[josm-dev] svn:eol-style=native
Hi, I'd like to set svn:eol-style=native for 481 source files. Any objections? One-third (207) of the files already have this flag. Btw, you can put the following in the subversion config: enable-auto-props = yes *.java = svn:eol-style=native This way all added files get the property by default. __ Sebastian ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
[josm-dev] email addresses in trac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I think the addresses shown in trac ( cc:) are to long and not much of interest for other user. Could you please shorten them somehow that you do almost get the whole address. It is also not really obvious that you can use your user-name instead of email-address and if you are logged it does not offer the username but your email-address. Myself did that mistake, and using that part shown with google easily presents you my whole address Please can someone change my email-address into my username in the archive. Thanks colliar -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREIAAYFAkuPkFgACgkQalWTFLzqsCvJCwCguFj/7bA0UEuBYTonwDKjNP6E 3QEAoMTpsO0hOCQDelAHOP66Ge+u5vYG =lPOc -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] self-intersecting ways
At 2010-03-03 14:31, Richard Welty wrote: On 3/3/10 4:29 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: Alan Mintz wrote: A similar problem exists with some landuse=* ways that people have glued to roads. I'd call that a bit of an error: Clearly that landuse doesn't continue all the way out to the street centerline. but for people using josm w/the validator who are not aware of the issue, they are told that the duplicate nodes are an error, and there's a convenient fix button right there. Sounds like the validator should take into account the type of features in this case, right? I'm all for joining nodes of like feature types (like landuse to landuse), but it shouldn't tell you (let you?) join landuse to highway. From a technical standpoint, the land parcels do indeed usually extend out to the centerline of the roadway, but an easement is granted to the city/county/state for the road, utilities, etc., and the area within the easement may not be built upon by the landowner. IMO, that should exclude the area within the easement from the landuse boundary. -- Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] self-intersecting ways
On 3/4/10 11:54 AM, Alan Mintz wrote: At 2010-03-03 14:31, Richard Welty wrote: On 3/3/10 4:29 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: Alan Mintz wrote: A similar problem exists with some landuse=* ways that people have glued to roads. I'd call that a bit of an error: Clearly that landuse doesn't continue all the way out to the street centerline. but for people using josm w/the validator who are not aware of the issue, they are told that the duplicate nodes are an error, and there's a convenient fix button right there. Sounds like the validator should take into account the type of features in this case, right? I'm all for joining nodes of like feature types (like landuse to landuse), but it shouldn't tell you (let you?) join landuse to highway. i would agree with you. not being familiar with internals in this case, i don't know how hard that would be to adjust. however, at a minimum, there probably ought to be some sort of documentation/help option available for errors and warnings so a newish user can get immediate feedback on whether a fix is advisable, maybe right click/help-with-error leading to a text help dialog? From a technical standpoint, the land parcels do indeed usually extend out to the centerline of the roadway, but an easement is granted to the city/county/state for the road, utilities, etc., and the area within the easement may not be built upon by the landowner. IMO, that should exclude the area within the easement from the landuse boundary. and from a practical point of view, this is how they are in the database at the present time; nodes for landuse/areas are at the same locations as nodes in highways. richard ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] self-intersecting ways
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Richard Welty schrieb: On 3/4/10 11:54 AM, Alan Mintz wrote: At 2010-03-03 14:31, Richard Welty wrote: From a technical standpoint, the land parcels do indeed usually extend out to the centerline of the roadway, but an easement is granted to the city/county/state for the road, utilities, etc., and the area within the easement may not be built upon by the landowner. IMO, that should exclude the area within the easement from the landuse boundary. and from a practical point of view, this is how they are in the database at the present time; nodes for landuse/areas are at the same locations as nodes in highways. I came accross this, too, and have to say it is quite a lot of work to get the landuse of the road and often you get conflicts later on these areas again. Maybe a tool for unglueing those objects and moving the area aubout 2 meters of would be nice or even a automatical fix by josm itself. Also validator warns about landuses glued together if there exists nothing else and these landuses should be glued you get warnings about them. cheers colliar -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREIAAYFAkuP8FQACgkQalWTFLzqsCsBPQCguEasIjHG0peW+mRHXwLvwy9J 708An3kFqEcKz0VFX4U1vxuLj87pb8e8 =/e0l -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] svn:eol-style=native
Hi, that's fine for me. I've now updated my local SVN config too. Regards Karl Am 04.03.2010 11:16, schrieb Sebastian Klein: Hi, I'd like to set svn:eol-style=native for 481 source files. Any objections? One-third (207) of the files already have this flag. Btw, you can put the following in the subversion config: enable-auto-props = yes *.java = svn:eol-style=native This way all added files get the property by default. __ Sebastian ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] self-intersecting ways
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 06:39:34PM +0100, colliar wrote: Richard Welty schrieb: On 3/4/10 11:54 AM, Alan Mintz wrote: At 2010-03-03 14:31, Richard Welty wrote: From a technical standpoint, the land parcels do indeed usually extend out to the centerline of the roadway, but an easement is granted to the city/county/state for the road, utilities, etc., and the area within the easement may not be built upon by the landowner. IMO, that should exclude the area within the easement from the landuse boundary. and from a practical point of view, this is how they are in the database at the present time; nodes for landuse/areas are at the same locations as nodes in highways. I came accross this, too, and have to say it is quite a lot of work to get the landuse of the road and often you get conflicts later on these areas again. Maybe a tool for unglueing those objects and moving the area aubout 2 meters of would be nice or even a automatical fix by josm itself. +1. Some days ago, I came across a mkgmap warning for a dead-end oneway in a residential area that was riddled with landuse polygons that shared points with ways. It was very hard to see that the oneway was not connected to the road it was supposed to. I spent several minutes detaching the landuses from the roads in the area. Marko ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
[josm-dev] Previous presets still available?
Hi! After switching to a recent version of JOSM, I noted that the presets have changed to a different structure. I liked some of the old presets better, e.g. the ability to set a track/tracktype with one click - which has become much more complicated with the new presets. Are the previous presets already available as an option somewhere or should I extract them from an old JOSM build? If it's the latter: With which version did the presets change? bye Nop -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Previous-presets-still-available-tp4677821p4677821.html Sent from the JOSM Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] self-intersecting ways
At 2010-03-04 09:10, Richard Welty wrote: On 3/4/10 11:54 AM, Alan Mintz wrote: From a technical standpoint, the land parcels do indeed usually extend out to the centerline of the roadway, but an easement is granted to the city/county/state for the road, utilities, etc., and the area within the easement may not be built upon by the landowner. IMO, that should exclude the area within the easement from the landuse boundary. and from a practical point of view, this is how they are in the database at the present time; nodes for landuse/areas are at the same locations as nodes in highways. Some imported ones, yes. I doubt human-drawn ones are (I certainly don't do it). It would be nice if someone would create a tool that lets you select two nodes, specify a direction and distance, and have it dup and move them, as well as the specified way that connects them. It should also be possible to have it do the same thing with an entire polygon and/or, in the case where it is rectangular, specify separate easement distances for all 4 sides (this would be the most common usage). This would greatly speed up fixing of these types of issues when they are encountered by the more experienced of us. -- Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
