Re: Developers' Use of Prod Data For Testing

2010-06-18 Thread Ed Gould

From: Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Tue, June 15, 2010 3:04:06 PM
Subject: Re: Developers' Use of Prod Data For Testing

--snip---
One thing to remember is that production data may not always be the best test, 
as it may not contain all possible combinations of values in the various 
fields. Just because it is production does not mean it is comprehensive.
-unsnip
Another drawback to using production data is this: all too often it's already 
gone through a pre-screening process where invalid data is filtered out. Such 
things as alphabetics in numeric fields, missing data, etc.

Rick,

I agree with you that is one point that I could never get across to our users. 
The only people that seemed to be into testing with data from outside learned 
early on editing was mandatory. For the most part our foreign people were on 
IBM MF's so the testing from them was pretty easy. Where it got to be fun was 
the PC (and other computer) manufacturers. I do vaguely remember some buzz 
going around about issues from these Other computer users as to how to handle 
bad data. I *vaguely* remember that the handling decision went up the 
management ladder to the president and it came down (exactly how I do not 
remember as it was 15+ years ago). But it really did. Now we were (somewhat) 
unique as we were owned by the users, so the president was the person who dealt 
with them directly. 
I wish I could be more exact but it was not in my daily workings, so I only got 
tidbits most of the time from the management of the programming staff when we 
went out for drinks:)

Ed



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
  


Re: taking down the machine - z9 series

2010-06-18 Thread Ed Gould

From: Mark Jacobs mark.jac...@custserv.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thu, June 17, 2010 8:56:01 AM
Subject: Re: taking down the machine - z9 series
---SNIP---

We called it a 'Sheldon shield' after an operator hit the IML button on the old 
3033 console keyboard several times unexpectedly.

snip

-- Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service
Tampa, FL


Mark:

Funny you should talk about this. Long ago and far away when I worked for  the 
same company you are at we had a MP168 and we had 
several issues like the one you mentioned. The one that I remember the most was 
the EPO on the console. One of the operators hung something on it and of course 
the contents shifted and oops no system. Unfortunately this was at a time we 
were IPLing 15 times a day for some other issue and the DC manager was furious 
and actually threw a listing or a magazine at the operator and (chuckle) that 
hit the operator and then hit the power off button, can we say OOPS.. Operator 
was not hurt but was really po'ed. (I can tell you a further story but it would 
have to be offline).

After that we had a hinged plastic square put on both consoles so that would 
not happen again and then the EPO  was labeled in big red letters to stay away 
from.

Ed



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
  


Re: taking down the machine - z9 series

2010-06-18 Thread Jan MOEYERSONS
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:44:45 +0300, Matan Cohen 
matancohen...@gmail.com wrote:

in the past I  remeber i was told never to cut power using the emergency
switch ( i don't know the reason for that but it was said by a wise man).

There were machines that had built-in fire extinguishers. These would trip 
when the emergency power-off switch was hit. 

Needless to say that could cause some havoc...

Jantje.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Health Checker

2010-06-18 Thread Peter Relson
We expect and intend that HC is left running. It should only be taken down 
if it is causing a problem.

It sounds like the poster is relatively inexperienced in the capabilities 
of HC. 

For example, if you do not like highlighted messages, then you have full 
capability to produce something else. The check severity is tunable.
But then again if you are simply going to ignore the messages then why run 
HC at all? The intent of HC is to alert you to problems. 
You have a lot of control over what action to take when an exception 
message is issued. You should be able to get suitable notifications 
according to your needs.

Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Health Checker

2010-06-18 Thread Don Imbriale
You may be able to view information about error conditions using SDSF CK.
Messages can also be seen in the STC output.  And the Health Checker message
buffer can be displayed in detail using the HZSPRINT utility.

Some errors are transient, so only running the task periodically may miss
some of those conditions.  I recommend leaving it up all the time.

- Don Imbriale

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Crabtree, Anne D anne.d.crabt...@wv.govwrote:

 I'll have to look roll mode up, but we have AFOPER which captures error
 conditions, such as tape problems, dasd problems, aux shortages, etc  If
 an operator is not signed on, then we use SA-IOM to page several people.
 (yes, we still use pagers) On weekends, if an operator has to come to the
 site, they need to see the highlighted messages on the console.  So, I can't
 just let highlighted message roll off (if that's what roll mode is).  Maybe
 I should just trap the HZS1002E messages, do something with them and then
 de-highlight them?  Just thinking out loud...

 Anne D. Crabtree
 System Programmer
 WV Office of Technology Data Center
 1900 Kanawha Blvd East
 Charleston, WV  25305
 (304)558-5914 ext 58292
 (304)558-1441 fax

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
 Behalf Of Carroll, William
 Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 3:26 PM
 To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
 Subject: Re: Health Checker

 Leave it up all the time and do the roll mode on the weekends.  Anything
 that is in error does get picked up by automation, typically just an email.


 Bill

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
 Behalf Of Crabtree, Anne D
 Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 1:12 PM
 To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
 Subject: Health Checker

 Do most of you keep the health checker up and running all the time?  I
 usually just start it periodically to see what is new that shows up.  My
 concern in keeping it running has to do with highlighted messages it puts on
 the console (like when no operator is on duty).  I was just curious how most
 people handle it.

 Anne D. Crabtree
 System Programmer
 WV Office of Technology Data Center
 1900 Kanawha Blvd East
 Charleston, WV  25305
 (304)558-5914 ext 58292
 (304)558-1441 fax


 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
 DISCLAIMER:
 The information contained in this message may be privileged
 or confidential and is protected from disclosure. If the
 reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or
 an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message
 to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
 dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication
 is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
 in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the
 message and deleting it from your computer.

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Health Checker

2010-06-18 Thread Crabtree, Anne D
Thank you for all the helpful suggestions.  And yes, I am inexperienced with 
the Health Checker otherwise I wouldn't have asked.  I'm playing with the 
HZSPRMxx member to try and do things and I most certainly do not want to ignore 
messages.

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)558-5914 ext 58292
(304)558-1441 fax

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Don Imbriale
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 8:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Health Checker

You may be able to view information about error conditions using SDSF CK.
Messages can also be seen in the STC output.  And the Health Checker message
buffer can be displayed in detail using the HZSPRINT utility.

Some errors are transient, so only running the task periodically may miss
some of those conditions.  I recommend leaving it up all the time.

- Don Imbriale

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Crabtree, Anne D anne.d.crabt...@wv.govwrote:

 I'll have to look roll mode up, but we have AFOPER which captures error
 conditions, such as tape problems, dasd problems, aux shortages, etc  If
 an operator is not signed on, then we use SA-IOM to page several people.
 (yes, we still use pagers) On weekends, if an operator has to come to the
 site, they need to see the highlighted messages on the console.  So, I can't
 just let highlighted message roll off (if that's what roll mode is).  Maybe
 I should just trap the HZS1002E messages, do something with them and then
 de-highlight them?  Just thinking out loud...

 Anne D. Crabtree
 System Programmer
 WV Office of Technology Data Center
 1900 Kanawha Blvd East
 Charleston, WV  25305
 (304)558-5914 ext 58292
 (304)558-1441 fax

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
 Behalf Of Carroll, William
 Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 3:26 PM
 To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
 Subject: Re: Health Checker

 Leave it up all the time and do the roll mode on the weekends.  Anything
 that is in error does get picked up by automation, typically just an email.


 Bill

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
 Behalf Of Crabtree, Anne D
 Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 1:12 PM
 To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
 Subject: Health Checker

 Do most of you keep the health checker up and running all the time?  I
 usually just start it periodically to see what is new that shows up.  My
 concern in keeping it running has to do with highlighted messages it puts on
 the console (like when no operator is on duty).  I was just curious how most
 people handle it.

 Anne D. Crabtree
 System Programmer
 WV Office of Technology Data Center
 1900 Kanawha Blvd East
 Charleston, WV  25305
 (304)558-5914 ext 58292
 (304)558-1441 fax


 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
 DISCLAIMER:
 The information contained in this message may be privileged
 or confidential and is protected from disclosure. If the
 reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or
 an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message
 to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
 dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication
 is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
 in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the
 message and deleting it from your computer.

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Health Checker

2010-06-18 Thread Shane Ginnane
Excuse my cynisosity, but wasn't that the whole point of HC (at least 
initially) - a sop to the 
zNextGen that IBM has been assiduously pursuing (them what don't have all the 
experience) ?.
Why the hell aren't the defaults more sensible ?. Go have a look at Barbaras 
gripes over the last 
12 months (the HC ones I mean).
Sites with experienced folks turn off what they want to ignore - what about the 
others ?. Folks like 
me come into a (mature) site, and no HC alerts - guess why ?.

Another idea that missed IMHO. I was going to have a quiet discussion with 
Marna about this, but 
we got onto other things.

Shane ...

On Fri, Jun 18th, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Peter Relson wrote:

 It sounds like the poster is relatively inexperienced in the
 capabilities of HC. 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Enclaves hung up

2010-06-18 Thread Ward, Mike S
Hello, all. I have a problem that we are working on and it seems to no
avail. We have a distributed application that uses DB/2 on the MF and
DB/2 connect to get to the mainframe. We are on z/os V1.7 currently
migrating to V1.11 with DB/2 at V7 with no plan to migrate because of
the application on the distributed side. (My assumption)There is a
situation where a user does some kind query or DB/2 access that causes
them to lock a resource on the MF side, this then causes all the other
users to halt on the MF. The users then get impatient and close the
browser and reopen it again to start another session. The enclave that
the user was using when they clicked the browser closed is still
running. Eventually there are hundreds of enclaves and the CPU has
soared to 100%. Then we get called and now we are trying to handle a
snowball that has grown very large. All in all we stabilize the system,
but in our comedy caper routine we didn't have the time to figure out
what really caused the problem. Have any of you ever had this problem?
If so what was done to correct it? Do any of you have any suggestions
that we could follow that may help us figure out what the problem really
is?


Thanks in advance for your support.
==
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity
to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please 
notify the system manager. This message
contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual 
named. If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the 
sender immediately by e-mail if you
have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. 
If you are not the intended recipient
you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in 
reliance on the contents of this
information is strictly prohibited.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM Rational Developer for System z

2010-06-18 Thread Mike W Stayton
Redbooks about z/PDT

System z Personal Development Tool: Volume 1 Introduction and Reference, 
SG24-7721-01
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247721.html?Open 
System z Personal Development Tool: Volume 2 Installation and Basic Use, 
SG24-7722-01
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247722.html?Open 
IBM System z Personal Development Tool: Volume 3 Additional Topics, 
SG24-7723-01
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247723.html?Open

Mike Stayton
z/OS Communications Server
m...@us.ibm.com


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Enclaves hung up

2010-06-18 Thread George Henke
DB2 has a default deadlock timeout which rolls back deadly embraces after
the timeout expires (DROLLBACK(YES)).  Most DB2 systems have this turned on,
including yours most likely, or nothing would ever get done.

However, when DB2 CONNECT triggers a CICS Distributed Program Link (DPL)
mirror transaction to the AOR, to satisfy a DB2 Query it needs to specify
the Syncpoint On Return parameter on the EXEC CICS LINK statement (the only
place it can be specified) or DB2 will not do the DROLLBACK when the timeout
interval expires.

This is most likely the problem.

Once the deadlock rollback fails the users get frustrated, close their
browsers, come back in again, and the problem just escalates out of
control.

Whatever software you are using to do the DB2 CONNECT most likely has a
parameter to tell CICS to turn the Syncpoiint On Return on or off.

If you check it you will probably find it is turned off for the transaction
in question.
Just turn it on, and you should be ok; EXEC CICS LINK, under the
covers, will turn on the Syncpoint On Return parameter, and when the default
deadlock time interval expires, DB2 will do the rollback as it should.
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Ward, Mike S mw...@ssfcu.org wrote:

 Hello, all. I have a problem that we are working on and it seems to no
 avail. We have a distributed application that uses DB/2 on the MF and
 DB/2 connect to get to the mainframe. We are on z/os V1.7 currently
 migrating to V1.11 with DB/2 at V7 with no plan to migrate because of
 the application on the distributed side. (My assumption)There is a
 situation where a user does some kind query or DB/2 access that causes
 them to lock a resource on the MF side, this then causes all the other
 users to halt on the MF. The users then get impatient and close the
 browser and reopen it again to start another session. The enclave that
 the user was using when they clicked the browser closed is still
 running. Eventually there are hundreds of enclaves and the CPU has
 soared to 100%. Then we get called and now we are trying to handle a
 snowball that has grown very large. All in all we stabilize the system,
 but in our comedy caper routine we didn't have the time to figure out
 what really caused the problem. Have any of you ever had this problem?
 If so what was done to correct it? Do any of you have any suggestions
 that we could follow that may help us figure out what the problem really
 is?


 Thanks in advance for your support.
 ==
 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
 solely for the use of the individual or entity
 to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error
 please notify the system manager. This message
 contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual
 named. If you are not the named addressee you
 should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the
 sender immediately by e-mail if you
 have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your
 system. If you are not the intended recipient
 you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any
 action in reliance on the contents of this
 information is strictly prohibited.

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html




-- 
George Henke
(C) 845 401 5614

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM Rational Developer for System z

2010-06-18 Thread Tony Harminc
On 16 June 2010 01:48, Timothy Sipples timothy.sipp...@us.ibm.com wrote:
 Please bear in mind that I do not speak for IBM officially, so ask your
 IBM representative. However, my personal assessment follows.

 Tony Harminc writes:
Suppose I have three developers, Alice, Bob, and Carol, and they all
want to use a single Intel machine configured with the minimum of
whatever it takes to be properly licensed to do z/OS development and
testing. (For the sake of this discussion, let's assume that none of
the activities crosses the line into production work of any kind,
however vaguely that may be defined.)

 It's not vague at all, in my opinion. It's one of the clearer explanations
 of permitted uses I've seen, actually.

The announcement says ...may not be used for production workloads of
any kind, nor robust development workloads including without
limitation production module builds, pre-production testing, stress
testing, or performance testing. You may think that clear, but I
think it's entirely open to IBM to redefine anything they don't like
to fit in to the exclusion list.

Why IBM wants to base its licensing on what customers choose to use
their hardware and software for, rather than just selling MIPS and
getting out of the way, is an interesting question that isn't likely
to get answered here. It's obvious that it has led to grief in the
past, and doubtless will do so again. Even the airlines don't try to
say if you are flying on this discounted fare, it is a condition of
carriage that you may not fly to a business meeting, but only for
purposes of personal or family vacation, and only if during your
vacation you do not at any time take a phone call from work. Rather,
they try to add features that appeal to business travellers to the
higher fares, and in various ways make it difficult for them to take
advantage of the lower fares.

 That said, if Eve the system programmer accesses RDz Unit Test in order
 (for example) to set up and/or configure Alice/Bob/Carol/Don's unit test
 environment, yes, Eve would need licenses for both RDz and RDz Unit Test.
 She's a user. In software licensing there's no such thing as smoking but
 not inhaling. :-)

So would she need a separate licence for each machine/dongle in the
shop, or does one cover all her sysprog tasks on each small group's or
individual's machine? I imagine you're going to tell me it's clear...

I also think it's quite unrealistic to think that these machines won't
need sysprog help. IBM has worked hard on dumbing down the sysprog's
job for decades, but the marketing aspect of that has always led the
reality by quite a bit. Your average COBOL (or Java for that matter)
programmer, will not really know what to do when s/he gets an S0C6 in
RACF when submitting that COBOL compile.

 But let's add in Maude now. Maude provides z/OS help desk support at Eve's
 company. If Alice calls Maude and asks for help, and Maude provides
 telephone support, does Maude need a license? No. She's not accessing RDz
 Unit Test, she's not using it, she doesn't have a session to it -- she
 doesn't need a license. If Maude stands over Alice's shoulder, watches, and
 verbally suggests courses of action as Alice works (Alice's permitted
 uses), does Maude need a license? Still no. If Maude yanks the keyboard
 from Alice's hands and starts typing into TSO (on RDz Unit Test), does
 Maude need a license? Yes.

 If Maude then goes to Starbucks, buys a decaf latte, turns on her iPad,
 and...  Oh, never mind. :-)

Very funny.

 Support means that you can open PMRs on RDz
 Unit Test container issues. For example, if you have trouble installing
 RDz Unit Test, you can open a PMR. But if you're trying to figure out why
 your JCL isn't running in the Unit Test environment, no, that's not
 eligible for a PMR.

How about that S0C6 that doesn't happen on the production machine? How
about an MVS integrity exposure?

Oh come on - I'm not suggesting any improper use; I'm trying to find
out how many licences for what components are required and what *is*
proper use.

 I think the language is pretty darn clear and rather common throughout the
 IT industry. Licensing concepts like user and permitted uses certainly
 are not new, especially for application development.

They are quite new to the IBM mainframe world. Licensing per seat
has been around for a long time for application software in certain
industries, but this increasingly detailed specification of the nature
of the workloads you can run is new to z/OS.

Sure - I get the general idea, however ill-specified. But might it
even be the case that only development based on actually using the
desktop portion of IBM Rational Developer for System z with EGL or IBM
Rational Developer for System z with Java is permitted? GUI good -
green-screen bad?

 Does it say that?

I don't know if it is trying to say that. You keep telling me it's
clear, but it's not. This is part of the problem of bundling together
unrelated software components. I can easily 

Re: JES2 Queue Times / SMF30 Data Zones

2010-06-18 Thread Tom Wasik
Let me explain what each time means/comes from and perhaps that will help
answer your questions:

SMF30RST - The comment in the IFASMFR3 macro states TIME, IN HUNDREDTHS OF
A SECOND READER RECOGNIZED THE JOB CARD FOR THIS JOB.  This is precisely
correct.  It is when JES2 input processing sees the JOB card.  In z/OS 1.7
this happens a bit earlier for internal readers than prior releases (in case
that matters).

11.08.15 JOB94550  TUESDAY,   01 JUN 2010 
This is when the first message is placed in the job log for the job.  This
is when the data set is created.  In general, the first message for a job is
the RACF message that the job has been authenticated and assigned a userid.
 This occurs at the end of input processing (when JES2 realizes that it has
a complete job).  For TSO SUBMIT processing, it is when it reaches the end
of the job stream and issues an ENDREQ macro to get the job id.  It also
occurs when a IEBGENER closes the internal reader.  Or it occurs when the
next JOB card is encountered. 

The difference between these 2 time stamps is the time it took to complete
input processing for the job.  This includes the RACF check and writing the
job to SPOOL.  It also includes the time the submitting application took to
actually write the job.  There have been cases when an application was
submitting multiple jobs but did not tell JES when one job ended.  In that
case, the job will sit there until the next job is written to the internal
reader.

There are some rare cases where the first message into a job log does not
occur during input processing.  For example when you supply a userid and
password on the job card and did not enable the ICH70002I YOUR PASSWORD
WILL EXPIRE IN  xx DAYS. message.  Then the first message occurs at
conversion time.  Just submit a job with TYPRUN=JCLHOLD to see what messages
are issued at input time vs conversion time.

I think the other time stamps are clear enough.  Let me know if you need
additional information.

Tom

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Emulator Sessions Hung

2010-06-18 Thread Kopischke, David G.
Greetings again,
   I've been trying to track down the cause of several emulator sessions
not coming back alive after IPL's. We have two PC's running EXTRA! 3270
emulators. Each has four emulator sessions defined and running. When we
IPL, one set of sessions on one PC come back alive just fine. Of the
four sessions on the other PC, only one comes back alive.

   I double checked all the session definitions. They match. I had
EXTRA!
reloaded on the PC. I checked for weird things in TN3270 and VTAM, but
find nothing to explain this inconsistent behavior. We can bounce the
CICS regions these are defined to and they recover the sessions just
fine.
We only experience the connectivity issue after IPL's.

   Any ideas on what to check next 


--
This e-mail transmission may contain information that is proprietary, 
privileged and/or confidential and is intended exclusively for the person(s) to 
whom it is addressed. Any use, copying, retention or disclosure by any person 
other than the intended recipient or the intended recipient's designees is 
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient or their designee, 
please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies. 
OppenheimerFunds may, at its sole discretion, monitor, review, retain and/or 
disclose the content of all email communications. 
==

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Enclaves hung up

2010-06-18 Thread Brian Peterson
One thing we do to protect our system from runaway distributed DB2 queries
is to make sure the WLM service class for possibly-ill-behaved queries has
two periods with the final period set to Discretionary.  That way, we have a
chance of logging on and dealing with an ill-behaved thread without too many
ill effects to the rest of the system.

HTH

Brian

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Emulator Sessions Hung

2010-06-18 Thread Patrick Lyon
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:45:20 -0600, Kopischke, David G. 
dgkopisc...@oppenheimerfunds.com wrote:

   Any ideas on what to check next 


David, a couple of questions if I may.

1)  Does the Extra session stay connected?
2)  Is this a telnet session to port 23?
3)  What is supposed to appear on the screen?  A USSTAB?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Centralized Log Management?

2010-06-18 Thread Jeffrey Deaver
Anybody out there have an enterprise wide centralized log management tool
(sometimes called SIEM tool) which they are feeding mainframe logs to?
I'd be interested in hearing stories.  Thanks.

Jeffrey Deaver, Engineer
Systems Engineering
jeffrey.dea...@securian.com
651-665-4231(v)
IS - Creating competitive advantage with technology.  Providing service
that excels.
OSS -  Where Innovation Happens

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Emulator Sessions Hung

2010-06-18 Thread Michael Saraco
Did you check the time out or keep alive setting for the ones not working?






From:   Kopischke, David G. dgkopisc...@oppenheimerfunds.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date:   06/18/2010 12:45 PM
Subject:Emulator Sessions Hung
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu



Greetings again,
   I've been trying to track down the cause of several emulator sessions
not coming back alive after IPL's. We have two PC's running EXTRA! 3270
emulators. Each has four emulator sessions defined and running. When we
IPL, one set of sessions on one PC come back alive just fine. Of the
four sessions on the other PC, only one comes back alive.

   I double checked all the session definitions. They match. I had
EXTRA!
reloaded on the PC. I checked for weird things in TN3270 and VTAM, but
find nothing to explain this inconsistent behavior. We can bounce the
CICS regions these are defined to and they recover the sessions just
fine.
We only experience the connectivity issue after IPL's.

   Any ideas on what to check next 


--
This e-mail transmission may contain information that is proprietary, 
privileged and/or confidential and is intended exclusively for the 
person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any use, copying, retention or 
disclosure by any person other than the intended recipient or the intended 
recipient's designees is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended 
recipient or their designee, please notify the sender immediately by 
return e-mail and delete all copies. OppenheimerFunds may, at its sole 
discretion, monitor, review, retain and/or disclose the content of all 
email communications. 
==

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html





--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Emulator Sessions Hung

2010-06-18 Thread George Henke
All PD starts with an error message or error code.

Please check the SYSLOG at IPL time, the VTAM log, and the CICS MSGLOG.

Either there is an error message for these 3 devices in one or more of these
logs or not.

If there is, it will tell us where to start PD.

If there is not, then VTAM and CICS are not even trying to connect at IPL
time and PD will go down that path.

But without an error message or the positive lack thereof, we are
just guessing, speculating, shooting in the dark, because it could anyone
of number of things.

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Michael Saraco 
michael.sar...@baer-consulting.com wrote:

 Did you check the time out or keep alive setting for the ones not working?






 From:   Kopischke, David G. dgkopisc...@oppenheimerfunds.com
 To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
 Date:   06/18/2010 12:45 PM
 Subject:Emulator Sessions Hung
 Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu



 Greetings again,
   I've been trying to track down the cause of several emulator sessions
 not coming back alive after IPL's. We have two PC's running EXTRA! 3270
 emulators. Each has four emulator sessions defined and running. When we
 IPL, one set of sessions on one PC come back alive just fine. Of the
 four sessions on the other PC, only one comes back alive.

   I double checked all the session definitions. They match. I had
 EXTRA!
 reloaded on the PC. I checked for weird things in TN3270 and VTAM, but
 find nothing to explain this inconsistent behavior. We can bounce the
 CICS regions these are defined to and they recover the sessions just
 fine.
 We only experience the connectivity issue after IPL's.

   Any ideas on what to check next 



 --
 This e-mail transmission may contain information that is proprietary,
 privileged and/or confidential and is intended exclusively for the
 person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any use, copying, retention or
 disclosure by any person other than the intended recipient or the intended
 recipient's designees is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
 recipient or their designee, please notify the sender immediately by
 return e-mail and delete all copies. OppenheimerFunds may, at its sole
 discretion, monitor, review, retain and/or disclose the content of all
 email communications.

 ==

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html





 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html




-- 
George Henke
(C) 845 401 5614

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Emulator Sessions Hung

2010-06-18 Thread Dave Kopischke
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:13:03 -0500, Patrick Lyon 
ptl...@midamerican.com wrote:


David, a couple of questions if I may.

1)  Does the Extra session stay connected?
2)  Is this a telnet session to port 23?
3)  What is supposed to appear on the screen?  A USSTAB?


1) The EXTRA! session stays running on the PC. Connectivity to the host is 
lost.
2) Yes.
3) Yes.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Emulator Sessions Hung

2010-06-18 Thread Dave Kopischke
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:26:00 -0500, Michael Saraco michael.sar...@baer-
CONSULTING.COM wrote:

Did you check the time out or keep alive setting for the ones not working?



Yes, TN3270 has both these PC's IP addresses listed as KEEPALIVE.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Emulator Sessions Hung

2010-06-18 Thread Brian Peterson
My (non attachmate) emulator has a keepalive setup option.  Did you compare
the settings for each of the emulators you're having trouble with compared
to an emulator that is working OK?  From your reply (below), it sounded like
you were talking about z/OS TN3270 options, not emulator options.

Brian

On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:40:59 -0500, Dave Kopischke wrote:

On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:26:00 -0500, Michael Saraco wrote:

Did you check the time out or keep alive setting for the ones not working?



Yes, TN3270 has both these PC's IP addresses listed as KEEPALIVE.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Emulator Sessions Hung

2010-06-18 Thread Dave Kopischke
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:40:16 -0400, George Henke gahe...@gmail.com 
wrote:

All PD starts with an error message or error code.

Please check the SYSLOG at IPL time, the VTAM log, and the CICS MSGLOG.



I didn't notice these in my first pass

IST663I INIT OTHER REQUEST FAILED, SENSE=08570003
IST664I REAL  OLU=SSINET.TESTOLD  REAL  DLU=SSINET.PCOPO3
IST889I SID = D5DBA179299B6BFD
IST264I REQUIRED RESOURCE PCOPO3 NOT ACTIVE
IST314I END

IST663I INIT OTHER REQUEST FAILED, SENSE=08570003
IST664I REAL  OLU=SSINET.TESTTRN  REAL  DLU=SSINET.PCOPO5
IST889I SID = D5DBA179299B6BF6
IST264I REQUIRED RESOURCE PCOPO5 NOT ACTIVE
IST314I END

IST663I INIT OTHER REQUEST FAILED, SENSE=08570003
IST664I REAL  OLU=SSINET.TESTTRN  REAL  DLU=SSINET.PCOPO6
IST889I SID = D5DBA179299B6BF7
IST264I REQUIRED RESOURCE PCOPO6 NOT ACTIVE
IST314I END

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Emulator Sessions Hung

2010-06-18 Thread Dave Kopischke
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:58:38 -0500, Brian Peterson 
brian.peterson.ibm.m...@comcast.net wrote:

My (non attachmate) emulator has a keepalive setup option.  Did you 
compare
the settings for each of the emulators you're having trouble with compared
to an emulator that is working OK?  From your reply (below), it sounded like
you were talking about z/OS TN3270 options, not emulator options.


I have checked everything obvious. The EXTRA! definitions of the sessions all 
match except for LU name. I didn't see a KEEPALIVE option in those definitions 
though. No timeout or anything like that either.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Enclaves hung up

2010-06-18 Thread Clark, Kevin
Marc,

From a Z/OS systems perspective classified all DB2/DDF workloads via
WLM. 

Then sub-classified them into appropriate services classes with default
below batch ( be careful of congestion of threads not getting CPU
services that low and your ability cancel them).  

Since you stated that the CPU was soaring, you should add a CPU governor
via DB2 for these threads if indeed they are excessive. 

No the problem:   locate the high usage thread via SMF post processing
or any other tool you may have, if it's simple a case of too many
threads, then you'll have to throttle them down.

Kevin  



-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Ward, Mike S
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 10:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Enclaves hung up

Hello, all. I have a problem that we are working on and it seems to no
avail. We have a distributed application that uses DB/2 on the MF and
DB/2 connect to get to the mainframe. We are on z/os V1.7 currently
migrating to V1.11 with DB/2 at V7 with no plan to migrate because of
the application on the distributed side. (My assumption)There is a
situation where a user does some kind query or DB/2 access that causes
them to lock a resource on the MF side, this then causes all the other
users to halt on the MF. The users then get impatient and close the
browser and reopen it again to start another session. The enclave that
the user was using when they clicked the browser closed is still
running. Eventually there are hundreds of enclaves and the CPU has
soared to 100%. Then we get called and now we are trying to handle a
snowball that has grown very large. All in all we stabilize the system,
but in our comedy caper routine we didn't have the time to figure out
what really caused the problem. Have any of you ever had this problem?
If so what was done to correct it? Do any of you have any suggestions
that we could follow that may help us figure out what the problem really
is?


Thanks in advance for your support.
==
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error
please notify the system manager. This message
contains confidential information and is intended only for the
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify
the sender immediately by e-mail if you
have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your
system. If you are not the intended recipient
you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any
action in reliance on the contents of this
information is strictly prohibited.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


This e-mail message and any attachments transmitted with it are confidential 
and are intended solely for the use of its authorized recipient(s). If you are 
not an intended or authorized recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the 
information contained in this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this 
message in error or are not authorized to receive it, please immediately notify 
the sender and delete the original message and all copies of it from your 
computer.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Emulator Sessions Hung

2010-06-18 Thread George Henke
Thank you Dave, this is a good start.

The 08570003 means the VTAM Secondary LU is not active.

According to QUICKREF(QW):

 o   If the required resource is NOT ACTIVE, enter a VARY ACT command to
 activate the resource. If the resource is an application program,
 start it.

Are you issuing a VARY ACT manually after the IPL to get these sessions
active?

If not, somehow they are getting started because I believe you said they
eventually go into session.

You need simply to look further into these logs to see at what point these
LU's become active and who finally activates them, how are they activated..

The Attachmate emulator program is known as an application LU, not a
physical 3270 LU.  But VTAM does not know the difference.

So if for some reason the Attachmate emulator program is not started in the
PC at the time VTAM issues the INIT BIND for it, it will look to VTAM like
the physical terminal is turned off.

You could check for any anomalies, like pauses, in the Attachmate script
that starts the emulator programs.

But, this would still just be guessing because we need to research further
in the logs to see at what point the LU's finally come active and how they
are activated.

It could be by an operator manually, could be NETVIEW scripts, could be CICS
AUTOINSTALL, could be a VTAM MAJNODE not being active.

It is all still to soon to draw conclusions without more information.

So, please continue to examine the logs: SYSLOG, VTAMLOG, and CICS MSGLOG,
to spot the precise point at which these SLU's become active and who is
doing it.

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Dave Kopischke 
dgkopisc...@oppenheimerfunds.com wrote:

 On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:40:16 -0400, George Henke gahe...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 All PD starts with an error message or error code.
 
 Please check the SYSLOG at IPL time, the VTAM log, and the CICS MSGLOG.
 


 I didn't notice these in my first pass

 IST663I INIT OTHER REQUEST FAILED, SENSE=08570003
 IST664I REAL  OLU=SSINET.TESTOLD  REAL  DLU=SSINET.PCOPO3
 IST889I SID = D5DBA179299B6BFD
 IST264I REQUIRED RESOURCE PCOPO3 NOT ACTIVE
 IST314I END

 IST663I INIT OTHER REQUEST FAILED, SENSE=08570003
 IST664I REAL  OLU=SSINET.TESTTRN  REAL  DLU=SSINET.PCOPO5
 IST889I SID = D5DBA179299B6BF6
 IST264I REQUIRED RESOURCE PCOPO5 NOT ACTIVE
 IST314I END

 IST663I INIT OTHER REQUEST FAILED, SENSE=08570003
 IST664I REAL  OLU=SSINET.TESTTRN  REAL  DLU=SSINET.PCOPO6
 IST889I SID = D5DBA179299B6BF7
 IST264I REQUIRED RESOURCE PCOPO6 NOT ACTIVE
 IST314I END

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html




-- 
George Henke
(C) 845 401 5614

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Enclaves hung up

2010-06-18 Thread George Henke
The high CPU is most likely attributable to a race condition imposed by
the deadly embrace deadlock condition from which DB2 was unable to
ROLLBACK for reasons previously stated.

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Clark, Kevin kevin.cl...@bcbsde.comwrote:

 Marc,

 From a Z/OS systems perspective classified all DB2/DDF workloads via
 WLM.

 Then sub-classified them into appropriate services classes with default
 below batch ( be careful of congestion of threads not getting CPU
 services that low and your ability cancel them).

 Since you stated that the CPU was soaring, you should add a CPU governor
 via DB2 for these threads if indeed they are excessive.

 No the problem:   locate the high usage thread via SMF post processing
 or any other tool you may have, if it's simple a case of too many
 threads, then you'll have to throttle them down.

 Kevin



 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
 Behalf Of Ward, Mike S
 Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 10:46 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
 Subject: Enclaves hung up

 Hello, all. I have a problem that we are working on and it seems to no
 avail. We have a distributed application that uses DB/2 on the MF and
 DB/2 connect to get to the mainframe. We are on z/os V1.7 currently
 migrating to V1.11 with DB/2 at V7 with no plan to migrate because of
 the application on the distributed side. (My assumption)There is a
 situation where a user does some kind query or DB/2 access that causes
 them to lock a resource on the MF side, this then causes all the other
 users to halt on the MF. The users then get impatient and close the
 browser and reopen it again to start another session. The enclave that
 the user was using when they clicked the browser closed is still
 running. Eventually there are hundreds of enclaves and the CPU has
 soared to 100%. Then we get called and now we are trying to handle a
 snowball that has grown very large. All in all we stabilize the system,
 but in our comedy caper routine we didn't have the time to figure out
 what really caused the problem. Have any of you ever had this problem?
 If so what was done to correct it? Do any of you have any suggestions
 that we could follow that may help us figure out what the problem really
 is?


 Thanks in advance for your support.
 ==
 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
 intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
 to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error
 please notify the system manager. This message
 contains confidential information and is intended only for the
 individual named. If you are not the named addressee you
 should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify
 the sender immediately by e-mail if you
 have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your
 system. If you are not the intended recipient
 you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any
 action in reliance on the contents of this
 information is strictly prohibited.

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


 This e-mail message and any attachments transmitted with it are
 confidential and are intended solely for the use of its authorized
 recipient(s). If you are not an intended or authorized recipient, you are
 hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any
 action in reliance on the information contained in this e-mail is
 prohibited. If you have received this message in error or are not authorized
 to receive it, please immediately notify the sender and delete the original
 message and all copies of it from your computer.

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html




-- 
George Henke
(C) 845 401 5614

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Emulator Sessions Hung

2010-06-18 Thread Chris Mason
Dave

 I have checked everything obvious.

Everything obvious includes particularly any error messages. My first 
reaction 
to George Henke suggesting that you look for error messages was What 
nonsense, of course he checked for error messages, grandmothers are very 
good at doing something I have had intellectually challenged list/forum 
moderators object to[1] to eggs! Imagine my surprise when - lo and behold -
it turns out there were some error messages to be perused/pursued!

 IST663I INIT OTHER REQUEST FAILED, SENSE=08570003
 IST664I REAL  OLU=SSINET.TESTOLD  REAL  DLU=SSINET.PCOPO3
 IST889I SID = D5DBA179299B6BFD
 IST264I REQUIRED RESOURCE PCOPO3 NOT ACTIVE
 IST314I END

 IST663I INIT OTHER REQUEST FAILED, SENSE=08570003
 IST664I REAL  OLU=SSINET.TESTTRN  REAL  DLU=SSINET.PCOPO5
 IST889I SID = D5DBA179299B6BF6
 IST264I REQUIRED RESOURCE PCOPO5 NOT ACTIVE
 IST314I END

 IST663I INIT OTHER REQUEST FAILED, SENSE=08570003
 IST664I REAL  OLU=SSINET.TESTTRN  REAL  DLU=SSINET.PCOPO6
 IST889I SID = D5DBA179299B6BF7
 IST264I REQUIRED RESOURCE PCOPO6 NOT ACTIVE
 IST314I END

So what do you make of sense code 08570003?

Pause while you look it up ...

Now just to be sure we are reading from the same hymn sheet[2].

What are TESTOLD and TESTTRN? I'm going to guess they are some sort of 
application. I'm also going to guess that you have deceived yourself and us in 
that you do *not* expect to see an USS message 10 appear but you expect 
to log onto a CICS system named either TESTOLD or TESTTRN.

I can see no point otherwise in your mentioning that you checked for CICS 
messages.

You need to explain why there is a session setup attempt which discovers 
that the secondary LU is inactive at the time the session setup is attempted.

What you appear to have is some sort of timing problem while system 
components are being brought up such that not all the resources necessary to 
be active are active at the right time and there is no recovery from a failure.

Please be very precise about exactly how you - or a colleague who was 
responsible - have configured your emulator, the TN3270 server, the APPL 
statements representing the secondary LUs and TESTOLD/TESTTRN as it 
affects the establishment of a connection and session.

Chris Mason

[1] An amusing sequence introducing the film Getting Straight is a student 
protesting over something holding a placard stating Gravity is a lie on one 
side and The Earth that word to which moderators may object on the 
other.

[2] From the z/OS Communications Server IP and SNA Codes manual - which 
you should always have logically/electronically to hand:

quote

Sense code 0857

SSCP-LU Session Not Active: The SSCP-LU session, required for the 
processing of a request, is not active; for example, in processing REQECHO, 
the SSCP did not have an active session with the target LU named in the 
REQECHO RU.

Bytes 2 and 3 following the sense code contain sense-code-specific 
information.

...

0003 The SSCP-SLU session is inactive.

/quote

On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:01:46 -0500, Dave Kopischke 
dgkopisc...@oppenheimerfunds.com wrote:

On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:58:38 -0500, Brian Peterson
brian.peterson.ibm.m...@comcast.net wrote:

My (non attachmate) emulator has a keepalive setup option.  Did you
compare
the settings for each of the emulators you're having trouble with compared
to an emulator that is working OK?  From your reply (below), it sounded like
you were talking about z/OS TN3270 options, not emulator options.


I have checked everything obvious. The EXTRA! definitions of the sessions all
match except for LU name. I didn't see a KEEPALIVE option in those 
definitions
though. No timeout or anything like that either.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Emulator Sessions Hung

2010-06-18 Thread George Henke
Everything obvious includes particularly any error messages. My first
reaction
to George Henke suggesting that you look for error messages was What
nonsense, of course he checked for error messages, grandmothers are very
good at doing

Sorry, sometimes it takes the naive to see the obvious.



On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Chris Mason chrisma...@belgacom.netwrote:

 Dave

  I have checked everything obvious.

 Everything obvious includes particularly any error messages. My first
 reaction
 to George Henke suggesting that you look for error messages was What
 nonsense, of course he checked for error messages, grandmothers are very
 good at doing something I have had intellectually challenged list/forum
 moderators object to[1] to eggs! Imagine my surprise when - lo and behold
 -
 it turns out there were some error messages to be perused/pursued!

  IST663I INIT OTHER REQUEST FAILED, SENSE=08570003
  IST664I REAL  OLU=SSINET.TESTOLD  REAL  DLU=SSINET.PCOPO3
  IST889I SID = D5DBA179299B6BFD
  IST264I REQUIRED RESOURCE PCOPO3 NOT ACTIVE
  IST314I END

  IST663I INIT OTHER REQUEST FAILED, SENSE=08570003
  IST664I REAL  OLU=SSINET.TESTTRN  REAL  DLU=SSINET.PCOPO5
  IST889I SID = D5DBA179299B6BF6
  IST264I REQUIRED RESOURCE PCOPO5 NOT ACTIVE
  IST314I END

  IST663I INIT OTHER REQUEST FAILED, SENSE=08570003
  IST664I REAL  OLU=SSINET.TESTTRN  REAL  DLU=SSINET.PCOPO6
  IST889I SID = D5DBA179299B6BF7
  IST264I REQUIRED RESOURCE PCOPO6 NOT ACTIVE
  IST314I END

 So what do you make of sense code 08570003?

 Pause while you look it up ...

 Now just to be sure we are reading from the same hymn sheet[2].

 What are TESTOLD and TESTTRN? I'm going to guess they are some sort of
 application. I'm also going to guess that you have deceived yourself and us
 in
 that you do *not* expect to see an USS message 10 appear but you expect
 to log onto a CICS system named either TESTOLD or TESTTRN.

 I can see no point otherwise in your mentioning that you checked for CICS
 messages.

 You need to explain why there is a session setup attempt which discovers
 that the secondary LU is inactive at the time the session setup is
 attempted.

 What you appear to have is some sort of timing problem while system
 components are being brought up such that not all the resources necessary
 to
 be active are active at the right time and there is no recovery from a
 failure.

 Please be very precise about exactly how you - or a colleague who was
 responsible - have configured your emulator, the TN3270 server, the APPL
 statements representing the secondary LUs and TESTOLD/TESTTRN as it
 affects the establishment of a connection and session.

 Chris Mason

 [1] An amusing sequence introducing the film Getting Straight is a
 student
 protesting over something holding a placard stating Gravity is a lie on
 one
 side and The Earth that word to which moderators may object on the
 other.

 [2] From the z/OS Communications Server IP and SNA Codes manual - which
 you should always have logically/electronically to hand:

 quote

 Sense code 0857

 SSCP-LU Session Not Active: The SSCP-LU session, required for the
 processing of a request, is not active; for example, in processing REQECHO,
 the SSCP did not have an active session with the target LU named in the
 REQECHO RU.

 Bytes 2 and 3 following the sense code contain sense-code-specific
 information.

 ...

 0003 The SSCP-SLU session is inactive.

 /quote

 On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:01:46 -0500, Dave Kopischke
 dgkopisc...@oppenheimerfunds.com wrote:

 On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:58:38 -0500, Brian Peterson
 brian.peterson.ibm.m...@comcast.net wrote:
 
 My (non attachmate) emulator has a keepalive setup option.  Did you
 compare
 the settings for each of the emulators you're having trouble with
 compared
 to an emulator that is working OK?  From your reply (below), it sounded
 like
 you were talking about z/OS TN3270 options, not emulator options.
 
 
 I have checked everything obvious. The EXTRA! definitions of the sessions
 all
 match except for LU name. I didn't see a KEEPALIVE option in those
 definitions
 though. No timeout or anything like that either.

 --
  For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html




-- 
George Henke
(C) 845 401 5614

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CA's MSM

2010-06-18 Thread Scott Fagen
To give at least some color from the analyst community about our efforts,
here are two links to briefs by EMA and Gartner (mind any wraps).

EMA:
http://www.ca.com/files/IndustryAnalystReports/emaworldmainframe0510ib_239016.pdf
(We host the EMA brief because we paid them for the right, it is a
flattering review.  The same report is available for a fee from their site at
http://www.enterprisemanagement.com/research/asset.php?id=1752 )

Gartner:
http://www.gartner.com/technology/media-products/reprints/ca/vol2/article1/article1.html

As with all things, opinions vary.  In the last year, we've had over 260
sites install and use CA MSM, from the largest financial institutions to
some of our smallest customers.

Scott Fagen
Chief Architect
Mainframe Business Unit
CA Technologies

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Emulator Sessions Hung

2010-06-18 Thread Dave Kopischke
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:43:13 -0400, George Henke gahe...@gmail.com 
wrote:

Thank you Dave, this is a good start.

The 08570003 means the VTAM Secondary LU is not active.

Are you issuing a VARY ACT manually after the IPL to get these sessions
active?

No, I don't see anything varying them active. Neither the ones that work nor 
the ones that don't.

If not, somehow they are getting started because I believe you said they
eventually go into session.

The operators manually restart the EXTRA sessions. Once they do that, they 
get the VTAM splash and connect up just fine.

So if for some reason the Attachmate emulator program is not started in the
PC at the time VTAM issues the INIT BIND for it, it will look to VTAM like
the physical terminal is turned off.

The PC and emulator sessions remain on throughout the IPL. Once VTAM 
initializes, all the emulators get the VTAM splash and work as expected except 
for these three.

It could be by an operator manually, could be NETVIEW scripts, could be CICS
AUTOINSTALL, could be a VTAM MAJNODE not being active.

That's why I posted. I checked everything I could think of (everything 
obvious). I'll look through VTAM messages more closely and see if there's 
something buried deeper in there. I already checked AUTOINSTALL and found 
no differences, but I'll look at that again. There has to be an answer.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Emulator Sessions Hung

2010-06-18 Thread George Henke
Thank you, Dave, this is very helpful.

I would switch the focus now to the one good Attachmate session on the PC
which works.

Please trace it through the IPL SYSLOG and note where and how it is
activated and how it goes into session.  Note its majnode, timing, etc.

Then without losing your focus, note, as you go along, any irregularities
occurring with the other 3 failing nodes at or about the same time.

I know this may sound super simple but in PD, whenever you have an instance
where something works and something is broken, the solution is simple and
sure if you just remember to always work from the side that works first.
Then you will eventually see and find what is going wrong with the other one
that is broken.

The big mistake most people make is to get stuck on the broken one and
ignore the one good one that is working.  That approach never leads
anywhere.

So please go back through the IPL SYSLOG and this time track the one good
node that is working and let us know what you find.


On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Dave Kopischke 
dgkopisc...@oppenheimerfunds.com wrote:

 On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:43:13 -0400, George Henke gahe...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Thank you Dave, this is a good start.
 
 The 08570003 means the VTAM Secondary LU is not active.
 
 Are you issuing a VARY ACT manually after the IPL to get these sessions
 active?

 No, I don't see anything varying them active. Neither the ones that work
 nor
 the ones that don't.

 If not, somehow they are getting started because I believe you said they
 eventually go into session.

 The operators manually restart the EXTRA sessions. Once they do that, they
 get the VTAM splash and connect up just fine.

 So if for some reason the Attachmate emulator program is not started in
 the
 PC at the time VTAM issues the INIT BIND for it, it will look to VTAM like
 the physical terminal is turned off.

 The PC and emulator sessions remain on throughout the IPL. Once VTAM
 initializes, all the emulators get the VTAM splash and work as expected
 except
 for these three.

 It could be by an operator manually, could be NETVIEW scripts, could be
 CICS
 AUTOINSTALL, could be a VTAM MAJNODE not being active.

 That's why I posted. I checked everything I could think of (everything
 obvious). I'll look through VTAM messages more closely and see if there's
 something buried deeper in there. I already checked AUTOINSTALL and found
 no differences, but I'll look at that again. There has to be an answer.

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html




-- 
George Henke
(C) 845 401 5614

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Emulator Sessions Hung

2010-06-18 Thread Richard Peurifoy

On 6/18/2010 5:13 PM, Dave Kopischke wrote:



That's why I posted. I checked everything I could think of (everything
obvious). I'll look through VTAM messages more closely and see if there's
something buried deeper in there. I already checked AUTOINSTALL and found
no differences, but I'll look at that again. There has to be an answer.


Have you checked the definitions in VTAMLST to make sure they
don't specify LOGAPPL=xxx

This will also show up on a D NET,ID=terminalluname,E as

CONTROLLING LU = applid

--
Richard

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Emulator Sessions Hung

2010-06-18 Thread George Henke
Richard's suggestion does fit the crime.

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Richard Peurifoy
r-peuri...@neo.tamu.eduwrote:

 On 6/18/2010 5:13 PM, Dave Kopischke wrote:


 That's why I posted. I checked everything I could think of (everything
 obvious). I'll look through VTAM messages more closely and see if there's
 something buried deeper in there. I already checked AUTOINSTALL and found
 no differences, but I'll look at that again. There has to be an answer.


 Have you checked the definitions in VTAMLST to make sure they
 don't specify LOGAPPL=xxx

 This will also show up on a D NET,ID=terminalluname,E as

 CONTROLLING LU = applid

 --
 Richard


 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html




-- 
George Henke
(C) 845 401 5614

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CA's MSM

2010-06-18 Thread Shane Ginnane
Of course if Phil was still around, there'd be no need to add some  color from 
the analyst community.
He provided that in spades.

Shane ...

On Sat, Jun 19th, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Scott Fagen wrote:

 To give at least some color from the analyst community about our
 efforts, ...

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Emulator Sessions Hung

2010-06-18 Thread George Henke
I would try Richard's suggestion first.

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:28 PM, George Henke gahe...@gmail.com wrote:

 Richard's suggestion does fit the crime.


 On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Richard Peurifoy r-peuri...@neo.tamu.edu
  wrote:

 On 6/18/2010 5:13 PM, Dave Kopischke wrote:


 That's why I posted. I checked everything I could think of (everything
 obvious). I'll look through VTAM messages more closely and see if there's
 something buried deeper in there. I already checked AUTOINSTALL and found
 no differences, but I'll look at that again. There has to be an answer.


 Have you checked the definitions in VTAMLST to make sure they
 don't specify LOGAPPL=xxx

 This will also show up on a D NET,ID=terminalluname,E as

 CONTROLLING LU = applid

 --
 Richard


 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html




  --
 George Henke
 (C) 845 401 5614




-- 
George Henke
(C) 845 401 5614

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html