AW: Re: Would SHARE kindly kick IBM in the ass for what the've done with their web content?
Hello Harry,thank you very much for you response, and especially for picking this up. I know the subject I chose was a bit harshly formulated, but I did this on purpose. I was hoping that it would get things going, and it did. I'm grateful. Best regardsPeter -- Peter Hunkeler -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
AW: Re: Would SHARE kindly kick IBM in the ass for what the've done with their web content?
>Even if you have a z/OS 2.1 manual, some PTFs do add features or command or document changes to older versions, and they only update the newest manual. Very good point! I strongly prefer to read PDFs over KC web pages when I need to read more than a few paragraphs. However, with the change to continuous delivery, online documentation, being up to date, is required. I have a couple of gigabytes of z/OS related PDFs on my workstation, and on my iPad. However, I always look up the newest issue on the web when something looks odd. Maybe a PTF has introduced new behaviour. -- Peter Hunkeler -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
AW: Re: Would SHARE kindly kick IBM in the ass for what the've done with their web content?
>Does this link not work for everyone? > >https://www-304.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc00100.nsf/pages/zosv2r1-pdf-download?OpenDocument I can't tell if it is working for everyone, but I can confirm that is for me. -- Peter Hunkeler -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
