Re: DUMP parm recommendation

2015-04-29 Thread Peter Relson
I would have said that adding CSA to every dump is not typically 
desirable.

As was suggested by a question, there is a difference between data asked 
for by a program on its own and data asked for by the DUMP command.
For the former, the program is responsible for capturing what it thinks it 
needs. You probably do not want to add CSA for example to an SVC Dump 
asked for by RSM since RSM for all intents and purposes uses no CSA. But 
if using the DUMP command, it could be a good thing to add when you don't 
know what diagnostic data might be needed.

The same is true for several of the options that you have landed with. But 
as long as size (and duration) of dumps is not a problem, then I'd far 
rather have too much data than too little.

Why LPA? Do you IPL w/ CLPA frequently?

I couldn't tell if it was the case with the asker of this, but FWIW many 
people seem to think that the LPA option asks to dump all of LPA. It does 
not. It asks to include in the dump LPA modules represented by CDEs/LPDEs 
on the job pack queue of ASID(s) being dumped.

Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: DUMP parm recommendation

2015-04-29 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 07:39:43 -0400 Peter Relson rel...@us.ibm.com wrote:

:Why LPA? Do you IPL w/ CLPA frequently?

:I couldn't tell if it was the case with the asker of this, but FWIW many 
:people seem to think that the LPA option asks to dump all of LPA. It does 
:not. It asks to include in the dump LPA modules represented by CDEs/LPDEs 
:on the job pack queue of ASID(s) being dumped.

Yes, that would be me. Thanks for the info.

--
Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
http://www.dissensoftware.com

Director, Dissen Software, Bar  Grill - Israel


Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.

I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: DUMP parm recommendation

2015-04-28 Thread Richards, Robert B.
Shalom Binyamin,

We IPL several systems on a daily basis.

Having the benefit of reading the replies from Lizette, Skip, Shane and Barbara 
before any response on my part... what they said!  :-)  and many thanks for 
the comments and suggestions.

  Is this for system initiated dumps or when DUMP COMM= is done?

Lizette, could be either.

So, after consolidating the aforementioned suggestions, this looks like a good 
recommendation:

SDATA=(CSA,,SQA,RGN,TRT,GRSQ,LPA,LSQA,SUM,NUC,PSA,SWA,XESDATA,COUPLE)

Barbara, I have left NUC in for now until such a time as size does become an 
issue. Thanks for reminding me about XESDATA and COUPLE.

Bob

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 3:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DUMP parm recommendation

On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 13:01:38 -0400 Richards, Robert B.
robert.richa...@opm.gov wrote:

:Going to z/OS 2.1 and am looking for a good recommendation for a default 
SDATA.

:My WebSphere guy asked for this:

:SDATA=(CSA,,SQA,RGN,TRT,GRSQ,LPA,LSQA,SUM,NUC,PSA,SWA,ALLNUC) and I am 
thinking of adding HCSAByASID,HCSANoOwner,HCSASysOwner.

:Advice? Thoughts?

Why LPA? Do you IPL w/ CLPA frequently?

--
Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com http://www.dissensoftware.com

Director, Dissen Software, Bar  Grill - Israel

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: DUMP parm recommendation

2015-04-27 Thread Shane Ginnane
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 13:01:38 -0400, Richards, Robert B. wrote:

I am thinking of adding HCSAByASID,HCSANoOwner,HCSASysOwner.

Advice? Thoughts?

CSA by itself covers everything - above and below the bar. Your preferences 
will exclude data above the bar for ASIDs not in the dump.

Me, I always want as much as I can get in a dump - there's generally a reason a 
dump is taken, and it may not be reproducable. Unless you are having issues 
with the size of dumps, I say leave it as-is.

Shane ...

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: DUMP parm recommendation

2015-04-27 Thread Lizette Koehler
Is this for system initiated dumps or when DUMP COMM= is done?

Each product, IMS, DB2, MQ all have parms that they prefer in the dump.  You
may need to consolidate all the needs of the many into the one.

Lizette


 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
 On Behalf Of Richards, Robert B.
 Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 10:02 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: DUMP parm recommendation
 
 Going to z/OS 2.1 and am looking for a good recommendation for a default
 SDATA.
 
 My WebSphere guy asked for this:
 
 SDATA=(CSA,,SQA,RGN,TRT,GRSQ,LPA,LSQA,SUM,NUC,PSA,SWA,ALLNUC)
 and I am thinking of adding HCSAByASID,HCSANoOwner,HCSASysOwner.
 
 Advice? Thoughts?
 
 Bob

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


DUMP parm recommendation

2015-04-27 Thread Richards, Robert B.
Going to z/OS 2.1 and am looking for a good recommendation for a default SDATA.

My WebSphere guy asked for this:

SDATA=(CSA,,SQA,RGN,TRT,GRSQ,LPA,LSQA,SUM,NUC,PSA,SWA,ALLNUC) and I am thinking 
of adding HCSAByASID,HCSANoOwner,HCSASysOwner.

Advice? Thoughts?

Bob

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: DUMP parm recommendation

2015-04-27 Thread J O Skip Robinson
We IPL CLPA *every* time. Ever since we accidentally IPLed from the wrong 
rotating sysres. Coming up at an unexpected maintenance level might be 
annoying, but try it sometime when LINKLIB is at one OS maintenance level and 
LPA is at a different level. How long will take you to figure out what's wrong? 
Recommendation: CLPA every time.  

.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 12:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DUMP parm recommendation

On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 13:01:38 -0400 Richards, Robert B.
robert.richa...@opm.gov wrote:

:Going to z/OS 2.1 and am looking for a good recommendation for a default 
SDATA.

:My WebSphere guy asked for this:

:SDATA=(CSA,,SQA,RGN,TRT,GRSQ,LPA,LSQA,SUM,NUC,PSA,SWA,ALLNUC) and I am 
thinking of adding HCSAByASID,HCSANoOwner,HCSASysOwner.

:Advice? Thoughts?

Why LPA? Do you IPL w/ CLPA frequently?

--
Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com http://www.dissensoftware.com

Director, Dissen Software, Bar  Grill - Israel

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: DUMP parm recommendation

2015-04-27 Thread nitz-...@gmx.net
 My WebSphere guy asked for this:
 SDATA=(CSA,,SQA,RGN,TRT,GRSQ,LPA,LSQA,SUM,NUC,PSA,SWA,ALLNUC)
Looks like the general setting that IBM support asks for, copied from one 
component to the other without any thought to content or validity.

 Advice? Thoughts?
Replace the ALLNUC with NUC or ditch NUC altogether. Unless you are debugging a 
problem in RSM/SRM/DISPATCHER (components that really truly have their code in 
the nucleus), I don't see any reason to artificially increase dump sizes by 
using ALLNUC. After all, if you ask IPCS about a nucleus module, you will 
always get the actual csect name (and not just the lmod name, which would 
require either an amblist of the lmod or the full module hopefully dumped. If 
not, support will still need the amblist to determine the actual csect). 
And if any of those components writes a dump, they should have included what 
they need. Same for slip traps that support for those components hands out. 

If you are running in a sysplex environment, I would add XESDATA and COUPLE, 
just in case.

Barbara

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: DUMP parm recommendation

2015-04-27 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 13:01:38 -0400 Richards, Robert B.
robert.richa...@opm.gov wrote:

:Going to z/OS 2.1 and am looking for a good recommendation for a default 
SDATA.

:My WebSphere guy asked for this:

:SDATA=(CSA,,SQA,RGN,TRT,GRSQ,LPA,LSQA,SUM,NUC,PSA,SWA,ALLNUC) and I am 
thinking of adding HCSAByASID,HCSANoOwner,HCSASysOwner.

:Advice? Thoughts?

Why LPA? Do you IPL w/ CLPA frequently?

--
Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
http://www.dissensoftware.com

Director, Dissen Software, Bar  Grill - Israel


Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.

I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN