[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-4738) ExecuteSQL error when table uses 9-digit unsigned int
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311973#comment-16311973 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4738: -- Github user mcgilman commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2373 Thanks @mattyb149! This has been merged to master. > ExecuteSQL error when table uses 9-digit unsigned int > - > > Key: NIFI-4738 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4738 > Project: Apache NiFi > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Extensions >Reporter: Matt Burgess >Assignee: Matt Burgess > > There is a logic bug in the fix for NIFI-3076 that causes unsigned 9-digit > integers to be treated as ints when the DB (at least MySQL) will return a > Long object. Although the fix for NIFI-3076 does work for MEDIUMINT, this is > because the logic bug is not exposed when the MEDIUMINT is signed (as it > satisfies the other condition of the if clause). But if a field is declared > as INT(9) UNSIGNED, the logic will see if the precision is 9 digits or less, > and treat it as an Integer if so. But an unsigned value with 9 digits will > fit in a Long, and should be treated as such in the schema. > Recommended fix is to replace the "<= MAX_DIGITS_PER_INT" with "< > MAX_DIGITS_PER_INT". -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-4738) ExecuteSQL error when table uses 9-digit unsigned int
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311972#comment-16311972 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4738: -- Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2373 > ExecuteSQL error when table uses 9-digit unsigned int > - > > Key: NIFI-4738 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4738 > Project: Apache NiFi > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Extensions >Reporter: Matt Burgess >Assignee: Matt Burgess > > There is a logic bug in the fix for NIFI-3076 that causes unsigned 9-digit > integers to be treated as ints when the DB (at least MySQL) will return a > Long object. Although the fix for NIFI-3076 does work for MEDIUMINT, this is > because the logic bug is not exposed when the MEDIUMINT is signed (as it > satisfies the other condition of the if clause). But if a field is declared > as INT(9) UNSIGNED, the logic will see if the precision is 9 digits or less, > and treat it as an Integer if so. But an unsigned value with 9 digits will > fit in a Long, and should be treated as such in the schema. > Recommended fix is to replace the "<= MAX_DIGITS_PER_INT" with "< > MAX_DIGITS_PER_INT". -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-4738) ExecuteSQL error when table uses 9-digit unsigned int
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311970#comment-16311970 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on NIFI-4738: --- Commit ce4374ee0017708252e955ac94d34b61c481a1ce in nifi's branch refs/heads/master from [~ca9mbu] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi.git;h=ce4374e ] NIFI-4738: Fixed logic bug in JdbcCommon for 9-digit unsigned ints. This closes #2373 > ExecuteSQL error when table uses 9-digit unsigned int > - > > Key: NIFI-4738 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4738 > Project: Apache NiFi > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Extensions >Reporter: Matt Burgess >Assignee: Matt Burgess > > There is a logic bug in the fix for NIFI-3076 that causes unsigned 9-digit > integers to be treated as ints when the DB (at least MySQL) will return a > Long object. Although the fix for NIFI-3076 does work for MEDIUMINT, this is > because the logic bug is not exposed when the MEDIUMINT is signed (as it > satisfies the other condition of the if clause). But if a field is declared > as INT(9) UNSIGNED, the logic will see if the precision is 9 digits or less, > and treat it as an Integer if so. But an unsigned value with 9 digits will > fit in a Long, and should be treated as such in the schema. > Recommended fix is to replace the "<= MAX_DIGITS_PER_INT" with "< > MAX_DIGITS_PER_INT". -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-4738) ExecuteSQL error when table uses 9-digit unsigned int
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311945#comment-16311945 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4738: -- Github user mcgilman commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2373 Will review... > ExecuteSQL error when table uses 9-digit unsigned int > - > > Key: NIFI-4738 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4738 > Project: Apache NiFi > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Extensions >Reporter: Matt Burgess >Assignee: Matt Burgess > > There is a logic bug in the fix for NIFI-3076 that causes unsigned 9-digit > integers to be treated as ints when the DB (at least MySQL) will return a > Long object. Although the fix for NIFI-3076 does work for MEDIUMINT, this is > because the logic bug is not exposed when the MEDIUMINT is signed (as it > satisfies the other condition of the if clause). But if a field is declared > as INT(9) UNSIGNED, the logic will see if the precision is 9 digits or less, > and treat it as an Integer if so. But an unsigned value with 9 digits will > fit in a Long, and should be treated as such in the schema. > Recommended fix is to replace the "<= MAX_DIGITS_PER_INT" with "< > MAX_DIGITS_PER_INT". -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-4738) ExecuteSQL error when table uses 9-digit unsigned int
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311909#comment-16311909 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4738: -- GitHub user mattyb149 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2373 NIFI-4738: Fixed logic bug in JdbcCommon for 9-digit unsigned ints I tested this with MEDIUMINT UNSIGNED, MEDIUMINT, and INT(9) UNSIGNED ### For all changes: - [x] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced in the commit message? - [x] Does your PR title start with NIFI- where is the JIRA number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character. - [x] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target branch (typically master)? - [x] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit? ### For code changes: - [x] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn -Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder? - [x] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes? - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main LICENSE file under nifi-assembly? - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly? - [ ] If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition to .name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties? ### For documentation related changes: - [ ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in which it is rendered? ### Note: Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/mattyb149/nifi NIFI-4738 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2373.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #2373 commit 9f2ec30f48efbf794884b7b5988b7bf265252904 Author: Matthew BurgessDate: 2018-01-04T19:30:47Z NIFI-4738: Fixed logic bug in JdbcCommon for 9-digit unsigned ints > ExecuteSQL error when table uses 9-digit unsigned int > - > > Key: NIFI-4738 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4738 > Project: Apache NiFi > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Extensions >Reporter: Matt Burgess >Assignee: Matt Burgess > > There is a logic bug in the fix for NIFI-3076 that causes unsigned 9-digit > integers to be treated as ints when the DB (at least MySQL) will return a > Long object. Although the fix for NIFI-3076 does work for MEDIUMINT, this is > because the logic bug is not exposed when the MEDIUMINT is signed (as it > satisfies the other condition of the if clause). But if a field is declared > as INT(9) UNSIGNED, the logic will see if the precision is 9 digits or less, > and treat it as an Integer if so. But an unsigned value with 9 digits will > fit in a Long, and should be treated as such in the schema. > Recommended fix is to replace the "<= MAX_DIGITS_PER_INT" with "< > MAX_DIGITS_PER_INT". -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)