Re: OS/390 V2R4 on Z9

2007-10-07 Thread Thompson, Steve
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rankin, Bob
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 12:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: OS/390 V2R4 on Z9

Our production environment is running OS390 V2R4 (9708 PUT). My
management wants to purchase a Z9 to replace our aging Multiprise
2003-125 and move our existing OS to run on the Z9. While we know that
OS390 V2R4 has not been certified to run on the Z9, my management thinks
it possible that it might work anyway. Personally I don't think this is
feasible but IBM has done stranger things in the past.

 

Can anyone out there provide more specific information regarding this
topic.
While I know that there are significant instruction set differences,
perhaps
V2R4 may not encounter them, I don't know. 

 

Has anyone done this? 

 

Does anyone know what will happen if we attempt to do this? 
SNIP

Based on my experience with OS/390 V2R9, you will get a PI-LOOP. That
is, it will go to a check stop state during the IPL itself.

I'm trying to remember the release that I once tried to IPL on a z890
(It wasn't a z800 because that's where we were going to migrate from).
During the SAPR meeting, you should have seen the look on a few people's
faces when IBM's people said that only 2.10 and up would run. Well, I
was told to give it a try and the Production system (OS/390 2.9) died
before I could get my finger off the enter key from doing the load. 

Regards,
Steve Thompson

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: OS/390 V2R4 on Z9

2007-10-07 Thread Brian Westerman
I think that I might have mentioned this before but I have successfully
(several times) migrated 2.8 and 2.9 system to a Z9.  Admittedly, we didn't
leave the client there for very long, (less than a week) while we moved them
to z/OS, but it ran okay.

Brian Westerman

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


OS/390 V2R4 on Z9

2007-10-01 Thread Rankin, Bob
Our production environment is running OS390 V2R4 (9708 PUT). My management
wants to purchase a Z9 to replace our aging Multiprise 2003-125 and move our
existing OS to run on the Z9. While we know that OS390 V2R4 has not been
certified to run on the Z9, my management thinks it possible that it might
work anyway. Personally I don't think this is feasible but IBM has done
stranger things in the past.

 

Can anyone out there provide more specific information regarding this topic.
While I know that there are significant instruction set differences, perhaps
V2R4 may not encounter them, I don't know. 

 

Has anyone done this? 

 

Does anyone know what will happen if we attempt to do this? 

 

Bob Rankin

City of Portland, Oregon

 


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: OS/390 V2R4 on Z9

2007-10-01 Thread Mark Jacobs
On what factual basis does your management think that this will work?
IBM had compatibility FMID's back in the early zOS releases that would
enable them to run on a zxxx processor. There never was an equalvilent
for OS/390 releases of the operating system.

I would bet against it, but I don't have any hard facts to back it up.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rankin, Bob
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 1:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: OS/390 V2R4 on Z9

Our production environment is running OS390 V2R4 (9708 PUT). My
management wants to purchase a Z9 to replace our aging Multiprise
2003-125 and move our existing OS to run on the Z9. While we know that
OS390 V2R4 has not been certified to run on the Z9, my management thinks
it possible that it might work anyway. Personally I don't think this is
feasible but IBM has done stranger things in the past.

 

Can anyone out there provide more specific information regarding this
topic.
While I know that there are significant instruction set differences,
perhaps
V2R4 may not encounter them, I don't know. 

 

Has anyone done this? 

 

Does anyone know what will happen if we attempt to do this? 

 

Bob Rankin

City of Portland, Oregon

 


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search
the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: OS/390 V2R4 on Z9

2007-10-01 Thread R.S.

Mark Jacobs wrote:

On what factual basis does your management think that this will work?
IBM had compatibility FMID's back in the early zOS releases that would
enable them to run on a zxxx processor. There never was an equalvilent
for OS/390 releases of the operating system.


The fact is OS/390 2.10 *was* supported on z/990. Compatibility fmids 
were for multiple channel subsystem machines (z/990, z/890), not z 
at all. Earlier OS/390 releases worked on z/900, without compatibility 
fmid, although with some recommended service (PTFs).
AFAIK even OS/390 2.10 with compatibility fmids won't work on z9. Won't 
work, no  not supported.


--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland


--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl

Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy 
XII Wydzia Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sdowego, 
nr rejestru przedsibiorców KRS 025237

NIP: 526-021-50-88
Wedug stanu na dzie 01.01.2007 r. kapita zakadowy BRE Banku SA (w caoci 
opacony) wynosi 118.064.140 z. W zwizku z realizacj warunkowego 
podwyszenia kapitau zakadowego, na podstawie uchwa XVI WZ z dnia 21.05.2003 
r., kapita zakadowy BRE Banku SA moe ulec podwyszeniu do kwoty 118.760.528 
z. Akcje w podwyszonym kapitale zakadowym bd w caoci opacone.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: OS/390 V2R4 on Z9

2007-10-01 Thread Silvio Camplani
We are currently running a production OS390 V2R10 on a z9 BC.

BUT, we have to do any HCD changes from a z/OS 1.4 lpar with the z990
compatibility ptfs installed.

I do not know about V2R4.

Silvio

On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 10:56:34 -0700, Rankin, Bob
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
 Our production environment is running OS390 V2R4 (9708 PUT). My
 management wants to purchase a Z9 to replace our aging Multiprise 2003-
 125 and move our existing OS to run on the Z9. While we know that
 OS390 V2R4 has not been certified to run on the Z9, my management
 thinks it possible that it might work anyway. Personally I don't think
 this is feasible but IBM has done stranger things in the past.



 Can anyone out there provide more specific information regarding this
 topic. While I know that there are significant instruction set
 differences, perhaps V2R4 may not encounter them, I don't know.



 Has anyone done this?



 Does anyone know what will happen if we attempt to do this?



 Bob Rankin

 City of Portland, Oregon




 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
 email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: OS/390 V2R4 on Z9

2007-10-01 Thread Kreiter, Chuck
We attempted to run a soon to be eliminated OS/390 2.6 system on a
z/890 a while back.  The system did IPL, but once more than a few users
got on, performance was terrible.  We moved them back to the Amdahl that
came off lease until we could upgrade it to OS/390 2.10 (then
supported).

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: OS/390 V2R4 on Z9

2007-10-01 Thread Hare, Tim
You are running a production environment on an operating system which has not 
been supported for a number of years? Is your application environment (CICS, 
DB2, what have you) similarly in an unsupported state?   I hope, for your sake, 
that some application doesn't come along which breaks this fragile setup, or 
you will be installing a LOT of software in a very short time (or paying 
through the nose to have it done).

Tim Hare
Senior Systems Programmer
Florida Department of Transportation
Tel: +1 (850) 414-4209

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: OS/390 V2R4 on Z9

2007-10-01 Thread Jim Mulder
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 10/01/2007 
01:56:34 PM:

 Our production environment is running OS390 V2R4 (9708 PUT). My 
management
 wants to purchase a Z9 to replace our aging Multiprise 2003-125 and move 
our
 existing OS to run on the Z9. While we know that OS390 V2R4 has not been
 certified to run on the Z9, my management thinks it possible that it 
might
 work anyway. Personally I don't think this is feasible but IBM has done
 stranger things in the past.
 Can anyone out there provide more specific information regarding this 
topic.
 While I know that there are significant instruction set differences, 
perhaps
 V2R4 may not encounter them, I don't know.
 
 Has anyone done this?
 Does anyone know what will happen if we attempt to do this?

 In the archives:

http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0702L=ibm-mainP=R25482I=1X=-

Jim Mulder   z/OS System Test   IBM Corp.  Poughkeepsie,  NY

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: OS/390 V2R4 on Z9

2007-10-01 Thread Tom Schmidt
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 10:56:34 -0700, Rankin, Bob wrote:

Our production environment is running OS390 V2R4 (9708 PUT). My 
management
wants to purchase a Z9 to replace our aging Multiprise 2003-125 and move 
our
existing OS to run on the Z9. While we know that OS390 V2R4 has not been
certified to run on the Z9, my management thinks it possible that it might
work anyway. Personally I don't think this is feasible but IBM has done
stranger things in the past.

Can anyone out there provide more specific information regarding this topic.
While I know that there are significant instruction set differences, perhaps
V2R4 may not encounter them, I don't know.

Has anyone done this?

Does anyone know what will happen if we attempt to do this?
 
 
Search the archives for [(Mulder) and (purge)] and you should find this:
 
 
 z890, z990, and z9 machines have a 2-level TLB.  Nothing 
 lower than OS/390 2.10 will run reliably on a machine with a 2-level
 TLB because lower releases than 2.10 do not do some of the necessary 
 TLB purges.  I have heard some speculation that you might be able to 
 get around this by running an older MVS under VM, with the following
 VM trace:
 
 #CP TRACE IPTE RUN NOTERM 
  
 Of course, this would cause some performance degradation, since VM would
 intercepting and simulating every IPTE for this virtual machine.  I don't 
 know of anyone who has tried this.  It was just some hall talk with 
 a VM developer.
 
 There may be other issues that would prevent an older MVS from running
 on a modern machine, such as missing support for a larger storage 
 increment size.  The storage increment size might also be avoided under VM if
 the virtual machine does not have too much real storage defined - I think
 VM simulates the increment size but I wouldn't swear to that.
 
 
...which leads me to believe that you can expect 'difficulties' (at minimum) 
unless you are running your OS/390 2.4 system under z/VM - and maybe even 
IF you are running under z/VM.  (It was just hallway talk, after all.)  
 
Jim's post was addressing a jump from a newer-than-your machine to a z/9-BC 
and he posted it back in (or around) February.  (Thanks, as always, Jim!) 
 
-- 
Tom Schmidt 
Madison, WI

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: OS/390 V2R4 on Z9

2007-10-01 Thread Brian Westerman
I can only speak for OS/390 2.9 and 2.10 on the Z9 as being able to run, I
have never tried an older version, mostly because we have not had a client
with an older version move to a Z9 (at least not with my help).

I think that there are better ways to accomplish what you need though, I
could easily set up a supported system (z/OS) on the Z9 in a weekend and
depending on your configuration, it might be possible to share most of your
hardware and cut over incrementally in a very short period of time.  

I have had a lot of experience getting older versions of the subsystems to
run under the newer z/OS versions which would allow you to move your
subsystems intact changing (mostly) just the operating system.  Obviously
I'm simplifying this, but depending on what your current installed subsystem
configuration is, it might be quite simple and quick to get you up on the Z9
with only a minor amount of fuss.  

It might be worth a try to see if we could get 2.4 to run as well, but I
wouldn't want to bet the farm on it.

If your interested, give me a off list email and we can discuss it.

Brian Westerman

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html