Re: [homenet] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile-06: (with COMMENT)
> Perhaps he refers to the RFC8174 update to the boilerplate: Ah, thanks. Will do. -- Juliusz ___ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
Re: [homenet] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile-06: (with COMMENT)
Hello Julius, this was indeed a bit rapidly written. And effectively, Markus identified what I meant. Thank you. -m Le 2018-05-07 à 21:34, Markus Stenberg a écrit : On 7 May 2018, at 22.30, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: you should refer to 8174. Perhaps you could kindly justify your advice? Non-capitalised "must" is used just once in this document, and I don't see any opportunity for ambiguity. Perhaps he refers to the RFC8174 update to the boilerplate: === OLD === .. The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119. === NEW === .. The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. === END === -Markus ___ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
Re: [homenet] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile-06: (with COMMENT)
On 7 May 2018, at 22.30, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: >> you should refer to 8174. > Perhaps you could kindly justify your advice? Non-capitalised "must" is > used just once in this document, and I don't see any opportunity for > ambiguity. Perhaps he refers to the RFC8174 update to the boilerplate: === OLD === ... The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119. === NEW === ... The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. === END === -Markus ___ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
Re: [homenet] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile-06: (with COMMENT)
> you should refer to 8174. Perhaps you could kindly justify your advice? Non-capitalised "must" is used just once in this document, and I don't see any opportunity for ambiguity. -- Juliusz ___ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
[homenet] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile-06: (with COMMENT)
Martin Vigoureux has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile-06: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile/ -- COMMENT: -- Hello, you should refer to 8174. ___ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
