Re: [j-nsp] EX-UM-2X4SFP- 2-port 10G SFP+ / 4-port 1G SFP Uplink Module
Mike, this is really interesting. I haven't noticed that you were talking about 3300. Sorry for answering the question you were not really asking :) Please share your findings with the list. If you discuss this topic with your SE, it is worth asking if EX3300 suffers from the same problem as EX3200 when ports ge-0/1/0-ge-0/1/3 were sharing resources with last 4 ports on the ge-0/0 PIC. I also wonder how it looks from the configuration point of view. Like, do you have interfaces ge-0/1/0 and xe-0/1/1 at the same time? thanks nick On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Mike Williams mike.willi...@comodo.comwrote: That is certainly the way it is for the 3200 and 4200 http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/junos/topics/task/configuration/uplink-module-ex3200-ex4200-sfp-plus-mode-setting-cli.html However it seems the 3300 is a different beast, or at least that's what I hope! From the datasheet on http://www.juniper.net/us/en/products-services/switching/ex-series/ex3300/#literature Uplink • Fixed 4-port uplinks which can be individually configured as GbE (SFP) or 10GbE (SFP+) ports. I've yet to find documentation detailing exactly how you go about that though. On Monday 27 February 2012 14:25:12 Nick Kritsky wrote: As far as I remember you have to explicitly select 10g or 1g mode on PIC level for EX uplink module. This automatically rules out any mixed mode setup. NK 2012/2/21 Timh Bergström timh.bergst...@videoplaza.com On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Mike Williams mike.willi...@comodo.com wrote: On Tuesday 21 February 2012 08:33:53 Jeff Wheeler wrote: The built in uplink ports in the EX3300. Do they support running 2 at 10Gb (for VC) and 2 at 1Gb for regular ethernet? I'm sure I've seen it written that all four ports can be used at 10Gb, if true that would support my belief mixed mode operation is supported too. Afaik two of the four 10Gb ports are pre-configured for VC, the other two can be used for ethernet out of the box, or you can use one for VC and three for ethernet or the other way round, no problems (at least that's what the juniper SE told me when I bought mine). -- Mike Williams Senior Infrastructure Architect Comodo CA Ltd Office Tel Europe: +44 (0) 161 8747070 Fax Europe: +44 (0) 161 8771767 ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Decent J-Series software version
any one? On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Yucong Sun (叶雨飞) sunyuc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have two j2350, one with 9.3r4.4, and the other I am trying to find a good version to upgrade to, with security features. So far I have tried: 1) 10.1 - 10.2R4, those runs okay, but they only have half-ass ipv6 support. 2) 10.4R8, crash once a month or so, msut be manually rebooted, plus they basically just hose horribly under 20kpps or 200k sessions. 3) 11.X crash on boot directly they both are taking full BGP feeds, and I've upgraded them both to 2.5G ram, and I even upgraded on-board cpu to 3G model. anyway I'm about to give up on any hope to use non-packet mode on these routers, my money would have been much better spend if I just buy a decent dell server and good network cards, they all handles tons of tons more sessions just fine, any similar experiences? ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Decent J-Series software version
- 10.2R4.8 on J2320's 512M RAM; but in packet-mode (as I'm using it for an MPLS/CPE endpoint), which is the last version you can use without upgrading the CF/RAM. - 10.4R8.5 on J2320's 1Gb RAM, packet mode (same as above as MPLS CPE/endpoint) - I've had good luck with 10.4R8.5 so far though; but again, no sessions/flows. - 10.0R2.10 or 10.0R3.10 on J2320's w/1Gb RAM in Security/Flow mode, but no IPv6 Sorry couldn't be of any more help here. Haven't had a reason to run IPv6+Security yet; as we generally aren't using these J's for their fire-walling capabilities (MPLS CPE instead); or if we do (for a customer), it's for IPv4 only so far. - Chris. On 2012-02-29, at 10:23 AM, Yucong Sun (叶雨飞) wrote: any one? On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Yucong Sun (叶雨飞) sunyuc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have two j2350, one with 9.3r4.4, and the other I am trying to find a good version to upgrade to, with security features. So far I have tried: 1) 10.1 - 10.2R4, those runs okay, but they only have half-ass ipv6 support. 2) 10.4R8, crash once a month or so, msut be manually rebooted, plus they basically just hose horribly under 20kpps or 200k sessions. 3) 11.X crash on boot directly they both are taking full BGP feeds, and I've upgraded them both to 2.5G ram, and I even upgraded on-board cpu to 3G model. anyway I'm about to give up on any hope to use non-packet mode on these routers, my money would have been much better spend if I just buy a decent dell server and good network cards, they all handles tons of tons more sessions just fine, any similar experiences? ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Decent J-Series software version
I just tried 11.1 half year ago for a couple of times and it crashes badly either on boot or after a while, that basically gives my take on using bleeding edge version. I don't have access to the new release anyway. On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:51 PM, James Jones james.v...@gmail.com wrote: Do all versions of 11.x crash? Sent from my iPhone On Feb 28, 2012, at 6:23 PM, Yucong Sun (叶雨飞) sunyuc...@gmail.com wrote: any one? On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Yucong Sun (叶雨飞) sunyuc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have two j2350, one with 9.3r4.4, and the other I am trying to find a good version to upgrade to, with security features. So far I have tried: 1) 10.1 - 10.2R4, those runs okay, but they only have half-ass ipv6 support. 2) 10.4R8, crash once a month or so, msut be manually rebooted, plus they basically just hose horribly under 20kpps or 200k sessions. 3) 11.X crash on boot directly they both are taking full BGP feeds, and I've upgraded them both to 2.5G ram, and I even upgraded on-board cpu to 3G model. anyway I'm about to give up on any hope to use non-packet mode on these routers, my money would have been much better spend if I just buy a decent dell server and good network cards, they all handles tons of tons more sessions just fine, any similar experiences? ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
