Am Dienstag, 24. Februar 2009 09:30 schrieb Aaron Denney:
> On 2009-02-19, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> > In addition, I wouldn’t include algebraic structures in a
> > *numerical* prelude since the cool thing about them is that they are
> > so abstract that they are not only about numbers.
>
> But the thing is that to have the numerical classes support the proper
> abstractions we want them to support, we need to define the algebraic
> structures as well. So the rework goes together...
Of course! It’s just that having algebraic structures in a separate algebra
package is in my opinion a better idea than having them in a numeric prelude.
Best wishes,
Wolfgang
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
