RE: IMAP status?
Hi Serge. You again? It was some indexing and retrieval reason that made me create the Tamino mail repository. With the XML database in the back, a search on mails/news can be done easily and fast. I believe such functionality should not be implemented in James but the different repositories by themselves, and the MailRepository interface should privide a way to access this implementation. That way you can integrate Lucene for indexing but still allow other implementations. What I also might find useful is a SearchableRepository, which just implements some indexing/retrieval (maybe with Lucene) and actually stores the messages to another repository. This way it can be applied to any other repository implementation (same as I suggested for the caching repository). I somehow love the way Avalon plugs the components together.. Hiran - Hiran Chaudhuri SAG Systemhaus GmbH Elsenheimerstra?e 11 80687 Munchen Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone +49-89-54742-134 Fax +49-6151-9234-5134 -Original Message- From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 1:35 PM To: James Developers List Subject: Re: IMAP status? Thanks Darrell. I haven't had as much time this weekend as I'd hoped, but I do hope to at least start looking into things. As for the FETCH/SEARCH functionality, I was thinking about using Lucene to do automatic indexing of the appropriate parts of messages... had you given much thought to the search stuff yet? I'm fine droping the ACL stuff for now... I'd rather get a version 1.0 out, and hope that we can refactor that when we have something workable that will attract more developer interest. Hopefully later today I'll get a chance to get into the code and prepare some questions and/or lay out what I think I can start working on. -- Serge Knystautas Loki Technologies - Unstoppable Websites http://www.lokitech.com/ Darrell DeBoer wrote: On Fri, 3 May 2002 07:13, Serge Knystautas wrote: Does anybody know the status of the IMAP code? After going over the Avalon upgrade changes this weekend, I was hoping to try to get into that code but wasn't sure if the code is in any way testable. Anyone tried it lately? Hi Serge, I'm pretty sure I was the last one to delve in there Unfortunately (for the IMAP proposal, anyway), I've been sidetracked working on the Myrmidon Ant2 proposal, which is taking up all of my Jakarta time presently. When I finished up, I'd done some heavy refactoring of the command processing design, to break it down into separate classes for each command. I'd also simplified things a bunch by ignoring the ACL stuff, and changing the way the namespaces map to the set of mailboxes. This was based on my interpretaion of the RFC, but is a bit different to the way Charles had it working - I can furnish more details if you like. I wrote some tests, and had a bunch of commands functioning, including LIST, CREATE, DELETE and a couple of others. FETCH was the next thing to get working, IIRC. To be honest, if you've got some time to dive in and start working on it, I think I might find a little time to join you. It's just that I have little need for an IMAP server myself, and with no-one else working on it to keep me interested, I sort of let it slip... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IMAP status?
On Fri, 3 May 2002 07:13, Serge Knystautas wrote: Does anybody know the status of the IMAP code? After going over the Avalon upgrade changes this weekend, I was hoping to try to get into that code but wasn't sure if the code is in any way testable. Anyone tried it lately? Hi Serge, I'm pretty sure I was the last one to delve in there Unfortunately (for the IMAP proposal, anyway), I've been sidetracked working on the Myrmidon Ant2 proposal, which is taking up all of my Jakarta time presently. When I finished up, I'd done some heavy refactoring of the command processing design, to break it down into separate classes for each command. I'd also simplified things a bunch by ignoring the ACL stuff, and changing the way the namespaces map to the set of mailboxes. This was based on my interpretaion of the RFC, but is a bit different to the way Charles had it working - I can furnish more details if you like. I wrote some tests, and had a bunch of commands functioning, including LIST, CREATE, DELETE and a couple of others. FETCH was the next thing to get working, IIRC. To be honest, if you've got some time to dive in and start working on it, I think I might find a little time to join you. It's just that I have little need for an IMAP server myself, and with no-one else working on it to keep me interested, I sort of let it slip... -- ciao, Daz -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IMAP status?
Thanks Darrell. I haven't had as much time this weekend as I'd hoped, but I do hope to at least start looking into things. As for the FETCH/SEARCH functionality, I was thinking about using Lucene to do automatic indexing of the appropriate parts of messages... had you given much thought to the search stuff yet? I'm fine droping the ACL stuff for now... I'd rather get a version 1.0 out, and hope that we can refactor that when we have something workable that will attract more developer interest. Hopefully later today I'll get a chance to get into the code and prepare some questions and/or lay out what I think I can start working on. -- Serge Knystautas Loki Technologies - Unstoppable Websites http://www.lokitech.com/ Darrell DeBoer wrote: On Fri, 3 May 2002 07:13, Serge Knystautas wrote: Does anybody know the status of the IMAP code? After going over the Avalon upgrade changes this weekend, I was hoping to try to get into that code but wasn't sure if the code is in any way testable. Anyone tried it lately? Hi Serge, I'm pretty sure I was the last one to delve in there Unfortunately (for the IMAP proposal, anyway), I've been sidetracked working on the Myrmidon Ant2 proposal, which is taking up all of my Jakarta time presently. When I finished up, I'd done some heavy refactoring of the command processing design, to break it down into separate classes for each command. I'd also simplified things a bunch by ignoring the ACL stuff, and changing the way the namespaces map to the set of mailboxes. This was based on my interpretaion of the RFC, but is a bit different to the way Charles had it working - I can furnish more details if you like. I wrote some tests, and had a bunch of commands functioning, including LIST, CREATE, DELETE and a couple of others. FETCH was the next thing to get working, IIRC. To be honest, if you've got some time to dive in and start working on it, I think I might find a little time to join you. It's just that I have little need for an IMAP server myself, and with no-one else working on it to keep me interested, I sort of let it slip... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
