Re: DISP=MOD UNIT=CART/TAPE
Janek, Thanks for pointing this out. It looks like the problem that we had. Also, I am now signed up to receive future notices - I should have done that a long time ago... Robert -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jakubek, Jan Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 12:40 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: DISP=MOD UNIT=CART/TAPE Today, I received this notification from CA: Subject: COMPUTER ASSOCIATES PML SOLUTION NOTIFICATION - QI73753 Title: SECONDARY VOLUMES MAY BE LOST DURING DISP=MOD Product: 1 Release: 11.0 Opsys: OS Solution #: 99 http://supportconnect.ca.com/sc/solcenter/solresults.jsp?aparno=QI73753 It seems to provide a workaround/ solution. Hth ... Janek Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: DISP=MOD UNIT=CART/TAPE
Hello Glenn, I am pretty sure that we had this exact problem. I recently installed CA-VTAPE R11 SP1 and as part of that project, upgraded to CA-1 R11 (plus APAR tape dated 8/16/05). We IPLed Sept 4 to bring in the new CA1. Everything was fine until late in the month, around the 28th or 29th, when a weekly SMF mod job and another weekly CMF mod job abended with the errors you list below. I have a hardcopy of one of the jobs that MOD'ed the tape generation. One strange thing is, in the JES2 message log we received: IEC705I TAPE ON 0587,101148,SL... (normal) IECTMS9 0587,101148,** WORK TAPE ** (should not have been a work tape) The dataset was recataloged properly in the OS usercat: IEC205I SYSUT2,SMFTAPE,GENER,FILESEQ=0001, EXTEND VOLUME LIST,... IEF285I ESA1T.SMF05.G0009V00RECATALOGED IEF285I VOL SER NOS= all volumes listed But they were not chained properly in the TMC (nextvol, prevvol, etc). CA1 thought they were scratch tapes and they were reused the next day by another job, causing us to lose data. I spent all the next day (a Friday, of course) working with CA. They were not able to identify a problem. They gave me a special CAS9 input to reinitialize the CA1 modules and the problem went away. I have not been able to reproduce the problem, but have been worried about it ever since. I was a nervous wreck the whole weekend. I didn't know how many tapes had been trashed. All that we found were 3 tape datasets that were lost - the monthly SMF and CMF datasets and a CA7 LOG tape that is MOD'ed. That's all I can think of for now. Please keep me or the list posted on anything that you find out. We are running z/OS 1.4. Robert Johnston UAMS -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn Miller Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005 11:05 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: DISP=MOD UNIT=CART/TAPE Has anyone encountered either of the following two situations recently ( say the last 6 months or so )? IEC023I 237-08,IFG0553F IEC140I ddname ,vv END OF DATA SET NOT ON VOLUME IEFTMS50 1XX- 08 jobname,stepname ,ddname ,ccuu,vv IEA995I SYMPTOM DUMP OUTPUT SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=1EB REASON CODE= We have had a few since the previous Sunday following a system IPL/software upgrade. We are currently investaging this matter with the software vendor of one of the products we upgraded. Alhough I was wondering if anyone had already encountered this issue. Thank you for your help. Glenn Miller PS: If you have any non-public questions, please contact me directly. Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: DISP=MOD UNIT=CART/TAPE
Today, I received this notification from CA: Subject: COMPUTER ASSOCIATES PML SOLUTION NOTIFICATION - QI73753 Title: SECONDARY VOLUMES MAY BE LOST DURING DISP=MOD Product: 1 Release: 11.0 Opsys: OS Solution #: 99 http://supportconnect.ca.com/sc/solcenter/solresults.jsp?aparno=QI73753 It seems to provide a workaround/ solution. Hth ... Janek -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: DISP=MOD UNIT=CART/TAPE
For the second problem, OA12035 (z/OS 1.6) or OA12923 (z/OS 1.5) might be the problem. Since you use CA-1, I would certainly suggest talking with CA-1 support as well. Brian On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 23:04:58 -0500, Glenn Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone encountered either of the following two situations recently ( say the last 6 months or so )? IEC023I 237-08,IFG0553F IEC140I ddname ,vv END OF DATA SET NOT ON VOLUME IEFTMS50 1XX- 08 jobname,stepname ,ddname ,ccuu,vv IEA995I SYMPTOM DUMP OUTPUT SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=1EB REASON CODE= We have had a few since the previous Sunday following a system IPL/software upgrade. We are currently investaging this matter with the software vendor of one of the products we upgraded. Alhough I was wondering if anyone had already encountered this issue. Thank you for your help. Glenn Miller -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
DISP=MOD UNIT=CART/TAPE
Has anyone encountered either of the following two situations recently ( say the last 6 months or so )? IEC023I 237-08,IFG0553F IEC140I ddname ,vv END OF DATA SET NOT ON VOLUME IEFTMS50 1XX- 08 jobname,stepname ,ddname ,ccuu,vv IEA995I SYMPTOM DUMP OUTPUT SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=1EB REASON CODE= We have had a few since the previous Sunday following a system IPL/software upgrade. We are currently investaging this matter with the software vendor of one of the products we upgraded. Alhough I was wondering if anyone had already encountered this issue. Thank you for your help. Glenn Miller PS: If you have any non-public questions, please contact me directly. --- This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (including its group companies) shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (or its group companies) does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
