[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-18996) Avoid disorder for time interval join
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lyn Zhang updated FLINK-18996: -- Attachment: image-2023-04-04-18-04-36-497.png > Avoid disorder for time interval join > - > > Key: FLINK-18996 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18996 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Table SQL / Runtime >Reporter: Benchao Li >Assignee: Lyn Zhang >Priority: Major > Labels: auto-deprioritized-critical, auto-deprioritized-major, > pull-request-available > Fix For: 1.18.0 > > Attachments: image-2023-04-04-18-02-45-202.png, > image-2023-04-04-18-04-36-497.png > > > Currently, the time interval join will produce data with rowtime later than > watermark. If we use the rowtime again in downstream, e.t. window > aggregation, we'll lose some data. > > reported from user-zh: > [http://apache-flink.147419.n8.nabble.com/Re-flink-interval-join-tc4458.html#none] -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-18996) Avoid disorder for time interval join
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lyn Zhang updated FLINK-18996: -- Attachment: image-2023-04-04-18-02-45-202.png > Avoid disorder for time interval join > - > > Key: FLINK-18996 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18996 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Table SQL / Runtime >Reporter: Benchao Li >Assignee: Lyn Zhang >Priority: Major > Labels: auto-deprioritized-critical, auto-deprioritized-major, > pull-request-available > Fix For: 1.18.0 > > Attachments: image-2023-04-04-18-02-45-202.png > > > Currently, the time interval join will produce data with rowtime later than > watermark. If we use the rowtime again in downstream, e.t. window > aggregation, we'll lose some data. > > reported from user-zh: > [http://apache-flink.147419.n8.nabble.com/Re-flink-interval-join-tc4458.html#none] -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-18996) Avoid disorder for time interval join
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ASF GitHub Bot updated FLINK-18996: --- Labels: auto-deprioritized-critical auto-deprioritized-major pull-request-available (was: auto-deprioritized-critical auto-deprioritized-major) > Avoid disorder for time interval join > - > > Key: FLINK-18996 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18996 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Table SQL / Runtime >Reporter: Benchao Li >Assignee: Lyn Zhang >Priority: Major > Labels: auto-deprioritized-critical, auto-deprioritized-major, > pull-request-available > Fix For: 1.18.0 > > > Currently, the time interval join will produce data with rowtime later than > watermark. If we use the rowtime again in downstream, e.t. window > aggregation, we'll lose some data. > > reported from user-zh: > [http://apache-flink.147419.n8.nabble.com/Re-flink-interval-join-tc4458.html#none] -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-18996) Avoid disorder for time interval join
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Xintong Song updated FLINK-18996: - Fix Version/s: 1.18.0 (was: 1.17.0) > Avoid disorder for time interval join > - > > Key: FLINK-18996 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18996 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Table SQL / Runtime >Reporter: Benchao Li >Priority: Major > Labels: auto-deprioritized-critical, auto-deprioritized-major > Fix For: 1.18.0 > > > Currently, the time interval join will produce data with rowtime later than > watermark. If we use the rowtime again in downstream, e.t. window > aggregation, we'll lose some data. > > reported from user-zh: > [http://apache-flink.147419.n8.nabble.com/Re-flink-interval-join-tc4458.html#none] -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-18996) Avoid disorder for time interval join
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Xingbo Huang updated FLINK-18996: - Fix Version/s: 1.17.0 (was: 1.16.0) > Avoid disorder for time interval join > - > > Key: FLINK-18996 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18996 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Table SQL / Runtime >Reporter: Benchao Li >Priority: Major > Labels: auto-deprioritized-critical, auto-deprioritized-major > Fix For: 1.17.0 > > > Currently, the time interval join will produce data with rowtime later than > watermark. If we use the rowtime again in downstream, e.t. window > aggregation, we'll lose some data. > > reported from user-zh: > [http://apache-flink.147419.n8.nabble.com/Re-flink-interval-join-tc4458.html#none] -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-18996) Avoid disorder for time interval join
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yun Gao updated FLINK-18996: Fix Version/s: 1.16.0 > Avoid disorder for time interval join > - > > Key: FLINK-18996 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18996 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Table SQL / Runtime >Reporter: Benchao Li >Priority: Major > Labels: auto-deprioritized-critical, auto-deprioritized-major > Fix For: 1.15.0, 1.16.0 > > > Currently, the time interval join will produce data with rowtime later than > watermark. If we use the rowtime again in downstream, e.t. window > aggregation, we'll lose some data. > > reported from user-zh: > [http://apache-flink.147419.n8.nabble.com/Re-flink-interval-join-tc4458.html#none] -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)
[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-18996) Avoid disorder for time interval join
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-18996: --- Labels: auto-deprioritized-critical auto-deprioritized-major (was: auto-deprioritized-major stale-critical) Priority: Major (was: Critical) This issue was labeled "stale-critical" 7 days ago and has not received any updates so it is being deprioritized. If this ticket is actually Critical, please raise the priority and ask a committer to assign you the issue or revive the public discussion. > Avoid disorder for time interval join > - > > Key: FLINK-18996 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18996 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Table SQL / Runtime >Reporter: Benchao Li >Priority: Major > Labels: auto-deprioritized-critical, auto-deprioritized-major > Fix For: 1.15.0 > > > Currently, the time interval join will produce data with rowtime later than > watermark. If we use the rowtime again in downstream, e.t. window > aggregation, we'll lose some data. > > reported from user-zh: > [http://apache-flink.147419.n8.nabble.com/Re-flink-interval-join-tc4458.html#none] -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-18996) Avoid disorder for time interval join
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kurt Young updated FLINK-18996: --- Fix Version/s: 1.15.0 > Avoid disorder for time interval join > - > > Key: FLINK-18996 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18996 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Table SQL / Runtime >Reporter: Benchao Li >Priority: Critical > Labels: auto-deprioritized-major, stale-critical > Fix For: 1.15.0 > > > Currently, the time interval join will produce data with rowtime later than > watermark. If we use the rowtime again in downstream, e.t. window > aggregation, we'll lose some data. > > reported from user-zh: > [http://apache-flink.147419.n8.nabble.com/Re-flink-interval-join-tc4458.html#none] -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-18996) Avoid disorder for time interval join
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-18996: --- Labels: auto-deprioritized-major stale-critical (was: auto-deprioritized-major) I am the [Flink Jira Bot|https://github.com/apache/flink-jira-bot/] and I help the community manage its development. I see this issues has been marked as Critical but is unassigned and neither itself nor its Sub-Tasks have been updated for 14 days. I have gone ahead and marked it "stale-critical". If this ticket is critical, please either assign yourself or give an update. Afterwards, please remove the label or in 7 days the issue will be deprioritized. > Avoid disorder for time interval join > - > > Key: FLINK-18996 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18996 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Table SQL / Runtime >Reporter: Benchao Li >Priority: Critical > Labels: auto-deprioritized-major, stale-critical > > Currently, the time interval join will produce data with rowtime later than > watermark. If we use the rowtime again in downstream, e.t. window > aggregation, we'll lose some data. > > reported from user-zh: > [http://apache-flink.147419.n8.nabble.com/Re-flink-interval-join-tc4458.html#none] -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-18996) Avoid disorder for time interval join
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Timo Walther updated FLINK-18996: - Priority: Critical (was: Minor) > Avoid disorder for time interval join > - > > Key: FLINK-18996 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18996 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Table SQL / Runtime >Reporter: Benchao Li >Priority: Critical > Labels: auto-deprioritized-major > > Currently, the time interval join will produce data with rowtime later than > watermark. If we use the rowtime again in downstream, e.t. window > aggregation, we'll lose some data. > > reported from user-zh: > [http://apache-flink.147419.n8.nabble.com/Re-flink-interval-join-tc4458.html#none] -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-18996) Avoid disorder for time interval join
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-18996: --- Labels: auto-deprioritized-major (was: stale-major) Priority: Minor (was: Major) This issue was labeled "stale-major" 7 ago and has not received any updates so it is being deprioritized. If this ticket is actually Major, please raise the priority and ask a committer to assign you the issue or revive the public discussion. > Avoid disorder for time interval join > - > > Key: FLINK-18996 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18996 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Table SQL / Runtime >Reporter: Benchao Li >Priority: Minor > Labels: auto-deprioritized-major > > Currently, the time interval join will produce data with rowtime later than > watermark. If we use the rowtime again in downstream, e.t. window > aggregation, we'll lose some data. > > reported from user-zh: > [http://apache-flink.147419.n8.nabble.com/Re-flink-interval-join-tc4458.html#none] -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-18996) Avoid disorder for time interval join
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jark Wu updated FLINK-18996: Component/s: (was: Table SQL / API) > Avoid disorder for time interval join > - > > Key: FLINK-18996 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18996 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Table SQL / Runtime >Reporter: Benchao Li >Priority: Major > Labels: stale-major > > Currently, the time interval join will produce data with rowtime later than > watermark. If we use the rowtime again in downstream, e.t. window > aggregation, we'll lose some data. > > reported from user-zh: > [http://apache-flink.147419.n8.nabble.com/Re-flink-interval-join-tc4458.html#none] -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-18996) Avoid disorder for time interval join
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-18996: --- Labels: stale-major (was: ) > Avoid disorder for time interval join > - > > Key: FLINK-18996 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18996 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Table SQL / API, Table SQL / Runtime >Reporter: Benchao Li >Priority: Major > Labels: stale-major > > Currently, the time interval join will produce data with rowtime later than > watermark. If we use the rowtime again in downstream, e.t. window > aggregation, we'll lose some data. > > reported from user-zh: > [http://apache-flink.147419.n8.nabble.com/Re-flink-interval-join-tc4458.html#none] -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
