Re: [PHP-DEV] Changelog / upgrading notes for promoted warnings

2019-12-19 Thread G. P. B.
On Thu, 19 Dec 2019, 21:17 Rowan Tommins,  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Earlier, I was writing an application-specific wrapper around the
> password_hash function, and was surprised that it could return false,
> rather than throwing an error.
>
> I then found this commit to master making it throw errors for PHP 8.0:
> https://github.com/php/php-src/commit/37c11714
>
> That's great! But ... it is a breaking change, and I can't see any note
> in UPGRADING. Is there a running list of the Warnings that have been
> promoted to Errors anywhere, and if not, should we create one before we
> forget?
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Rowan Tommins (né Collins)
> [IMSoP]
>

As there are a lot more of these promotion, from what I recall, is that a
general upgrading note will be added.
As the promotions cover case which are clear programming/logic errors and
thus shouldn't arise in production code.

An example of a promotion is an invalid flag value (e.g. a mode with fopen
which does not exist) or out of bound values (usually integer value which
need to be greater than zero).

Moreover, I'm not sure it's helpful to have a massive list of functions
where some warnings have been promoted and others not. But this is only my
opinion.

Best regards

George P. Banyard

>


Re: [PHP-DEV] ChangeLog

2010-05-31 Thread Jan Schneider

Zitat von Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com:


2010/5/29 Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de:

Hey,

On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 23:50 +0200, Pierre Joye wrote:

I'd to add that unless we add everything in the NEWS file, the
ChangeLog remains the only way to have a list of all changes (without
doing manually).


Having the file is absolutely fine with me, while I can fulfill my needs
with svn annotate and svn log. But if we ship it, it should be correct
and at least since 5.2.0 we ship a wrong (not updated) file. And that I
consider bad. So I ask somebody to either remove it or make sure  
it's updated

(automatically or by adding instructions to README.RELEASE_PROCESS) in
all places.


Maybe simply do it at release time?


Having the changelog updated automatically used to be a really useful  
thing, because there also existed a mailing list that sent daily (or  
weekly?) diffs to the changelog file.
This way you could easily follow development of PHP without having to  
subscribe to the commits mailing list.


Jan.

--
Do you need professional PHP or Horde consulting?
http://horde.org/consulting/


--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Commit messages and ChangeLog (Re: [PHP-DEV] ChangeLog)

2010-05-29 Thread Gwynne Raskind
On May 28, 2010, at 7:43 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
 Is anybody using this file? If this is thee case could somebody then
 make sure it's being updated (and maybe take care of
 ChangeLog-200[6-9].gz being created) else I'd suggest dropping them. An
 outdated file might be confusing for users expecting content like we
 have in the NEWS file there.
 
 I do, what's about only changing how it is generated to generated
 changes since last release instead?
 
 I'd to add that unless we add everything in the NEWS file, the
 ChangeLog remains the only way to have a list of all changes (without
 doing manually).
 
 Isn't that what svn log -v now provides? The format is slightly
 different of course, but it does provide the same info.
 
 By without doing it manually, I meant when one fetches a release or
 a snapshot.


The ChangeLog files aren't updated because no one ever ported the ChangeLog 
crons from CVS to SVN. It wouldn't be very difficult - in fact one of the 
open-source scripts already out there for the purpose would seem appropos, it 
just hasn't been done. They seem to be standard fare in FOSS projects, so I'm 
-1 for removing the functionality, but +1 for removing the useless archives 
from all active branches.

I wish I could volunteer to do the port, but I have too much on my plate right 
now :(

-- Gwynne



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: [PHP-DEV] ChangeLog

2010-05-29 Thread Pierre Joye
2010/5/29 Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de:
 Hey,

 On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 23:50 +0200, Pierre Joye wrote:
 I'd to add that unless we add everything in the NEWS file, the
 ChangeLog remains the only way to have a list of all changes (without
 doing manually).

 Having the file is absolutely fine with me, while I can fulfill my needs
 with svn annotate and svn log. But if we ship it, it should be correct
 and at least since 5.2.0 we ship a wrong (not updated) file. And that I
 consider bad. So I ask somebody to either remove it or make sure it's updated
 (automatically or by adding instructions to README.RELEASE_PROCESS) in
 all places.

Maybe simply do it at release time?


Cheers,
-- 
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org

--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP-DEV] ChangeLog

2010-05-29 Thread Johannes Schlüter
Hey,

On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 23:50 +0200, Pierre Joye wrote:
 I'd to add that unless we add everything in the NEWS file, the
 ChangeLog remains the only way to have a list of all changes (without
 doing manually).

Having the file is absolutely fine with me, while I can fulfill my needs
with svn annotate and svn log. But if we ship it, it should be correct
and at least since 5.2.0 we ship a wrong (not updated) file. And that I
consider bad. So I ask somebody to either remove it or make sure it's updated
(automatically or by adding instructions to README.RELEASE_PROCESS) in
all places.

johannes




-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP-DEV] ChangeLog

2010-05-28 Thread Patrick ALLAERT
2010/5/28 Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de:
 Hey,

 I know type hints are more fun to discuss but anyways: In trunk
 ChangeLog lists entries up till 2005 (when 5.2 was branched of, from
 which 5.3 was branched from which the current trunk was branched of) In
 the old trunk the file lasts until 2009-07-08 (when we switched from CVS
 to svn)

 Is anybody using this file? If this is thee case could somebody then
 make sure it's being updated (and maybe take care of
 ChangeLog-200[6-9].gz being created) else I'd suggest dropping them. An
 outdated file might be confusing for users expecting content like we
 have in the NEWS file there.

+1 for dropping it, it is confusing and why do we need that aside the
NEWS file ?

 johannes



 --
 PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
 To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP-DEV] ChangeLog

2010-05-28 Thread Adam Harvey
2010/5/28 Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de:
 Is anybody using this file? If this is thee case could somebody then
 make sure it's being updated (and maybe take care of
 ChangeLog-200[6-9].gz being created) else I'd suggest dropping them. An
 outdated file might be confusing for users expecting content like we
 have in the NEWS file there.

+1 on removing the ChangeLog and its archives, particularly since
they're taking up over a meg in a PHP 5.3 checkout, most of which is
already gzipped.

NEWS and the migration guides in the manual cover the needs of users
these days, and there's always svn log for anyone who wants more
detailed changeset information.

Adam

--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP-DEV] ChangeLog

2010-05-28 Thread Pierre Joye
hi Johannes,

2010/5/28 Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de:

 Is anybody using this file? If this is thee case could somebody then
 make sure it's being updated (and maybe take care of
 ChangeLog-200[6-9].gz being created) else I'd suggest dropping them. An
 outdated file might be confusing for users expecting content like we
 have in the NEWS file there.

I do, what's about only changing how it is generated to generated
changes since last release instead?

I'd to add that unless we add everything in the NEWS file, the
ChangeLog remains the only way to have a list of all changes (without
doing manually).

Cheers,
-- 
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org

--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



[PHP-DEV] Commit messages and ChangeLog (Re: [PHP-DEV] ChangeLog)

2010-05-28 Thread Derick Rethans
On Fri, 28 May 2010, Pierre Joye wrote:

 2010/5/28 Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de:
 
  Is anybody using this file? If this is thee case could somebody then
  make sure it's being updated (and maybe take care of
  ChangeLog-200[6-9].gz being created) else I'd suggest dropping them. An
  outdated file might be confusing for users expecting content like we
  have in the NEWS file there.
 
 I do, what's about only changing how it is generated to generated
 changes since last release instead?
 
 I'd to add that unless we add everything in the NEWS file, the
 ChangeLog remains the only way to have a list of all changes (without
 doing manually).

Isn't that what svn log -v now provides? The format is slightly 
different of course, but it does provide the same info. 

Although it does seem that we need to get ourselves more diciplined into 
writing the commit messages according to the prefered format[1] again.

[1] 
http://svn.php.net/viewvc/php/php-src/trunk/README.SVN-RULES?view=annotate#l90

with kind regards,
Derick

-- 
http://derickrethans.nl | http://xdebug.org
Like Xdebug? Consider a donation: http://xdebug.org/donate.php
twitter: @derickr and @xdebug
-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

[PHP-DEV] Re: Commit messages and ChangeLog (Re: [PHP-DEV] ChangeLog)

2010-05-28 Thread Pierre Joye
2010/5/29 Derick Rethans der...@php.net:
 On Fri, 28 May 2010, Pierre Joye wrote:

 2010/5/28 Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de:

  Is anybody using this file? If this is thee case could somebody then
  make sure it's being updated (and maybe take care of
  ChangeLog-200[6-9].gz being created) else I'd suggest dropping them. An
  outdated file might be confusing for users expecting content like we
  have in the NEWS file there.

 I do, what's about only changing how it is generated to generated
 changes since last release instead?

 I'd to add that unless we add everything in the NEWS file, the
 ChangeLog remains the only way to have a list of all changes (without
 doing manually).

 Isn't that what svn log -v now provides? The format is slightly
 different of course, but it does provide the same info.

By without doing it manually, I meant when one fetches a release or
a snapshot.

--
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org

--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php