[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-2566) FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14944902#comment-14944902 ] Matthias J. Sax commented on FLINK-2566: Fixed via 7a67a60f934123863ca96a95e30471c99bb8088a > FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely > - > > Key: FLINK-2566 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Storm Compatibility >Reporter: Matthias J. Sax >Assignee: Matthias J. Sax >Priority: Minor > > Currently FlinkTopologyContext is not populated completely. It only contains > enough information to make WordCount example work. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-2566) FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14944900#comment-14944900 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2566: --- Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1135 > FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely > - > > Key: FLINK-2566 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Storm Compatibility >Reporter: Matthias J. Sax >Assignee: Matthias J. Sax >Priority: Minor > > Currently FlinkTopologyContext is not populated completely. It only contains > enough information to make WordCount example work. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-2566) FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14941386#comment-14941386 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2566: --- Github user mjsax commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1135#issuecomment-145085340 Just updated this PR. It additionally contains the maven module restructuring and internal code cleanup in a second commit. If no objects, I will push this into master. > FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely > - > > Key: FLINK-2566 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Storm Compatibility >Reporter: Matthias J. Sax >Assignee: Matthias J. Sax >Priority: Minor > > Currently FlinkTopologyContext is not populated completely. It only contains > enough information to make WordCount example work. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-2566) FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14941388#comment-14941388 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2566: --- Github user mjsax commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1135#issuecomment-145085684 Prove reading for README, Web documenation, and examples JavaDoc would be appreciated ;) It's a lot if renaming going on and I might have missed something. > FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely > - > > Key: FLINK-2566 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Storm Compatibility >Reporter: Matthias J. Sax >Assignee: Matthias J. Sax >Priority: Minor > > Currently FlinkTopologyContext is not populated completely. It only contains > enough information to make WordCount example work. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-2566) FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14768876#comment-14768876 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2566: --- Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1135#issuecomment-140730955 There is a test failure ``` StormWrapperSetupHelperTest.testCreateTopologyContext:190 » ClassCast class su... ``` > FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely > - > > Key: FLINK-2566 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Storm Compatibility >Reporter: Matthias J. Sax >Assignee: Matthias J. Sax >Priority: Minor > > Currently FlinkTopologyContext is not populated completely. It only contains > enough information to make WordCount example work. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-2566) FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14768870#comment-14768870 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2566: --- Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1135#discussion_r39624182 --- Diff: flink-contrib/flink-storm-compatibility/flink-storm-compatibility-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/stormcompatibility/api/FlinkTopology.java --- @@ -28,17 +28,14 @@ * cannot be executed directly, but must be handed over to a {@link FlinkLocalCluster}, {@link FlinkSubmitter}, or * {@link FlinkClient}. */ -class FlinkTopology extends StreamExecutionEnvironment { +public class FlinkTopology extends StreamExecutionEnvironment { --- End diff -- While trying out the Storm compat, I stumbled across the fact that the FlinkTopology was only package visible --> Good fix ;) > FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely > - > > Key: FLINK-2566 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Storm Compatibility >Reporter: Matthias J. Sax >Assignee: Matthias J. Sax >Priority: Minor > > Currently FlinkTopologyContext is not populated completely. It only contains > enough information to make WordCount example work. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-2566) FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14790672#comment-14790672 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2566: --- Github user mjsax commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1135#issuecomment-140795134 I know. See dev mailing list "Java 8 JDK issue". > FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely > - > > Key: FLINK-2566 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Storm Compatibility >Reporter: Matthias J. Sax >Assignee: Matthias J. Sax >Priority: Minor > > Currently FlinkTopologyContext is not populated completely. It only contains > enough information to make WordCount example work. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-2566) FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14790669#comment-14790669 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2566: --- Github user mjsax commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1135#discussion_r39652292 --- Diff: flink-contrib/flink-storm-compatibility/flink-storm-compatibility-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/stormcompatibility/api/FlinkTopology.java --- @@ -28,17 +28,14 @@ * cannot be executed directly, but must be handed over to a {@link FlinkLocalCluster}, {@link FlinkSubmitter}, or * {@link FlinkClient}. */ -class FlinkTopology extends StreamExecutionEnvironment { +public class FlinkTopology extends StreamExecutionEnvironment { --- End diff -- That was on purpose on no bug. Because, a user should on call `new FlinkTopology()`. But now I need it to be public. Furthermore, and I am going to change some stuff and allow `new FlinkTopology()` (so I did not include a private constructor either in this PR -- for future purpose). > FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely > - > > Key: FLINK-2566 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Storm Compatibility >Reporter: Matthias J. Sax >Assignee: Matthias J. Sax >Priority: Minor > > Currently FlinkTopologyContext is not populated completely. It only contains > enough information to make WordCount example work. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-2566) FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14791134#comment-14791134 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2566: --- Github user fhueske commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1135#issuecomment-140898273 Tricky bug :-) If it does not depend on #1046, why not merge it? Or would you like to have somebody else looking over the code? > FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely > - > > Key: FLINK-2566 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Storm Compatibility >Reporter: Matthias J. Sax >Assignee: Matthias J. Sax >Priority: Minor > > Currently FlinkTopologyContext is not populated completely. It only contains > enough information to make WordCount example work. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-2566) FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14791165#comment-14791165 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2566: --- Github user fhueske commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1135#issuecomment-140901138 #1046 seems to be almost done. Porting to the ExecutionConfig, shouldn't be too hard. I'd rather try to drive #1046 forward and merge it first, but it's up to you. > FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely > - > > Key: FLINK-2566 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Storm Compatibility >Reporter: Matthias J. Sax >Assignee: Matthias J. Sax >Priority: Minor > > Currently FlinkTopologyContext is not populated completely. It only contains > enough information to make WordCount example work. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-2566) FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14791124#comment-14791124 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2566: --- Github user mjsax commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1135#issuecomment-140895609 Fixed. Please let me know if I can merge this. Or should I wait for #1046 ? > FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely > - > > Key: FLINK-2566 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Storm Compatibility >Reporter: Matthias J. Sax >Assignee: Matthias J. Sax >Priority: Minor > > Currently FlinkTopologyContext is not populated completely. It only contains > enough information to make WordCount example work. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-2566) FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14791144#comment-14791144 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2566: --- Github user mjsax commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1135#issuecomment-140899681 I use the config that is introduced in #1046 already... See TODO in StormWrapperSetupHelper.java and StormWrapperSetupHelperTest.java ... Not sure if it is cleaver to merge this first (of course #1046 can just fix this up after a rebase). And I applied package restructuring which might require a tricky rebase for #1046 Would like to get advice about a good way to handle this (or if I can ignore this and just merge). And comments about the code are always welcome :) > FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely > - > > Key: FLINK-2566 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Storm Compatibility >Reporter: Matthias J. Sax >Assignee: Matthias J. Sax >Priority: Minor > > Currently FlinkTopologyContext is not populated completely. It only contains > enough information to make WordCount example work. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-2566) FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14791168#comment-14791168 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2566: --- Github user mjsax commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1135#issuecomment-140901671 Thanks. I agree with you. Just wanted to get a second opinion. > FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely > - > > Key: FLINK-2566 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Storm Compatibility >Reporter: Matthias J. Sax >Assignee: Matthias J. Sax >Priority: Minor > > Currently FlinkTopologyContext is not populated completely. It only contains > enough information to make WordCount example work. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-2566) FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14746405#comment-14746405 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2566: --- GitHub user mjsax opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1135 [FLINK-2566] FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely - extended FlinkTopologyContext to be populted with all supportable attributes - added JUnit test - updated README.md additionally: module restructuring to get cleaner package structure You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/mjsax/flink flink-2566-topologyContext Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1135.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #1135 commit 07473990fcbe06cff2305afcd78d5aef74895736 Author: mjsaxDate: 2015-09-15T21:59:31Z [FLINK-2566] FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely - extended FlinkTopologyContext to be populted with all supportable attributes - added JUnit test - updated README.md additionally: module restructuring to get cleaner package structure > FlinkTopologyContext not populated completely > - > > Key: FLINK-2566 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Storm Compatibility >Reporter: Matthias J. Sax >Assignee: Matthias J. Sax >Priority: Minor > > Currently FlinkTopologyContext is not populated completely. It only contains > enough information to make WordCount example work. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-2566) FlinkTopologyContext no populated completely
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14741223#comment-14741223 ] Matthias J. Sax commented on FLINK-2566: The PR for this feature is almost ready. It depend on FLINK-2525. Thus, I need to wait until this is merged, so I can rebase and finish the code. > FlinkTopologyContext no populated completely > > > Key: FLINK-2566 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2566 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Storm Compatibility >Reporter: Matthias J. Sax >Assignee: Matthias J. Sax >Priority: Minor > > Currently FlinkTopologyContext is not populated completely. It only contains > enough information to make WordCount example work. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)