huh
I really like the create/destroy as opposed to init/destroy,
words sometimes are powerful, I mean the first one clearly says what it
needs to say, I will use that instead. huh.
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David
|Budworth
|Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 10:35 PM
|To: marc fleury
|Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: ServiceMBeanSupport init and destroy
|commented out
|
|
|Marc, init/destroy are never called on a ServiceMBean. (At least they
|aren't called on mine)
|
|So uncommenting them does nothing.
|
|I assume they were commented out when David J made the change from two
|stage init/destroy to 1 stage. (Which, BTW, broke every serivce I
|had written
|previously since I used start/stop to pause/unpause, and init/destroy to
|create/destroy expensive resources. But, that's a different thread)
|
|
|
|On Fri, 07 Dec 2001, marc fleury wrote:
|
| Revision 1.5 / (download) / (as text) - annotate - [select for
|diffs] , Mon Nov 12 06:52:17 2001 UTC (3 weeks, 4 days ago) by d_jencks
| Branch: MAIN
| CVS Tags: Rel_2_4_4_15
| Changes since 1.4: +15 -15 lines
| Diff to previous 1.4
|
| Changes to move toward eliminating init and destroy from Service
|interface, and make J2eeDeployer use mbean-refs. (2nd try at
|committing - is cvs acting weird?
|
| ?:|, David, I am not up for a 50 mail thread on that one but I
|think it was an oversight, I will uncomment, write if you want to
|discuss so we have something to fight over during the weekend
|
| __
| View: http://jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=66thread=5197
|
| ___
| Jboss-development mailing list
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
|
|___
|Jboss-development mailing list
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
