Re: [Lazarus] TFPWriterJPEG quality
On 18/11/15 15:32, Lukasz Sokol wrote: On 18/11/15 13:55, Norbert Crettol wrote: On 18/11/15 14:38, Mattias Gaertner wrote: On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 05:22:44 -0800 Aradeonas <aradeo...@operamail.com> wrote: Maximum 100 I think.At least it is better that 75. More is better ;) If you want a lossless image, you use for example png, not jpg. (100 in jpg is still not lossless). You choose the jpg format to get a small file. 100 is definitely not the best default. Mattias Hello, To display my photographs on a monitor, I usually use a 80% jpeg compression. That's not good for printing but fair enough for a computer monitor. If you want a better quality, don't compress. Norbert BTW: this is my first post on this list Hi Norbert, you're welcome, please note, that the netiquette of this list asks to preserve the order in which the messages are being answered to; (with your answer inline or under the message you are replying to). (unless you have a reason not to, e.g. using a screen-reader / voice composer for visually impaired) (I let myself to rearrange this message accordingly as an example) There are numerous reasons why it is so, feel free to search the Net for 'Netiquette' ;) Thanks for the reminder. I'll do that Norbert -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] TFPWriterJPEG quality
Hello, To display my photographs on a monitor, I usually use a 80% jpeg compression. That's not good for printing but fair enough for a computer monitor. If you want a better quality, don't compress. Norbert BTW: this is my first post on this list On 18/11/15 14:38, Mattias Gaertner wrote: On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 05:22:44 -0800 Aradeonaswrote: Maximum 100 I think.At least it is better that 75. More is better ;) If you want a lossless image, you use for example png, not jpg. (100 in jpg is still not lossless). You choose the jpg format to get a small file. 100 is definitely not the best default. Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Docked Form
Hello, I received this mail. Cheers Norbert On 12/06/15 08:04, Sandro Cumerlato wrote: Hello Balázs, unfortunately this mail has been marked as SPAM by gmail. Are you registered to the mailing list? Do other members have received the message? Docking IDE is an important milestone IMHO. Please Lazarus developers go ahead. Sandro Cumerlato On 11 Jun 2015 13:17, Balazs Szekely balazsszek...@yahoo.com mailto:balazsszek...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi all, I would like to see the docked form feature implemented, because lot of people complaining about the IDE not being modern. Personally I prefer the old non-docked version, but I do understand those, especially younger guys, who are used to more modern IDE's(Visual Studio/Eclipse//Delphi 2007+). Today I ported back the docking system from CT. According to (L)GPL license we are allowed to do so. The good part is, the embedded design is optional. The old undocked version is the default, it can be changed from Options/Desktop frame. I attach a patch, which was created against the latest trunk r49313. Can you please test it? Is this a good docking solution? If not why? I tested under Win32/64, GTK2, QT. PS: Please read Readme.txt first. Thank you, Balázs -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org mailto:Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Unable to find file staticpackages.inc
On 13/03/15 17:45, Norbert Crettol wrote: On 13/03/15 16:50, Mattias Gaertner wrote: On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:48:16 +0100 Norbert Crettol norbert.cret...@gmail.com wrote: [...] I'm lost. Is that an purely Debian error? That might be. You can try our debian packages from http://sourceforge.net/projects/lazarus/?source=directory Since you already have FPC 2.6.4 you only need to uninstall the lazarus* packages and install our lazarus package. [...] I've done it. Removed the Lazarus packages, kept back the fpc packages and installed the one you pointed me to. I've tried the same operation: installed new package lazdatadict and rebuild the IDE. After a while of compilation I got: Compiling package lazdatadict 0.0 completed components/lazutils/masks.pas(23,22)Fatal: Can't find unit contnrs used by Masks I just removed directory ~/.lazarus, restarted lazarus, added the package lazdatadict, rebuild the IDE and that's it! Can't find unit contnrs error was gone. Thanks for the help. Best regards Norbert -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] Unable to find file staticpackages.inc
Hello Lazarus community, This is my first post to this mailing-list. Let me first introduce myself: my name is Norbert Crettol, from Switzerland. I'm a former Turbo Pascal user. My first version was Turbo Pascal v.1.0 for CP/M (on Z80 processor). ;-) I've not been doing any Pascal development for many years now. I've no experience with Lazarus. Now, my problem: On a fresh Debian Jessie installation, I've installed Lazarus and fpc (see the list of installed packages below). Now, I'm trying to install a new package: lazdatadict. I went to Package-Install/Uninstall Packages and moved lazdatadict from Available... to Installed and clicked on Save and rebuild IDE. It compiles for a while and then displays an error message: - Unable to find file staticpackages.inc. If it belongs to your project, check search path in Project - Compiler Options - Search Paths - Other Unit Files. If this file belongs to a package, check the appropriate package compiler options. If this file belongs to Lazarus, make sure compiling clean. If the file belongs to FPC then check fpc.cfg. If unsure, check Project - CompilerOptions - Test - I've checked the newly created ~/.lazarus folder and a file called staticpackages.inc exists there. I've tried to add /path/to/my/home/.lazarus in Other Unit Files as suggested by the error message but this leads to other errors. I'm lost. Is that an purely Debian error? I've googled a little but found nothing satisfying. Here are some data from Lazarus: Lazarus version: 1.2.4+dfsg2-1 Lazarus svn revision: 43696 Lazarus build date: 2015/02/17 Lazarus was compiled for x86_64-linux Lazarus was compiled with fpc 2.6.4 Here is a list of installed packages: = ~$ dpkg -l | grep lazarus ii lazarus ii lazarus-1.2.4 ii lazarus-doc-1.2.4 ii lazarus-ide-1.2.4 ii lazarus-ide-gtk2-1.2.4 ii lazarus-ide-qt4 ii lazarus-ide-qt4-1.2.4 ii lazarus-src-1.2.4 ~$ dpkg -l | grep fpc ii fpc ii fpc-2.6.4 ii fpc-source ii fpc-source-2.6.4 ~$ dpkg -l | grep fp- ii fp-compiler ii fp-compiler-2.6.4 ii fp-ide-2.6.4 ii fp-units-base ii fp-units-base-2.6.4 ii fp-units-db ii fp-units-db-2.6.4 ii fp-units-fcl ii fp-units-fcl-2.6.4 ii fp-units-fv-2.6.4 ii fp-units-gfx ii fp-units-gfx-2.6.4 ii fp-units-gnome1-2.6.4 ii fp-units-gtk-2.6.4 ii fp-units-gtk2 ii fp-units-gtk2-2.6.4 ii fp-units-math ii fp-units-math-2.6.4 ii fp-units-misc ii fp-units-misc-2.6.4 ii fp-units-multimedia-2.6.4 ii fp-units-net-2.6.4 ii fp-units-rtl-2.6.4 ii fp-utils ii fp-utils-2.6.4 Can someone help? Best regards Norbert -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Unable to find file staticpackages.inc
On 13/03/15 16:50, Mattias Gaertner wrote: On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:48:16 +0100 Norbert Crettol norbert.cret...@gmail.com wrote: [...] I'm lost. Is that an purely Debian error? That might be. You can try our debian packages from http://sourceforge.net/projects/lazarus/?source=directory Since you already have FPC 2.6.4 you only need to uninstall the lazarus* packages and install our lazarus package. Thanks for the help. I've done it. Removed the Lazarus packages, kept back the fpc packages and installed the one you pointed me to. I've tried the same operation: installed new package lazdatadict and rebuild the IDE. After a while of compilation I got: Compiling package lazdatadict 0.0 completed components/lazutils/masks.pas(23,22)Fatal: Can't find unit contnrs used by Masks This sounds familiar to me. I think I got the same some years ago as I played with Lazarus for the first time. Anyway, I've to leave now. I'll keep tweaking with Lazarus next week. Best regards Norbert -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus