Hi Magnus,
ti, 2020-07-28 kello 07:44 -0700, Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker
kirjoitti:
> Magnus Westerlund has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-32: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
> this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal/
>
>
>
> ---
> ---
> COMMENT:
> ---
> ---
>
> Thanks for resolving and answering my questions.
>
> I have only one minor comment that I noticed due to that you edit the
> text:
>
> Section 2:
> "Following [RFC5770] and SDP [RFC3264] ..."
>
> RFC 3264 is not SDP, it is the "Offer/Answer model with SDP" there is
> a
> significant difference, as SDP base spec is RFC4566.
how about:
SDP related naming conventions [RFC3264]
or just:
[RFC3264]
___
Hipsec mailing list
Hipsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
