[Issue 122233] sourceforge.net: download file name column of directory too narrow
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122233 Marcus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue. You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 122233] sourceforge.net: download file name column of directory too narrow
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122233 Marcus changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NOT_AN_OOO_ISSUE Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED --- Comment #32 from Marcus --- This issue has to be fixed on SourceForge.net. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue. You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 122233] sourceforge.net: download file name column of directory too narrow
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122233 --- Comment #31 from Marcus--- (In reply to mroe from comment #30) > I think the problem is the filename itself. If one download more than one > file (version/language/...) one has the same problem with different file > managers. > (see comment 3) > > What about > [...] > ? I know the file names are long but when we change the structure again then we have a total mess in the download scripting with much more exceptions that needs to be checked and deopending on the results different code parts have to be executed. So, please not. ;-) And it won't help for other projects on SourceForge. The problem (at least what I can see) is the "Recommended Projects" box on the right hand side. If this could be re-positioned, then the filenames have the full space that is needed. I've checked this with Firebug in Firefox. When deleting the box and disabling the fixed width for the files, then it's perfect. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the issue. You are on the CC list for the issue.
[Issue 122233] sourceforge.net: download file name column of directory too narrow
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122233 --- Comment #30 from mroe--- Sorry for comment 27. It isn't helpful. But without a suggestion how a solution could look, I can't see what sourceforge should do. Maybe the script implements a switch that toggles the columns "Modified" and "Size" on/off. But this will work also only for a limited length of filenames. Maybe the filenames will separated by cutting in the middle: Apache_OpenOffice_tar.gz doesn't make it better ... I think the problem is the filename itself. If one download more than one file (version/language/...) one has the same problem with different file managers. (see comment 3) What about AOO_Lin64_deb_en-GB_inst_4.2.1.tar.gz AOO_Lin32_rpm_en-GB_inst_4.2.1.tar.gz AOO_Mac64_en-GB_inst_4.2.1.dmg AOO_Win32_en-GB_inst_4.2.1.exe (for future: AOO_Win64_en-GB_inst_4.2.1.exe) and AOO_Lin64_deb_en-GB_lang_4.2.1.tar.gz AOO_Lin32_rpm_en-GB_lang_4.2.1.tar.gz AOO_Mac64_en-GB_lang_4.2.1.dmg AOO_Win32_en-GB_lang_4.2.1.exe (for future: AOO_Win64_en-GB_lang_4.2.1.exe) ? If these filenames truncated as now, the important information will stay visible. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue. You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 122233] sourceforge.net: download file name column of directory too narrow
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122233 Marcuschanged: What|Removed |Added Assignee|rgalopp...@geek.net |iss...@openoffice.apache.or ||g --- Comment #26 from Marcus --- (In reply to orcmid from comment #25) > I am dissatisfied with the way this conversation went, especially with > regard to folks who are by no means typical end-users claiming what > end-users might or might not do. > > We already had an example of a QA person (probably a power user) needing to > see the details. This is more than 1 year old and there is no further discussion. Also there are no further interested people on the CC list - besides the usual listeners. ;-) > Also, kicking the can to SourceForge is strange. It is about how a service > for us works for *our* users, not typical SourceForge users. (And so being > logged in is a strange condition.) I find it strange that you want to draw a special relation here. SourceForge is no service for or from Apache or OpenOffice. We are using its great service and they serve it to many, many others, too. When other projects on SourceForge also use long file names like we do, then they would see the same problem. I haven't looked around but, again, it's no special problem that belongs to OpenOffice alone. > I think this should remain open until we have the people who claim it is > important to improve are fully heard. I just don't think it makes sense to > tell end-users that they need to negotiate with SourceForge themselves. Why should a issue stay open that has no attention and no further comments? And end-users do not need to search on SourceForge. For this we have our own download webpage. > And Roberto, as a member of the AOO PMC is a great candidate to carry the > word to SourceForge, as he has done here. I don't want to minimize that and > that he offered something that could be done immediately to improve the > situation. Right, Roberto is the right one to try to change it. AFAIK he knows the issue but there is no solution until today. So, maybe it's not technically possible without to change much more on their webpage. @orcmid: Sorry, but I don't think that this issue is right placed in the issue tracker of OpenOffice due to the reasons I stated above. But to do something constructive I will notify Roberto (again) about the problem reported in this issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue. You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 122233] sourceforge.net: download file name column of directory too narrow
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122233 --- Comment #28 from orcmid--- (In reply to Marcus from comment #26) > @orcmid: > Sorry, but I don't think that this issue is right placed in the issue > tracker of OpenOffice due to the reasons I stated above. But to do something > constructive I will notify Roberto (again) about the problem reported in > this issue. Thank you Marcus. I see you doing that on the dev@ list. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue. You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 122233] sourceforge.net: download file name column of directory too narrow
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122233 --- Comment #29 from orcmid--- (In reply to Marcus from comment #26) > This is more than 1 year old and there is no further discussion. Also there > are no further interested people on the CC list - besides the usual > listeners. ;-) For me, this kind of silence on an obvious usability issue is something to taken as an indication that someone gave up on us. The issue did not disappear. Confidence in the project to take users seriously may have disappeared. The problem is we don't often get to know. I don't think we are taking the fact that users took something seriously enough to figure out how to submit a buzilla issue, and then go away a short time later, is probably not a good sign. These are the only indicators that we have that maybe others take themselves away without saying anything, not seeing it as their job, or for whatever other reasons they might have. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue. You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 122233] sourceforge.net: download file name column of directory too narrow
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122233 --- Comment #27 from mroe--- I'm using Firefox with NoScript AddOn. I see the complete filenames. But the reason is that all scripts are disabled. If I allow the execution of scripts from fsdn.com the table will formatted, so that the filenames are cropped. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue. You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 122233] sourceforge.net: download file name column of directory too narrow
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122233 orcmidchanged: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOT_AN_ISSUE|--- CC||orc...@apache.org Status|CLOSED |REOPENED --- Comment #25 from orcmid --- I am dissatisfied with the way this conversation went, especially with regard to folks who are by no means typical end-users claiming what end-users might or might not do. We already had an example of a QA person (probably a power user) needing to see the details. Also, kicking the can to SourceForge is strange. It is about how a service for us works for *our* users, not typical SourceForge users. (And so being logged in is a strange condition.) I think this should remain open until we have the people who claim it is important to improve are fully heard. I just don't think it makes sense to tell end-users that they need to negotiate with SourceForge themselves. And Roberto, as a member of the AOO PMC is a great candidate to carry the word to SourceForge, as he has done here. I don't want to minimize that and that he offered something that could be done immediately to improve the situation. The issue about ad placement is a companion concern and needs its own consideration. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.
[Issue 122233] sourceforge.net: download file name column of directory too narrow
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122233 Marcuschanged: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.
[Issue 122233] sourceforge.net: download file name column of directory too narrow
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122233 Marcuschanged: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |NOT_AN_ISSUE --- Comment #24 from Marcus --- As with comment #23 this is no issue of Apache OpenOffice but SourceForge. So, it has to be fixed there. Closing this issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.
[Issue 122233] sourceforge.net: download file name column of directory too narrow
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122233 --- Comment #23 from Marcus mar...@apache.org --- @Rainer: We at AOO cannot change this. Please get in contact with Roberto from Soureforge. He is the only one who (may) can help you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue. You are watching all issue changes.
[Issue 122233] sourceforge.net: download file name column of directory too narrow
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122233 --- Comment #22 from Rainer Bielefeld rainerbielefeld_ooo...@bielefeldundbuss.de --- Hi Marcus: I know that mirror here in my hometown, during OOo@sun I was involved (a little) in keeping it running. End-user argument: Of course I know the trick with Styles = none in browser, and may be not too many users get astray to there. It's a matter of pride. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue. You are watching all issue changes.
[Issue 122233] sourceforge.net: download file name column of directory too narrow
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122233 --- Comment #21 from Marcus mar...@apache.org --- @Rainer: If you want to get older release, please go to our starting webpage for archived builds: http://www.openoffice.org/download/archive.html It is not intended that end-users start at Sorceforge. Therefore I think it's OK to leave it as it is. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue. You are watching all issue changes.
[Issue 122233] sourceforge.net: download file name column of directory too narrow
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122233 Rainer Bielefeld rainerbielefeld_ooo...@bielefeldundbuss.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |REOPENED CC||rainerbielefeld_ooo_qa@biel ||efeldundbuss.de Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #20 from Rainer Bielefeld rainerbielefeld_ooo...@bielefeldundbuss.de --- If you think those downloads are not for normal final users, drop all that statistics fripperies and show a normal list like ftp://ftp.rz.tu-bs.de/pub/mirror/openoffice-archive/localized/de/3.2.0/ or so. http://www.eu.apache.org/dist/openoffice/ is not an alternative if you are searching for older versions. Please excuse me for the rude comment, but the current solution is a horrible mess. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue. You are watching all issue changes.