Re: Rule not working as expected
On 2014-08-19 15:39, R.J. Baars wrote: I discovered that the rule below is not working very well. It look like 'skip' also skips over sentence boundaries. No, that shouldn't be possible. Maybe sentence detection is broken? What sentence does this match that it shouldn't? Regards Daniel -- ___ Languagetool-devel mailing list Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
Re: Rule not working as expected
R.J. Baars r.j.ba...@xs4all.nl wrote: I discovered that the rule below is not working very well. It look like 'skip' also skips over sentence boundaries. Is that intentional? Or is something else wrong? In case it is intentional, is there an option to forbid that? Ruud rule id=nr738 name=duur kost pattern token skip=4duur/token tokenkost/token /pattern messageU bedoelt suggestionis duur/suggestion of suggestionkost veel/suggestion./message shortIs duur, kost veel/short example type=incorrectWeet je niet hoe markerduur die auto wel niet kost/marker?/example example type=correctWeet je niet hoe markerduur die auto wel niet is/marker?/example /rule Hi Ruud, You can run with the -v option (for verbose) to see what's going on. It should then show each sentence separately, the tokenization, the POS tags, the lemma, which unification rules match etc. Skip should not span multiple sentences. In my experience, skip=... with a large numbers (or worse with -1) can easily produces false positives. Regards Dominique -- ___ Languagetool-devel mailing list Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
Re: Rule not working as expected
THanks, I will check it out. The rule is not functioning very well at all. I commented it out and put it on the list of items to do. Ruud R.J. Baars r.j.ba...@xs4all.nl wrote: I discovered that the rule below is not working very well. It look like 'skip' also skips over sentence boundaries. Is that intentional? Or is something else wrong? In case it is intentional, is there an option to forbid that? Ruud rule id=nr738 name=duur kost pattern token skip=4duur/token tokenkost/token /pattern messageU bedoelt suggestionis duur/suggestion of suggestionkost veel/suggestion./message shortIs duur, kost veel/short example type=incorrectWeet je niet hoe markerduur die auto wel niet kost/marker?/example example type=correctWeet je niet hoe markerduur die auto wel niet is/marker?/example /rule Hi Ruud, You can run with the -v option (for verbose) to see what's going on. It should then show each sentence separately, the tokenization, the POS tags, the lemma, which unification rules match etc. Skip should not span multiple sentences. In my experience, skip=... with a large numbers (or worse with -1) can easily produces false positives. Regards Dominique -- ___ Languagetool-devel mailing list Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel -- ___ Languagetool-devel mailing list Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
