Re: Projects under github.com/fedora-infra
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021, 5:09 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > I've been looking at all the projects we have under the fedora-infra org on > github.com. > > We have 134 projects there: > - 45 of them are archived > - 1 is a mirror > - people2 > - 4 are forks: https://github.com/fedora-infra?type=fork > - ssh-gpg-smartcard-config > - Last commit on November 2020 > - Seems up to date with its parent project > - pyramid_fas_openid >- master branch > - last commits October 2020 (previous ones 2017) > - 40 commits ahead of master in its parent project >- develop branch > - last commits 2015 > - 26 commits ahead of master in its parent project > - badgr-server > - last commit March 2020 > - 415 commits behind its parent project > - fedora-college > - Last commit August 2014 > - 22 commits behind its parent project > Questions: > Are they being used/developed? > Do we need them? > If not, can we simply delete them? > > - 85 are "source" repo. > > Of these I would like to propose that we archive the following 24: > - tbs > - fpdc > - fedora-packages > - fedora-search > - stickynotes2modernpaste > - people2 > - pkgwat.api > - pkgwat.cli > - noggin-old > - cpsreport > - taiga-contrib-oidc-auth > - zanata2fedmsg > - rdbsync > - fedmsg-notify > - fedmsg-health > - pkgdb2 > - fedmsg-genacls > - fedora-stats-tools > - fedmsg-java > - pagure-hook-receiver > - JSAutoLogin > - fedmsg-wp > - askbot-fedmsg > - busmon > > Then we have a these four that we run but do not maintain and that may > want to > find a better place: > - asknot-ng > - fedbages > - tahrir > - tahrir-api > I believe we started a discussion about this last flock. We def need to > follow-up on the actual status and what left to do since then. > > This would reduce the number of projects down to 57 projects most of which > are > run and maintained by Fedora Infrastructure. > > > Then, I am also wondering if we should move the archived projects to > another > organisation just to keep the list of projects somewhat manageable. > > > What do you think? > > > Thanks, > Pierre > ___ > infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to > infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Projects under github.com/fedora-infra
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 01:40:05PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 01:17:35PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 05:09:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > - 85 are "source" repo. > > > > > > Of these I would like to propose that we archive the following 24: > > > - tbs > > > - fpdc > > > - fedora-packages > > > - fedora-search > > > - stickynotes2modernpaste > > > - people2 > > > - pkgwat.api > > > - pkgwat.cli > > > - noggin-old > > > - cpsreport > > > - taiga-contrib-oidc-auth > > > - zanata2fedmsg > > > - rdbsync > > > - fedmsg-notify > > > - fedmsg-health > > > - pkgdb2 > > > - fedmsg-genacls > > > - fedora-stats-tools > > > - fedmsg-java > > > - pagure-hook-receiver > > > - JSAutoLogin > > > - fedmsg-wp > > > - askbot-fedmsg > > > - busmon > > > > +1 > > Considering the feedback, I'm going to go ahead and archive these projects. Here are a few more that I've archived as well: taiga-contrib-fas-openid-auth jenkins-fedmsg-emit (not changed since 2017 and was used when we ran our own jenkins instance) fpdc-client (since we archived pdc) pdc-updater (merged into toddlers) Pierre signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Projects under github.com/fedora-infra
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 01:17:35PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 05:09:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > - 85 are "source" repo. > > > > Of these I would like to propose that we archive the following 24: > > - tbs > > - fpdc > > - fedora-packages > > - fedora-search > > - stickynotes2modernpaste > > - people2 > > - pkgwat.api > > - pkgwat.cli > > - noggin-old > > - cpsreport > > - taiga-contrib-oidc-auth > > - zanata2fedmsg > > - rdbsync > > - fedmsg-notify > > - fedmsg-health > > - pkgdb2 > > - fedmsg-genacls > > - fedora-stats-tools > > - fedmsg-java > > - pagure-hook-receiver > > - JSAutoLogin > > - fedmsg-wp > > - askbot-fedmsg > > - busmon > > +1 Considering the feedback, I'm going to go ahead and archive these projects. Thanks everyone! Pierre signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Projects under github.com/fedora-infra
On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 08:26:02PM -0600, Nick Bebout wrote: > I forked ssh-gpg-smartcard-config a while back before I got access to > herlo's repo so I could update it. Now I have commit access to herlo's > repo, so it may be unnecessary to have our fork (although I don't see what > it hurts). I would like to look and see if the fedora-infra repo is linked > to anywhere before we delete it. Thanks, the goal is simply to have a better overview of what we currently maintain. Pierre ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Projects under github.com/fedora-infra
I forked ssh-gpg-smartcard-config a while back before I got access to herlo's repo so I could update it. Now I have commit access to herlo's repo, so it may be unnecessary to have our fork (although I don't see what it hurts). I would like to look and see if the fedora-infra repo is linked to anywhere before we delete it. On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 2:38 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 01:17:35PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 05:09:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > We have 134 projects there: > > > - 45 of them are archived > > > - 1 is a mirror > > > - people2 > > > - 4 are forks: https://github.com/fedora-infra?type=fork > > > - ssh-gpg-smartcard-config > > > - Last commit on November 2020 > > > - Seems up to date with its parent project > > > > I think someone forked this to add some yubikey info? > > But in any case I don't think we need it now. > > > > > - pyramid_fas_openid > > >- master branch > > > - last commits October 2020 (previous ones 2017) > > > - 40 commits ahead of master in its parent project > > >- develop branch > > > - last commits 2015 > > > - 26 commits ahead of master in its parent project > > > > Alas, we still use this for bodhi I am pretty sure. > > At least bodhi-backend01 has: > > python3-pyramid-fas-openid-0.4.0-1.fc32.noarch > > installed. > > Do we know if the package's sources come from our fork? > > > > Then we have a these four that we run but do not maintain and that may > want to > > > find a better place: > > > - asknot-ng > > > - fedbages > > > - tahrir > > > - tahrir-api > > > > Yep. Lets see is OSPO wants them somewhere... > > > > > This would reduce the number of projects down to 57 projects most of > which are > > > run and maintained by Fedora Infrastructure. > > > > Still a lot. ;) > > yup, though the split of the message schemas to different repo kind of > "artificially" increases that number (ie: maintaining 1 code-base, results > in > two projects on github). Let's see how are things once we've cleaned them > up a > little more :) > > > > Then, I am also wondering if we should move the archived projects to > another > > > organisation just to keep the list of projects somewhat manageable. > > > > We could. Github does filter the archived ones out some, so I don't know > > if it's worth the trouble, but if you think it's worth it we can. > > Agreed, however archived projects are shown by default, if we find a way > to hide > archived project by default I think that would be sufficient. > Basically, I'm looking for a way that it shows 57 or so projects by default > rather than 134. > > Hoping it makes sense :) > > > Pierre > ___ > infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to > infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Projects under github.com/fedora-infra
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 09:29:04AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 01:17:35PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 05:09:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > We have 134 projects there: > > > - 45 of them are archived > > > - 1 is a mirror > > > - people2 > > > - 4 are forks: https://github.com/fedora-infra?type=fork > > > - ssh-gpg-smartcard-config > > > - Last commit on November 2020 > > > - Seems up to date with its parent project > > > > I think someone forked this to add some yubikey info? > > But in any case I don't think we need it now. > > > > > - pyramid_fas_openid > > >- master branch > > > - last commits October 2020 (previous ones 2017) > > > - 40 commits ahead of master in its parent project > > >- develop branch > > > - last commits 2015 > > > - 26 commits ahead of master in its parent project > > > > Alas, we still use this for bodhi I am pretty sure. > > At least bodhi-backend01 has: > > python3-pyramid-fas-openid-0.4.0-1.fc32.noarch > > installed. > > Do we know if the package's sources come from our fork? dnf info shows our fork as URL so I guess that answers it :) Pierre signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Projects under github.com/fedora-infra
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 01:17:35PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 05:09:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > We have 134 projects there: > > - 45 of them are archived > > - 1 is a mirror > > - people2 > > - 4 are forks: https://github.com/fedora-infra?type=fork > > - ssh-gpg-smartcard-config > > - Last commit on November 2020 > > - Seems up to date with its parent project > > I think someone forked this to add some yubikey info? > But in any case I don't think we need it now. > > > - pyramid_fas_openid > >- master branch > > - last commits October 2020 (previous ones 2017) > > - 40 commits ahead of master in its parent project > >- develop branch > > - last commits 2015 > > - 26 commits ahead of master in its parent project > > Alas, we still use this for bodhi I am pretty sure. > At least bodhi-backend01 has: > python3-pyramid-fas-openid-0.4.0-1.fc32.noarch > installed. Do we know if the package's sources come from our fork? > > Then we have a these four that we run but do not maintain and that may want > > to > > find a better place: > > - asknot-ng > > - fedbages > > - tahrir > > - tahrir-api > > Yep. Lets see is OSPO wants them somewhere... > > > This would reduce the number of projects down to 57 projects most of which > > are > > run and maintained by Fedora Infrastructure. > > Still a lot. ;) yup, though the split of the message schemas to different repo kind of "artificially" increases that number (ie: maintaining 1 code-base, results in two projects on github). Let's see how are things once we've cleaned them up a little more :) > > Then, I am also wondering if we should move the archived projects to another > > organisation just to keep the list of projects somewhat manageable. > > We could. Github does filter the archived ones out some, so I don't know > if it's worth the trouble, but if you think it's worth it we can. Agreed, however archived projects are shown by default, if we find a way to hide archived project by default I think that would be sufficient. Basically, I'm looking for a way that it shows 57 or so projects by default rather than 134. Hoping it makes sense :) Pierre signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Projects under github.com/fedora-infra
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 05:09:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > I've been looking at all the projects we have under the fedora-infra org on > github.com. > > We have 134 projects there: > - 45 of them are archived > - 1 is a mirror > - people2 > - 4 are forks: https://github.com/fedora-infra?type=fork > - ssh-gpg-smartcard-config > - Last commit on November 2020 > - Seems up to date with its parent project I think someone forked this to add some yubikey info? But in any case I don't think we need it now. > - pyramid_fas_openid >- master branch > - last commits October 2020 (previous ones 2017) > - 40 commits ahead of master in its parent project >- develop branch > - last commits 2015 > - 26 commits ahead of master in its parent project Alas, we still use this for bodhi I am pretty sure. At least bodhi-backend01 has: python3-pyramid-fas-openid-0.4.0-1.fc32.noarch installed. > - badgr-server > - last commit March 2020 > - 415 commits behind its parent project > - fedora-college > - Last commit August 2014 > - 22 commits behind its parent project No idea on those two. > Questions: > Are they being used/developed? > Do we need them? > If not, can we simply delete them? > > - 85 are "source" repo. > > Of these I would like to propose that we archive the following 24: > - tbs > - fpdc > - fedora-packages > - fedora-search > - stickynotes2modernpaste > - people2 > - pkgwat.api > - pkgwat.cli > - noggin-old > - cpsreport > - taiga-contrib-oidc-auth > - zanata2fedmsg > - rdbsync > - fedmsg-notify > - fedmsg-health > - pkgdb2 > - fedmsg-genacls > - fedora-stats-tools > - fedmsg-java > - pagure-hook-receiver > - JSAutoLogin > - fedmsg-wp > - askbot-fedmsg > - busmon +1 > Then we have a these four that we run but do not maintain and that may want to > find a better place: > - asknot-ng > - fedbages > - tahrir > - tahrir-api Yep. Lets see is OSPO wants them somewhere... > This would reduce the number of projects down to 57 projects most of which are > run and maintained by Fedora Infrastructure. Still a lot. ;) > > Then, I am also wondering if we should move the archived projects to another > organisation just to keep the list of projects somewhat manageable. We could. Github does filter the archived ones out some, so I don't know if it's worth the trouble, but if you think it's worth it we can. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Projects under github.com/fedora-infra
Good Morning Everyone, I've been looking at all the projects we have under the fedora-infra org on github.com. We have 134 projects there: - 45 of them are archived - 1 is a mirror - people2 - 4 are forks: https://github.com/fedora-infra?type=fork - ssh-gpg-smartcard-config - Last commit on November 2020 - Seems up to date with its parent project - pyramid_fas_openid - master branch - last commits October 2020 (previous ones 2017) - 40 commits ahead of master in its parent project - develop branch - last commits 2015 - 26 commits ahead of master in its parent project - badgr-server - last commit March 2020 - 415 commits behind its parent project - fedora-college - Last commit August 2014 - 22 commits behind its parent project Questions: Are they being used/developed? Do we need them? If not, can we simply delete them? - 85 are "source" repo. Of these I would like to propose that we archive the following 24: - tbs - fpdc - fedora-packages - fedora-search - stickynotes2modernpaste - people2 - pkgwat.api - pkgwat.cli - noggin-old - cpsreport - taiga-contrib-oidc-auth - zanata2fedmsg - rdbsync - fedmsg-notify - fedmsg-health - pkgdb2 - fedmsg-genacls - fedora-stats-tools - fedmsg-java - pagure-hook-receiver - JSAutoLogin - fedmsg-wp - askbot-fedmsg - busmon Then we have a these four that we run but do not maintain and that may want to find a better place: - asknot-ng - fedbages - tahrir - tahrir-api This would reduce the number of projects down to 57 projects most of which are run and maintained by Fedora Infrastructure. Then, I am also wondering if we should move the archived projects to another organisation just to keep the list of projects somewhat manageable. What do you think? Thanks, Pierre ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
