[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-22144) MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans

2019-04-30 Thread Hudson (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16830872#comment-16830872
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-22144:


Results for branch branch-1
[build #800 on 
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/800/]: 
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*

details (if available):

(x) {color:red}-1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/800//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk7 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk7 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/800//JDK7_Nightly_Build_Report/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/800//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]




(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


> MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-22144
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Filters, scan
>Reporter: Josh Elser
>Assignee: Josh Elser
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.2.0, 2.3.0, 2.0.6, 2.1.5
>
> Attachments: HBASE-22144.001.patch, HBASE-22144.002.patch, 
> HBASE-22144.002.patch
>
>
> It appears that MultiRowRangeFilter was never written to function with 
> reverse scans. There is too much logic that operates with the assumption that 
> we are always moving "forward" through increasing ranges. It needs to be 
> rewritten to "traverse" forward or backward, given how the context of the 
> scan being used.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-22144) MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans

2019-04-29 Thread Hudson (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16829973#comment-16829973
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-22144:


Results for branch branch-1.4
[build #772 on 
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1.4/772/]: 
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*

details (if available):

(x) {color:red}-1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1.4/772//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk7 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk7 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1.4/772//JDK7_Nightly_Build_Report/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1.4/772//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]




(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


> MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-22144
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Filters, scan
>Reporter: Josh Elser
>Assignee: Josh Elser
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.2.0, 2.3.0, 2.0.6, 2.1.5
>
> Attachments: HBASE-22144.001.patch, HBASE-22144.002.patch, 
> HBASE-22144.002.patch
>
>
> It appears that MultiRowRangeFilter was never written to function with 
> reverse scans. There is too much logic that operates with the assumption that 
> we are always moving "forward" through increasing ranges. It needs to be 
> rewritten to "traverse" forward or backward, given how the context of the 
> scan being used.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-22144) MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans

2019-04-29 Thread Hudson (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16829968#comment-16829968
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-22144:


Results for branch branch-1
[build #798 on 
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/798/]: 
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*

details (if available):

(x) {color:red}-1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/798//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk7 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk7 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/798//JDK7_Nightly_Build_Report/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/798//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]




(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


> MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-22144
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Filters, scan
>Reporter: Josh Elser
>Assignee: Josh Elser
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.2.0, 2.3.0, 2.0.6, 2.1.5
>
> Attachments: HBASE-22144.001.patch, HBASE-22144.002.patch, 
> HBASE-22144.002.patch
>
>
> It appears that MultiRowRangeFilter was never written to function with 
> reverse scans. There is too much logic that operates with the assumption that 
> we are always moving "forward" through increasing ranges. It needs to be 
> rewritten to "traverse" forward or backward, given how the context of the 
> scan being used.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-22144) MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans

2019-04-24 Thread Hudson (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16824956#comment-16824956
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-22144:


Results for branch branch-1.4
[build #761 on 
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1.4/761/]: 
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*

details (if available):

(x) {color:red}-1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1.4/761//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk7 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk7 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1.4/761//JDK7_Nightly_Build_Report/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1.4/761//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]




(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


> MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-22144
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Filters, scan
>Reporter: Josh Elser
>Assignee: Josh Elser
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.2.0, 2.3.0, 2.0.6, 2.1.5
>
> Attachments: HBASE-22144.001.patch, HBASE-22144.002.patch, 
> HBASE-22144.002.patch
>
>
> It appears that MultiRowRangeFilter was never written to function with 
> reverse scans. There is too much logic that operates with the assumption that 
> we are always moving "forward" through increasing ranges. It needs to be 
> rewritten to "traverse" forward or backward, given how the context of the 
> scan being used.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-22144) MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans

2019-04-24 Thread Hudson (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16824934#comment-16824934
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-22144:


Results for branch branch-1
[build #787 on 
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/787/]: 
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*

details (if available):

(x) {color:red}-1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/787//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk7 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk7 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/787//JDK7_Nightly_Build_Report/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/787//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]




(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


> MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-22144
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Filters, scan
>Reporter: Josh Elser
>Assignee: Josh Elser
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.2.0, 2.3.0, 2.0.6, 2.1.5
>
> Attachments: HBASE-22144.001.patch, HBASE-22144.002.patch, 
> HBASE-22144.002.patch
>
>
> It appears that MultiRowRangeFilter was never written to function with 
> reverse scans. There is too much logic that operates with the assumption that 
> we are always moving "forward" through increasing ranges. It needs to be 
> rewritten to "traverse" forward or backward, given how the context of the 
> scan being used.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-22144) MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans

2019-04-11 Thread Hudson (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16815972#comment-16815972
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-22144:


Results for branch branch-2.0
[build #1512 on 
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.0/1512/]: 
(/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}*

details (if available):

(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.0/1512//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]




(/) {color:green}+1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.0/1512//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]


(/) {color:green}+1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.0/1512//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop3)/]


(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


> MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-22144
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Filters, scan
>Reporter: Josh Elser
>Assignee: Josh Elser
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.2.0, 2.3.0, 2.0.6, 2.1.5
>
> Attachments: HBASE-22144.001.patch, HBASE-22144.002.patch, 
> HBASE-22144.002.patch
>
>
> It appears that MultiRowRangeFilter was never written to function with 
> reverse scans. There is too much logic that operates with the assumption that 
> we are always moving "forward" through increasing ranges. It needs to be 
> rewritten to "traverse" forward or backward, given how the context of the 
> scan being used.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-22144) MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans

2019-04-11 Thread Hudson (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16815957#comment-16815957
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-22144:


Results for branch branch-2.1
[build #1046 on 
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.1/1046/]: 
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*

details (if available):

(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.1/1046//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]




(/) {color:green}+1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.1/1046//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.1/1046//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop3)/]


(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test{color}


> MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-22144
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Filters, scan
>Reporter: Josh Elser
>Assignee: Josh Elser
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.2.0, 2.3.0, 2.0.6, 2.1.5
>
> Attachments: HBASE-22144.001.patch, HBASE-22144.002.patch, 
> HBASE-22144.002.patch
>
>
> It appears that MultiRowRangeFilter was never written to function with 
> reverse scans. There is too much logic that operates with the assumption that 
> we are always moving "forward" through increasing ranges. It needs to be 
> rewritten to "traverse" forward or backward, given how the context of the 
> scan being used.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-22144) MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans

2019-04-11 Thread Hudson (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16815946#comment-16815946
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-22144:


Results for branch branch-2
[build #1815 on 
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1815/]: 
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*

details (if available):

(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1815//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]




(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1815//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1815//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop3)/]


(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test{color}


> MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-22144
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Filters, scan
>Reporter: Josh Elser
>Assignee: Josh Elser
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.2.0, 2.3.0, 2.0.6, 2.1.5
>
> Attachments: HBASE-22144.001.patch, HBASE-22144.002.patch, 
> HBASE-22144.002.patch
>
>
> It appears that MultiRowRangeFilter was never written to function with 
> reverse scans. There is too much logic that operates with the assumption that 
> we are always moving "forward" through increasing ranges. It needs to be 
> rewritten to "traverse" forward or backward, given how the context of the 
> scan being used.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-22144) MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans

2019-04-11 Thread Hudson (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16815926#comment-16815926
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-22144:


Results for branch master
[build #926 on 
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/926/]: (x) 
*{color:red}-1 overall{color}*

details (if available):

(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/926//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]




(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/926//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/926//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop3)/]


(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test{color}


> MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-22144
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Filters, scan
>Reporter: Josh Elser
>Assignee: Josh Elser
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.2.0, 2.3.0, 2.0.6, 2.1.5
>
> Attachments: HBASE-22144.001.patch, HBASE-22144.002.patch, 
> HBASE-22144.002.patch
>
>
> It appears that MultiRowRangeFilter was never written to function with 
> reverse scans. There is too much logic that operates with the assumption that 
> we are always moving "forward" through increasing ranges. It needs to be 
> rewritten to "traverse" forward or backward, given how the context of the 
> scan being used.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-22144) MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans

2019-04-11 Thread Hudson (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16815898#comment-16815898
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-22144:


Results for branch branch-2.2
[build #176 on 
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.2/176/]: 
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*

details (if available):

(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.2/176//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]




(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.2/176//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.2/176//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop3)/]


(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test{color}


> MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-22144
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Filters, scan
>Reporter: Josh Elser
>Assignee: Josh Elser
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.2.0, 2.3.0, 2.0.6, 2.1.5
>
> Attachments: HBASE-22144.001.patch, HBASE-22144.002.patch, 
> HBASE-22144.002.patch
>
>
> It appears that MultiRowRangeFilter was never written to function with 
> reverse scans. There is too much logic that operates with the assumption that 
> we are always moving "forward" through increasing ranges. It needs to be 
> rewritten to "traverse" forward or backward, given how the context of the 
> scan being used.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-22144) MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans

2019-04-11 Thread Josh Elser (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16815518#comment-16815518
 ] 

Josh Elser commented on HBASE-22144:


Ugh, this doesn't come back to branch-2.0 or branch-2.1 due to HBASE-19008 and 
HBASE-21129 never being backported to these branches. I'm not sure what the 
lesser headache would be: making sure those changes don't break public API 
guarantees or re-implementing this fix.

> MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-22144
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Josh Elser
>Assignee: Josh Elser
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HBASE-22144.001.patch, HBASE-22144.002.patch, 
> HBASE-22144.002.patch
>
>
> It appears that MultiRowRangeFilter was never written to function with 
> reverse scans. There is too much logic that operates with the assumption that 
> we are always moving "forward" through increasing ranges. It needs to be 
> rewritten to "traverse" forward or backward, given how the context of the 
> scan being used.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-22144) MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans

2019-04-11 Thread Josh Elser (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16815464#comment-16815464
 ] 

Josh Elser commented on HBASE-22144:


Thanks, Toshi. I think that's a good idea. We can have a discussion about it. I 
could see us interpreting "forward ranges" for a reverse scan being considered 
a "bug", too. But, we can see what others think.

> MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-22144
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Josh Elser
>Assignee: Josh Elser
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HBASE-22144.001.patch, HBASE-22144.002.patch, 
> HBASE-22144.002.patch
>
>
> It appears that MultiRowRangeFilter was never written to function with 
> reverse scans. There is too much logic that operates with the assumption that 
> we are always moving "forward" through increasing ranges. It needs to be 
> rewritten to "traverse" forward or backward, given how the context of the 
> scan being used.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-22144) MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans

2019-04-10 Thread Toshihiro Suzuki (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16814998#comment-16814998
 ] 

Toshihiro Suzuki commented on HBASE-22144:
--

{quote}
but I don't want to convolute this bug fix with changing how the implementation 
works, especially when this is public API (and we have to be certain that we 
aren't breaking user-code).
{quote}
Okay I see. Then +1.

Will create another Jira ticket for what I mentioned in my last comment.

> MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-22144
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Josh Elser
>Assignee: Josh Elser
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HBASE-22144.001.patch, HBASE-22144.002.patch, 
> HBASE-22144.002.patch
>
>
> It appears that MultiRowRangeFilter was never written to function with 
> reverse scans. There is too much logic that operates with the assumption that 
> we are always moving "forward" through increasing ranges. It needs to be 
> rewritten to "traverse" forward or backward, given how the context of the 
> scan being used.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-22144) MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans

2019-04-10 Thread Josh Elser (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16814507#comment-16814507
 ] 

Josh Elser commented on HBASE-22144:


Thanks for taking a look, Toshi.

bq. In reverse scan, startRow should be bigger than stopRow. So I think we 
should be also able to specify in the same way in RowRange when using 
MultiRowRangeFilter in reverse scan.

This is something we could consider, but I don't want to convolute this bug fix 
with changing how the implementation works, especially when this is public API 
(and we have to be certain that we aren't breaking user-code).


> MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-22144
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Josh Elser
>Assignee: Josh Elser
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HBASE-22144.001.patch, HBASE-22144.002.patch, 
> HBASE-22144.002.patch
>
>
> It appears that MultiRowRangeFilter was never written to function with 
> reverse scans. There is too much logic that operates with the assumption that 
> we are always moving "forward" through increasing ranges. It needs to be 
> rewritten to "traverse" forward or backward, given how the context of the 
> scan being used.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-22144) MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans

2019-04-09 Thread Toshihiro Suzuki (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16814046#comment-16814046
 ] 

Toshihiro Suzuki commented on HBASE-22144:
--

In reverse scan, startRow should be bigger than stopRow. So I think we should 
be also able to specify in the same way in RowRange when using 
MultiRowRangeFilter in reverse scan.

> MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-22144
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Josh Elser
>Assignee: Josh Elser
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HBASE-22144.001.patch, HBASE-22144.002.patch, 
> HBASE-22144.002.patch
>
>
> It appears that MultiRowRangeFilter was never written to function with 
> reverse scans. There is too much logic that operates with the assumption that 
> we are always moving "forward" through increasing ranges. It needs to be 
> rewritten to "traverse" forward or backward, given how the context of the 
> scan being used.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-22144) MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans

2019-04-08 Thread HBase QA (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16812759#comment-16812759
 ] 

HBase QA commented on HBASE-22144:
--

| (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
24s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hbaseanti {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} Patch does not have any anti-patterns. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} master Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
14s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  4m 
 3s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  1m 
11s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  1m 
40s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green}  4m 
22s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building our shaded 
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  3m 
26s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
51s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
16s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  4m 
10s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  1m 
12s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  1m 
12s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  1m 
37s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green}  4m 
19s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building our shaded 
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:green}  
8m 19s{color} | {color:green} Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 2.7.4 
or 3.0.0. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  3m 
34s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
51s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  3m 
29s{color} | {color:green} hbase-client in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}137m 
23s{color} | {color:green} hbase-server in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
55s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}183m 12s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce base: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/33/artifact/patchprocess/Dockerfile
 |
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-22144 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12965225/HBASE-22144.002.patch 
|
| Optional Tests |  dupname  asflicense  javac  javadoc  unit  findbugs  
shadedjars  hadoopcheck  hbaseanti  checkstyle  compile  |
| uname | Linux 6a8ac4c9da83 4.4.0-138-generic #164-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 2 
17:16:02 UTC 2018 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | dev-support/hbase-personality.sh |
| git revision | master / 89ce5d17e4 |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.5.4 
(1edded0938998edf8bf061f1ceb3cfdeccf443fe; 2018-06-17T18:33:14Z) |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_181 |
| findbugs | 

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-22144) MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans

2019-04-08 Thread Josh Elser (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16812710#comment-16812710
 ] 

Josh Elser commented on HBASE-22144:


{quote}what are the target version(s) here?
{quote}
2.x and master, certainly. A quick glance at the 1.x line looked like it also 
had the same defect.

> MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-22144
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Josh Elser
>Assignee: Josh Elser
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HBASE-22144.001.patch, HBASE-22144.002.patch, 
> HBASE-22144.002.patch
>
>
> It appears that MultiRowRangeFilter was never written to function with 
> reverse scans. There is too much logic that operates with the assumption that 
> we are always moving "forward" through increasing ranges. It needs to be 
> rewritten to "traverse" forward or backward, given how the context of the 
> scan being used.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-22144) MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans

2019-04-08 Thread Sean Busbey (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16812680#comment-16812680
 ] 

Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-22144:
-

what are the target version(s) here?

> MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-22144
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Josh Elser
>Assignee: Josh Elser
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HBASE-22144.001.patch, HBASE-22144.002.patch, 
> HBASE-22144.002.patch
>
>
> It appears that MultiRowRangeFilter was never written to function with 
> reverse scans. There is too much logic that operates with the assumption that 
> we are always moving "forward" through increasing ranges. It needs to be 
> rewritten to "traverse" forward or backward, given how the context of the 
> scan being used.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-22144) MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans

2019-04-08 Thread Josh Elser (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16812631#comment-16812631
 ] 

Josh Elser commented on HBASE-22144:


Reattaching to get another run. I don't think these failures are related.

> MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-22144
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Josh Elser
>Assignee: Josh Elser
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HBASE-22144.001.patch, HBASE-22144.002.patch, 
> HBASE-22144.002.patch
>
>
> It appears that MultiRowRangeFilter was never written to function with 
> reverse scans. There is too much logic that operates with the assumption that 
> we are always moving "forward" through increasing ranges. It needs to be 
> rewritten to "traverse" forward or backward, given how the context of the 
> scan being used.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-22144) MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans

2019-04-03 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16809506#comment-16809506
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-22144:
---

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
19s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hbaseanti {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} Patch does not have any anti-patterns. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} master Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
14s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  3m 
56s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  3m 
47s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  1m 
36s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green}  4m 
11s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building our shaded 
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  3m 
40s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
57s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
13s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  4m 
 7s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  4m 
17s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red}  3m 15s{color} 
| {color:red} hbase-server generated 1 new + 193 unchanged - 1 fixed = 194 
total (was 194) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  1m 
34s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green}  4m 
13s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building our shaded 
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:green}  
8m  5s{color} | {color:green} Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 2.7.4 
or 3.0.0. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  3m 
48s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
53s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  3m 
22s{color} | {color:green} hbase-client in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}322m 31s{color} 
| {color:red} hbase-server in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
42s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}373m  7s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hbase.client.TestSnapshotTemporaryDirectory |
|   | hadoop.hbase.client.TestAsyncTableAdminApi |
|   | hadoop.hbase.tool.TestSecureLoadIncrementalHFiles |
|   | hadoop.hbase.namespace.TestNamespaceAuditor |
|   | hadoop.hbase.client.TestFromClientSide3 |
|   | hadoop.hbase.client.TestSnapshotTemporaryDirectoryWithRegionReplicas |
|   | hadoop.hbase.replication.TestReplicationKillSlaveRSWithSeparateOldWALs |
|   | hadoop.hbase.replication.TestReplicationSmallTestsSync |
|   | hadoop.hbase.master.procedure.TestTruncateTableProcedure |
|   | hadoop.hbase.client.TestSnapshotDFSTemporaryDirectory |
|   | hadoop.hbase.client.replication.TestReplicationAdminWithClusters |
|   | 

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-22144) MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans

2019-04-03 Thread Josh Elser (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16809334#comment-16809334
 ] 

Josh Elser commented on HBASE-22144:


hbase-rest was using one of the methods I had removed (because I thought no one 
was using it). v2 fixes that.

> MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-22144
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Josh Elser
>Assignee: Josh Elser
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HBASE-22144.001.patch, HBASE-22144.002.patch
>
>
> It appears that MultiRowRangeFilter was never written to function with 
> reverse scans. There is too much logic that operates with the assumption that 
> we are always moving "forward" through increasing ranges. It needs to be 
> rewritten to "traverse" forward or backward, given how the context of the 
> scan being used.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-22144) MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans

2019-04-01 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16807388#comment-16807388
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-22144:
---

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
20s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hbaseanti {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} Patch does not have any anti-patterns. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} master Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
28s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  4m 
54s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  4m 
31s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  1m 
52s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green}  5m 
11s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building our shaded 
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  4m  
9s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m  
2s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
17s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} mvninstall {color} | {color:red}  4m 
32s{color} | {color:red} root in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  4m 
29s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  4m 
29s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  1m 
56s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green}  5m 
10s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building our shaded 
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:red}  3m 
15s{color} | {color:red} The patch causes 16 errors with Hadoop v2.7.4. {color} 
|
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:red}  6m 
44s{color} | {color:red} The patch causes 16 errors with Hadoop v3.0.0. {color} 
|
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  4m 
46s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m  
2s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  3m 
45s{color} | {color:green} hbase-client in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}253m 
30s{color} | {color:green} hbase-server in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
46s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}310m 18s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hbase:b002b0b |
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-22144 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12964491/HBASE-22144.001.patch 
|
| Optional Tests |  dupname  asflicense  javac  javadoc  unit  findbugs  
shadedjars  hadoopcheck  hbaseanti  checkstyle  compile  |
| uname | Linux 20269231d177 4.4.0-138-generic #164-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 2 
17:16:02 UTC 2018 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/component/dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
 |
| git revision | master / a3faad76e1 |
| maven |