RE: FW: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-25 Thread Sacha Labourey
 Yes, that's the idea.  It goes like this when  jboss instantiates an
 mbean from a *-service.xml file:

 (create mbean)
 state: instantiated
 (set attributes)
 state: configured
 (call create method) ~(call destroy method)
 state: created
 (call start method) ~(call stop method)
 state: started

 where the ~() methods go backwards from the other methods.

 Personally I think the create and destroy methods could be safely
 removed as useless, but I lost the argument the last time we had it.

Clustering needed this at least because of the state transfer algorithm:
services must first be able to register with the HAPartition and once
everyone has done that, the next step can be used to actually exchange the
initial state. It was not (at that time, maybe it has changed) possible to
make micro-state-transfer on a service-by-service basis. I think another
service had a similar needs but I don't remember which one.




---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



Re: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-25 Thread David Jencks

On Friday, January 24, 2003, at 12:37 PM, Sacha Labourey wrote:


Hello David,


oh yes! This problem really involves all management parts i.e. how we
want
to be able to store the config, modify the config, have config
repositories,
etc. Furthermore, we need to take in account in this new design the
really-missing-restart-feature which is not equivalent to the
stop-start
semantic.


Why not?


because otherwise, when you are in the stop state, you don't know if 
it is a
definitive stop (in which case you shouln't block the valve for 
example) or
a temporary stop (in which case you may want to give a way to a
service/application to provide some temporary state that the service
controller can give it back once the service is restarted for example)


We must really implement the restart trick for 4.0 as it is one of 
the
only
way to cleanly implement the valve trick (block the valve for new
invocations as we cycle the app/service).

I was planning to move the dependency logic from ServiceController to
ServiceContext and make ServiceContext an mbean interceptor.  It would
also block calls when state was not started.   If you change a set of
attributes, it would consult the metadata to see what lifecycle state
it must downgrade to, go to it, and go back to started.  Do you see
something wrong with this plan?


Well, then you cannot update the list of the JMX interceptors as you 
cycle
your service, right? Otherwise, how do you cycle the ServiceContext
interceptor?
The ServiceContext has to exist whether or not it is currently part of 
an interceptor chain for a currently existing mbean, in order to record 
dependencies on mbeans that haven't been deployed yet.  So I don't 
think changing the interceptor list will be a problem: you always get 
the ServiceContext from a centralized factory/store which returns the 
one  it already knows about.

At one point, independently of where do you manage that, I am
pretty sure that you need a part of the system that thinks I do think 
in a
specific way because it is a restart and not a definitive stop. You 
don't
think so?

The other way I can think of to handle this is with timeouts: any 
blocked call will eventually time out if the mbean isn't started first. 
  Timeouts have the property that if something goes wrong in the 
restart the clients will be informed that there is a problem in a known 
amount of time.  Many calls should be within a transaction anyway, 
which also times out...

david jencks

Cheers,



sachay



---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development





---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



RE: FW: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-25 Thread Matt Munz
David,
 
  Thanks so much.  To paraphrase, there's basically a JBoss-specific MBean type that 
requires invoking stop() before setting any attributes and start() after doing so.  
This sounds quite reasonable.
 
  Thanks again.
 
  - Matt
 

-Original Message- 
From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Fri 1/24/2003 9:00 PM 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Cc: 
Subject: Re: FW: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master 
Configuration Service



Yes, that's the idea.  It goes like this when  jboss instantiates an
mbean from a *-service.xml file:

(create mbean)
state: instantiated
(set attributes)
state: configured
(call create method) ~(call destroy method)
state: created
(call start method) ~(call stop method)
state: started

where the ~() methods go backwards from the other methods.

Personally I think the create and destroy methods could be safely
removed as useless, but I lost the argument the last time we had it.

Anyway, to see why this might be useful, lets hypothesize an mbean that
takes a long time to create (just as an object) and has a socket.  You
want to set the ip address and port on the socket as separate
attributes on the mbean. Well, creating a new socket whenever you
change the host or port is not very satisfactory since there's a good
chance you want to change both.  Changing just one will leave the mbean
in a unusable state, pointing to the right host but wrong port.  You
don't want to replace the mbean object with a new one because it takes
a long time to create.  So , the service lifecycle lets you:

stop (mbean is now theoretically unusable: this should be implemented
in an interceptor, but is not right now)(this would discard the old
socket)
change both attributes (while the mbean is off)
start (this creates a new socket with  all correct parameters)(mbean is
now usable again).

There are also mbean dependencies, whereby if your mbean has an
ObjectName valued attribute, and you tell jboss, your mbean can't start
until the referenced mbean has started.  This is used to get most of
jboss to start in an order that will work.

The code  that does this is now spread over ServiceController,
ServiceConfigurator, and ServiceContext with a little bit of
ServiceCreator thrown in.

Hope this clarifies what is going on a little bit.  There are no
attributes that have no effect... its just that say a port number may
not get into the socket until you cycle the mbean, in case you want to
change the host also.

I also mentioned earlier that there's an xmbean attribute indicating
what the effect on service lifecycle should be of changing an attribute
value.  The idea behind this (unimplemented) is that if you set several
attributes at once, jboss should be able to cycle the lifecycle state
for you.

david jencks

On Friday, January 24, 2003, at 05:07 PM, Matt Munz wrote:

 David,

   We are miscommunicating.

  

   In all the mbeans I have written and seen in jboss, aside from
   egregious bugs, if setting an attribute doesn't have an immediate
   effect, it does have the desired effect if you run through the
 service
   lifecycle (usually stop, start, occasionally stop, destroy, create,
   start).  My view is that mbeans in jboss can take advantage of the
   service lifecycle.  If you don't want to, make all your attribute
   changes have their effects immediately.  All our mbeans are pretty
 much
   jboss specific and most heavily use the service lifecycle.  They just
   won't run without it.  I still think it is a really convenient
   extension to vanilla jmx and don't see why we should replace it.
  
  
   I barely know what the service lifecycle is.  I have not used it.  I
 am not arguing to replace it.  I never said that.  You said that.
  
   How do I set an attribute correctly, step by step, for a Bean that
 uses the service lifecycle?
  
   It helps me to use a state metaphor when considering lifecycle
 issues.  It sounds like there are several states a lifecycle-oriented
 bean can be in: destroyed, created, running.  In which state is it
 safe 

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 25-January-2003

2003-01-25 Thread scott . stark


JBoss daily test results

SUMMARY

Number of tests run:   1010



Successful tests:  1007

Errors:2

Failures:  1





[time of test: 2003-01-25.12-05 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
[java.vm.version: 1.3.1_03-69]
[java.vm.name: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM]
[java.vm.info: mixed mode]
[os.name: Mac OS X]
[os.arch: ppc]
[os.version: 10.2.3]

See http://users.jboss.org/~starksm/Branch_3_0/2003-01-25.12-05
for details of this test. 

NOTE: If there are any errors shown above - this mail is only highlighting 
them - it is NOT indicating that they are being looked at by anyone.

It is assumed that whoever makes change(s) to jboss that 
break the test will be fixing the test or jboss, as appropriate!





DETAILS OF ERRORS



Suite:   LocalWrapperCleanupUnitTestCase
Test:
testAutoCommitOffInRemoteUserTx(org.jboss.test.jca.test.LocalWrapperCleanupUnitTestCase)
Type:error
Exception:   java.rmi.ServerException
Message: RemoteException occurred in server thread; nested exception is:   
java.rmi.ServerException: EJBException:; nested exception is:   
javax.ejb.EJBException: Row committed, autocommit still on!
-



Suite:   MissingClassUnitTestCase
Test:
testDeployServiceWithoutClass(org.jboss.test.jmx.test.MissingClassUnitTestCase)
Type:error
Exception:   org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentException
Message: jboss.test:name=missingclasstest is not registered.; - nested throwable: 
(javax.management.InstanceNotFoundException: jboss.test:name=missingclasstest is not 
registered.)
-



Suite:   BeanStressTestCase
Test:testDeadLockFromClient(org.jboss.test.deadlock.test.BeanStressTestCase)
Type:failure
Exception:   junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
Message: expected a client deadlock for AB BA
-




---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



[JBoss-dev] RE: how's ecperf going?

2003-01-25 Thread Bill Burke


 -Original Message-
 From: Stefan Reich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 8:24 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: how's ecperf going?


 Hi Bill,

 I am running ecperf regularly on the 3.0 and 3.2 branches. I
 accumulated a bunch of fixes for scalability and performance problems
 already, plus a few fixes for inconsistent lock usage that I will merge
 soon.

 Here are some things I noticed:
 * the test fails when I deploy the BMP version, some of the beans that
 have been created don't seem to end up in the database.

This is probably my fault.  I was tweaking the shit out of the BMP stuff.

 * the CMP version must be tweaked to use the util.xml BMP version of
 the beans (search for SERIALIZABLE in the README) to work correctly
 * the CMP version doesn't deploy anymore on the current 3.2 branch

I wonder if CMP 1.1 is finally trashedWas wondering when that would
finally happen.

 * with the 3.2 branch I get many more spurious esceptions than with 3.0
 * a HashMap in the class CachedConnectionManager seems to be the most
 contended lock
 * JAWS checks for the existence of a PK before inserting a new row in
 the database. This is pretty expensive.

I guess if you have the correct table integrity checks, the DB will barf and
the query is not needed.

 * the LogInterceptor usage of the NDC class makes it a global source of
 contention
 * TxInterceptorCMP suspends and resumes a transaction in all cases,
 sometimes even twice. This can be very expensive, especially with
 global transactions.


??  Can you point this out?

 Since I am running the tests on PowerPC Macs and the Apple VM it is
 hard to compare the results with other platforms.

 Stefan


Stefan, this is great stuff!  If you need any help, let me know and we'll
get somebody to help you out.  We really appreciate this work.

Bill



 On Thursday, Jan 23, 2003, at 19:11 US/Pacific, Bill Burke wrote:

  Are you getting decent results?  I heard from Scott that you've made
  some
  improvements.  Need me to merge your changes at all?  Just want to know
  what's up.
 
  Thanks,
 
  
  Bill Burke
  Chief Architect
  JBoss Group, LLC
  
 




---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-674167 ] JBoss 3.0.5 running with Compaq Java 1.4.0

2003-01-25 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #674167, was opened at 2003-01-24 09:47
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=674167group_id=22866

Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: John Stalker (jstalker)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: JBoss 3.0.5 running with Compaq Java 1.4.0

Initial Comment:
I downloaded the src for jboss using the 3_0_5 tag and
built it (all went fine) using Compaq's Java 1.4.0 on
an alpha: uname -a = OSF1 iridium V5.1 1885 alpha alpha.

I then fired up the server, only changing a few port
numbers in the config file and get this output:



  JBoss Bootstrap Environment

  JBOSS_HOME: /home/iridium/prodinfo/tools/jboss

  JAVA: /usr/opt/java140/bin/java

  JAVA_OPTS: -DSQENV=jstalker -Dprogram.name=run.sh

  CLASSPATH:
/home/iridium/prodinfo/tools/jboss/bin/run.jar:/usr/opt/java140/lib/tools.jar



run.sh: unused non-option argument: 
12:36:51,284 INFO  [Server] JBoss Release: JBoss-3.0.5
CVSTag=JBoss_3_0_5
12:36:51,335 INFO  [Server] Home Dir:
/usr/home/prodinfo/tools/jboss-3.0.5
12:36:51,339 INFO  [Server] Home URL:
file:/usr/home/prodinfo/tools/jboss-3.0.5/
12:36:51,344 INFO  [Server] Library URL:
file:/usr/home/prodinfo/tools/jboss-3.0.5/lib/
12:36:51,357 INFO  [Server] Patch URL: null
12:36:51,358 INFO  [Server] Server Name: jstalker
12:36:51,360 INFO  [Server] Server Home Dir:
/usr/home/prodinfo/tools/jboss-3.0.5/server/jstalker
12:36:51,362 INFO  [Server] Server Home URL:
file:/usr/home/prodinfo/tools/jboss-3.0.5/server/jstalker/
12:36:51,365 INFO  [Server] Server Data Dir:
/usr/home/prodinfo/tools/jboss-3.0.5/server/jstalker/db
12:36:51,366 INFO  [Server] Server Temp Dir:
/usr/home/prodinfo/tools/jboss-3.0.5/server/jstalker/tmp
12:36:51,368 INFO  [Server] Server Config URL:
file:/usr/home/prodinfo/tools/jboss-3.0.5/server/jstalker/conf/
12:36:51,369 INFO  [Server] Server Library URL:
file:/usr/home/prodinfo/tools/jboss-3.0.5/server/jstalker/lib/
12:36:51,369 INFO  [Server] Root Deployemnt Filename:
jboss-service.xml
12:36:51,377 INFO  [Server] Starting General Purpose
Architecture (GPA)...
12:36:52,109 INFO  [ServerInfo] Java version:
1.4.0,Compaq Computer Corp.
12:36:52,110 INFO  [ServerInfo] Java VM: Fast VM
1.4.0-1,Compaq Computer Corp.
12:36:52,110 INFO  [ServerInfo] OS-System: OSF1 V5.1,alpha
12:36:52,215 INFO  [ServiceController] Controller MBean
online
12:36:52,471 INFO  [MainDeployer] Creating
12:36:52,540 INFO  [MainDeployer] Created
12:36:52,546 INFO  [MainDeployer] Starting
12:36:52,549 INFO  [MainDeployer] Started
12:36:52,575 INFO  [JARDeployer] Creating
12:36:52,576 INFO  [JARDeployer] Created
12:36:52,580 INFO  [JARDeployer] Starting
12:36:52,582 INFO  [MainDeployer] Adding deployer:
org.jboss.deployment.JARDeployer@80a3040
12:36:52,584 INFO  [JARDeployer] Started
12:36:52,614 INFO  [SARDeployer] Creating
12:36:52,615 INFO  [SARDeployer] Created
12:36:52,617 INFO  [SARDeployer] Starting
12:36:52,617 INFO  [MainDeployer] Adding deployer:
org.jboss.deployment.SARDeployer@80a72b9
12:36:52,652 INFO  [SARDeployer] Started
12:36:52,652 INFO  [Server] Core system initialized
12:36:52,660 INFO  [MainDeployer] Starting deployment
of package:
file:/usr/home/prodinfo/tools/jboss-3.0.5/server/jstalker/conf/jboss-service.xml
Java stack overflow in make_native_call for method  init
12:36:55,081 ERROR [MainDeployer] could not create
deployment:
file:/usr/home/prodinfo/tools/jboss-3.0.5/server/jstalker/conf/jboss-service.xml
org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentException: instantiating
org.jboss.varia.property.PropertyEditorManagerService
failed: java.lang.StackOverflowError; - nested
throwable: (RuntimeErrorException: instantiating
org.jboss.varia.property.PropertyEditorManagerService
failed: java.lang.StackOverflowError
Cause: java.lang.StackOverflowError)
at
org.jboss.system.ServiceConfigurator.install(ServiceConfigurator.java:153)
at
org.jboss.system.ServiceController.install(ServiceController.java:231)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)
at
org.jboss.mx.capability.ReflectedMBeanDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedMBeanDispatcher.java:284)
at
org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:517)
at
org.jboss.util.jmx.MBeanProxy.invoke(MBeanProxy.java:174)
at $Proxy2.install(Unknown Source)
at
org.jboss.deployment.SARDeployer.create(SARDeployer.java:189)
at
org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.create(MainDeployer.java:766)
at

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-665183 ] 3.2RC1 w/Tomcat 4.1.18 startup error

2003-01-25 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #665183, was opened at 2003-01-09 10:09
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=665183group_id=22866

Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Matt Cleveland (groovesoftware)
Assigned to: Scott M Stark (starksm)
Summary: 3.2RC1 w/Tomcat 4.1.18 startup error

Initial Comment:
I have a fresh checkout of 3.2 code from CVS built with
integrated Tomcat 4.1.18, running on Solaris with Java
1.3.1.  I get the following error attempting to startup
the default configuration.

2003-01-09 17:43:56,076 ERROR
[org.jboss.deployment.scanner.URLDeploymentScanner
] Failed to deploy:
org.jboss.deployment.scanner.URLDeploymentScanner$DeployedUR
L@9a82f7b8{
url=file:/home/mcleveland/work/agent/jboss-install/jboss-3.2.0RC1_to
mcat-4.1.18/server/default/deploy/tomcat41-service.xml,
deployedLastModified=0 }
org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentException: exception in
init of file:/home/mcleve
land/work/agent/jboss-install/jboss-3.2.0RC1_tomcat-4.1.18/server/default/deploy
/tomcat41-service.xml; - nested throwable:
(org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentExcep
tion: - nested throwable: (java.lang.NullPointerException))
at
org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.init(MainDeployer.java:712)
at
org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.deploy(MainDeployer.java:624)
at
org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.deploy(MainDeployer.java:600)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
at
org.jboss.mx.capability.ReflectedMBeanDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedMBea
nDispatcher.java:284)
at
org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:549)
at
org.jboss.util.jmx.MBeanProxy.invoke(MBeanProxy.java:174)
at $Proxy7.deploy(Unknown Source)
at
org.jboss.deployment.scanner.URLDeploymentScanner.deploy(URLDeploymen
tScanner.java:404)
at
org.jboss.deployment.scanner.URLDeploymentScanner.scan(URLDeploymentS
canner.java:545)
at
org.jboss.deployment.scanner.AbstractDeploymentScanner$ScannerThread.
doScan(AbstractDeploymentScanner.java:195)
at
org.jboss.deployment.scanner.AbstractDeploymentScanner.startService(A
bstractDeploymentScanner.java:268)
at
org.jboss.system.ServiceMBeanSupport.start(ServiceMBeanSupport.java:1
97)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
at
org.jboss.mx.capability.ReflectedMBeanDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedMBea
nDispatcher.java:284)
at
org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:549)
at
org.jboss.system.ServiceController$ServiceProxy.invoke(ServiceControl
ler.java:957)
at $Proxy0.start(Unknown Source)
at
org.jboss.system.ServiceController.start(ServiceController.java:388)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
at
org.jboss.mx.capability.ReflectedMBeanDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedMBea
nDispatcher.java:284)
at
org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:549)
at
org.jboss.util.jmx.MBeanProxy.invoke(MBeanProxy.java:174)
at $Proxy5.start(Unknown Source)
at
org.jboss.deployment.SARDeployer.start(SARDeployer.java:299)
at
org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.start(MainDeployer.java:824)
at
org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.deploy(MainDeployer.java:636)
at
org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.deploy(MainDeployer.java:600)
at
org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.deploy(MainDeployer.java:584)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
at
org.jboss.mx.capability.ReflectedMBeanDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedMBea
nDispatcher.java:284)
at
org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:549)
at
org.jboss.util.jmx.MBeanProxy.invoke(MBeanProxy.java:174)
at $Proxy6.deploy(Unknown Source)
at
org.jboss.system.server.ServerImpl.doStart(ServerImpl.java:325)
at
org.jboss.system.server.ServerImpl.start(ServerImpl.java:232)
at org.jboss.Main.boot(Main.java:155)
at org.jboss.Main$1.run(Main.java:393)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479)
 + nested throwable:
org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentException: - nested
throwable: (java.lang.NullPoi
nterException)
at
org.jboss.deployment.SARDeployer.init(SARDeployer.java:156)
at
org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.init(MainDeployer.java:688)
at
org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.deploy(MainDeployer.java:624)
at
org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.deploy(MainDeployer.java:600)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
at
org.jboss.mx.capability.ReflectedMBeanDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedMBea
nDispatcher.java:284)
at
org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:549)
at
org.jboss.util.jmx.MBeanProxy.invoke(MBeanProxy.java:174)
at $Proxy7.deploy(Unknown Source)
at
org.jboss.deployment.scanner.URLDeploymentScanner.deploy(URLDeploymen
tScanner.java:404)
 

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-662569 ] 3.2.0beta3 src archive missing tools\lib

2003-01-25 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #662569, was opened at 2003-01-05 04:30
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=662569group_id=22866

Category: Build System
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Out of Date
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul W. Ward (pward)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: 3.2.0beta3 src archive missing tools\lib

Initial Comment:
There's no tools\lib directory in the source archive for 
jboss 3.2.0 beta 3.  I'm assuming I can just copy the 
directory over from the beta 2 release.

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=662569group_id=22866


---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



[JBoss-dev] [ANN] JBoss JMX View Gui Betta

2003-01-25 Thread Stefan Groschupf
Dear Friends,
I'm sorry to be so slow, but the normal JBoss  development speed is nothing
for hobby coder. ;-)

Anyway a betta version of the JBoss JMX View Gui Plugin for Eclipse is
released just in this minute.
This eclipse plugin allow you to browse a unfiltered JBoss  JMX tree in a
eclipse view.

Since this version, you can change MBean attributes.
So far this plugin support:
+String
+int
+long
+boolean
+ObjectName

Operation invocation with this primitive datatypes is planed for the next
release.
Furthermore a graph for monitoring int and long values is planed.
See release notes at:
https://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=131182

Download at:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/jbossadmingui
See screen shots:
http://jbossadmingui.sourceforge.net/
Please report any bug to:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=59214atid=490275
Please give any feedback to:
http://sourceforge.net/forum/?group_id=59214
Please vote no war at:
http://www.votenowar.org
Thank you!

Regards
Stefan





---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 25-January-2003

2003-01-25 Thread scott . stark


JBoss daily test results

SUMMARY

Number of tests run:   1026



Successful tests:  1023

Errors:2

Failures:  1





[time of test: 2003-01-25.17-30 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
[java.vm.version: 1.3.1_03-69]
[java.vm.name: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM]
[java.vm.info: mixed mode]
[os.name: Mac OS X]
[os.arch: ppc]
[os.version: 10.2.3]

See http://users.jboss.org/~starksm/Branch_3_0/2003-01-25.17-30
for details of this test. 

NOTE: If there are any errors shown above - this mail is only highlighting 
them - it is NOT indicating that they are being looked at by anyone.

It is assumed that whoever makes change(s) to jboss that 
break the test will be fixing the test or jboss, as appropriate!





DETAILS OF ERRORS



Suite:   LocalWrapperCleanupUnitTestCase
Test:
testAutoCommitOffInRemoteUserTx(org.jboss.test.jca.test.LocalWrapperCleanupUnitTestCase)
Type:error
Exception:   java.rmi.ServerException
Message: RemoteException occurred in server thread; nested exception is:   
java.rmi.ServerException: EJBException:; nested exception is:   
javax.ejb.EJBException: Row committed, autocommit still on!
-



Suite:   MissingClassUnitTestCase
Test:
testDeployServiceWithoutClass(org.jboss.test.jmx.test.MissingClassUnitTestCase)
Type:error
Exception:   org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentException
Message: jboss.test:name=missingclasstest is not registered.; - nested throwable: 
(javax.management.InstanceNotFoundException: jboss.test:name=missingclasstest is not 
registered.)
-



Suite:   BeanStressTestCase
Test:testDeadLockFromClient(org.jboss.test.deadlock.test.BeanStressTestCase)
Type:failure
Exception:   junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
Message: expected a client deadlock for AB BA
-




---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



[JBoss-dev] Cepte Eglence Asil Simdi Basliyor!

2003-01-25 Thread Melodi Grafik Duyuru
Title: MELODI GRAFIK DUYURU
 www.melodilerim.com / www.grafiklerim.com Merhaba,  Melodilerim.Com ve Grafiklerim.Com'dan haberiniz var mý ?   Cep telefonlarýnýz için en geniþ melodi arþivi, 1800 melodi...Üstelik sürekli güncelleniyor. Ýþte "Ne Oldu Can - Kayahan" ve "Sen Yoluna Ben Yoluma - Çelik"...Daha albümleri taptazeyken melodileri Melodilerim.Com'da !   Cep telefonlarýnýzýn ekranlarýný þenlendirecek binlerce logo, resimli mesaj, extra-large logo ve hareketli resimler...Hepsi Grafiklerim.Com'da !  Üstelik bu melodi ve logolar cebinize tek bir mesajla çok kolay geliyor...  Rengarenk, pýrýl pýrýl sitelerimiz sizleri bekliyor !  Mutlu Günler  SMSNET Ekibi  Melodi isteðinde  bulunmak istiyorum!Resmimi telefonumda görmek istiyorum! Yardým hattýmýz: 0 312 2865891 (her gün 9.00 - 19.30 arasý)  Duyuru listemizden çýkmak için lütfen týklayýnýz...To be removed from our mailing list, please click here...



---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development