Re: SDSF PREFIX (was RE: multiple jobs / same name)

2009-10-19 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:09:24 -0500, Chase, John wrote:

Perhaps we have something misconfigured, but I've wondered why I must
append an asterisk to a prefix value, say, to display all the CICS
regions on the DA screen.  If I enter PRE CICS I get a blank screen,
but if I enter PRE CICS* I see all the CICSes that are running.  Why
isn't CICS treated as a PREFIX when I say it's a PREFIX?

This is at z/OS 1.9 and earlier (back as far as I can remember).

I can remember back further.  At one time, PREFIX was exactly that:
a prefix, with no wildcard characters supported, much less required.
At some point, SDSF extended the syntax to support wildcards, but
chose to overload PREFIX, rather than provide a more suitable name,
such as PATTERN.  It was particularly jarring at that upgrade
boundary when PREFIX USER ceased to display anything except for
the TSO session of USER.  I needed to ask an expert to discover
that the novus ordo seclorum required PREFIX USER*.  But I believe
that constructs such as PREFIX FOO*BAR*, and even counterintuitively
PREFIX *A, are now possible.

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SDSF PREFIX (was RE: multiple jobs / same name)

2009-10-19 Thread Chase, John
 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
 
 On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:09:24 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
 
 Perhaps we have something misconfigured, but I've wondered why I must
 append an asterisk to a prefix value, say, to display all the CICS
 regions on the DA screen.  If I enter PRE CICS I get a blank
screen,
 but if I enter PRE CICS* I see all the CICSes that are running.
Why
 isn't CICS treated as a PREFIX when I say it's a PREFIX?
 
 This is at z/OS 1.9 and earlier (back as far as I can remember).
 
 I can remember back further.  At one time, PREFIX was exactly that:
 a prefix, with no wildcard characters supported, much less required.
 At some point, SDSF extended the syntax to support wildcards, but
 chose to overload PREFIX, rather than provide a more suitable name,
 such as PATTERN.  It was particularly jarring at that upgrade
 boundary when PREFIX USER ceased to display anything except for
 the TSO session of USER.  I needed to ask an expert to discover
 that the novus ordo seclorum required PREFIX USER*.  But I believe
 that constructs such as PREFIX FOO*BAR*, and even counterintuitively
 PREFIX *A, are now possible.

Well, PRE *ICS returns a blank DA screen, but PRE *ICS* shows all
the CICS regions.

PRE C*T* shows all jobnames that begin with C and contain a T.

-jc-

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SDSF PREFIX (was RE: multiple jobs / same name)

2009-10-19 Thread Ed Finnell
 
In a message dated 10/19/2009 9:38:57 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
jch...@ussco.com writes:

Well, PRE *ICS returns a blank DA screen, but PRE *ICS* shows  all
the CICS regions.



Long ago and far away started using  ---da ostc cics*





--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SDSF PREFIX (was RE: multiple jobs / same name)

2009-10-19 Thread Howard Brazee
I hardly ever use PREFIX anymore, preferring SELECT for its ephemeral
nature.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SDSF PREFIX (was RE: multiple jobs / same name)

2009-10-19 Thread Mark Zelden
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:31:40 -0500, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:

On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:09:24 -0500, Chase, John wrote:

Perhaps we have something misconfigured, but I've wondered why I must
append an asterisk to a prefix value, say, to display all the CICS
regions on the DA screen.  If I enter PRE CICS I get a blank screen,
but if I enter PRE CICS* I see all the CICSes that are running.  Why
isn't CICS treated as a PREFIX when I say it's a PREFIX?

This is at z/OS 1.9 and earlier (back as far as I can remember).

I can remember back further.  At one time, PREFIX was exactly that:
a prefix, with no wildcard characters supported, much less required.
At some point, SDSF extended the syntax to support wildcards, but
chose to overload PREFIX, rather than provide a more suitable name,
such as PATTERN.  It was particularly jarring at that upgrade
boundary when PREFIX USER ceased to display anything except for
the TSO session of USER.  I needed to ask an expert to discover
that the novus ordo seclorum required PREFIX USER*.  But I believe
that constructs such as PREFIX FOO*BAR*, and even counterintuitively
PREFIX *A, are now possible.



You can have SDSF automatically append the * again.  See APAR PK79932.
There was also a discussion in IBM-MAIN about this a few months ago.

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1PK79932

--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:mark.zel...@zurichna.com
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SDSF PREFIX (was RE: multiple jobs / same name)

2009-10-19 Thread Chase, John
 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
 
 On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:31:40 -0500, Paul Gilmartin
paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
 
 On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:09:24 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
 
 Perhaps we have something misconfigured, but I've wondered why I
must
 append an asterisk to a prefix value, say, to display all the CICS
 regions on the DA screen.  If I enter PRE CICS I get a blank
screen,
 but if I enter PRE CICS* I see all the CICSes that are running.
Why
 isn't CICS treated as a PREFIX when I say it's a PREFIX?
 
 This is at z/OS 1.9 and earlier (back as far as I can remember).
 
 I can remember back further.  At one time, PREFIX was exactly that:
 a prefix, with no wildcard characters supported, much less required.
 At some point, SDSF extended the syntax to support wildcards, but
 chose to overload PREFIX, rather than provide a more suitable name,
 such as PATTERN.  It was particularly jarring at that upgrade
 boundary when PREFIX USER ceased to display anything except for
 the TSO session of USER.  I needed to ask an expert to discover
 that the novus ordo seclorum required PREFIX USER*.  But I believe
 that constructs such as PREFIX FOO*BAR*, and even
counterintuitively
 PREFIX *A, are now possible.
 
 
 
 You can have SDSF automatically append the * again.  See APAR PK79932.
 There was also a discussion in IBM-MAIN about this a few months ago.
 
 http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1PK79932

Yabbut  By definition, a prefix shouldn't need a wildcard
character to act like a prefix.

   -jc-

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SDSF PREFIX (was RE: multiple jobs / same name)

2009-10-19 Thread Mark Zelden
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:23:02 -0500, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote:


 You can have SDSF automatically append the * again.  See APAR PK79932.
 There was also a discussion in IBM-MAIN about this a few months ago.

 http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1PK79932

Yabbut  By definition, a prefix shouldn't need a wildcard
character to act like a prefix.


Won't debate that.   As Paul said, it's been that way for so long I can't
remember when it was different.  I just wanted to let you know you can
get the behavior you desire now if you are running z/OS 1.9 or above. 

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:mark.zel...@zurichna.com
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html