Re: spool to spool output transfer
Thanks Ravi, Yes we do have connect direct. We have been looking into using it as well. Thanks for the heads up. _ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB1G p 616.653.8429 f 616.653.8497 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Ravi Kumar Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 8:11 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: spool to spool output transfer if you guys have connect direct as third party product spool to spool transfer is pretty easy stuff.. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: spool to spool output transfer
if you guys have connect direct as third party product spool to spool transfer is pretty easy stuff.. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: spool to spool output transfer
I had a similar requirement a few months back because for some reason, they have NJE locked up real tight around here. I created a rexx routine that basically ftps the spool file to the intended lpar by ip address. I initiate the process by performing an SE on the spool entry and then typing the Edit Macro/REXX at the command line. For lack of creativity, I called my script LPR and follow it by the destination name of the lpar such as PROD, DEV, QA etc. The esoteric name then gets converted by the rexx to the ip address of the lpar and I can ftp to the same lpar where the command was initiated if needed. I place a jcl skeleton (iebgener) and spool data into an mvs file (RECFM=VBA,LRECL=300,BLKSIZE=27900) and then FTP the file to the desired lpar to create the new spool entry. QUOTE SITE FILETYP=JES MODE B TYPE E QUOTE SITE JESLRECL=254 PUT '||'FIL2FTP' Although it is not fully automated and the original characteristics of the spool entry are not kept, it has worked fine for all intents and purposes. I'm positive there is much room for improvement but my only requirement was to be able to print a report/sysout for programmers from lpars that do not have printers set up so it works just fine for me. Offloading to a spool offload dataset and then reloading was too cumbersome so this was much easier. On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:09:03 -0500, Jousma, David david.jou...@53.com wrote: All, Looking for ideas for doing spool to spool transfer of output NOT using NJE.Issue is transferring output between two different MAS-plex of the same node-name. NJE would work if multi-hopped, NODE-A connected to NODE-B, NODE-B connected to NODE-C, and finally NODE-C connects to the other NODE-A, but that is too many hops in my opinion. Looking for other creative, supportable methods to solve this. Already thinking about: - Automated spool offload to dataset, FTP to remote site, spool reload - ?? Assumptions: - Maintain print characteristics - both spools have the same node name, that's why is not the first option - cannot change node name due to external customer connections - existing external connections are using Enterprise Extender, and the IP's of the separate hosts ARE different, so no conflict externally. _ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB1G p 616.653.8429 f 616.653.8497 This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this e- mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: spool to spool output transfer
Thanks Gilbert. I have to be able to do the action to all output in a certain output class via a interval driven process. I am still leaning toward the spool offload process. _ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB1G p 616.653.8429 f 616.653.8497 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Gilbert Cardenas Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 9:13 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: spool to spool output transfer I had a similar requirement a few months back because for some reason, they have NJE locked up real tight around here. I created a rexx routine that basically ftps the spool file to the intended lpar by ip address. I initiate the process by performing an SE on the spool entry and then typing the Edit Macro/REXX at the command line. For lack of creativity, I called my script LPR and follow it by the destination name of the lpar such as PROD, DEV, QA etc. The esoteric name then gets converted by the rexx to the ip address of the lpar and I can ftp to the same lpar where the command was initiated if needed. I place a jcl skeleton (iebgener) and spool data into an mvs file (RECFM=VBA,LRECL=300,BLKSIZE=27900) and then FTP the file to the desired lpar to create the new spool entry. QUOTE SITE FILETYP=JES MODE B TYPE E QUOTE SITE JESLRECL=254 PUT '||'FIL2FTP' Although it is not fully automated and the original characteristics of the spool entry are not kept, it has worked fine for all intents and purposes. I'm positive there is much room for improvement but my only requirement was to be able to print a report/sysout for programmers from lpars that do not have printers set up so it works just fine for me. Offloading to a spool offload dataset and then reloading was too cumbersome so this was much easier. On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:09:03 -0500, Jousma, David david.jou...@53.com wrote: All, Looking for ideas for doing spool to spool transfer of output NOT using NJE.Issue is transferring output between two different MAS-plex of the same node-name. NJE would work if multi-hopped, NODE-A connected to NODE-B, NODE-B connected to NODE-C, and finally NODE-C connects to the other NODE-A, but that is too many hops in my opinion. Looking for other creative, supportable methods to solve this. Already thinking about: - Automated spool offload to dataset, FTP to remote site, spool reload - ?? Assumptions: - Maintain print characteristics - both spools have the same node name, that's why is not the first option - cannot change node name due to external customer connections - existing external connections are using Enterprise Extender, and the IP's of the separate hosts ARE different, so no conflict externally. _ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB1G p 616.653.8429 f 616.653.8497 This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this e- mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. -- For IBM-MAIN
Re: spool to spool output transfer
I don't think this is what you will want, but I'll just throw it out there anyway. Have you considered running two JES2 systems on system #1? The second JES2 would be, say, JESA. You could then NJE from JES2 to JESA on system #1, then NJE from JESA on system #1 to the JES2 on system #2. I'm not sure, but I think you'd need to turn off the network path manager in JESA. That's PATHMGR=NO on the NODE for JESA as defined in the other JES2 systems. -- John McKown Systems Engineer IV IT Administrative Services Group HealthMarkets(r) 9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010 (817) 255-3225 phone * john.mck...@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Jousma, David Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 8:21 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: spool to spool output transfer Thanks Gilbert. I have to be able to do the action to all output in a certain output class via a interval driven process. I am still leaning toward the spool offload process. _ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB1G p 616.653.8429 f 616.653.8497 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Gilbert Cardenas Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 9:13 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: spool to spool output transfer I had a similar requirement a few months back because for some reason, they have NJE locked up real tight around here. I created a rexx routine that basically ftps the spool file to the intended lpar by ip address. I initiate the process by performing an SE on the spool entry and then typing the Edit Macro/REXX at the command line. For lack of creativity, I called my script LPR and follow it by the destination name of the lpar such as PROD, DEV, QA etc. The esoteric name then gets converted by the rexx to the ip address of the lpar and I can ftp to the same lpar where the command was initiated if needed. I place a jcl skeleton (iebgener) and spool data into an mvs file (RECFM=VBA,LRECL=300,BLKSIZE=27900) and then FTP the file to the desired lpar to create the new spool entry. QUOTE SITE FILETYP=JES MODE B TYPE E QUOTE SITE JESLRECL=254 PUT '||'FIL2FTP' Although it is not fully automated and the original characteristics of the spool entry are not kept, it has worked fine for all intents and purposes. I'm positive there is much room for improvement but my only requirement was to be able to print a report/sysout for programmers from lpars that do not have printers set up so it works just fine for me. Offloading to a spool offload dataset and then reloading was too cumbersome so this was much easier. On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:09:03 -0500, Jousma, David david.jou...@53.com wrote: All, Looking for ideas for doing spool to spool transfer of output NOT using NJE.Issue is transferring output between two different MAS-plex of the same node-name. NJE would work if multi-hopped, NODE-A connected to NODE-B, NODE-B connected to NODE-C, and finally NODE-C connects to the other NODE-A, but that is too many hops in my opinion. Looking for other creative, supportable methods to solve this. Already thinking about: -Automated spool offload to dataset, FTP to remote site, spool reload -?? Assumptions: -Maintain print characteristics -both spools have the same node name, that's why is not the first option -cannot change node name due to external customer connections -existing external connections are using Enterprise Extender, and the IP's of the separate hosts ARE different, so no conflict externally. _ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB1G p 616.653.8429 f 616.653.8497 This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this e- mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any
Re: spool to spool output transfer
Well, I thought about that, but I don't think that works either. JESA would have to know about both JES2's of the same name, and that still doesn't work(at least that is my understanding). Someone correct me if I am wrong.please. I think it would take JES2 - JESA - JESB - JES2 _ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB1G p 616.653.8429 f 616.653.8497 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of McKown, John Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 9:45 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: spool to spool output transfer I don't think this is what you will want, but I'll just throw it out there anyway. Have you considered running two JES2 systems on system #1? The second JES2 would be, say, JESA. You could then NJE from JES2 to JESA on system #1, then NJE from JESA on system #1 to the JES2 on system #2. I'm not sure, but I think you'd need to turn off the network path manager in JESA. That's PATHMGR=NO on the NODE for JESA as defined in the other JES2 systems. -- John McKown Systems Engineer IV IT Administrative Services Group HealthMarkets(r) 9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010 (817) 255-3225 phone * john.mck...@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Jousma, David Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 8:21 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: spool to spool output transfer Thanks Gilbert. I have to be able to do the action to all output in a certain output class via a interval driven process. I am still leaning toward the spool offload process. _ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB1G p 616.653.8429 f 616.653.8497 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Gilbert Cardenas Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 9:13 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: spool to spool output transfer I had a similar requirement a few months back because for some reason, they have NJE locked up real tight around here. I created a rexx routine that basically ftps the spool file to the intended lpar by ip address. I initiate the process by performing an SE on the spool entry and then typing the Edit Macro/REXX at the command line. For lack of creativity, I called my script LPR and follow it by the destination name of the lpar such as PROD, DEV, QA etc. The esoteric name then gets converted by the rexx to the ip address of the lpar and I can ftp to the same lpar where the command was initiated if needed. I place a jcl skeleton (iebgener) and spool data into an mvs file (RECFM=VBA,LRECL=300,BLKSIZE=27900) and then FTP the file to the desired lpar to create the new spool entry. QUOTE SITE FILETYP=JES MODE B TYPE E QUOTE SITE JESLRECL=254 PUT '||'FIL2FTP' Although it is not fully automated and the original characteristics of the spool entry are not kept, it has worked fine for all intents and purposes. I'm positive there is much room for improvement but my only requirement was to be able to print a report/sysout for programmers from lpars that do not have printers set up so it works just fine for me. Offloading to a spool offload dataset and then reloading was too cumbersome so this was much easier. On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:09:03 -0500, Jousma, David david.jou...@53.com wrote: All, Looking for ideas for doing spool to spool transfer of output NOT using NJE.Issue is transferring output between two different MAS-plex of the same node-name. NJE would work if multi-hopped, NODE-A connected to NODE-B, NODE-B connected to NODE-C, and finally NODE-C connects to the other NODE-A, but that is too many hops in my opinion. Looking for other creative, supportable methods to solve this. Already thinking about: -Automated spool offload to dataset, FTP to remote site, spool reload -?? Assumptions: -Maintain print characteristics -both spools have the same node name, that's why is not the first option -cannot change node
Re: spool to spool output transfer
You're probably right. John McKown Systems Engineer IV IT Administrative Services Group HealthMarkets(r) 9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010 (817) 255-3225 phone * john.mck...@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Jousma, David Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 9:17 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: spool to spool output transfer Well, I thought about that, but I don't think that works either. JESA would have to know about both JES2's of the same name, and that still doesn't work(at least that is my understanding). Someone correct me if I am wrong.please. I think it would take JES2 - JESA - JESB - JES2 _ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB1G p 616.653.8429 f 616.653.8497 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of McKown, John Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 9:45 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: spool to spool output transfer I don't think this is what you will want, but I'll just throw it out there anyway. Have you considered running two JES2 systems on system #1? The second JES2 would be, say, JESA. You could then NJE from JES2 to JESA on system #1, then NJE from JESA on system #1 to the JES2 on system #2. I'm not sure, but I think you'd need to turn off the network path manager in JESA. That's PATHMGR=NO on the NODE for JESA as defined in the other JES2 systems. -- John McKown Systems Engineer IV IT Administrative Services Group HealthMarkets(r) 9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010 (817) 255-3225 phone * john.mck...@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Jousma, David Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 8:21 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: spool to spool output transfer Thanks Gilbert. I have to be able to do the action to all output in a certain output class via a interval driven process. I am still leaning toward the spool offload process. _ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB1G p 616.653.8429 f 616.653.8497 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Gilbert Cardenas Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 9:13 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: spool to spool output transfer I had a similar requirement a few months back because for some reason, they have NJE locked up real tight around here. I created a rexx routine that basically ftps the spool file to the intended lpar by ip address. I initiate the process by performing an SE on the spool entry and then typing the Edit Macro/REXX at the command line. For lack of creativity, I called my script LPR and follow it by the destination name of the lpar such as PROD, DEV, QA etc. The esoteric name then gets converted by the rexx to the ip address of the lpar and I can ftp to the same lpar where the command was initiated if needed. I place a jcl skeleton (iebgener) and spool data into an mvs file (RECFM=VBA,LRECL=300,BLKSIZE=27900) and then FTP the file to the desired lpar to create the new spool entry. QUOTE SITE FILETYP=JES MODE B TYPE E QUOTE SITE JESLRECL=254 PUT '||'FIL2FTP' Although it is not fully automated and the original characteristics of the spool entry are not kept, it has
Re: spool to spool output transfer
would take JES2 - JESA - JESB - JES2 Interesting puzzle. Seems to me that still wouldn't work, since JESA would need to know about JES2 (left) because it's connected to it, and JES2 (right) in order to know it needs to route traffic destined for JES2 (right) via JESB. Dana -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: spool to spool output transfer
At 11:59 -0600 on 12/01/2010, Dana Mitchell wrote about Re: spool to spool output transfer: would take JES2 - JESA - JESB - JES2 Interesting puzzle. Seems to me that still wouldn't work, since JESA would need to know about JES2 (left) because it's connected to it, and JES2 (right) in order to know it needs to route traffic destined for JES2 (right) via JESB. Dana It is doable. All 4 Nodes have N1 JES2 N255 JESB N254 JESA CONNECT NODE1=JESA,NODE2=JESB CONNECT NODE1=JESA,NODE2=JES2 Note that the CONNECT statement does not pass connection information between nodes. Also the JES2 in JESA is JES2 Left while the JES2 in JESB is JES2 Right. On JES2 Left you route the data to N255 (which passes it through JESA's JESA-JESB connection) via a ROUTE NODE=N255 command (I forget the syntax). On JESB, you have a timed $TA that does the route of N255 to N1 (passing it the rest of the way). -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
spool to spool output transfer
All, Looking for ideas for doing spool to spool transfer of output NOT using NJE.Issue is transferring output between two different MAS-plex of the same node-name. NJE would work if multi-hopped, NODE-A connected to NODE-B, NODE-B connected to NODE-C, and finally NODE-C connects to the other NODE-A, but that is too many hops in my opinion. Looking for other creative, supportable methods to solve this. Already thinking about: - Automated spool offload to dataset, FTP to remote site, spool reload - ?? Assumptions: - Maintain print characteristics - both spools have the same node name, that's why is not the first option - cannot change node name due to external customer connections - existing external connections are using Enterprise Extender, and the IP's of the separate hosts ARE different, so no conflict externally. _ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB1G p 616.653.8429 f 616.653.8497 This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: spool to spool output transfer
1. NJE over TCP would result in one hop (assuming IP connectivity between the two MASs) 2. If it's a one-time exercise, can you do a spool unload/reload? Bob Shannon Rocket Software -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: spool to spool output transfer
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 13:09 -0500, Jousma, David wrote: Looking for ideas for doing spool to spool transfer of output NOT using NJE. Maybe Sine Nomine's NJE/IP Bridge package would be useful here? http://www.sinenomine.net/products/vm/njeip -- David Andrews A. Duda and Sons, Inc. david.andr...@duda.com -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: spool to spool output transfer
Doesn't NJE over IP have the same restrictions as standard NJE of connecting two nodes of the same name? _ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB1G p 616.653.8429 f 616.653.8497 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Bob Shannon Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 1:19 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: spool to spool output transfer 1. NJE over TCP would result in one hop (assuming IP connectivity between the two MASs) 2. If it's a one-time exercise, can you do a spool unload/reload? Bob Shannon Rocket Software -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: spool to spool output transfer
Doesn't NJE over IP have the same restrictions as standard NJE of connecting two nodes of the same name? I overlooked that detail. You should be able to use a node number as long as they are different. Bob Shannon Rocket Software -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: spool to spool output transfer
Node number is the same too. _ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB1G p 616.653.8429 f 616.653.8497 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Bob Shannon Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 1:36 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: spool to spool output transfer Doesn't NJE over IP have the same restrictions as standard NJE of connecting two nodes of the same name? I overlooked that detail. You should be able to use a node number as long as they are different. Bob Shannon Rocket Software -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
