)

 That's still not constructive.  I.e, is it the black, the gray, the orange?

OK, it's the black; it seems a tad too strong for me (the fact that
you have a black theme for your browser probably doesn't help).

 Using more intense colours for the bar at the top becomes distracting very 
 quickly.

How about a more neutral, paler colour?

 Anyway, here's something with a bit more colour:  http://i.imgur.com/LpQmH.png

Apart from the black up the top still, I think this is nicer.
However, maybe the links in the description text up the top are a bit
too obvious...


-- 
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com
IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-06 Thread Gregory Crosswhite
I concur that the latest version with the softer colors looks a lot nicer, and 
I approve of the overall design.  I think that you should go back to using a 
change in the foreground color rather than the background color for the links 
in the main description, since at the moment it looks ugly.  I also think that 
it would look better if you could align the two columns in the top (i.e., the 
description text and the major links above the News and Events section) so 
that they align better with the two columns below;  you could probably also 
have the description text creep into the left margin so that it isn't exactly 
centered over the left column below, if that would look better.

Cheers,
Greg


On Apr 6, 2010, at 5:16 PM, Ivan Miljenovic wrote:

 On 7 April 2010 10:02, Thomas Schilling nomin...@googlemail.com wrote:
 On 7 April 2010 00:57, Ivan Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
 OK, I dislike the colour scheme.  Happy now? ;-)
 
 That's still not constructive.  I.e, is it the black, the gray, the orange?
 
 OK, it's the black; it seems a tad too strong for me (the fact that
 you have a black theme for your browser probably doesn't help).
 
 Using more intense colours for the bar at the top becomes distracting very 
 quickly.
 
 How about a more neutral, paler colour?
 
 Anyway, here's something with a bit more colour:  
 http://i.imgur.com/LpQmH.png
 
 Apart from the black up the top still, I think this is nicer.
 However, maybe the links in the description text up the top are a bit
 too obvious...
 
 
 -- 
 Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
 ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com
 IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com
 ___
 Haskell-Cafe mailing list
 Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-06 Thread Thomas Schilling
Ok, based on both your and Ivan's comments I modified a bit more.

http://i.imgur.com/cumLj.png

Making the top columns and the lower columns the same width looks bad,
but I agree that the large margin between the blurb and the
Documentation headline was too large.
After I changed that, however, the Documentation section and the News
sections did not line up anymore which looked even worse when the news
section had a different background colour.  So instead the background
colour is used for the quicklinks.  Removing any use of a background
colour would makes things too boring, though.
I also swapped the heading colour and the title bar colour.  So
headings are now a very dark blue.

The italic things in the blurb are actually not links (though they
could be).  Without any styling the blurb would look too boring, so
I'm using the same blue that the title bar uses.


On 7 April 2010 01:25, Gregory Crosswhite gcr...@phys.washington.edu wrote:
 I concur that the latest version with the softer colors looks a lot nicer, 
 and I approve of the overall design.  I think that you should go back to 
 using a change in the foreground color rather than the background color for 
 the links in the main description, since at the moment it looks ugly.  I also 
 think that it would look better if you could align the two columns in the top 
 (i.e., the description text and the major links above the News and Events 
 section) so that they align better with the two columns below;  you could 
 probably also have the description text creep into the left margin so that it 
 isn't exactly centered over the left column below, if that would look better.

 Cheers,
 Greg


 On Apr 6, 2010, at 5:16 PM, Ivan Miljenovic wrote:

 On 7 April 2010 10:02, Thomas Schilling nomin...@googlemail.com wrote:
 On 7 April 2010 00:57, Ivan Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
 OK, I dislike the colour scheme.  Happy now? ;-)

 That's still not constructive.  I.e, is it the black, the gray, the orange?

 OK, it's the black; it seems a tad too strong for me (the fact that
 you have a black theme for your browser probably doesn't help).

 Using more intense colours for the bar at the top becomes distracting very 
 quickly.

 How about a more neutral, paler colour?

 Anyway, here's something with a bit more colour:  
 http://i.imgur.com/LpQmH.png

 Apart from the black up the top still, I think this is nicer.
 However, maybe the links in the description text up the top are a bit
 too obvious...


 --
 Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
 ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com
 IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com
 ___
 Haskell-Cafe mailing list
 Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe





-- 
Push the envelope.  Watch it bend.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-06 Thread Ivan Miljenovic
On 7 April 2010 10:49, Thomas Schilling nomin...@googlemail.com wrote:
 http://i.imgur.com/cumLj.png

I wonder... is there any reason why the actual page content is so
narrow compared to the title bar (to allow for small screens)?

 [snip] So headings are now a very dark blue.

 The italic things in the blurb are actually not links (though they
 could be).  Without any styling the blurb would look too boring, so
 I'm using the same blue that the title bar uses.

That's _blue_ ? :O

I was thinking it looked more like Slate Gray or something...

-- 
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com
IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-06 Thread Gregory Crosswhite
Nice!  Is there any way you can enlarge the bottom section so that the box in 
the top-right doesn't look like it is hanging over the side (i.e., having 
whitespace directly below it and to the right of the main text)?  If anything, 
I think that it would look better for the bottom text to extend further right 
than the box at the top than vice versa.

Cheers,
Greg

On Apr 6, 2010, at 5:49 PM, Thomas Schilling wrote:

 Ok, based on both your and Ivan's comments I modified a bit more.
 
 http://i.imgur.com/cumLj.png
 
 Making the top columns and the lower columns the same width looks bad,
 but I agree that the large margin between the blurb and the
 Documentation headline was too large.
 After I changed that, however, the Documentation section and the News
 sections did not line up anymore which looked even worse when the news
 section had a different background colour.  So instead the background
 colour is used for the quicklinks.  Removing any use of a background
 colour would makes things too boring, though.
 I also swapped the heading colour and the title bar colour.  So
 headings are now a very dark blue.
 
 The italic things in the blurb are actually not links (though they
 could be).  Without any styling the blurb would look too boring, so
 I'm using the same blue that the title bar uses.
 
 
 On 7 April 2010 01:25, Gregory Crosswhite gcr...@phys.washington.edu wrote:
 I concur that the latest version with the softer colors looks a lot nicer, 
 and I approve of the overall design.  I think that you should go back to 
 using a change in the foreground color rather than the background color for 
 the links in the main description, since at the moment it looks ugly.  I 
 also think that it would look better if you could align the two columns in 
 the top (i.e., the description text and the major links above the News and 
 Events section) so that they align better with the two columns below;  you 
 could probably also have the description text creep into the left margin so 
 that it isn't exactly centered over the left column below, if that would 
 look better.
 
 Cheers,
 Greg
 
 
 On Apr 6, 2010, at 5:16 PM, Ivan Miljenovic wrote:
 
 On 7 April 2010 10:02, Thomas Schilling nomin...@googlemail.com wrote:
 On 7 April 2010 00:57, Ivan Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
 OK, I dislike the colour scheme.  Happy now? ;-)
 
 That's still not constructive.  I.e, is it the black, the gray, the orange?
 
 OK, it's the black; it seems a tad too strong for me (the fact that
 you have a black theme for your browser probably doesn't help).
 
 Using more intense colours for the bar at the top becomes distracting very 
 quickly.
 
 How about a more neutral, paler colour?
 
 Anyway, here's something with a bit more colour:  
 http://i.imgur.com/LpQmH.png
 
 Apart from the black up the top still, I think this is nicer.
 However, maybe the links in the description text up the top are a bit
 too obvious...
 
 
 --
 Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
 ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com
 IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com
 ___
 Haskell-Cafe mailing list
 Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Push the envelope.  Watch it bend.

___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-06 Thread Thomas Schilling
Ok, last revision for tonight:  http://i.imgur.com/d3ARq.png

I fixed the link-box hanging over and I made the logo a bit bigger
(60px, like currently on the Wiki)

Ivan, yes it's more like Slate Grey, no idea what it's called.  I have
set a maximum width on purpose so that it doesn't degrade too badly on
big screens.  It was 50em (50 x font size), now it's 55em;  For
one-column text 40em would be better (too long lines are hard to
read), but since it's a two-column layout, it's fine if it's wider.
I've seen a website that fluidly switches between 2 and 3-column
layout depending on how wide the window is (using CSS only) but I
suppose that's hard to get to work portably (well, IE).

On 7 April 2010 01:57, Gregory Crosswhite gcr...@phys.washington.edu wrote:
 Nice!  Is there any way you can enlarge the bottom section so that the box in 
 the top-right doesn't look like it is hanging over the side (i.e., having 
 whitespace directly below it and to the right of the main text)?  If 
 anything, I think that it would look better for the bottom text to extend 
 further right than the box at the top than vice versa.

 Cheers,
 Greg

 On Apr 6, 2010, at 5:49 PM, Thomas Schilling wrote:

 Ok, based on both your and Ivan's comments I modified a bit more.

 http://i.imgur.com/cumLj.png

 Making the top columns and the lower columns the same width looks bad,
 but I agree that the large margin between the blurb and the
 Documentation headline was too large.
 After I changed that, however, the Documentation section and the News
 sections did not line up anymore which looked even worse when the news
 section had a different background colour.  So instead the background
 colour is used for the quicklinks.  Removing any use of a background
 colour would makes things too boring, though.
 I also swapped the heading colour and the title bar colour.  So
 headings are now a very dark blue.

 The italic things in the blurb are actually not links (though they
 could be).  Without any styling the blurb would look too boring, so
 I'm using the same blue that the title bar uses.


 On 7 April 2010 01:25, Gregory Crosswhite gcr...@phys.washington.edu wrote:
 I concur that the latest version with the softer colors looks a lot nicer, 
 and I approve of the overall design.  I think that you should go back to 
 using a change in the foreground color rather than the background color for 
 the links in the main description, since at the moment it looks ugly.  I 
 also think that it would look better if you could align the two columns in 
 the top (i.e., the description text and the major links above the News and 
 Events section) so that they align better with the two columns below;  you 
 could probably also have the description text creep into the left margin so 
 that it isn't exactly centered over the left column below, if that would 
 look better.

 Cheers,
 Greg


 On Apr 6, 2010, at 5:16 PM, Ivan Miljenovic wrote:

 On 7 April 2010 10:02, Thomas Schilling nomin...@googlemail.com wrote:
 On 7 April 2010 00:57, Ivan Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
 OK, I dislike the colour scheme.  Happy now? ;-)

 That's still not constructive.  I.e, is it the black, the gray, the 
 orange?

 OK, it's the black; it seems a tad too strong for me (the fact that
 you have a black theme for your browser probably doesn't help).

 Using more intense colours for the bar at the top becomes distracting 
 very quickly.

 How about a more neutral, paler colour?

 Anyway, here's something with a bit more colour:  
 http://i.imgur.com/LpQmH.png

 Apart from the black up the top still, I think this is nicer.
 However, maybe the links in the description text up the top are a bit
 too obvious...


 --
 Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
 ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com
 IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com
 ___
 Haskell-Cafe mailing list
 Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe





 --
 Push the envelope.  Watch it bend.





-- 
Push the envelope.  Watch it bend.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-06 Thread Jason Dagit
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Thomas Schilling nomin...@googlemail.comwrote:

 Ok, based on both your and Ivan's comments I modified a bit more.

 http://i.imgur.com/cumLj.png

 Making the top columns and the lower columns the same width looks bad,
 but I agree that the large margin between the blurb and the
 Documentation headline was too large.
 After I changed that, however, the Documentation section and the News
 sections did not line up anymore which looked even worse when the news
 section had a different background colour.  So instead the background
 colour is used for the quicklinks.  Removing any use of a background
 colour would makes things too boring, though.
 I also swapped the heading colour and the title bar colour.  So
 headings are now a very dark blue.

 The italic things in the blurb are actually not links (though they
 could be).  Without any styling the blurb would look too boring, so
 I'm using the same blue that the title bar uses.


We were discussing it briefly around the office and some things I recall
from that:
  a) There's only so much you can do with square boxes, flat colors, and a
single font.
  b) http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/ is probably one of the best looking
programming language websites.
  c) the wiki bar at the top has got to go
  d) how do the designs look on mobile devices?

It looks like you've definitely tackled (c), so that's great.  It seems like
maybe we can draw on (b) to help address (a).

I wish I had more concrete suggestions.  Keep up the good work!

Jason
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-06 Thread Ben Millwood
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:22 AM, Thomas Schilling
nomin...@googlemail.com wrote:
 I have
 set a maximum width on purpose so that it doesn't degrade too badly on
 big screens.

I've never really trusted this argument - it's not required that the
browser window occupy the entire screen, so why not let the user
choose how wide they want their text?
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-06 Thread Ivan Miljenovic
On 7 April 2010 11:53, Ben Millwood hask...@benmachine.co.uk wrote:
 I've never really trusted this argument - it's not required that the
 browser window occupy the entire screen, so why not let the user
 choose how wide they want their text?

Agreed; I hate websites/blogs/etc. that only take up a fraction of the
screen width (especially since I like to increase the font size to
make it more readable, which results in only having a few words per
line and quite often weird wrapping issues).  At least it's in the
centre though; this (which my brother worked on, which is why I know
about it) abomination for some reason has everything on the left of
the screen (some argument about how people might want to overlap their
browser window with a text editor, etc.; I dont' see why they don't
just shrink and move the browser window then):
http://www.arachnoserver.org/



-- 
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com
IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-06 Thread Gregory Crosswhite
Ah, that looks a lot nicer.  :-)

Cheers,
Greg


On Apr 6, 2010, at 5:49 PM, Thomas Schilling wrote:

 Ok, based on both your and Ivan's comments I modified a bit more.
 
 http://i.imgur.com/cumLj.png
 
 Making the top columns and the lower columns the same width looks bad,
 but I agree that the large margin between the blurb and the
 Documentation headline was too large.
 After I changed that, however, the Documentation section and the News
 sections did not line up anymore which looked even worse when the news
 section had a different background colour.  So instead the background
 colour is used for the quicklinks.  Removing any use of a background
 colour would makes things too boring, though.
 I also swapped the heading colour and the title bar colour.  So
 headings are now a very dark blue.
 
 The italic things in the blurb are actually not links (though they
 could be).  Without any styling the blurb would look too boring, so
 I'm using the same blue that the title bar uses.
 
 
 On 7 April 2010 01:25, Gregory Crosswhite gcr...@phys.washington.edu wrote:
 I concur that the latest version with the softer colors looks a lot nicer, 
 and I approve of the overall design.  I think that you should go back to 
 using a change in the foreground color rather than the background color for 
 the links in the main description, since at the moment it looks ugly.  I 
 also think that it would look better if you could align the two columns in 
 the top (i.e., the description text and the major links above the News and 
 Events section) so that they align better with the two columns below;  you 
 could probably also have the description text creep into the left margin so 
 that it isn't exactly centered over the left column below, if that would 
 look better.
 
 Cheers,
 Greg
 
 
 On Apr 6, 2010, at 5:16 PM, Ivan Miljenovic wrote:
 
 On 7 April 2010 10:02, Thomas Schilling nomin...@googlemail.com wrote:
 On 7 April 2010 00:57, Ivan Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
 OK, I dislike the colour scheme.  Happy now? ;-)
 
 That's still not constructive.  I.e, is it the black, the gray, the orange?
 
 OK, it's the black; it seems a tad too strong for me (the fact that
 you have a black theme for your browser probably doesn't help).
 
 Using more intense colours for the bar at the top becomes distracting very 
 quickly.
 
 How about a more neutral, paler colour?
 
 Anyway, here's something with a bit more colour:  
 http://i.imgur.com/LpQmH.png
 
 Apart from the black up the top still, I think this is nicer.
 However, maybe the links in the description text up the top are a bit
 too obvious...
 
 
 --
 Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
 ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com
 IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com
 ___
 Haskell-Cafe mailing list
 Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Push the envelope.  Watch it bend.

___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-06 Thread Gregory Crosswhite
While I think that (d) is a valid concern, it is also important not to let the 
perfect be the enemy of the good.  If we agree that the proposed web site 
layout is sufficiently better than the current one and is good enough 
aesthetically, then I think we should go ahead and switch to the new layout and 
*then* start thinking about how we could make it *completely amazing* like the 
Ruby web site, because if we demand completely amazing for our *first* try then 
I fear that all that will happen is that nothing will change because the bar 
will have been set too high.

Cheers,
Greg

On Apr 6, 2010, at 6:25 PM, Jason Dagit wrote:

 
 
 On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Thomas Schilling nomin...@googlemail.com 
 wrote:
 Ok, based on both your and Ivan's comments I modified a bit more.
 
 http://i.imgur.com/cumLj.png
 
 Making the top columns and the lower columns the same width looks bad,
 but I agree that the large margin between the blurb and the
 Documentation headline was too large.
 After I changed that, however, the Documentation section and the News
 sections did not line up anymore which looked even worse when the news
 section had a different background colour.  So instead the background
 colour is used for the quicklinks.  Removing any use of a background
 colour would makes things too boring, though.
 I also swapped the heading colour and the title bar colour.  So
 headings are now a very dark blue.
 
 The italic things in the blurb are actually not links (though they
 could be).  Without any styling the blurb would look too boring, so
 I'm using the same blue that the title bar uses.
 
 We were discussing it briefly around the office and some things I recall from 
 that:
   a) There's only so much you can do with square boxes, flat colors, and a 
 single font.
   b) http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/ is probably one of the best looking 
 programming language websites.
   c) the wiki bar at the top has got to go
   d) how do the designs look on mobile devices?
 
 It looks like you've definitely tackled (c), so that's great.  It seems like 
 maybe we can draw on (b) to help address (a).
 
 I wish I had more concrete suggestions.  Keep up the good work!
 
 Jason

___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-06 Thread Antoine Latter
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Thomas Schilling
nomin...@googlemail.com wrote:
 Ok, last revision for tonight:  http://i.imgur.com/d3ARq.png

I'm no web design guru, but this is definitely better than what we
have now. Good job on it.

Antoine
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


[Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-05 Thread Simon Michael

On 4/2/10 5:28 AM, Thomas Schilling wrote:

How about something more colourful?

http://i.imgur.com/7jCPq.png


No-one replied to this, but I like it. You sacrificed some information density for a simple, engaging, low-stress page 
(which can still rotate in new content frequently). Anything appearing on this page will be noticed and read, which is 
not true of all designs. And reducing stress in learning Haskell is a good idea! (I almost expect to see a Hitch-hiker's 
Guide Don't Panic button[1])




[1] http://wiki.zope.org/zope2/dontpanicbutton.gif

___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-04-05 Thread Ivan Miljenovic
On 6 April 2010 13:24, Simon Michael si...@joyful.com wrote:
 On 4/2/10 5:28 AM, Thomas Schilling wrote:

 How about something more colourful?

 http://i.imgur.com/7jCPq.png

 No-one replied to this, but I like it. You sacrificed some information
 density for a simple, engaging, low-stress page (which can still rotate in
 new content frequently).

Hmmm, I must have missed this one.  However, I find it being _too_
bereft of content.  Maybe still have a sub-menu of important
links/info (e.g. events) rather than force users to dig for them.

-- 
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com
IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


[Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-03-29 Thread Simon Marlow

On 28/03/2010 21:44, Christopher Done wrote:

This is a post about re-designing the whole Haskell web site.

We got a new logo but didn't really take it any further. For a while
there's been talk about a new design for the Haskell web site, and there
are loads of web pages about Haskell that don't follow a theme
consistent with Haskell.org's, probably because it doesn't really have a
proper theme.

I'm not a designer so take my suggestion with a grain of salt, but
something that showed pictures of the latest events and the feeds we
currently have would be nice. The feeds let you know that the community
is busy, and pictures tell you that we are human and friendly.

Anyway, I came up with something to kick off a discussion:

http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Image:Haskell-homepage-idea.png

It answers the basic questions:

* What's Haskell?
* Where am I on the site? (Answered by a universally recognised tab
  menu)
* What's it like?
* How do I learn it?
* Does it have an active community?
* What's going on in the community? What are they making?
* This language is weird. Are they human? -- Yes. The picture of a
  recent event can fade from one to another with jQuery.

The colours aren't the most exciting, but someone who's a professional
designer could do a proper design. But I like the idea of the site being
like this; really busy but not scarily busy.


The general design looks great, nice job.

Is the footer necessary?  I dislike sites that have too many ways to 
navigate, and the footer looks superfluous.  The footer will probably be 
off the bottom of the window in any case, which reduces its usefulness 
as a navigation tool.


If we want a tree of links for navigation, maybe the tabs at the top 
could be drop-down menus, or there could be a menu sidebar.


Cheers,
Simon
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


[Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-03-29 Thread Christopher Done
On 29 March 2010 11:19, Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com wrote:
 Is the footer necessary?  I dislike sites that have too many ways to
 navigate, and the footer looks superfluous.  The footer will probably be off
 the bottom of the window in any case, which reduces its usefulness as a
 navigation tool.

Footer navigations are a way to provide a bit of a sitemap without
cluttering the top nav, good for SEO, and to provide the user with an
overview of the hierarchical structure of the site on every page.
According to the W3C, headings are easily navigable with a
screenreader; as someone using assistive technologies I'd get
something like:

Welcome to Haskell.org
Events
Learning
Headlines
Latest Packages
Quick Links
Download
Community
Wiki
Reports

We can get rid of it but I think it's a useful thing.

 If we want a tree of links for navigation, maybe the tabs at the top could
 be drop-down menus, or there could be a menu sidebar.

A side bar on sub pages sounds good.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


[Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-03-29 Thread Simon Marlow

On 29/03/2010 13:20, Christopher Done wrote:

On 29 March 2010 11:19, Simon Marlowmarlo...@gmail.com  wrote:

Is the footer necessary?  I dislike sites that have too many ways to
navigate, and the footer looks superfluous.  The footer will probably be off
the bottom of the window in any case, which reduces its usefulness as a
navigation tool.


Footer navigations are a way to provide a bit of a sitemap without
cluttering the top nav, good for SEO, and to provide the user with an
overview of the hierarchical structure of the site on every page.


IMHO, these aren't compelling reasons.  Note that already on your page 
there is an inconsistency between the tabs at the top and the headings 
at the bottom: I don't know where to look to find the content I want. 
Put the navigation in one place.


A sitemap: sitemaps are for robots.  If you're worried about cluttering 
up the page, use drop-down menus.


SEO: we shouldn't compromise the usability or appearance of the site for 
SEO.  If we do it right, SEO takes care of itself - and it's not like we 
care that much about SEO here, we're not competing with other sites to 
sell you Haskell.



According to the W3C, headings are easily navigable with a
screenreader; as someone using assistive technologies I'd get
something like:

Welcome to Haskell.org
Events
Learning
Headlines
Latest Packages
Quick Links
Download
Community
Wiki
Reports


Making this work right is an important goal, I agree.

Cheers,
Simon
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-03-29 Thread Sean Leather
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 16:24, Simon Marlow wrote:

 On 29/03/2010 13:20, Christopher Done wrote:

 On 29 March 2010 11:19, Simon Marlow  wrote:

 Is the footer necessary?  I dislike sites that have too many ways to
 navigate, and the footer looks superfluous.  The footer will probably be
 off
 the bottom of the window in any case, which reduces its usefulness as a
 navigation tool.


 Footer navigations are a way to provide a bit of a sitemap without
 cluttering the top nav, good for SEO, and to provide the user with an
 overview of the hierarchical structure of the site on every page.


 IMHO, these aren't compelling reasons.  Note that already on your page
 there is an inconsistency between the tabs at the top and the headings at
 the bottom: I don't know where to look to find the content I want. Put the
 navigation in one place.

 A sitemap: sitemaps are for robots.  If you're worried about cluttering up
 the page, use drop-down menus.

 SEO: we shouldn't compromise the usability or appearance of the site for
 SEO.  If we do it right, SEO takes care of itself - and it's not like we
 care that much about SEO here, we're not competing with other sites to sell
 you Haskell.


I like something like this footer (though I don't think this is a great one:
page-specific wiki actions doesn't belong, and I don't get the Reports
column). It clearly doesn't serve as main navigation. For me, it's the
where do I go next collection of links for when I've read the page. I
think it can improve usability, not hurt it.

As for SEO, I don't think the concern should be do we show up high in the
ranks? but rather does a query in a search engine take you to the most
appropriate page? I've long been frustrated by Google not being able to
find good answers to my Haskell-related questions. If there's anything we
can do to improve this issue by changing the page layout and structure of
haskell.org, then I'm all for it. This in itself is a matter of usability.

Regards,
Sean
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-03-29 Thread Christopher Done
On 29 March 2010 16:16, Sean Leather leat...@cs.uu.nl wrote:
 On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 16:24, Simon Marlow wrote:
 IMHO, these aren't compelling reasons.  Note that already on your page
 there is an inconsistency between the tabs at the top and the headings at
 the bottom: I don't know where to look to find the content I want. Put the
 navigation in one place.

 A sitemap: sitemaps are for robots.  If you're worried about cluttering up
 the page, use drop-down menus.

 SEO: we shouldn't compromise the usability or appearance of the site for
 SEO.  If we do it right, SEO takes care of itself - and it's not like we
 care that much about SEO here, we're not competing with other sites to sell
 you Haskell.

 I like something like this footer (though I don't think this is a great one:
 page-specific wiki actions doesn't belong, and I don't get the Reports
 column). It clearly doesn't serve as main navigation. For me, it's the
 where do I go next collection of links for when I've read the page. I
 think it can improve usability, not hurt it.

 As for SEO, I don't think the concern should be do we show up high in the
 ranks? but rather does a query in a search engine take you to the most
 appropriate page? I've long been frustrated by Google not being able to
 find good answers to my Haskell-related questions. If there's anything we
 can do to improve this issue by changing the page layout and structure of
 haskell.org, then I'm all for it. This in itself is a matter of usability.


Well, I'm not a usability expert nor do I have any research handy
about how to do this properly. If someone is or has, that would be
great! I was going to ask the guy at work who is a usability expert
and up on W3C recommendations, but he wasn't in!

Meanwhile for the sake of productivity I'll just take it out and get
cracking. If someone thinks something's confusing we can just take it
out, no problem.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


[Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-03-28 Thread Ashley Yakeley

Christopher Done wrote:

On 28 March 2010 22:54, Don Stewart d...@galois.com wrote:

This looks great!

What are the implementation details of having this go live?

   * Ashley: would you be able to e.g. install an index.html like this,
 and hang the wiki under it?
   * How do we allow editing (by trusted users?)


I've emailed Ashley about sorting this out. I'll stick to the way it's
currently done, wikimedia template for the home page. I'll just make
the index page a special case somehow or make a new index file to pull
the necessary bits from the wiki database. Let's go, Ashley!


Is the front page a wiki page?

--
Ashley
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


[Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-03-28 Thread Christopher Done
On 28 March 2010 23:32, Ashley Yakeley ash...@semantic.org wrote:
 There was a big competition for the logo, with this blind Condorcet voting
 and everything, and this is the shape that was picked. But it kind of ran
 out of steam before colours were decided upon. So I just copied the colours
 from the Haskell Platform logo...

Sure. Maybe the colours are great, I don't know. But I can't get them
to work very well, personally.

On 28 March 2010 23:25, Ashley Yakeley ash...@semantic.org wrote:
 Is the front page a wiki page?

By the looks of it, yes. If you go to 'Edit this page', you can see
that it's made out of wikimedia templates. But that's just a guess.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


[Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-03-28 Thread Ashley Yakeley

Christopher Done wrote:

On 28 March 2010 23:32, Ashley Yakeley ash...@semantic.org wrote:

There was a big competition for the logo, with this blind Condorcet voting
and everything, and this is the shape that was picked. But it kind of ran
out of steam before colours were decided upon. So I just copied the colours
from the Haskell Platform logo...


Sure. Maybe the colours are great, I don't know. But I can't get them
to work very well, personally.


No, you're right, they're ugly colours IMO.


On 28 March 2010 23:25, Ashley Yakeley ash...@semantic.org wrote:

Is the front page a wiki page?


By the looks of it, yes. If you go to 'Edit this page', you can see
that it's made out of wikimedia templates. But that's just a guess.


I meant, in the redesign, is the intent to make the front page a wiki 
page, or a special static page?


--
Ashley Yakeley
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-03-28 Thread Don Stewart
ashley:
 Christopher Done wrote:
 On 28 March 2010 23:32, Ashley Yakeley ash...@semantic.org wrote:
 There was a big competition for the logo, with this blind Condorcet voting
 and everything, and this is the shape that was picked. But it kind of ran
 out of steam before colours were decided upon. So I just copied the colours
 from the Haskell Platform logo...

 Sure. Maybe the colours are great, I don't know. But I can't get them
 to work very well, personally.

 No, you're right, they're ugly colours IMO.

 On 28 March 2010 23:25, Ashley Yakeley ash...@semantic.org wrote:
 Is the front page a wiki page?

 By the looks of it, yes. If you go to 'Edit this page', you can see
 that it's made out of wikimedia templates. But that's just a guess.

 I meant, in the redesign, is the intent to make the front page a wiki  
 page, or a special static page?


I think the goal is an attractive non-wiki page with live content.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-03-28 Thread Christopher Done
On 29 March 2010 00:08, Don Stewart d...@galois.com wrote:
 On 28 March 2010 23:25, Ashley Yakeley ash...@semantic.org wrote:
 Is the front page a wiki page?

 By the looks of it, yes. If you go to 'Edit this page', you can see
 that it's made out of wikimedia templates. But that's just a guess.

 I meant, in the redesign, is the intent to make the front page a wiki
 page, or a special static page?


 I think the goal is an attractive non-wiki page with live content.


Right -- ideally the index page would be written separately from the
Wiki but maybe use its libraries or at least in some way access the
wiki database so that the index page can be manipulated through the
wiki. Each section is kind of modular anyway.

I'm trying out the 1.5 version I got from the mediawiki svn now. A
copy of the database sans users would be nice. How big is it? I can
construct my own example db but it's nice to work with the real thing.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org re-design

2010-03-28 Thread Jeff Wheeler
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Ashley Yakeley ash...@semantic.org wrote:

 No, you're right, they're ugly colours IMO.

I originally mocked up the logo that we chose, so I'm partial to the
grayish-blue that I used. Others probably work, but I think the
combination of blues in the one that's used a lot now is awkward.

I do like the new design idea, but there are a few places I'd like to
nitpick, if nobody minds.

- The Register | Login button is awkward; it looks like it's
centered with the descenders included, so it's a bit too high. Also, a
pipe as a separator is strange. (This same style is used a few other
places, too.)
- The Haskell Programming Language is a bit long. Perhaps make
The/Programming Language be a lot lighter, so that Haskell really
stands out.
- I doubt we'll end up using that font for the headers (unless
somebody is ponying up for a license and wants to use Typekit or so),
but the 't' as in Welcome _t_o is very strange.
- Under Events, I'd move More to be in line with the prev/next buttons.
- Under Latest Packages, I think different formatting could make
this read more easily. At the very least, the package name and
description should be a different color or weight. I'd move the
description onto the same line (wrapping if necessary), but a lighter
weight and a lighter gray (same color as the Latest Event?).

Just some ideas to think about.

-- 
Jeff Wheeler

Undergraduate, Electrical Engineering
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe