[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Pros/Cons of war vs. ear deployments (Jboss 4.2)

2007-04-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just needed to find out what feature you were talking about ;)

and yes, this  is something we have as a target - better hotdeployement.

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4038758#4038758

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4038758
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Pros/Cons of war vs. ear deployments (Jboss 4.2)

2007-04-18 Thread tzman
I pointed out Exadel only because I was just trying it out. The server publish 
action calls into a generated ant script that bundles and moves the file to the 
deploy directory. I believe this is actually a part of jst or wst?


Really the point of the comment is that having the ability to do hot 
deployments of code and only the code that has really been modified is/would be 
a huge productivity boost for us. This is more important on the ui/web side 
then the back end services. 

I did not mean to point a finger at any specific tool, only making a generic 
comment about what our shop needs.

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4038589#4038589

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4038589
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Pros/Cons of war vs. ear deployments (Jboss 4.2)

2007-04-17 Thread stu2
Thanks for the info Christian.  You saved me from jumping in to find this out 
myself.  Agreed - the xhtml reloading is the most important, as everything else 
can be unit tested.

I am intrigued by the JBoss 5 capabilities though.  I'll wait until it gets 
fully baked.

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4037832#4037832

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4037832
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Pros/Cons of war vs. ear deployments (Jboss 4.2)

2007-04-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I fully agree on the fact that virtual archives is what is needed. JBoss 5 is 
building it into the core of AS but until we have that in JBoss Tools/RHDS we 
are working on having it at the IDE level.

Giving you an incremental update of the deployed artifacts removing the need 
for seperate assemble/copy step during development.

With respect to why WAR and EAR's still are interesting for IDE's then its 
because it gives a standard structure where you (and the tool) can agree on 
where is the class files, where are the web.xml, components.xml etc. 

Virtual archives doesn't really solve that problem.
Your development files sometimes does not even contain enough information to 
tell the IDE what your view of the world is. The java source code is normally 
static; but config files with ${deploy.url}, ${deploy.dir} instead of the 
actual values makes it extremely hard for IDE's to deduce enough information to 
be really usefull.

I have some ideas for solving that; but there are many common corner cases to 
solve.

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4037921#4037921

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4037921
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Pros/Cons of war vs. ear deployments (Jboss 4.2)

2007-04-17 Thread tzman
With applications having 500k+ lines of code, it is very important to us to 
shrink the amount of time it takes to code/test/redeploy. We have had success 
in the past with deploying the ejb's in an ear file and hot deploying the web 
components in an exploded war outside of the ear; the ejb components are tested 
outside of the container. Just starting to look at seam, but it appears as 
though this may be troublesome to say the least.

It seems as though most IDE solutions are fine with small applications where 
packaging and deployment times are negligible, but not very useful for large 
applications. Exadel?s solution fits into this category.

Just my 2 cents.


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4038021#4038021

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4038021
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Pros/Cons of war vs. ear deployments (Jboss 4.2)

2007-04-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What do you mean exadels solution fits into this category ? Are you thinking 
about the default WTP deployment or ?

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4038131#4038131

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4038131
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Pros/Cons of war vs. ear deployments (Jboss 4.2)

2007-04-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, the EJB3 deployer will not scan your WAR for EJBs. So you can't have EJBs 
in there. 

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4037823#4037823

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4037823
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Pros/Cons of war vs. ear deployments (Jboss 4.2)

2007-04-16 Thread stu2
Ahh, so that hasn't changed.  I wondered if the embeddable microcontainer stuff 
might make that a viable option.

Has anyone explored using the dynamic classloader for ear deployments?  The 
docs say it's war-only.  I understand any EJBs wouldn't be reloadable, but it 
would be fantastic to get this for everything else.

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4037824#4037824

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4037824
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Pros/Cons of war vs. ear deployments (Jboss 4.2)

2007-04-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think all of this won't happen before JBoss5.

I checked out CVS of the Embedded JBoss5 last week and it's working nicely with 
hot-redeploy of virtual archives. Means I don't even have a WAR anymore, just a 
bunch of classes with annotations and a few config files, all in one directory. 
And then I programmatically feed that into a virtual EAR/JAR, which I deploy on 
JBoss5. 

IMO this is the approach we should take. WAR and EAR are _deployment_ 
solutions, I'm not deploying anything when I'm developing software. I just want 
to see my stuff running in one way or another and I have no idea why everyone 
(including the IDE vendors) thinks that WARs and EARs are a good idea for that. 
They are not, in fact, they are so badly designed that everyone writes 5 pages 
of build.xml just to get the dozens of files into the right locations. Why 
can't I develop how I like and only use the EAR/WAR stuff when I want to 
actually _deploy_ my application and run it?

So this whole issue should be solved in the second half of this year... I can 
see other projects (Tapestry for example) also pushing in new directions and 
only good can come from it. 


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4037828#4037828

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4037828
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Pros/Cons of war vs. ear deployments (Jboss 4.2)

2007-04-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By the way, the Seam hot deploy stuff is not that useful as it is right now. 
Because the hot-deployed components are in a different classloader, you can't 
reference them from classes that are not Seam components and in a different 
classloader. One example would be a servlet that calls a Seam component. I also 
found issues with restoring if PAGE context state. In the end I found the 
restrictions too severe and went back to manual redeployment when I change a 
class. It's not that bad, at least we can change and preview XHTML/CSS 
immediately.


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4037831#4037831

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4037831
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user