IRAQ SANCTIONS MONITOR Number 111

2000-08-24 Thread heikki sipilä


From: Mark Clement [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]


IRAQ SANCTIONS MONITOR Number 111
Thursday August 24, 2000


PLEASE NOTE THE MARIAM APPEAL HAS MOVED.
THE NEW CONTACT NUMBERS ARE:
TEL: +44 (0)20 7403 5200
FAX: +44 (0)20 7 403 3823

-

LATEST 

Russia suggests easing Iraq's reparations

UNITED NATIONS, Aug 23 (Reuters) - Russia has floated a proposal to reduce
from 30 percent to 20 percent the proportion of the proceeds from Iraq's
"oil-for-food" sales earmarked for reparations stemming from its 1990
invasion of Kuwait, Security Council sources said on Wednesday.

Russian U.N. envoy Sergei Lavrov was also said to have urged, during
closed-door council consultations, a review by the council of the operations
of the Geneva-based U.N. Compensation Commission, which reviews and pays out
claims for reparations.
Under the U.N. "oil-for-food program" that began in December 1996 Baghdad is
allowed to sell unlimited quantities of oil to buy food, medicine and other
civilian necessities to help offset the effects on ordinary Iraqis of
sanctions imposed after its invasion of Kuwait.
Since the start of the programme, 30 percent of the proceeds from the sale
of Iraqi oil is automatically siphoned off into the U.N.-administered
reparations fund.

Lesser amounts are used to administer the "oil-for-food program" and to meet
other costs related to the Gulf war. This includes scrapping Baghdad's
weapons of mass destruction, though U.N. arms inspectors have been barred
from Iraq for nearly two years.
The council sources said Lavrov raised the reparations issue informally in
challenging a $21.5 billion claim by Kuwait for lost oil production and
sales during Iraq's invasion and seven-month occupation of the emirate.

If the percentage of Iraqi oil proceeds earmarked for reparations was ever
reduced to 20 percent, the difference would presumably become available to
buy more food and other civilian supplies for the benefit of Iraqi
civilians.

Russian and French representatives in Geneva have held up a decision by the
Compensation Commission on the Kuwaiti claim, on which a panel of
arbitrators has recommended awarding $15.9 billion.

Kuwait's claim will be considered again when the commission's governing
council, which has the same 15-nation membership as the Security Council,
next meets in Geneva from Sept 26 to 28.
The council sources said Russia's move for a review of the operations of the
Compensation Commission was supported by France, China, Ukraine and Tunisia.

The United States, Britain, Canada and the Netherlands were said to have
argued that the Security Council should not pronounce on specific
reparations claims, which should be left to the technical body - the
Compensation Commission - established for that purpose.
Russia's moves on the reparations issue represents another front in a
campaign aimed at easing curbs placed on Iraq since its attack on Kuwait.

Russia, together with China and France, has been pressing for the easing of
sanctions in force for the past 10 years. It also campaigns vigorously
against "no-fly zones" patrolled by United States and British warplanes to
prevent the Iraqi army from attacking Kurdish dissidents in northern Iraq
and Shiite dissidents in the south.


Iraq will not accept new U.N. weapons team.
By Huda Majeed Saleh
BAGHDAD, Aug 23 (Reuters) - Iraq said on Wednesday it would not accept the
new United Nations arms inspection team established under a Security Council
resolution last December.
"Clearly speaking Iraq does not deal with resolution 1284," Deputy Prime
Minister Tareq Aziz told reporters and members of parliament. "Hans Blix and
his commission is a result of this resolution which Iraq does not deal with.

"When Iraq does not deal with the resolution and its results this means that
Iraq will not receive any person who has a relation with the resolution and
its results."
Security Council resolution 1284 adopted in December offers to ease
longstanding trade sanctions on Iraq if it allows U.N. weapons inspectors
empowered to dismantle Iraq's weapons of mass destruction to return to
Baghdad.

The resolution set up a new arms inspection body called the United Nations
Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC) to replace the
former U.N. Special Commission (UNSCOM).

Aziz said Iraq could not be intimidated on the issue. "We are accustomed to
threats and Iraq is ready to face all challenges in defence of its
sovereignty and legitimate rights," he said.
In Washington, a senior State Department official said Iraq was free to
reject the new inspection system but would then have to live with the
continuation of sanctions.

"If Iraq wants to take this opportunity, then it can. If not, they will be
stuck in t

IRAQ SANCTIONS MONITOR Number 111

2000-08-24 Thread heikki sipilä


When Madeleine Albright was told on a television show that a UN study had
found that perhaps 500,000 Iraqi children may have died because of our 10
years of sanctions, she responded, quote, "We believe it was worth it,"
worth it. When did the greatest republic on earth start waging war on
children?
(END VIDEO CLIP)
ZAHN: That was Pat Buchanan two weeks ago on the UN sanctions against Iraq.
Joining me now in the studio is Ambassador Richard Butler, former executive
chairman of the UN Special Commission and author of, "The Greatest Threat,
Iraq, Weapons of Mass Destruction and the Crisis of Global Security."
Good to have you with us here on THE EDGE.
AMB. RICHARD BUTLER, FORMER UNSCOM EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN: Good to be here,
Paula.
ZAHN: You didn't want to appear with Scott Ritter. Why not?
BUTLER: Because if I were to debate him directly, it would give credence to
some really shockingly wrong things that he's saying. And we heard some of
them tonight.
ZAHN: What wouldn't you say in front of him that you'll say in front of me
tonight?
BUTLER: Look, what would happen - and you know this very well - is that as
we saw with the gun segment a few moments ago, that we could presumably lose
valuable time in a he said-you said kind of debate. And I want to use that
time to a better purpose.
ZAHN: OK, let's quickly refute some of Scott Ritter's charges. One is he
does not think Saddam Hussein has the capacity to create weapons of mass
destruction.
BUTLER: Well, I find Scott's performance truly sad, I must say. He's
completely wrong. Scott himself, when he left UNSCOM almost two years ago,
went to the Congress of the United States and said Iraq is not disarmed. His
words were, "It is an ugly threat to the region and beyond." He was right
then, he's wrong now.
ZAHN: But he said tonight that he is convinced in his words, "qualitative
disarmament has worked."
BUTLER: Qualitative disarmament is a fictional concept that he invented for
the article that you referred to that he wrote for "Arms Control Today."
We're talking about quantity not quality, quantity of specific types of
weapons. And he knows very, very well that we never got rid of all the
chemical weapons, we never got rid of the missiles, all of them. We had a
complete black hole facing us with respect to biological weapons. He
knows...
ZAHN: How do we know that if we never got into some of these key weapons
sites?
BUTLER: Because we had over a million documents. We got into millions of
sites. We could see the tip of the iceberg. Look, take biological weapons,
for example, Paula. I called it a black hole. And Scott Ritter knows this
very well. Iraq had a substantial biological weapons program. They lied to
the world for four years saying they had no program. When we were able to
prove that that was false, they said, "Oh, well, it wasn't a big program."
Now I begged the Iraqis towards the end of my time there to help us get them
out of jail, to give us above all an honest declaration on biology. They
robustly refused. And as I record in my book, Tariq Aziz told me privately
that, "Of course, we had a biological weapons program," and he went on. He
said, "That's because we need to use it on Israel." Now that's what we're
dealing with.
Now Scott Ritter knows that. He knew it then, but he's seeking to deny it
now. I find that tragic.
ZAHN: He's saying he actually used Tariq Aziz as one of the sources in this
"Arms Control Weekly" piece that he just wrote and he's confident...
BUTLER: And so that was the deception. That was a deception, too, because..
ZAHN: Where was the deception in that?
BUTLER: Because the piece in "Arms Control Today" was written before he went
to Baghdad. You quite properly asked him, "Who was these Iraqis that you
cite in your article that you spoke with? What was their names? What was the
seniority? Who were they?" And Scott blurred that. He said the deputy
ambassador in New York. Now I accept that he probably talked to him when he
was preparing his "Arms Control Today" piece, but the meeting that he says
he had with Aziz and Amir Rashid happened afterwards when he went to
Baghdad, weeks or months after he prepared that article. So that was
deceptive to say, "I received those assurances from those people leading to
my concept of qualitative disarmament that he published in that article."
That could not have happened then.
ZAHN: So in closing tonight, give us your opinion on what you think Saddam
Hussein is capable of doing to his enemies today.
BUTLER: You know, well, I welcome that question because already, we've spent
too much time talking about a person in his youth who frankly lost his way
and is misleading people. I'll tell you quite plainly. Saddam Hussein is
back in the business of making long-range missiles. Secondly, he has
recalled his nuclear weapons design team. Thirdly, he's rebuilt his chemical
weapons manufacturing factories, and we believe the same is true of biology.
In other words, he is back in business but that is what I've