Re: IEFU8* exit points and RMF type 70

2016-08-22 Thread Charles Mills
Here's the problem: if you intercept IEFU83 and IEFU84 and it "works perfectly" 
you would never know it if you were missing .1% of the events that were coming 
through IEFU85. 

Charles

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Rob Scott
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 2:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEFU8* exit points and RMF type 70

IIRC the type 70 record can be intercepted by IEFU83 when written by RMF, 
however you need IEFU84 when it is written by CMF.

I would advise that you code your IEFU8x code to the requirements of IEFU85 
just in case things change.

Sent from my iPhone

> On 22 Aug 2016, at 17:22, Blaicher, Christopher Y. <cblaic...@syncsort.com> 
> wrote:
>
> According to Watson/Walker it is IEFU83.
> See:  
> http://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/watsonwalker/ww/wp-content/uploads/2
> 016/02/09233352/SMF-Reference-20150926.pdf
>
>
> Chris Blaicher
> Technical Architect
> Mainframe Development
> Syncsort Incorporated
> 50 Tice Boulevard, Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677
> P: 201-930-8234  |  M: 512-627-3803
> E: cblaic...@syncsort.com
>
> www.syncsort.com
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] 
> On Behalf Of Tim Hare
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 11:13 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: IEFU8* exit points and RMF type 70
>
> Bringing this back up again because I still haven't found the answer yet.  
> Are SMF type 70s written by RMF via branch-entry, requiring me to use IEFU85 
> exit point to examine them, or can I use just IEFU83 or IEFU84 ?
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
> email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> 
>
>
>
> ATTENTION: -
>
> The information contained in this message (including any files transmitted 
> with this message) may contain proprietary, trade secret or other 
> confidential and/or legally privileged information. Any pricing information 
> contained in this message or in any files transmitted with this message is 
> always confidential and cannot be shared with any third parties without prior 
> written approval from Syncsort. This message is intended to be read only by 
> the individual or entity to whom it is addressed or by their designee. If the 
> reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are on notice that 
> any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of this message, in any form, is 
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please 
> immediately notify the sender and/or Syncsort and destroy all copies of this 
> message in your possession, custody or control.
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
> email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Rocket Software, Inc. and subsidiaries ■ 77 Fourth Avenue, Waltham MA 02451 ■ 
+1 877.328.2932 ■ +1 781.577.4321 Unsubscribe From Commercial Email – 
unsubscr...@rocketsoftware.com Manage Your Subscription Preferences - 
http://info.rocketsoftware.com/GlobalSubscriptionManagementEmailFooter_SubscriptionCenter.html
Privacy Policy - http://www.rocketsoftware.com/company/legal/privacy-policy


This communication and any attachments may contain confidential information of 
Rocket Software, Inc. All unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is 
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Rocket 
Software immediately and destroy all copies of this communication. Thank you.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: IEFU8* exit points and RMF type 70

2016-08-22 Thread Rob Scott
IIRC the type 70 record can be intercepted by IEFU83 when written by RMF, 
however you need IEFU84 when it is written by CMF.

I would advise that you code your IEFU8x code to the requirements of IEFU85 
just in case things change.

Sent from my iPhone

> On 22 Aug 2016, at 17:22, Blaicher, Christopher Y. <cblaic...@syncsort.com> 
> wrote:
>
> According to Watson/Walker it is IEFU83.
> See:  
> http://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/watsonwalker/ww/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/09233352/SMF-Reference-20150926.pdf
>
>
> Chris Blaicher
> Technical Architect
> Mainframe Development
> Syncsort Incorporated
> 50 Tice Boulevard, Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677
> P: 201-930-8234  |  M: 512-627-3803
> E: cblaic...@syncsort.com
>
> www.syncsort.com
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On 
> Behalf Of Tim Hare
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 11:13 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: IEFU8* exit points and RMF type 70
>
> Bringing this back up again because I still haven't found the answer yet.  
> Are SMF type 70s written by RMF via branch-entry, requiring me to use IEFU85 
> exit point to examine them, or can I use just IEFU83 or IEFU84 ?
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
> lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> 
>
>
>
> ATTENTION: -
>
> The information contained in this message (including any files transmitted 
> with this message) may contain proprietary, trade secret or other 
> confidential and/or legally privileged information. Any pricing information 
> contained in this message or in any files transmitted with this message is 
> always confidential and cannot be shared with any third parties without prior 
> written approval from Syncsort. This message is intended to be read only by 
> the individual or entity to whom it is addressed or by their designee. If the 
> reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are on notice that 
> any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of this message, in any form, is 
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please 
> immediately notify the sender and/or Syncsort and destroy all copies of this 
> message in your possession, custody or control.
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Rocket Software, Inc. and subsidiaries ■ 77 Fourth Avenue, Waltham MA 02451 ■ 
+1 877.328.2932 ■ +1 781.577.4321
Unsubscribe From Commercial Email – unsubscr...@rocketsoftware.com
Manage Your Subscription Preferences - 
http://info.rocketsoftware.com/GlobalSubscriptionManagementEmailFooter_SubscriptionCenter.html
Privacy Policy - http://www.rocketsoftware.com/company/legal/privacy-policy


This communication and any attachments may contain confidential information of 
Rocket Software, Inc. All unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is 
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Rocket 
Software immediately and destroy all copies of this communication. Thank you.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: IEFU8* exit points and RMF type 70

2016-08-22 Thread Charles Mills
Cheryl's list is a wonderful resource but it cannot be considered definitive, 
especially with regard to exit numbers, and it is certainly not "binding" on 
IBM. You just cannot assume that a certain SMF record type will always come 
through a certain exit (unless it is a user type and you have control over the 
writing process). You might be good for a day, a week or a year assuming that 
all SMF Type 'x' records came through a particular IEFU8n, but you cannot count 
on it, not for all situations and certainly not for future releases of z/OS.

Charles

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Blaicher, Christopher Y.
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 11:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEFU8* exit points and RMF type 70

According to Watson/Walker it is IEFU83.
See:  
http://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/watsonwalker/ww/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/09233352/SMF-Reference-20150926.pdf


Chris Blaicher
Technical Architect
Mainframe Development
Syncsort Incorporated
50 Tice Boulevard, Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677
P: 201-930-8234  |  M: 512-627-3803
E: cblaic...@syncsort.com

www.syncsort.com




-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Tim Hare
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 11:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEFU8* exit points and RMF type 70

Bringing this back up again because I still haven't found the answer yet.  Are 
SMF type 70s written by RMF via branch-entry, requiring me to use IEFU85 exit 
point to examine them, or can I use just IEFU83 or IEFU84 ?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: IEFU8* exit points and RMF type 70

2016-08-22 Thread Blaicher, Christopher Y.
According to Watson/Walker it is IEFU83.
See:  
http://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/watsonwalker/ww/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/09233352/SMF-Reference-20150926.pdf


Chris Blaicher
Technical Architect
Mainframe Development
Syncsort Incorporated
50 Tice Boulevard, Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677
P: 201-930-8234  |  M: 512-627-3803
E: cblaic...@syncsort.com

www.syncsort.com




-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Tim Hare
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 11:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEFU8* exit points and RMF type 70

Bringing this back up again because I still haven't found the answer yet.  Are 
SMF type 70s written by RMF via branch-entry, requiring me to use IEFU85 exit 
point to examine them, or can I use just IEFU83 or IEFU84 ?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN





ATTENTION: -

The information contained in this message (including any files transmitted with 
this message) may contain proprietary, trade secret or other confidential 
and/or legally privileged information. Any pricing information contained in 
this message or in any files transmitted with this message is always 
confidential and cannot be shared with any third parties without prior written 
approval from Syncsort. This message is intended to be read only by the 
individual or entity to whom it is addressed or by their designee. If the 
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are on notice that 
any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of this message, in any form, is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please 
immediately notify the sender and/or Syncsort and destroy all copies of this 
message in your possession, custody or control.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: IEFU8* exit points and RMF type 70

2016-08-22 Thread Tim Hare
Bringing this back up again because I still haven't found the answer yet.  Are 
SMF type 70s written by RMF via branch-entry, requiring me to use IEFU85 exit 
point to examine them, or can I use just IEFU83 or IEFU84 ?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: IEFU8* exit points and RMF type 70

2016-08-03 Thread Charles Mills
No SVC's allowed if you come through IEFU85.

Charles

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Tim Hare
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2016 11:51 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: IEFU8* exit points and RMF type 70

Someone wants a WTO that shows SMF70LAC  (the 4-hour rolling average of MSUs 
value)  every time the RMF type 70 is written.   IEFU8* is the best exit point 
to do that, as near as I can tell,  however what I don't know is whether type 
70s are written the "normal" way, via branch-entry, or via cross-memory,  
require the record be examined at the respective 83, 84, or 85 exit point.  

At this point, I'd probably write the exit and name it as one of the modules at 
all of the exit points - as long as I do my WTO in a reentrant manner I should 
be OK,  but  I'd still kind of like to know the answer.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


IEFU8* exit points and RMF type 70

2016-08-03 Thread Tim Hare
Someone wants a WTO that shows SMF70LAC  (the 4-hour rolling average of MSUs 
value)  every time the RMF type 70 is written.   IEFU8* is the best exit point 
to do that, as near as I can tell,  however what I don't know is whether type 
70s are written the "normal" way, via branch-entry, or via cross-memory,  
require the record be examined at the respective 83, 84, or 85 exit point.  

At this point, I'd probably write the exit and name it as one of the modules at 
all of the exit points - as long as I do my WTO in a reentrant manner I should 
be OK,  but  I'd still kind of like to know the answer.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN