Re: Compiling to a binary

1999-06-01 Thread Mike Greaves

Also, have a look at 'binfmt_misc.txt' and 'java.txt' in:
/usr/src/linux/Documentation (or wherever your kernel docs are).

I haven't tried out the Misc Binary interface yet, but it looks useful
for your kind of requirement.

Mike Greaves



Ernst de Haan wrote:
> 
> Why don't you write a shell script? For instance:
> 
>java MyProgram $*
> 
> That's all.
> 
> GreetinX++, Ernst
> 
> > Anupama Jayathilake wrote:
> >
> > I got a problem.Please advice me.
> > I want to compile my java class to a binary so that i can run it
> > from commant prompt without giving "java  myprogram"
> > How can i compile java class.
> > Please help me
> > Anupama
> >
> 
> --
> Ernst de Haan
> Freelance Java architect
> 
> "Come to me all who are weary and burdened,
> and I will give you rest" -- Jesus Christ
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 

// Michael Greaves  [EMAIL PROTECTED] //



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



JIT in pre2???

1999-06-06 Thread Mike Greaves

Stefan Proels wrote:
> 


> > cannot find the JIT (sunwjit) and that it is switching to interpreted


> chmod 755 jdk1.2/jre/lib/i386/libsunwjit.so
   ^^^ -- ?

Excuse me for asking, but am I to understand that Blackdown JDK1.2, as
of prerelease 2, now includes a JIT and uses it by default?  And that
this JIT is based on Sun source code - i.e. the same one included with
the Solaris JDK1.2??

What are we trying to do, achieve high performance or something??  ;-)

Is TYA headed for the great, big, bit bucket in the sky?  :-(

Is Hotspot on it's way too?  Sorry for asking so many questions.  Maybe
I should have been following the list more closely, but this all seems
like a pleasant shock to me.

-- 

// Michael Greaves  [EMAIL PROTECTED] //



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: sunwjit slows down JDK

1999-06-07 Thread Mike Greaves

Paul Ignacio Pacheco Piemonti wrote:
> 



> with sunwjit:   It takes about 28  seconds to load.
> without a JIT:  It takes about 19 seconds to load.
> with tya:   it takes about 13 seconds to load.

And I was just noting how much of a boost the sunwjit seems to give.  I
haven't been able to find any free java benchmarks that I am totally
comfortable with.  So I've been using CaffeineMark 3.0 running in the
appletviewer and taking the results with a grain of salt.  You know what
they say about lies, damned lies, and benchmarks...

But, IIRC, I was getting around 380 in 1.1.7v3 w. TYA, and now I get
around 180 in 1.2pre2 without a JIT and around 900 (!) with sunwjit. 
Seems pretty fast to me.  The non-I/O-related tests all go up by around
a factor of 10 with the JIT on.

Maybe either your 64 MB of RAM or the dinky 128 kB cache in the Celeron
is becoming a limiting factor?  JITs increase memory consumption, don't
they?  Maybe someone who knows more can comment.

-- 

// Michael Greaves  [EMAIL PROTECTED] //



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]