On 03/11/16 14:37, VanCutsem, Geoffroy wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Not sure whether this is the right mailing list to ask but I looked today at
> the meta-oic [1] layer. It was recently upgraded to IoTivity 1.1.1 (using
> IoTivity 1.1-rel maintenance branch), thanks Philippe for helping with this!
> What caught my attention however is that there are a couple of recipes
> (inside recipes-apps [2]) which seem out-of-date (one indicates a 1.1.0
> version and the other is at 1.0.0). Both use code that's found in a tarball
> (vs. code pulled from the IoTivity Github repo). My question therefore is:
> should these be either updated or removed completely (if obsolete)?
>
> Thanks,
> Geoffroy
>
> [1] http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-oic/
> [2] http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-oic/tree/recipes-apps
Hi Geoffroy,
About, meta-oic I also have a 1.2.0 recipe to be shared (maybe next week)
yea I know about those samples I tried my best to make them build on
current release.
I am wondering if anyone is using them? Note one is intel specific.
IMHO, it's better to have a couple of examples outside iotivity project,
to be linked without rebuilding the whole project (using scons).
So back to your question, it's better to keep them in meta-oic as
example to base on.
Meanwhile I've wrote a couple of new simple examples,
using mraa, sysfs or csdk, and they are working on yocto, Tizen
(wearables), Arduino too
I made a basic implementation of OCF binary switch (to control a relay).
More details at bottom :
https://wiki.iotivity.org/examples
They need to be polished, but they might finish in meta-oic soon or later.
