Re: [hlds_linux] TF2 Maps Workshop
Do any of the map chooser plugins for Sourcemod support this format? On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 3:20 PM, ics i...@ics-base.net wrote: If it works same way as in CSGO, you only need the map id to switch maps manually from one to another. For example changelevel 454225330 or changelevel 454225336 should do the trick. I haven't experimented yet but you should be able to put those map i'ds to your servers maplist or mapcycle in order to swap to them or create a cycle. Works differenly on CSGO though. -ics Gordon Reynolds kirjoitti: I have figured out I can manually change the server to go to a workshop map using: `changelevel workshop/map_name/.ugcmapID` ex: changelevel workshop/pl_rainbowride_b7e.ugc454588202 Is there any easier way, or will that be coming later in the workshop beta? On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 9:58 AM Gordon Reynolds thisisgordonsem...@gmail.com wrote: I'm wondering how exactly the map workshop works for servers. Should I have to configure anything on my server to get them to work? Does this work like the CS:GO maps workshop in that people can just force my server to play whatever workshop map they want? How do I select one of the workshop maps to play on? I haven't seen a whole lot of discussion here about the maps workshop and the website is pretty light on technical details outside of the few cvars. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] [hlds] Optional TF2 update released
While we're at it why even have a password for rcon? Only a small handful of players even know how to use rcon. On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:10 AM, N-Gon ngongamedes...@gmail.com wrote: Again. Only a small handful of people within UGC know about making Sourcemod plugins. Instead of being pessimistic about fixing something why not come up with a better solution than the one I have presented? Such as maybe removing the cvar all together because it serves 0 purpose as the 0 backstab method is completely broken and 2 backstab method is completely untested AND broken. There is no need to have that cvar set to anything other than 1, so why not just remove it. On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:01 AM, AnAkkk anakin...@gmail.com wrote: Removing a cvar flag with a plugin is only 2 lines, some people sell cheat server plugins that got many more features than that, so it's easy for anyone to buy one and put it on their server. With VAC there is at least a chance (even if it's small) that the guy is going to get banned, and there's none if he has access to the server. 2015-05-19 14:54 GMT+01:00 N-Gon ngongamedes...@gmail.com: But the amount of players who can readily make something like that within UGC is not all that high. People thought of me as a messiah for my simple plugin when I had only learned about programming in SMod 2 days prior. Making a plugin to continue to cheat is way more steps involved than simply typing an rcon command in console. Nothing will ever 100% stop cheaters, but it's silly not to even try to slow them down. If we're going to just toss our hands in the air and say it's pointless because there will always be a workaround then why even bother having a VAC system in place. On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Ross Bemrose rbemr...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, that was a given. After all, server plugins can remove the cheat flag just as readily as the notify flag. On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:46 AM, AnAkkk anakin...@gmail.com wrote: That's pointless, someone could make a a plugin to remove the notify flag. You should only trust servers that are hosted by leagues where no one has the rcon_password or any access to the machine. There are many other cvars that can be modified the same way and be used to cheat. 2015-05-19 14:41 GMT+01:00 Ross Bemrose rbemr...@gmail.com: Either way, tf_backstab_detection_method should probably be flagged as Notify so that all players are told when its value changes. On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:13 AM, N-Gon ngongamedes...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, while we're on the subject of exploits I wanted to bring something up. tf_backstab_detection_method Currently that cvar can be changed on the fly with just rcon access. It's not Cheat or Notify flagged. I've had reports from 3 different UGC Plat players who are highly suspicious of other teams using this on a toggle to allow their spies easy facestabs when they need them. Adding a flag to this command will not harm anyone and it will be a load off the minds of the Comp players who have no way of proving this is being done in official matches. I made a plugin that, among other things, flagged this thing is a cheat. It's a nice start but I can't force everyone to use my plugin. But if Valve were to change this I wouldn't have to :) -Miggy On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Bruno Garcia garcia.bru...@gmail.com wrote: Fixed *crash* when getting a malformed KeyValues buffer On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:11 PM, N-Gon ngongamedes...@gmail.com wrote: Out of curiosity, what exactly did this do? On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Kyle Sanderson kyle.l...@gmail.com wrote: Now that this exploit is public knowledge, any idea when we will see the remaining mainline Source Games updated? Thanks, Kyle. On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Eric Smith er...@valvesoftware.com wrote: We've released an optional update for Team Fortress 2. Dedicated servers do not need to download the update but you can if you'd like. The note for the update is below. The updated version is 2771145. Thanks. -Eric --- - Fixed crash when getting a malformed KeyValues buffer (thanks to Nathaniel Theis for the report)
[hlds_linux] I must be missing something simple ...
I've downloaded and installed hldsupdatetool.bin to a new directory. Ran it which installed steam, ran steam which updated steam. Ran steam again to update/install hl2dm. Now everything looks fine. When I run: ./hlds_run -nomaster -insecure +sv_lan 1 +maxplayers 4 +map gasworks I see: Auto detecting CPU Using Pentium II Optimised binary. Auto-restarting the server on crash Console initialized. scandir failed:/usr/local/games/hl2server/./platform/SAVE Protocol version 47 Exe version 1.1.2.0/Stdio (valve) Exe build: 02:38:31 Jul 7 2004 (2738) STEAM Auth Server couldn't exec language.cfg Server IP address 192.168.1.5:27015 scandir failed:/usr/local/games/hl2server/./platform/SAVE couldn't exec listip.cfg couldn't exec banned.cfg Master server communication disabled. status hostname: Greybeard's Server version : 47/1.1.2.0/Stdio 2738 insecure tcp/ip : 192.168.1.5:27015 map : gasworks at: 0 x, 0 y, 0 z players : 0 active (4 max) # name userid uniqueid frag time ping loss adr 0 users sv_lan sv_lan is 1 -Note the status and sv_lan commands I entered, everything looks good. netstat shows a lister on port 27015 (UDP) But when I start HL2DM on my PC it says I have no servers running on my LAN. They are on the same subnet. I can communicate between the two with no problem. The firewall is off on the Windows machine. I have no iptables filters at all on the Linux machine. What am I missing? Bill W. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] I must be missing something simple ...
Message: 11 Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 18:17:28 -0500 From: Elmer Fudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] I must be missing something simple ... Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ./srcds_run not hlds_run and there is no gasworks map On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 22:49:58 +0100, Florian Zschocke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bill W wrote: ./hlds_run -nomaster -insecure +sv_lan 1 +maxplayers 4 +map gasworks [...] What am I missing? You didn't tell hlds_run which game you want to run. So it probably runs a HLDM server, not a HL2MP server. I don't know for sure, but I don't think there is a gasworks map in the standard mappack for HL2MP. Florian -- Cheers! -- Elmer Fudd Well, the answers made me poke around some more and I suspect that I am running HL2MP, not a DM server. Because that's what I had steam install. So, naturally, when I load HLDM on the PC it doesn't see it. On HL2MP there is a gasworks map, in fact it was the one I picked out of this list: maps * - undertow.bsp subtransit.bsp stalkyard.bsp snark_pit.bsp rapidcore.bsp lambda_bunker.bsp gasworks.bsp frenzy.bsp datacore.bsp crossfire.bsp bounce.bsp boot_camp.bsp The answer, of course, was as simple as I thought it ought to be, I just hadn't thought of it yet ... right-click Steam in the system tray and bring up Servers ... da, dah! Thanks for the nudge in the right direction! Bill W ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] Re: I must be missing something simple ...
Glenn said: Hate to tell you this, but that is not the maps directory of any HL2DM server I run. It looks suspiciously like my old HL1DM server's maps directory however. The game to install to install HL2 Deathmatch is actually hl2mp, so beware of installing the wrong item. -- Yeah, I think I've got it going right now. But, apparently, you need to first use steam to install Counter-Strike Source and then install HL2MP and/or HL2DM ... CSS is installing now and it's download a ton of hl2 files that I didn't have before. I'm hoping the trick is the install of CSS first. It seems like it's easy to get the HL1 files downloaded but that's not what I wanted. Bill W ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Steam client version?
There probably won't be a release tonight, they are still working on it which either means something broke. Or they just simply don't have it finished. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] Quiet on the list?
Yeah, gotta agree. It seems like valve has definitely given up the battle and doesn't care about VAC. The much vaunted Global Ban never happened as far as I know. I never even got to see VAC on my op4 server, probably never will. Ah well. HLGuard and Cdeath have made valiant efforts, and seem to stop most stuff for now. Sound hacks still work though. How long till stuff gets by hlg and cd again? I think when this next cycle of cheats come out and Valve still hasn't done antything, I'll probably take my server down. Valve managed to create 1 gamethink they'll ever come out with another that has real anti cheat integrated in it from the ground up? Nah, why bother probably just keep milking the CS franchise till the end time. What the heck does Valve do all day, manage licensing deals for: CS: Condition Flatulent, CS:Were Out of Ideas, CS: My Kid Needs Braces or whatever stupid thing they have licensed someone else to develop for them? Ack. -B - Original Message - From: Tyler Overkill Schwend [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 7:19 PM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] [OT] Quiet on the list? I certainly feel that CS and HLDS have become pretty stagnant... I think Valve's support cycle for this stuff is coming to an end except as a testing ground for future products. VAC is way behind, HLGuard is way behind, and I can't imagine much revenue is still being generated... I'm looking into other games, but sadly, Linux servers and community-generated utilities are hard to come by for the majority of games I'm interested in. AA:O, BF1942... - Tyler [TASF]Overkill Schwend Semper facere bonum, an a amare odium, vita mors. Waiting for our enemies to strike us first is as dangerous and irresponsible as it is an act of ignorance. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] So what happened to www.unitedadmins.com ???
Seems like it's been down the past few days. Anyone have any clues? -Bill ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Cheaters are back grrr
Yea it's been like this for the last month or so. They beat hlguard and CD also. Cheaters have the upper hand and frankly VAC is not cutting it. Pity the poor mod that doesn't even have VAC, like the original HLDM or OP4. Unfortunately the last thread on cheating degenerated in a discussion about connection prices $^#%#%. Few here actually seem to care about cheaters and how they are destroying the game. I guess thats why valve can get away with not releasing updates to vac or porting it to op4 or hldm. -B. - Original Message - From: Kingsley Foreman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 9:23 PM Subject: [hlds_linux] Cheaters are back grrr We have had 4 cheaters back in the last couple of days One of them looked he was using a wallhack on a secure server demo is here http://www.users.on.net/gary/432763.zip I think it is about time for a new VAC Kingsley ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Pingboost 3 impressions ...
Hi Adam, Pingboost 3 was pretty unusable for me, it caused lag from hell at times. And this was on a 1.1 ghz server with up to 8 players! I use pingboost 2 and it helped lower peoples pings by 10 to 20 with no noticable lag increase and cpu was about the same as well. -Bill - Original Message - From: Adam Pearse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 4:32 PM Subject: [hlds_linux] Pingboost 3 impressions ... This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Hi all, I run a 20 ppl CS server on a XP 2000+ with 512 MB of memory on a stripped down Linux 2.4.18. This is the only process running. It is connected to a 10Mbit half duplex connection to the Net. I am wondering due to the fact that pingboost 3 processing a frame EVERY time a packet arrives and can cause extreme CPU usage, should some players experience warping or sliding effect when they are all in and around 30 - 50ms with a server average across all players of approx. 45 ms? Basically, has anyone else noticed that when running pingboost 3 that some (1 or 2) ppl are experiencing lag-like effect? ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] This is NOT the HLG support maillist, please respect that.
Sometimes the things you descibe appear to happen on the UA forums I have to agree with you.. Although usually I've been lucky to get good help. This list is a valuable resource where you can get answers that sometimes you can't get anywhere else, and that includes hlguard. I think it's cause linux users are smater than windows users (jk) hehe. I think it's fine to ask HLGuard questions here. Folks if you don't wanna read em, DON'T :) - Bill - Original Message - From: Jay Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2002 8:57 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] This is NOT the HLG support maillist, please respect that. At Monday 03:35 PM 8/26/2002 +1200, you wrote: Err Jay they do! forums.unitedadmins.com Suggest you go ask your questions there. Ever tried getting support on their forums? Only thing support about them is their name is Support Forums You usually get some UA member giving you some sort of smart ass, non helpful reply or nothing at all. While this list may not be the place for this kind of stuff, it IS the only place you are going to get any sort of intelligent response. I've yet to have one issue resolved on those forums and 90% of the time, they don't even get addressed there. Posts sit with no replies forever until they fall off the front page. Here, however, I have never had 1 problem that hasn't been solved thanks to the helpful people on this list. Here's some examples for you. I posted over there a couple of days ago about the OGC detection. Specifically that I was having some scenarios come up that were not listed in the manual. My question was whether what I was seeing was a legit response that wasn't mentioned in the manual or if the people were indeed using OGC. I get a couple of me too people wanting to know the answer because they were also getting the same response I was and some UA guy comes in and pastes the page out of the manual in his post. That was in. No clarification of any sort. No This is the way it is, if it isn't this their cheating or I'll have someone look into it and get back with you or anything of that sort. I had said I had read the manual and what do I get? A smartass UA person pasting the page out of the manual in my post. Yea, that's real helpful. A while back I made another post about the wallhack unloading after a couple of rounds. No response for days and then someone gives a config change to make. I made the change, no difference and that was that. No This is a known bug. It will be addressed in a future release or anything of the sort. Couple of weeks later they release the next version with my problem specifically addressed. Obviously they knew it was a known bug but rather than address it, they just left me twisting in the wind. I wasted a fair amount of time trying to resolve something on my end that I assumed (Yea, I know all about ASS U ME) was a problem I was having and not a support issue with HLGuard because they didn't bother addressing my post in their forums. Where's the support in either of those scenarios? At least here you have people running the same things that can compare notes. FWIW, I appreciate the effort these guys are making. I've dealt with some of the UA guys before and they have been terrific. However, the ones I have dealt with in passing rarely respond to anything on those forums. I see them more on the OGC forums than I do the UA forums and I'd guess that asking support questions on the OGC forums is probably more off topic than doing so here :) For the person that called me a n00b, please look up sarcasm in the dictionary. Jay Jay Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.MeanKidsRacing.com Gary Coleman has a posse ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] This is NOT the HLG support maillist, please respect that.
I've seen the post, and he does ask intelligent questions. Questions are sometimes NOT answered well. - Original Message - From: Delirium Tremens [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2002 9:40 PM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] [OT] This is NOT the HLG support maillist, please respect that. Maybe you should ask your questions in a more intelligent manner and SEARCH the forum before you post... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jay Carter Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2002 11:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] This is NOT the HLG support maillist, please respect that. At Monday 03:35 PM 8/26/2002 +1200, you wrote: Err Jay they do! forums.unitedadmins.com Suggest you go ask your questions there. Ever tried getting support on their forums? Only thing support about them is their name is Support Forums You usually get some UA member giving you some sort of smart ass, non helpful reply or nothing at all. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Cheating in a nutshell
I can understand your frustration. I run an op4 server and it's difficult without having VAC. Cheaters seem more brazen than ever. Hlguard does seem to work fine for me(under linux). The only issue I have with it right now is for some reason, it reports I try to hack lambert and various other messages on folks that I know and are not cheating(their scores are normal). I posted error on UA and several other people are having problem, and no one can figure out where these are coming from. Other than that it's been great. UA and the hard work they do is the only reason I'm still running a server. I love the game, and the folks I've met through running my server are some great people, but there there is some 12 year old with a mouth like a sailor getting 58 to 0 on a map with no good camping spots, it can be annoying to everyone. Some things I've found that help: 1. Give some kind of Admin access to your trusted users that have been playing for awhile and can distinguish between cheaters and good players, and can be objective if they are legitamately gettign their butt kicked. Make sure they know how to get wonid's, ban, etc. 2. Those players that are Admin, have them put Admin in their name. Cheaters tend not to hang around if they know Admins watch site. 3. Install Cheating Death, in optional mode. If an admin thinks someone is cheating, they can ask suspected cheater to run cheating Death. Most people are cool with it, like the policy and I've gotten several compliments on it. What is really funny, are the people that completely refuse to run Cheating Death when asked, and YET swear they arent' cheating, they are just good. It is hilarious how vehement they are. If you arent' cheating, you shouldn't have a problem with running it. 4. Next version of HLGuard should help a lot, it's coming out soon. And VAC will eventually be coming for more mods. 5. The global ban from WON on cheater's Wonid's that will be happening soon This is the coolest thing, can't wait the OGC babies cry on their little forums when they get bannned. Yeah there are other stolen wonid's they can use for now, but those will eventually run out. -[USA]i see dead people... - Original Message - From: Rick and Cheryl [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 4:56 PM Subject: [hlds_linux] Cheating in a nutshell I am a realist and as much as I hate to say it, this problem is getting much worse very quickly. I am at the point where I think I am just going to take the server down because it is simply not worth it. Gazing into the horizon for that next anti-cheat that will solve our problems might be something you people want to fool yourselves with but I have been in this biz long enough to know better. HLGuard just don't cut it, the thing causes more problems than it solves. My server runs flawlessly without it but as soon as I try to use it (as I have 4 times now) all kinds of things go wrong... Custom maps crash at load, doors and elevators cease to work in a seemingly random manner and lag spikes become common. Please don't take this as a slam against UA, I applaud them for trying and know a lot of effort is put into it but HLGuard is just not a viable solution for me. This VAC which supposedly will help (when released for TFC) does not hold much promise in my book. The cheat community seems to be far more active than Valve's anti-cheat team and I honestly think they release revisions to circumvent faster than Valve can hack out new code. It is nothing but a vicious circle with no end in sight and I for one don't have that kind of time to devote to a game that consumes bandwidth and makes us no profit what so ever. The only real solution would be to identify and ban cheaters but that has serious problems too. The average cheater has plenty of keys and even most broadband connections now have a dynamic IP so what is a person to do, ban whole nodes by the hundreds? Not to mention the general pain in the ass it is to ban by IP to begin with. I don't see this getting better in the near future and the fact is that I spend almost as much time dicking around with a gameserver that makes us nothing as I do managing the four *nix servers we make our living off of. I hope the cheaters are happy because they are ruining this entire gaming community and then what are they going to do, go find another game to ruin I suppose. Sincerely, Rick Thompson Network Admin - Fortweb.com http://www.fortweb.com Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice Fax: 219.493.1280 ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] VAC?
How hard is OP4? - Original Message - From: Erik Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Half-Life Dedicated Linux Server Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 1:23 PM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] VAC? No, the reason for doing DoD first is that they have a more flexible release path. For TFC, this would require a full client release, for DoD it only requires a post to their news page. We're going to add VAC to TFC. TFC is still very important for us. -Original Message- From: Redemption [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 1:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] VAC? Pssst He was trying to help you out there. But so now that you've mentioned that. Why was DOD chosen for VAC before TFC? Are we going to see a Day of Defeat box in our local Game Stop and you needed to have the support in place for it? Please, share. Red - Original Message - From: Erik Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Half-Life Dedicated Linux Server Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 1:12 PM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] VAC? In terms of popularity (number of players) TFC and DoD are pretty close to identical. -Original Message- From: Eric (Deacon) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 12:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] VAC? Thank you Billy, yes it does help, at least I know now why I can't find anything about VAC relating to TFC from an intense google search. Odd that they would add it to a new mod before TFC though and as usual, if it was out I would have to read about it here or on a private individuals website because Valves site tells me squat. I wouldn't classify DoD as a new mod. Certainly TFC has been around longer, but it's also nowhere near as popular as DoD. And as far as Valve telling you squat, you WILL here hear it on this list and the HLDS Announce list when VAC goes gold on TFC servers. Though I do admit it would be nice to have a URL to point people to (and for our own checking) that would give at least basic, current information and links to other valuable and/or official resources... -- Eric (the Deacon remix) ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] how long between restarts?
I only restart for some really good reason like hardware addition/fix or I need to shutdown and move server. Last time was up for 50 days before I had to shutdown to see if something could be removed from memory to diagnose an hlguard bug. It's an op4 server, rh linux 7.3 I run Admin Mod, Player Name, hlguard, stripper2 and Cheating Death. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Best Linux OS
- Original Message - From: Casper Gielen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 9:16 AM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Best Linux OS snip ... slow for me). I tried Red Hat Linux 7.1(Couldn't get it to boot). Anything 7.1 is pretty old and may not have supported whatever hardware you are trying it on. There is full list at www.redhat.com as to what hardware the different versions support. 7.2 and 7.3 have both come out since then. I'd recomend 7.3, works great for me. Any linux distro should be good as long as it's recent and supports your hardware. -[USA]i see dead people... ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] spiders/bots and email archives
Which every _good_ list poster will do before sending a reply, right? :) Well, yes. I myself follow this simple rule (most of the time) . However, good luck trying to change ANYONE on this list. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] [OT] spiders/bots and email archives
I like Brian's Sig it shows creativity and art in the form of ASCII. If you have a problem with it, then go else with it. You are probably envious because you can't have a sig that looks like Brians. I use Outlook 2000 and it shows up just fine. Thanks, Daniel Reinhardt I vote the guy with the stupid sig off our island. Oh wait, were we voting or just telling people to go else with it? God damn Outlook users. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] spiders/bots and email archives
Actually, I'd say that page is a disservice to the BSD* community -- to me it portrays BSD users as being just as stupid and immature as the Linux users it is criticising. Fortunately, I know that neither generalisation is at all accurate. I know. I don't agree with that website. I was just trying to make a joke. Sorry. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] 2 year old WON id Shepard is this a jacked id?
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Hi Everyone, Tonight on my server (Op4 DM, i see dead people..) there was a Shepard that connected that was playing *extremely* well wasting very experienced players I know , and moving at speeds faster than are possible in a straight like, and he did not have long jump. I'm pretty sure they were cheating. What makes it really suspicious is that this persons WONID is over 2 years old ( 1348704 ) yet they are playing under Shepard the most generic op4 name possible. He said he only been playing, get this, a week! I looked thru my logs and it's the only name he's ever connected under since yesterday. Does this person have a jacked WONID, and if so is there way to find out if it's been stolen or key generated, which I've heard folks that are into cheating do?? Thanks for any input on this, -i see dead people... -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] adminmod plugin
do you have a link to this mod? if so I'll take a look at it and see what needs to be done. also, what does meta list in your console say? On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Jay Anstiss wrote: Hi folks - before anyone asks, yes - I have tried the adminmod forums (and also a chatroom), but have had no success, so forgive me for asking here... I have downloaded a plugin that announces the arrival of admins on a server, converted it to an amx file and placed it in the dlls dir within the csrtike dir. The server has been restarted but so far it does not seem to announce my (or a friends arrival) joining the server. It didn't really explain what else needs to be done (if anything does), but I'm wondering if anything else needs to be done, like perhaps editing some config or such. If anyone can help, please do! jay. (email - for off topic replies: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
