Re: WTO and IEF170I message
Scott Ballentine corrected my "expectation". The default default, in the absence of any routcode, desccode, mcsflag and CONSOLxx definition is routcodes 1-16. Many exits do not run in environments where WTP (routcode 11) would work. Some SMF exits, I believe, describe how to issue messages from "within". It is, simply put, important that you identify where you want your messages to go. Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: WTO and IEF170I message
The code runs in an exit In case it matters (unlikely as that is), what kind of "exit"? At least "is it some sort of WTO-related exit"? --> No, it is not a WTO-related exit. Is there something in the WTO parameters that causes the IEF170 message to disappear ? Maybe a combination of MCSFLAG, DESC and ROUTCDE ? The first question for any WTO is where do you want it to go? You then set MCSFLAG, DESC, and/or ROUTCDE to meet that desire. IEF170I comes from Write To Programmer processing (either by the WTP macro or by WTO(r) with routing code 11). --> MCSFLAG=HRDCPY did it. I did not set ROUTCDE or DESC. I no longer get the IEF170I message. I would not have expected routing code 11 to be included by default. Perhaps you have some WTO-related exit that changes the routing codes. And perhaps the environment of your exit is not appropriate for WTP. Thanks to all, Pierre. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: WTO and IEF170I message
The code runs in an exit In case it matters (unlikely as that is), what kind of "exit"? At least "is it some sort of WTO-related exit"? Is there something in the WTO parameters that causes the IEF170 message to disappear ? Maybe a combination of MCSFLAG, DESC and ROUTCDE ? The first question for any WTO is where do you want it to go? You then set MCSFLAG, DESC, and/or ROUTCDE to meet that desire. IEF170I comes from Write To Programmer processing (either by the WTP macro or by WTO(r) with routing code 11). I would not have expected routing code 11 to be included by default. Perhaps you have some WTO-related exit that changes the routing codes. And perhaps the environment of your exit is not appropriate for WTP. Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: WTO and IEF170I message
Pierre, I have used MCSFLAG=HRDCPY with success Best Regards Ituriel do Nascimento Neto z/OS System Programmer Em terça-feira, 18 de outubro de 2022 22:17:34 GMT+2, Charles Mills escreveu: Yikes indeed! Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of John Abell Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:46 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: WTO and IEF170I message And she was deemed to possibly your next President. YIKES John T. Abell Tel: 800-295-7608 Option 4 President International: 1-416-593-5578 Option 4 E-mail: john.ab...@intnlsoftwareproducts.com Fax: 800-295-7609 International: 1-416-593-5579 International Software Products www.ispinfo.com This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, retention, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive on behalf of the named recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Also,email is susceptible to data corruption, interception, tampering, unauthorized amendment and viruses. We only send and receive emails on the basis that we are not liable for any such corruption, interception, tampering, amendment or viruses or any consequence thereof. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Pierre Fichaud Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 2:38 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: WTO and IEF170I message I issue a plain WTO : wto 'This is a message' I also issue a WTO : wto text=dsa_wtotext,mf=(e,dsa_wtoarea) In both cases the WTO appears in the SDSF LOG. But I also get an IEF170I message for each WTO no matter the flavor. IEF170I 3 This is a message A WTO or WTOR macro requested a write-to-programmer (WTP) operation. The system was unable to complete WTP processing due to an error 3 means "The system issued the PUT macro to a system message data set, but failed." The code runs in an exit but since SVCs are allowed in the exit, the code must execute in TCB mode. Is there something in the WTO parameters that causes the IEF170 message to disappear ? Maybe a combination of MCSFLAG, DESC and ROUTCDE ? Thanks in advance, Pierre. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: WTO and IEF170I message
Yikes indeed! Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of John Abell Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:46 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: WTO and IEF170I message And she was deemed to possibly your next President. YIKES John T. Abell Tel:800-295-7608Option 4 President International: 1-416-593-5578 Option 4 E-mail: john.ab...@intnlsoftwareproducts.com Fax:800-295-7609 International: 1-416-593-5579 International Software Products www.ispinfo.com This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, retention, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive on behalf of the named recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Also,email is susceptible to data corruption, interception, tampering, unauthorized amendment and viruses. We only send and receive emails on the basis that we are not liable for any such corruption, interception, tampering, amendment or viruses or any consequence thereof. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Pierre Fichaud Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 2:38 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: WTO and IEF170I message I issue a plain WTO :wto 'This is a message' I also issue a WTO :wto text=dsa_wtotext,mf=(e,dsa_wtoarea) In both cases the WTO appears in the SDSF LOG. But I also get an IEF170I message for each WTO no matter the flavor. IEF170I 3 This is a message A WTO or WTOR macro requested a write-to-programmer (WTP) operation. The system was unable to complete WTP processing due to an error 3 means "The system issued the PUT macro to a system message data set, but failed." The code runs in an exit but since SVCs are allowed in the exit, the code must execute in TCB mode. Is there something in the WTO parameters that causes the IEF170 message to disappear ? Maybe a combination of MCSFLAG, DESC and ROUTCDE ? Thanks in advance, Pierre. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: WTO and IEF170I message
As you have not specified ROUTCDE, CONSOL** takes over. Probably includes 11. On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 13:37:35 -0500 Pierre Fichaud wrote: :>I issue a plain WTO :wto 'This is a message' :>I also issue a WTO :wto text=dsa_wtotext,mf=(e,dsa_wtoarea) :>In both cases the WTO appears in the SDSF LOG. :>But I also get an IEF170I message for each WTO no matter the flavor. :>IEF170I 3 This is a message :>A WTO or WTOR macro requested a write-to-programmer (WTP) operation. The system was unable to complete :>WTP processing due to an error :>3 means "The system issued the PUT macro to a system message data set, but failed." :>The code runs in an exit but since SVCs are allowed in the exit, the code must execute in TCB mode. :>Is there something in the WTO parameters that causes the IEF170 message to disappear ? :>Maybe a combination of MCSFLAG, DESC and ROUTCDE ? -- Binyamin Dissen http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: WTO and IEF170I message
And she was deemed to possibly your next President. YIKES John T. Abell Tel:800-295-7608Option 4 President International: 1-416-593-5578 Option 4 E-mail: john.ab...@intnlsoftwareproducts.com Fax:800-295-7609 International: 1-416-593-5579 International Software Products www.ispinfo.com This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, retention, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive on behalf of the named recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Also,email is susceptible to data corruption, interception, tampering, unauthorized amendment and viruses. We only send and receive emails on the basis that we are not liable for any such corruption, interception, tampering, amendment or viruses or any consequence thereof. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Pierre Fichaud Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 2:38 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: WTO and IEF170I message I issue a plain WTO :wto 'This is a message' I also issue a WTO :wto text=dsa_wtotext,mf=(e,dsa_wtoarea) In both cases the WTO appears in the SDSF LOG. But I also get an IEF170I message for each WTO no matter the flavor. IEF170I 3 This is a message A WTO or WTOR macro requested a write-to-programmer (WTP) operation. The system was unable to complete WTP processing due to an error 3 means "The system issued the PUT macro to a system message data set, but failed." The code runs in an exit but since SVCs are allowed in the exit, the code must execute in TCB mode. Is there something in the WTO parameters that causes the IEF170 message to disappear ? Maybe a combination of MCSFLAG, DESC and ROUTCDE ? Thanks in advance, Pierre. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
