Re: [julia-users] Re: does JLD handle Int128 (saw at one time it did not)
They were split, but google hasn't quite caught up to it. And all the old issues are of course still there in the original HDF5 repository. I don't remember the status of this at all. I hate to say it, but why don't you just try it out and see if it works? If not, please file an issue--- shouldn't be hard to fix. --Tim On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 12:37:32 PM Jeffrey Sarnoff wrote: I saw a note from Tim responding to a general question about the state of JLD. At that time (I thought the date was recent, though I might have misread the year) He said everything works very well except for the 128 bit integers, which were on hold until he could verify that the their sign bit ?something about it? would behave properly under storing and retrieving. After seeing that, I did not try. I don't have the page I saw here .. but just now looking for that I was routed to HDF5.jl .. were they not split recently, --- or am I ready for some coffee? On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 2:45:13 PM UTC-4, Stefan Karpinski wrote: JLD is built on top of HDF5. Jeffrey: does JLD not handle Int128 out of the box? On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Ismael VC ismael...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: Have you tried using it with HDF5.jl? https://github.com/timholy/HDF5.jl El miércoles, 19 de agosto de 2015, 12:50:35 (UTC-5), Jeffrey Sarnoff escribió: Or, what is a good approach to saving and reloading Int128s .. -x .. +x?
Re: [julia-users] Re: does JLD handle Int128 (saw at one time it did not)
JLD is built on top of HDF5. Jeffrey: does JLD not handle Int128 out of the box? On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Ismael VC ismael.vc1...@gmail.com wrote: Have you tried using it with HDF5.jl? https://github.com/timholy/HDF5.jl El miércoles, 19 de agosto de 2015, 12:50:35 (UTC-5), Jeffrey Sarnoff escribió: Or, what is a good approach to saving and reloading Int128s .. -x .. +x?
Re: [julia-users] Re: does JLD handle Int128 (saw at one time it did not)
I can do that. If it goes south, I note the issue. You showed me how to use it the first time, Thanks TIm. On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 4:20:22 PM UTC-4, Tim Holy wrote: They were split, but google hasn't quite caught up to it. And all the old issues are of course still there in the original HDF5 repository. I don't remember the status of this at all. I hate to say it, but why don't you just try it out and see if it works? If not, please file an issue--- shouldn't be hard to fix. --Tim On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 12:37:32 PM Jeffrey Sarnoff wrote: I saw a note from Tim responding to a general question about the state of JLD. At that time (I thought the date was recent, though I might have misread the year) He said everything works very well except for the 128 bit integers, which were on hold until he could verify that the their sign bit ?something about it? would behave properly under storing and retrieving. After seeing that, I did not try. I don't have the page I saw here .. but just now looking for that I was routed to HDF5.jl .. were they not split recently, --- or am I ready for some coffee? On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 2:45:13 PM UTC-4, Stefan Karpinski wrote: JLD is built on top of HDF5. Jeffrey: does JLD not handle Int128 out of the box? On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Ismael VC ismael...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: Have you tried using it with HDF5.jl? https://github.com/timholy/HDF5.jl El miércoles, 19 de agosto de 2015, 12:50:35 (UTC-5), Jeffrey Sarnoff escribió: Or, what is a good approach to saving and reloading Int128s .. -x .. +x?
[julia-users] Re: does JLD handle Int128 (saw at one time it did not)
Have you tried using it with HDF5.jl? https://github.com/timholy/HDF5.jl El miércoles, 19 de agosto de 2015, 12:50:35 (UTC-5), Jeffrey Sarnoff escribió: Or, what is a good approach to saving and reloading Int128s .. -x .. +x?
Re: [julia-users] Re: does JLD handle Int128 (saw at one time it did not)
It works On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 4:44:51 PM UTC-4, Jeffrey Sarnoff wrote: I can do that. If it goes south, I note the issue. You showed me how to use it the first time, Thanks TIm. On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 4:20:22 PM UTC-4, Tim Holy wrote: They were split, but google hasn't quite caught up to it. And all the old issues are of course still there in the original HDF5 repository. I don't remember the status of this at all. I hate to say it, but why don't you just try it out and see if it works? If not, please file an issue--- shouldn't be hard to fix. --Tim On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 12:37:32 PM Jeffrey Sarnoff wrote: I saw a note from Tim responding to a general question about the state of JLD. At that time (I thought the date was recent, though I might have misread the year) He said everything works very well except for the 128 bit integers, which were on hold until he could verify that the their sign bit ?something about it? would behave properly under storing and retrieving. After seeing that, I did not try. I don't have the page I saw here .. but just now looking for that I was routed to HDF5.jl .. were they not split recently, --- or am I ready for some coffee? On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 2:45:13 PM UTC-4, Stefan Karpinski wrote: JLD is built on top of HDF5. Jeffrey: does JLD not handle Int128 out of the box? On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Ismael VC ismael...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: Have you tried using it with HDF5.jl? https://github.com/timholy/HDF5.jl El miércoles, 19 de agosto de 2015, 12:50:35 (UTC-5), Jeffrey Sarnoff escribió: Or, what is a good approach to saving and reloading Int128s .. -x .. +x?
