Re: [IPsec] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-14: (with DISCUSS)
Hi Paul, On Mon, Nov 19, 2018, at 4:50 AM, Paul Wouters wrote: > On 2018-11-18 12:40 a.m., Alexey Melnikov wrote: > > -- > > DISCUSS: > > -- > > > > This is a well written document, so thank you for that. > > I've noticed that Benjamin already found typos that I found and raised one > > of > > the same questions, but I think this is important enough to be addressed > > before > > I recommend approval of this document. Specifically: > > > > In Section 3.1: > > > > o Domain Name (0 or more octets) - A Fully Qualified Domain Name > >used for Split DNS rules, such as "example.com", in DNS > >presentation format and optionally using IDNA [RFC5890] for > >Internationalized Domain Names. > > > > Do you mean A-label or U-label form here? > > > I thought it was obvious that we meant A-label. Why else refer to IDN if > you would just put in U-label, but I'll add the A-label term. There are documents which allow either, so being clear on this point is important. Thank you, Alexey ___ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
Re: [IPsec] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-14: (with DISCUSS)
On 2018-11-18 12:40 a.m., Alexey Melnikov wrote: -- DISCUSS: -- This is a well written document, so thank you for that. I've noticed that Benjamin already found typos that I found and raised one of the same questions, but I think this is important enough to be addressed before I recommend approval of this document. Specifically: In Section 3.1: o Domain Name (0 or more octets) - A Fully Qualified Domain Name used for Split DNS rules, such as "example.com", in DNS presentation format and optionally using IDNA [RFC5890] for Internationalized Domain Names. Do you mean A-label or U-label form here? I thought it was obvious that we meant A-label. Why else refer to IDN if you would just put in U-label, but I'll add the A-label term. Paul ___ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
[IPsec] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-14: (with DISCUSS)
Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-14: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns/ -- DISCUSS: -- This is a well written document, so thank you for that. I've noticed that Benjamin already found typos that I found and raised one of the same questions, but I think this is important enough to be addressed before I recommend approval of this document. Specifically: In Section 3.1: o Domain Name (0 or more octets) - A Fully Qualified Domain Name used for Split DNS rules, such as "example.com", in DNS presentation format and optionally using IDNA [RFC5890] for Internationalized Domain Names. Do you mean A-label or U-label form here? Implementors need to be careful that this value is not null-terminated. ___ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
