Re: IND$FILE question

2010-07-19 Thread Bob Shannon
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
John P. Baker
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 1:38 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IND$FILE question

Ed,

There were separate products released for MVS, VM, and VSE.  All were
released in 1983.

On MVS, the product number was 5665-311, and the FMID was HFX1112.

John P. Baker

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Ed Gould
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 1:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: IND$FILE question

I vaguely remember  (A LONG TIME AGO mind you) that there was a separately
installable FMID for IND$FILE (bonus points for the year it came out)
Does anyone remember this? As a side question there was a separate help
member in sys1.help (vague recollection here) Does(did?) IBM still ship the
Help member for it? I seemed to remember that it was dropped along the way
and it was never put back. Is this true?
I just vaguely remember creating a usermod to add it back.
Ed

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IND$FILE question

2010-07-19 Thread Bob Shannon
There were separate products released for MVS, VM, and VSE.  All were released 
in 1983.

There was also a version for CICS. I don't know when it became available.

Bob Shannon
Rocket Software

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IND$FILE question

2010-07-18 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Ed Gould wrote:

I vaguely remember  (A LONG TIME AGO mind you) that there was a 
separately installable FMID for IND$FILE (bonus points for the year it came out)

My last few remaining brain cells can't help you with that... ;-D

Does anyone remember this? As a side question there was a separate help 
member in sys1.help (vague recollection here) Does(did?) IBM still ship the 
Help member for it? I seemed to remember that it was dropped along the way 
and it was never put back. Is this true?

My searches for you, yielded NOTHING...  SYS1.MACLIB, MODLIB, SYS1.HELP, 
the usual concatenation lot Nada zilch, nothing...

Oh yes. IND$FILE (AM and RM still at 24!) on z/OS v1.10 is found in 
SYS1.CMDLIB with the usual disclaimer text:

INDFT0 IBM File Transfer Program:   Version 1.1.1 
INDFT0 PTF: UR43604   Date: 05/09/95  Size: 50C8 Bytes

Somewhat old ... 

My emulator supported it, but says a little about it in the help screens.

Check your emulator software if they support it or document something about 
IND$FILE.

I just vaguely remember creating a usermod to add it back.

??? Usermod??? First time I read about this (or probably forgot about it)

Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IND$FILE question

2010-07-18 Thread John P. Baker
Ed,

There were separate products released for MVS, VM, and VSE.  All were
released in 1983.

On MVS, the product number was 5665-311, and the FMID was HFX1112.

John P. Baker

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Ed Gould
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 1:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: IND$FILE question

I vaguely remember  (A LONG TIME AGO mind you) that there was a separately
installable FMID for IND$FILE (bonus points for the year it came out)
Does anyone remember this? As a side question there was a separate help
member in sys1.help (vague recollection here) Does(did?) IBM still ship the
Help member for it? I seemed to remember that it was dropped along the way
and it was never put back. Is this true?
I just vaguely remember creating a usermod to add it back.
Ed

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


IND$FILE question

2010-07-17 Thread Ed Gould
I vaguely remember  (A LONG TIME AGO mind you) that there was a separately 
installable FMID for IND$FILE (bonus points for the year it came out)
Does anyone remember this? As a side question there was a separate help member 
in sys1.help (vague recollection here) Does(did?) IBM still ship the Help 
member for it? I seemed to remember that it was dropped along the way and it 
was never put back. Is this true?
I just vaguely remember creating a usermod to add it back.
Ed
 




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IND$FILE question

2008-05-05 Thread Mark Hammond
Thanks for posting your findings.  I found it useful also.

Mark Hammond
-Original Message-
From: Pommier, Rex R. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 3:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IND$FILE question

Hi Brian,

Thanks for the suggestions.  I finally found it.  It is a setting in
Rumba called verify host screen.  

My purpose in having the users run it thru ISPF option 6 rather than a
straight TSO prompt is that when it doesn't work, I want the command
line saved so I can troubleshoot it.  

Rex 

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian Peterson
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 5:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IND$FILE question

Are you using the same terminal emulator?  It is up to the terminal
emulator whether to move the cursor to the HOME position, or leave the
cursor exactly where it was when the file transfer was initiated.  Maybe
the terminal emulator has an option for the user to select the cursor
starting position.

Are you using different ISPF option 6 screens?  The normal one is
ISRTSO, but you can set up your ISPF to use ISRTSOA (which provides a
command line).  
History on ISRTSOA only applies to the TSO command history, not the
command line above that.

I always tell my people who have trouble with IND$FILE that it always
works correctly from TSO READY.  It will *sometimes* work from ISPF
option 6, but it will *always* work from TSO READY.  I've seen problems
where the data set name was really long and the command was truncated
(when using ISPF option 6) and the same transfer command works perfectly
when started from TSO READY.  Of course, there's no history in TSO READY
like ISPF option 6.

Just a couple of thoughts.

Brian


On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:56:00 -0500, Pommier, Rex R. wrote:

 Hi List,

I don't know if it is lack of sleep or just a bad day, but a programmer

came to me with a strange question that I can't find an answer to.  We 
are using IND$FILE to transfer small files from PCs to a PDS on TSO.
The users log onto TSO/ISPF then navigate to the ISPF command shell 
(standard option 6) screen then run their send or receive command from 
Rumba.  When I run the command, TSO places the IND$FILE command in my 
TSO history (or command recall) line so I can see what was run.  When 
my colleague runs the same command, TSO does NOT place the IND$FILE
command
in his command recall area of the ISPF panel.  I have checked the TSO 
PROFILEs for both sessions and they are identical.  Any idea as to why 
mine would keep the command and his wouldn't?



TIA.

Rex

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: IND$FILE question

2008-05-02 Thread Pommier, Rex R.
Hey Steve and Ed,

It isn't the action bar LIST option.  It is something in the way the
emulators are set up but for the life of me I can't find it.  We're all
using the same emulator but I haven't been able to find anything in the
emulator that would indicate this behavior.  

Thanks for the suggestion, tho.  

Rex 

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve Comstock
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 5:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IND$FILE question

Pommier, Rex R. wrote:
  Hi List,
 
 I don't know if it is lack of sleep or just a bad day, but a 
 programmer came to me with a strange question that I can't find an 
 answer to.  We are using IND$FILE to transfer small files from PCs to
a PDS on TSO.
 The users log onto TSO/ISPF then navigate to the ISPF command shell 
 (standard option 6) screen then run their send or receive command from

 Rumba.  When I run the command, TSO places the IND$FILE command in my 
 TSO history (or command recall) line so I can see what was run.  When 
 my colleague runs the same command, TSO does NOT place the IND$FILE 
 command in his command recall area of the ISPF panel.  I have checked 
 the TSO PROFILEs for both sessions and they are identical.  Any idea 
 as to why mine would keep the command and his wouldn't?
 
 
 
 TIA.
 
 Rex


On the ISPF option 6 panel, there is an action bar at the top.

The second choice is List; this can be set as Update on or Update
off. If you want to preserve the command in the list, set Update on.



Kind regards,

-Steve Comstock
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.

303-393-8716
http://www.trainersfriend.com

   z/OS Application development made easier
 * Our classes include
+ How things work
+ Programming examples with realistic applications
+ Starter / skeleton code
+ Complete working programs
+ Useful utilities and subroutines
+ Tips and techniques

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: IND$FILE question

2008-05-02 Thread Big Iron
Is it possible that the other person has tso ind$file instead of the
default as the host command specified in the file transfer settings?

Bill

On Fri, 2 May 2008 11:08:59 -0500, Pommier, Rex R.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hey Steve and Ed,

It isn't the action bar LIST option.  It is something in the way the
emulators are set up but for the life of me I can't find it.  We're all
using the same emulator but I haven't been able to find anything in the
emulator that would indicate this behavior.

Thanks for the suggestion, tho.

Rex

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve Comstock
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 5:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IND$FILE question

Pommier, Rex R. wrote:
  Hi List,

 I don't know if it is lack of sleep or just a bad day, but a
 programmer came to me with a strange question that I can't find an
 answer to.  We are using IND$FILE to transfer small files from PCs to
a PDS on TSO.
 The users log onto TSO/ISPF then navigate to the ISPF command shell
 (standard option 6) screen then run their send or receive command from

 Rumba.  When I run the command, TSO places the IND$FILE command in my
 TSO history (or command recall) line so I can see what was run.  When
 my colleague runs the same command, TSO does NOT place the IND$FILE
 command in his command recall area of the ISPF panel.  I have checked
 the TSO PROFILEs for both sessions and they are identical.  Any idea
 as to why mine would keep the command and his wouldn't?



 TIA.

 Rex


On the ISPF option 6 panel, there is an action bar at the top.

The second choice is List; this can be set as Update on or Update
off. If you want to preserve the command in the list, set Update on.



Kind regards,

-Steve Comstock
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.

303-393-8716
http://www.trainersfriend.com

   z/OS Application development made easier
 * Our classes include
+ How things work
+ Programming examples with realistic applications
+ Starter / skeleton code
+ Complete working programs
+ Useful utilities and subroutines
+ Tips and techniques


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: IND$FILE question

2008-05-02 Thread Pommier, Rex R.
Hi Brian,

Thanks for the suggestions.  I finally found it.  It is a setting in
Rumba called verify host screen.  

My purpose in having the users run it thru ISPF option 6 rather than a
straight TSO prompt is that when it doesn't work, I want the command
line saved so I can troubleshoot it.  

Rex 

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian Peterson
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 5:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IND$FILE question

Are you using the same terminal emulator?  It is up to the terminal
emulator whether to move the cursor to the HOME position, or leave the
cursor exactly where it was when the file transfer was initiated.  Maybe
the terminal emulator has an option for the user to select the cursor
starting position.

Are you using different ISPF option 6 screens?  The normal one is
ISRTSO, but you can set up your ISPF to use ISRTSOA (which provides a
command line).  
History on ISRTSOA only applies to the TSO command history, not the
command line above that.

I always tell my people who have trouble with IND$FILE that it always
works correctly from TSO READY.  It will *sometimes* work from ISPF
option 6, but it will *always* work from TSO READY.  I've seen problems
where the data set name was really long and the command was truncated
(when using ISPF option 6) and the same transfer command works perfectly
when started from TSO READY.  Of course, there's no history in TSO READY
like ISPF option 6.

Just a couple of thoughts.

Brian


On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:56:00 -0500, Pommier, Rex R. wrote:

 Hi List,

I don't know if it is lack of sleep or just a bad day, but a programmer

came to me with a strange question that I can't find an answer to.  We 
are using IND$FILE to transfer small files from PCs to a PDS on TSO.
The users log onto TSO/ISPF then navigate to the ISPF command shell 
(standard option 6) screen then run their send or receive command from 
Rumba.  When I run the command, TSO places the IND$FILE command in my 
TSO history (or command recall) line so I can see what was run.  When 
my colleague runs the same command, TSO does NOT place the IND$FILE
command
in his command recall area of the ISPF panel.  I have checked the TSO 
PROFILEs for both sessions and they are identical.  Any idea as to why 
mine would keep the command and his wouldn't?



TIA.

Rex

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



IND$FILE question

2008-04-28 Thread Pommier, Rex R.
 Hi List,

I don't know if it is lack of sleep or just a bad day, but a programmer
came to me with a strange question that I can't find an answer to.  We
are using IND$FILE to transfer small files from PCs to a PDS on TSO.
The users log onto TSO/ISPF then navigate to the ISPF command shell
(standard option 6) screen then run their send or receive command from
Rumba.  When I run the command, TSO places the IND$FILE command in my
TSO history (or command recall) line so I can see what was run.  When my
colleague runs the same command, TSO does NOT place the IND$FILE command
in his command recall area of the ISPF panel.  I have checked the TSO
PROFILEs for both sessions and they are identical.  Any idea as to why
mine would keep the command and his wouldn't?



TIA.

Rex

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: IND$FILE question

2008-04-28 Thread Ed Philbrook
Rex,

Is it the List option in the Option Bar?  1 = Update On and 2 = 
Update Off.

EdP





Pommier, Rex R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
04/28/2008 05:56 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU


To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc

Subject
IND$FILE question






 Hi List,

I don't know if it is lack of sleep or just a bad day, but a programmer
came to me with a strange question that I can't find an answer to.  We
are using IND$FILE to transfer small files from PCs to a PDS on TSO.
The users log onto TSO/ISPF then navigate to the ISPF command shell
(standard option 6) screen then run their send or receive command from
Rumba.  When I run the command, TSO places the IND$FILE command in my
TSO history (or command recall) line so I can see what was run.  When my
colleague runs the same command, TSO does NOT place the IND$FILE command
in his command recall area of the ISPF panel.  I have checked the TSO
PROFILEs for both sessions and they are identical.  Any idea as to why
mine would keep the command and his wouldn't?



TIA.

Rex

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: IND$FILE question

2008-04-28 Thread Brian Peterson
Are you using the same terminal emulator?  It is up to the terminal emulator 
whether to move the cursor to the HOME position, or leave the cursor exactly 
where it was when the file transfer was initiated.  Maybe the terminal emulator 
has an option for the user to select the cursor starting position.

Are you using different ISPF option 6 screens?  The normal one is ISRTSO, but 
you can set up your ISPF to use ISRTSOA (which provides a command line).  
History on ISRTSOA only applies to the TSO command history, not the 
command line above that.

I always tell my people who have trouble with IND$FILE that it always works 
correctly from TSO READY.  It will *sometimes* work from ISPF option 6, but it 
will *always* work from TSO READY.  I've seen problems where the data set 
name was really long and the command was truncated (when using ISPF 
option 6) and the same transfer command works perfectly when started from 
TSO READY.  Of course, there's no history in TSO READY like ISPF option 6.

Just a couple of thoughts.

Brian


On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:56:00 -0500, Pommier, Rex R. wrote:

 Hi List,

I don't know if it is lack of sleep or just a bad day, but a programmer
came to me with a strange question that I can't find an answer to.  We
are using IND$FILE to transfer small files from PCs to a PDS on TSO.
The users log onto TSO/ISPF then navigate to the ISPF command shell
(standard option 6) screen then run their send or receive command from
Rumba.  When I run the command, TSO places the IND$FILE command in my
TSO history (or command recall) line so I can see what was run.  When my
colleague runs the same command, TSO does NOT place the IND$FILE 
command
in his command recall area of the ISPF panel.  I have checked the TSO
PROFILEs for both sessions and they are identical.  Any idea as to why
mine would keep the command and his wouldn't?



TIA.

Rex

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: IND$FILE question

2008-04-28 Thread Steve Comstock

Pommier, Rex R. wrote:

 Hi List,

I don't know if it is lack of sleep or just a bad day, but a programmer
came to me with a strange question that I can't find an answer to.  We
are using IND$FILE to transfer small files from PCs to a PDS on TSO.
The users log onto TSO/ISPF then navigate to the ISPF command shell
(standard option 6) screen then run their send or receive command from
Rumba.  When I run the command, TSO places the IND$FILE command in my
TSO history (or command recall) line so I can see what was run.  When my
colleague runs the same command, TSO does NOT place the IND$FILE command
in his command recall area of the ISPF panel.  I have checked the TSO
PROFILEs for both sessions and they are identical.  Any idea as to why
mine would keep the command and his wouldn't?



TIA.

Rex



On the ISPF option 6 panel, there is an action bar at the top.

The second choice is List; this can be set as Update on or
Update off. If you want to preserve the command in the list,
set Update on.



Kind regards,

-Steve Comstock
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.

303-393-8716
http://www.trainersfriend.com

  z/OS Application development made easier
* Our classes include
   + How things work
   + Programming examples with realistic applications
   + Starter / skeleton code
   + Complete working programs
   + Useful utilities and subroutines
   + Tips and techniques

== call or email to receive a free sample student handout ==

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html