Re: Non-SMS GDG Issue

2008-06-26 Thread Daniel McLaughlin
Control card:
  CATLG DSNAME=PSI.TRN.SI0095C.G2671V00,VOL=3490=183323

Would IDCAMS DEFINE NVSAM been the better choice?
TIA

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Non-SMS GDG Issue

2008-06-26 Thread John Laubenheimer
I wouldn't use IEHPROGM for anything any more.  IDCAMS is the way to go.
  
Also, for tapes, you really should be including the file-sequence number in the 
catalog entry.

 DEFINE NONVSAM(NAME(PSI.TRN.SI0095C.G2671V00) -
DEVICETYPES(3490) VOLUMES(183323) FSEQN(1))

Note: the FSEQN of 1 assumes that it is the first file on the 
standard-labeled 
tape.

Note (2): It looks OK from what you posted, but make sure that your Os 
and 0s are correct.  This could potentially lead to the dataset name being 
cataloged as NOT part of the proper GDG.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Non-SMS GDG Issue

2008-06-26 Thread Daniel McLaughlin
Thanks. I'll put this in my notes.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Non-SMS GDG Issue

2008-06-26 Thread Gibney, Dave
I haven't had a good, or any reason to use IEHPRROGM for almost two
decades.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Daniel McLaughlin
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 4:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Non-SMS GDG Issue

Control card:
  CATLG DSNAME=PSI.TRN.SI0095C.G2671V00,VOL=3490=183323

Would IDCAMS DEFINE NVSAM been the better choice?
TIA

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Non-SMS GDG Issue

2008-06-26 Thread Shane Ginnane
Quoting Gibney, Dave:

 I haven't had a good, or any reason to use IEHPRROGM for almost two
 decades.

Probably a good thing too ...  :0)
I would suspect I have made use of BYPASSNQ *much* more recently than that.

Shane ...

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Non-SMS GDG Issue

2008-06-26 Thread Linda Mooney
I use it fairly often to delete load modules from a common library in the link 
list.  Works great, very easy to do, runs in batch, provides an audit trail, 
and saves me a bunch of time.  Then I IEBCOPY in the new modules (for a product 
update) without the replace option for the IEBCOPY.  We have a number of 
products that have 40 or fewer modules that need to be in the link list, so we 
put them in a common products load library.  I also use the same method for 
removing old modules from TSO libraries and user lpa libraries.  Then we 
shutdown the product and refresh or IPL (depending what's needed for the 
product).  

Linda Mooney
-- Original message -- 
From: Gibney, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 I haven't had a good, or any reason to use IEHPRROGM for almost two 
 decades. 
 
 -Original Message- 
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
 Behalf Of Daniel McLaughlin 
 Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 4:12 AM 
 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU 
 Subject: Re: Non-SMS GDG Issue 
 
 Control card: 
 CATLG DSNAME=PSI.TRN.SI0095C.G2671V00,VOL=3490=183323 
 
 Would IDCAMS DEFINE NVSAM been the better choice? 
 TIA 
 
 -- 
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
 send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO 
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html 
 
 -- 
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
 send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO 
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html 
 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Non-SMS GDG Issue

2008-06-26 Thread Gibney, Dave
   Not that I like the idea of whacking on a live system, by IEBCOPY
works fine with DISP=SHR :) 

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Linda Mooney
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 4:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Non-SMS GDG Issue

I use it fairly often to delete load modules from a common library in
the link list.  Works great, very easy to do, runs in batch, provides an
audit trail, and saves me a bunch of time.  Then I IEBCOPY in the new
modules (for a product update) without the replace option for the
IEBCOPY.  We have a number of products that have 40 or fewer modules
that need to be in the link list, so we put them in a common products
load library.  I also use the same method for removing old modules from
TSO libraries and user lpa libraries.  Then we shutdown the product and
refresh or IPL (depending what's needed for the product).  

Linda Mooney
-- Original message -- 
From: Gibney, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 I haven't had a good, or any reason to use IEHPRROGM for almost two 
 decades. 
 
 -Original Message- 
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
 Behalf Of Daniel McLaughlin 
 Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 4:12 AM 
 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU 
 Subject: Re: Non-SMS GDG Issue 
 
 Control card: 
 CATLG DSNAME=PSI.TRN.SI0095C.G2671V00,VOL=3490=183323 
 
 Would IDCAMS DEFINE NVSAM been the better choice? 
 TIA 
 
 --

 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
 send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO

 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html 
 
 --

 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
 send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO

 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html 
 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Non-SMS GDG Issue

2008-06-26 Thread Linda Mooney
IEBCOPY does not delete members, it replaces,  or adds new.  Over time, modules 
some become stranded as load module names change.  Since we have a bunch of 
product load modules in a common library, with IEHPROGM we can be sure we get 
all of the old modules out and that none of the new modules names conflict with 
others already there.  IEHPROGM also works fine with DISP=SHR.  


-- Original message -- 
From: Gibney, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 Not that I like the idea of whacking on a live system, by IEBCOPY 
 works fine with DISP=SHR :) 
 
 -Original Message- 
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
 Behalf Of Linda Mooney 
 Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 4:49 PM 
 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU 
 Subject: Re: Non-SMS GDG Issue 
 
 I use it fairly often to delete load modules from a common library in 
 the link list. Works great, very easy to do, runs in batch, provides an 
 audit trail, and saves me a bunch of time. Then I IEBCOPY in the new 
 modules (for a product update) without the replace option for the 
 IEBCOPY. We have a number of products that have 40 or fewer modules 
 that need to be in the link list, so we put them in a common products 
 load library. I also use the same method for removing old modules from 
 TSO libraries and user lpa libraries. Then we shutdown the product and 
 refresh or IPL (depending what's needed for the product). 
 
 Linda Mooney 
 -- Original message -- 
 From: Gibney, Dave 
 
  I haven't had a good, or any reason to use IEHPRROGM for almost two 
  decades. 
  
  -Original Message- 
  From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
  Behalf Of Daniel McLaughlin 
  Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 4:12 AM 
  To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU 
  Subject: Re: Non-SMS GDG Issue 
  
  Control card: 
  CATLG DSNAME=PSI.TRN.SI0095C.G2671V00,VOL=3490=183323 
  
  Would IDCAMS DEFINE NVSAM been the better choice? 
  TIA 
  
  -- 
 
  For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
  send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO 
 
  Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html 
  
  -- 
 
  For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
  send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO 
 
  Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html 
  
 
 -- 
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
 send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO 
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html 
 
 -- 
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
 send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO 
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html 
 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Non-SMS GDG Issue

2008-06-25 Thread Daniel McLaughlin
We had some corruption in TLMS which left us a broken tape GDG. TLMS was 
fixed and the dataset was recataloged using IEHPROGM. Now the chain for the 
GDG is broken. When I tried an ALTER with ROLLIN I got a message that it's a 
NON-SMS dataset and it didn't roll back in. Has anyone gone through this 
before and if so how did you fix it? So far I've not found anything in the 
manuals.

TIA.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Non-SMS GDG Issue

2008-06-25 Thread Linda Mooney
What did your job look like?  The IEHPROGRM docs I have say to use IDCAMS for 
this purpose.

Linda Mooney
-- Original message -- 
From: Daniel McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 We had some corruption in TLMS which left us a broken tape GDG. TLMS was 
 fixed and the dataset was recataloged using IEHPROGM. Now the chain for the 
 GDG is broken. When I tried an ALTER with ROLLIN I got a message that it's a 
 NON-SMS dataset and it didn't roll back in. Has anyone gone through this 
 before and if so how did you fix it? So far I've not found anything in the 
 manuals. 
 
 TIA. 
 
 -- 
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
 send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO 
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html 
 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html