On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 01:56:13PM -0400, robert.f...@collabora.com wrote:
> From: Robert Foss <robert.f...@collabora.com>
> 
> This subtest verifies that creating many timelines and merging random fences
> from each timeline with eachother results in merged fences that are fully
> functional.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.f...@collabora.com>
> ---
>  tests/sw_sync.c | 73 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 73 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/sw_sync.c b/tests/sw_sync.c
> index 0e67ad5..8e5a7c9 100644
> --- a/tests/sw_sync.c
> +++ b/tests/sw_sync.c
> @@ -383,6 +383,76 @@ static void test_sync_multi_consumer_producer(void)
>       igt_assert_f(thread_ret == 0, "A sync thread reported failure.\n");
>  }
>  
> +static void test_sync_random_merge(void)
> +{
> +     int i, size, ret;
> +     const int nbr_timeline = 32;
> +     const int nbr_merge = 1024;
> +     int fence_map[nbr_timeline];
> +     int timeline_arr[nbr_timeline];
> +     int fence, tmpfence, merged;
> +     int timeline, timeline_offset, sync_pt;
> +
> +     srand(time(NULL));
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < nbr_timeline; i++)
> +             timeline_arr[i] = sw_sync_timeline_create();
> +
> +     memset(fence_map, -1, sizeof(fence_map));

This sets each byte to -1, which happens to be the same as an int -1,
but I don't really like it: this is only true for two special values, -1
and 0, and would become a bug if it was ever changed.

I'd much prefer if you simply set:
        fence_map[i] = -1;
in the loop you already have just above.

BTW, seeing how many times you set and test for -1 as the "invalid fd
sentinel", how about a:
        #define INVALID_FD (-1)
and use that token throughout the code? I think it would improve
readability as well

> +
> +     sync_pt = rand();
> +     fence = sw_sync_fence_create(timeline_arr[0], sync_pt);
> +
> +     fence_map[0] = sync_pt;
> +
> +     /* Randomly create syncpoints out of a fixed set of timelines,
> +      * and merge them together.
> +      */
> +     for (i = 0; i < nbr_merge; i++) {
> +             /* Generate syncpoint. */
> +             timeline_offset = rand() % nbr_timeline;
> +             timeline = timeline_arr[timeline_offset];
> +             sync_pt = rand();
> +
> +             /* Keep track of the latest sync_pt in each timeline. */
> +             if (fence_map[timeline_offset] == -1)
> +                     fence_map[timeline_offset] = sync_pt;
> +             else if (fence_map[timeline_offset] < sync_pt)
> +                     fence_map[timeline_offset] = sync_pt;
> +
> +             /* Merge. */
> +             tmpfence = sw_sync_fence_create(timeline, sync_pt);
> +             merged = sw_sync_merge(tmpfence, fence);
> +             sw_sync_fence_destroy(tmpfence);
> +             sw_sync_fence_destroy(fence);
> +             fence = merged;
> +     }
> +
> +     size = 0;
> +     for (i = 0; i < nbr_timeline; i++)
> +             if (fence_map[i] != -1)
> +                     size++;
> +
> +     /* Trigger the merged fence. */
> +     for (i = 0; i < nbr_timeline; i++) {
> +             if (fence_map[i] != -1) {
> +                     ret = sw_sync_wait(fence, 0);
> +                     igt_assert_f(ret == 0,
> +                                 "Failure waiting on fence until timeout\n");
> +                     /* Increment the timeline to the last sync_pt */
> +                     sw_sync_timeline_inc(timeline_arr[i], fence_map[i]);
> +             }
> +     }
> +
> +     /* Check that the fence is triggered. */
> +     ret = sw_sync_wait(fence, 0);
> +     igt_assert_f(ret > 0, "Failure triggering fence\n");
> +
> +     sw_sync_fence_destroy(fence);
> +     for (i = 0; i < nbr_timeline; i++)
> +             sw_sync_timeline_destroy(timeline_arr[i]);
> +}
> +
>  igt_main
>  {
>       igt_subtest("alloc_timeline")
> @@ -411,5 +481,8 @@ igt_main
>  
>       igt_subtest("sync_multi_consumer_producer")
>               test_sync_multi_consumer_producer();
> +
> +     igt_subtest("sync_random_merge")
> +             test_sync_random_merge();
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.7.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to