[Lazarus] [Possible BUG] Incompatible ppu
Hello, have an problem with detection of ppu compatibility. I'l describe my steps (shorted): 1) install fpcup 2) install fpc fixes_3_0_0 3) instal lazarus fixes_1_6 4) open package (postgresdac, with lot of changes) 5) at now, it was compiled ok 6) install this package 7) rebuild lazarus 8) open simple commandline apps, add one unist from package to uses 9) compile 10) app_server.lpr(13,3) Fatal: Cannot find PSQLDirectQuery used by app_server, incompatible ppu=C:\\i386-win32\PSQLDirectQuery.ppu, multiple packages: dclPostgresDACL, PostgresDACL This file is on disc at this place. When i delete them, recompile the package, the new one shows. So it seemslike bug i think. Sorry - i'm totally new to lazarus (moved from delphi and code typhon). I tried run lazarus from debugger (for debug compile process), but this way have a lot of error, which i didn't understand this time (new in lazarus). -- S pozdravem, Tomáš Emresz mailto:tomas.emr...@strankysnadno.cz -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] Possible bug in TFrame
To Whom It May Concern: I have detected a possible bug in the frames of Lazarus (1.0, 1.2.2, 1.3trunk) the problem manifests itself when the implemented component is embedded in frame and then try to run the program, which throws an error (The Control'' has no parent window), fortunately I don't have to send my code for some of their own components manifests. Please install the customdrawn package that comes with lazarus, create a frame insert one CDPageControl create CDTabSheet a page or two and then try to insert the frame within a form. It goes without saying that out of the frames components work perfectly . This is a bug already known?? Best Regards -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Possible bug?
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 06:58:16 +0100 Richard Mace richard.m...@gmail.com wrote: If you put a TPairSplitter on a form, then in the right sire add a TNotebook, then add a page, then add a memo that is anchored Top,Left and Right. When you resize the main form in design, the memo correctly wraps, but at runtime it doesn't. Is this a bug? Please create a bug report. Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] Possible bug?
If you put a TPairSplitter on a form, then in the right sire add a TNotebook, then add a page, then add a memo that is anchored Top,Left and Right. When you resize the main form in design, the memo correctly wraps, but at runtime it doesn't. Is this a bug? Richard -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Possible bug in TEdit, can somebody reproduce this?
This was caused by a wrong patch of me. It has been reverted, so it should work again. Sorry... Bart On 4/26/11, Alexsander Rosa alexsander.r...@gmail.com wrote: http://mantis.freepascal.org/view.php?id=19239 0019239: TEdit with CharCase = ecUpperCase causes alpha text to be typed in reverse It only happens with alpha text; numbers are ok. The caret is always moved to the 2nd position, so if you type ALEXSANDER the Edit ends with AREDNASXEL. An example project is attached. -- Atenciosamente, Alexsander da Rosa http://rednaxel.com -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Possible bug in TEdit, can somebody reproduce this?
http://mantis.freepascal.org/view.php?id=19239 0019239: TEdit with CharCase = ecUpperCase causes alpha text to be typed in reverse It only happens with alpha text; numbers are ok. The caret is always moved to the 2nd position, so if you type ALEXSANDER the Edit ends with AREDNASXEL. An example project is attached. -- Atenciosamente, Alexsander da Rosa http://rednaxel.com -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Possible bug in TEdit, can somebody reproduce this?
Bernd wrote: Before I file a bug, please somebody try and confirm: I can reproduce it using Lazarus 0.9.31 r30441. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Possible bug in TEdit, can somebody reproduce this?
Is the value of SelStart correct when you type over the selection? There were some changes handling this (for GTK2) in r26253 (issue #16678). Bart On 4/24/11, Vladimir Zhirov vvzh.li...@gmail.com wrote: Bernd wrote: Before I file a bug, please somebody try and confirm: I can reproduce it using Lazarus 0.9.31 r30441. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Possible bug in TEdit, can somebody reproduce this?
Bernd kirjoitti sunnuntai, 24. huhtikuuta 2011 02:01:55: Linux GTK2 Before I file a bug, please somebody try and confirm: Can't reproduce here. 64-bit Sabayon Linux, GTK2 2.0 (?) Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Possible bug in TEdit, can somebody reproduce this?
Can't reproduce it on Arch Linux with Lazarus 0.9.31 r30440M FPC 2.5.1 x86_64-linux-gtk 2 (2.22.0) Ido On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 02:01, Bernd prof7...@googlemail.com wrote: Linux GTK2 Before I file a bug, please somebody try and confirm: Steps to reproduce: 1: put a TEdit onto a form and compile and run the application (or alternatively just open one of the IDE's dialogs which contains a TEdit like for example refactor - rename) 2. write some text into it and then select a few characters in the middle of the word. For example I will write the text TFooBar into the TEdit and then select the three letters Foo. Then press any (printable) key. 3: I expect it to look like this (I have pressed X and the | marks the position of the caret), this is what I expect: TX|Bar 4. And this is what happens: TBX|ar It removes the Foo as expected but then jumps over the B and inserts after it. This is very annoying, its already slowly starting to influence the way I edit text in all other applications. Can somebody confirm this or is this again due to my old GTK2 version (GTK2 itself and pure GTK2 applications behave correctly). It does not happen in a combobox and also not in a TMemo, only in a TEdit. It used to work some months ago with the same GTK version, unfortunately I cannot say exactly which revision broke it, I did not update and use it for a few months, only started updating last few days again. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus LINESIP - Opening the source for communication http://www.linesip.com http://www.linesip.co.il -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Possible bug in TEdit, can somebody reproduce this?
Juha (gmail) kirjoitti sunnuntai, 24. huhtikuuta 2011 12:00:15: Bernd kirjoitti sunnuntai, 24. huhtikuuta 2011 02:01:55: Linux GTK2 Before I file a bug, please somebody try and confirm: Can't reproduce here. 64-bit Sabayon Linux, GTK2 2.0 (?) I again forgot how to check the version of GTK2. $ ldconfig -p | grep gtk shows (among other things): libgtk-1.2.so.0 (libc6) = /usr/lib32/libgtk-1.2.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 (libc6,x86-64) = /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 (libc6) = /usr/lib32/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so (libc6,x86-64) = /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so libgtk-x11-2.0.so (libc6) = /usr/lib32/libgtk-x11-2.0.so It can't be 2.0. Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Possible bug in TEdit, can somebody reproduce this?
It's not reproduceable on ArchLinux i386 with GTK+ 2.22.1 using Lazarus 0.9.31 r30449 (compiled with 2.4.2). On 24.04.2011 01:01, Bernd wrote: Linux GTK2 Before I file a bug, please somebody try and confirm: Steps to reproduce: 1: put a TEdit onto a form and compile and run the application (or alternatively just open one of the IDE's dialogs which contains a TEdit like for example refactor - rename) 2. write some text into it and then select a few characters in the middle of the word. For example I will write the text TFooBar into the TEdit and then select the three letters Foo. Then press any (printable) key. 3: I expect it to look like this (I have pressed X and the | marks the position of the caret), this is what I expect: TX|Bar 4. And this is what happens: TBX|ar It removes the Foo as expected but then jumps over the B and inserts after it. This is very annoying, its already slowly starting to influence the way I edit text in all other applications. Can somebody confirm this or is this again due to my old GTK2 version (GTK2 itself and pure GTK2 applications behave correctly). It does not happen in a combobox and also not in a TMemo, only in a TEdit. It used to work some months ago with the same GTK version, unfortunately I cannot say exactly which revision broke it, I did not update and use it for a few months, only started updating last few days again. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Possible bug in TEdit, can somebody reproduce this?
2011/4/24 Juha (gmail) juha.mannine...@gmail.com: I again forgot how to check the version of GTK2. pkg-config --modversion gtk+-2.0 2.12.9 -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Possible bug in TEdit, can somebody reproduce this?
I have filed a bug report: http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=19220 -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Possible bug in TEdit, can somebody reproduce this?
Bernd kirjoitti sunnuntai, 24. huhtikuuta 2011 14:03:08: 2011/4/24 Juha (gmail) juha.mannine...@gmail.com: I again forgot how to check the version of GTK2. pkg-config --modversion gtk+-2.0 2.12.9 Ok, it is 2.24.3 here. That makes the difference for the bug also I guess. Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Possible bug in TEdit, can somebody reproduce this?
Posted a possible fix in Mantis. Bart On 4/24/11, Juha (gmail) juha.mannine...@gmail.com wrote: Bernd kirjoitti sunnuntai, 24. huhtikuuta 2011 14:03:08: 2011/4/24 Juha (gmail) juha.mannine...@gmail.com: I again forgot how to check the version of GTK2. pkg-config --modversion gtk+-2.0 2.12.9 Ok, it is 2.24.3 here. That makes the difference for the bug also I guess. Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Possible bug in TEdit, can somebody reproduce this?
Is the value of SelStart correct when you type over the selection? There were some changes handling this (for GTK2) in r26253 (issue #16678). Yes, it looks correct (i.e. corresponds to visual cursor position). Given TFooBar example: (selecting Foo) T[Foo]Bar SelStart = 1 (pressing X) TBX|ar SelStart = 3 (Tested with GTK 2.16.6) -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] Possible bug in TEdit, can somebody reproduce this?
Linux GTK2 Before I file a bug, please somebody try and confirm: Steps to reproduce: 1: put a TEdit onto a form and compile and run the application (or alternatively just open one of the IDE's dialogs which contains a TEdit like for example refactor - rename) 2. write some text into it and then select a few characters in the middle of the word. For example I will write the text TFooBar into the TEdit and then select the three letters Foo. Then press any (printable) key. 3: I expect it to look like this (I have pressed X and the | marks the position of the caret), this is what I expect: TX|Bar 4. And this is what happens: TBX|ar It removes the Foo as expected but then jumps over the B and inserts after it. This is very annoying, its already slowly starting to influence the way I edit text in all other applications. Can somebody confirm this or is this again due to my old GTK2 version (GTK2 itself and pure GTK2 applications behave correctly). It does not happen in a combobox and also not in a TMemo, only in a TEdit. It used to work some months ago with the same GTK version, unfortunately I cannot say exactly which revision broke it, I did not update and use it for a few months, only started updating last few days again. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Possible bug in TEdit, can somebody reproduce this?
On 23/4/2011 20:01, Bernd wrote: Linux GTK2 Before I file a bug, please somebody try and confirm: Steps to reproduce: 1: put a TEdit onto a form and compile and run the application (or alternatively just open one of the IDE's dialogs which contains a TEdit like for example refactor - rename) 2. write some text into it and then select a few characters in the middle of the word. For example I will write the text TFooBar into the TEdit and then select the three letters Foo. Then press any (printable) key. 3: I expect it to look like this (I have pressed X and the | marks the position of the caret), this is what I expect: TX|Bar 4. And this is what happens: TBX|ar It removes the Foo as expected but then jumps over the B and inserts after it. This is very annoying, its already slowly starting to influence the way I edit text in all other applications. Can somebody confirm this I can confirm Luiz -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Possible bug in TEdit, can somebody reproduce this?
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 20:20:22 -0300 Luiz Americo Pereira Camara luiz...@oi.com.br wrote: On 23/4/2011 20:01, Bernd wrote: Linux GTK2 Before I file a bug, please somebody try and confirm: Steps to reproduce: 1: put a TEdit onto a form and compile and run the application (or alternatively just open one of the IDE's dialogs which contains a TEdit like for example refactor - rename) 2. write some text into it and then select a few characters in the middle of the word. For example I will write the text TFooBar into the TEdit and then select the three letters Foo. Then press any (printable) key. 3: I expect it to look like this (I have pressed X and the | marks the position of the caret), this is what I expect: TX|Bar 4. And this is what happens: TBX|ar It removes the Foo as expected but then jumps over the B and inserts after it. This is very annoying, its already slowly starting to influence the way I edit text in all other applications. Can somebody confirm this I can confirm Can you find the svn revision number that introduced this regression? That would help fixing the bug. Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Possible bug in TEdit, can somebody reproduce this?
Hi, On 24 April 2011 09:33, Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote: On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 20:20:22 -0300 Luiz Americo Pereira Camara luiz...@oi.com.br wrote: On 23/4/2011 20:01, Bernd wrote: Linux GTK2 Before I file a bug, please somebody try and confirm: Steps to reproduce: 1: put a TEdit onto a form and compile and run the application (or alternatively just open one of the IDE's dialogs which contains a TEdit like for example refactor - rename) 2. write some text into it and then select a few characters in the middle of the word. For example I will write the text TFooBar into the TEdit and then select the three letters Foo. Then press any (printable) key. 3: I expect it to look like this (I have pressed X and the | marks the position of the caret), this is what I expect: TX|Bar 4. And this is what happens: TBX|ar It removes the Foo as expected but then jumps over the B and inserts after it. This is very annoying, its already slowly starting to influence the way I edit text in all other applications. Can somebody confirm this I can confirm Can you find the svn revision number that introduced this regression? That would help fixing the bug. This bug does NOT occur in my Linux installation of Lazarus 0.9.31 with FPC 2.4.2 SVN rvn 30099. Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] Possible bug in TEdit, can somebody reproduce this?
Hi, On 24 April 2011 09:33, Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote: On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 20:20:22 -0300 Luiz Americo Pereira Camara luiz...@oi.com.br wrote: On 23/4/2011 20:01, Bernd wrote: Linux GTK2 Before I file a bug, please somebody try and confirm: Steps to reproduce: 1: put a TEdit onto a form and compile and run the application (or alternatively just open one of the IDE's dialogs which contains a TEdit like for example refactor - rename) 2. write some text into it and then select a few characters in the middle of the word. For example I will write the text TFooBar into the TEdit and then select the three letters Foo. Then press any (printable) key. 3: I expect it to look like this (I have pressed X and the | marks the position of the caret), this is what I expect: TX|Bar 4. And this is what happens: TBX|ar It removes the Foo as expected but then jumps over the B and inserts after it. This is very annoying, its already slowly starting to influence the way I edit text in all other applications. Can somebody confirm this I can confirm Can you find the svn revision number that introduced this regression? That would help fixing the bug. This bug does NOT occur in my Linux installation of Lazarus 0.9.31 with FPC 2.4.2 SVN rvn 30099. Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Possible bug in TEdit, can somebody reproduce this?
On 23/4/2011 20:33, Mattias Gaertner wrote: On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 20:20:22 -0300 Luiz Americo Pereira Camaraluiz...@oi.com.br wrote: On 23/4/2011 20:01, Bernd wrote: This is very annoying, its already slowly starting to influence the way I edit text in all other applications. Can somebody confirm this I can confirm Can you find the svn revision number that introduced this regression? That would help fixing the bug. No. I'm using Linux seldom. I first noticed this bug in the rename identifier dialog few weeks ago after a long time not updating lazarus in linux Luiz -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Possible bug in TEdit, can somebody reproduce this?
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote: On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 20:20:22 -0300 Luiz Americo Pereira Camara luiz...@oi.com.br wrote: I can confirm Can you find the svn revision number that introduced this regression? That would help fixing the bug. This bug does not occur in my WinXP installation of Lazarus 0.9.30.1 r29237 FPC 2.4.3 i386-win32-win32/win64 Marcos Douglas -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Possible bug
El sáb, 03-07-2010 a las 10:19 +0200, zeljko escribió: On Friday 02 July 2010 20:27, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote: El vie, 02-07-2010 a las 09:38 +0200, zeljko escribió: On Friday 02 July 2010 03:11, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote: El vie, 02-07-2010 a las 00:25 +0200, Mattias Gaertner escribió: On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:09:29 -0300 Leonardo M. Ramé l.r...@griensu.com wrote: What gtk version do you use? Can you try to find the svn revision that broke it? Mattias My libgtk2.0-0 is 2.20.1-0ubuntu2. Is that what do you need?. About trying to find which revision broke it, it's a difficult task, I think it could be easier to try to find and fix the bug, I don't have any problem in doing this. I don't think that's lazarus regression, but problem which raised with gtk2-2.20 (under Fedora 13 caret even doesn't blink).Some structures have been changed in gtk2 so that problem will become worst with every new gtk2 version if we don't do something in our gtk2 translated code. I cannot reproduce your problem with gtk2-2.12 / 2.18. zeljko I think it's a regression, or something with the x86_64 version, because I tested in Lazarus 0.9.28-8 i386 - SVN Rev. 22277 - FPC 2.4.0 and it doesn't have the same issue. No, it's not regression.I've fixed caret behaviour last night - it's problem (bug) with gtk2 theme under gnome.Caret blinks ok now. zeljko Thanks zelko. Now I don't know if this was caused by your change, but I can't compile packages, I'm getting this error:ç /usr/local/share/lazarus/components/codetools/laz2_xmlread.pas(1,1) Fatal: Can't find unit LazarusPackageIntf used by codetools -- Leonardo M. Ramé Griensu S.A. - Medical IT Córdoba Tel.: 0351-4247979 -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Possible bug (found what causes it)
I found what Package is causing this problem. If I remove AnchorDockingDsgn 0.5 the editor works correclty, so, this is what's causing the wrong behavior. -- Leonardo M. Ramé Griensu S.A. - Medical IT Córdoba Tel.: 0351-4247979 -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Possible bug (found what causes it)
On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 16:56:31 -0300 Leonardo M. Ramé l.r...@griensu.com wrote: I found what Package is causing this problem. If I remove AnchorDockingDsgn 0.5 the editor works correclty, so, this is what's causing the wrong behavior. Ah. In this case: The caret is vanishing correctly, because the focus is gone. The real bug is that the focus is not returned to the source editor under gtk2. It works under qt. It's on my todo list. Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Possible bug
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 22:11:25 -0300 Leonardo M. Ramé l.r...@griensu.com wrote: El vie, 02-07-2010 a las 00:25 +0200, Mattias Gaertner escribió: On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:09:29 -0300 Leonardo M. Ramé l.r...@griensu.com wrote: What gtk version do you use? Can you try to find the svn revision that broke it? Mattias My libgtk2.0-0 is 2.20.1-0ubuntu2. Is that what do you need?. Yes, thanks. About trying to find which revision broke it, it's a difficult task, No, it's a pretty simple a binary search. But it may take some time on slow computers/internet connections. I think it could be easier to try to find and fix the bug, I don't have any problem in doing this. Could someone point me to the sources that implement this feature?. I don't even know how do you call it, is it AutoCompletion?. Caret visibility state depends on focus, settings and timer, so it depends on code in synedit, LCL and gtk interface. Debugging something that depends on timer and focus is quite hard. That's why I suggest to try the binary search. Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Possible bug
On Friday 02 July 2010 03:11, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote: El vie, 02-07-2010 a las 00:25 +0200, Mattias Gaertner escribió: On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:09:29 -0300 Leonardo M. Ramé l.r...@griensu.com wrote: What gtk version do you use? Can you try to find the svn revision that broke it? Mattias My libgtk2.0-0 is 2.20.1-0ubuntu2. Is that what do you need?. About trying to find which revision broke it, it's a difficult task, I think it could be easier to try to find and fix the bug, I don't have any problem in doing this. I don't think that's lazarus regression, but problem which raised with gtk2-2.20 (under Fedora 13 caret even doesn't blink).Some structures have been changed in gtk2 so that problem will become worst with every new gtk2 version if we don't do something in our gtk2 translated code. I cannot reproduce your problem with gtk2-2.12 / 2.18. zeljko -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Possible bug
El vie, 02-07-2010 a las 09:38 +0200, zeljko escribió: On Friday 02 July 2010 03:11, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote: El vie, 02-07-2010 a las 00:25 +0200, Mattias Gaertner escribió: On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:09:29 -0300 Leonardo M. Ramé l.r...@griensu.com wrote: What gtk version do you use? Can you try to find the svn revision that broke it? Mattias My libgtk2.0-0 is 2.20.1-0ubuntu2. Is that what do you need?. About trying to find which revision broke it, it's a difficult task, I think it could be easier to try to find and fix the bug, I don't have any problem in doing this. I don't think that's lazarus regression, but problem which raised with gtk2-2.20 (under Fedora 13 caret even doesn't blink).Some structures have been changed in gtk2 so that problem will become worst with every new gtk2 version if we don't do something in our gtk2 translated code. I cannot reproduce your problem with gtk2-2.12 / 2.18. zeljko I think it's a regression, or something with the x86_64 version, because I tested in Lazarus 0.9.28-8 i386 - SVN Rev. 22277 - FPC 2.4.0 and it doesn't have the same issue. -- Leonardo M. Ramé Griensu S.A. - Medical IT Córdoba Tel.: 0351-4247979 -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Possible bug
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:09:29 -0300 Leonardo M. Ramé l.r...@griensu.com wrote: This bug is here since at least two weeks. Tested on Revision 26392 - Linux x86_64 - GTK2. I cannot reproduce this bug. Lucid 64-Bit same gtk2 version FPC 2.5.1 rev 15303 Lazarus rev 26392 and rev 26430 R. -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] Possible bug
Hi, I can't log-in to Mantis to report this. Please, if anyone can access create a report for this. The bug is this: When you press CTRL+SPACE after typing an object name in the editor, it shows its methods and properties (autocompletion, code insight, you_name_it), that's ok, but, when the user selects a property or method, the cursor disappears from the editor, instead of letting the user continue writing as it should. This bug is here since at least two weeks. Tested on Revision 26392 - Linux x86_64 - GTK2. -- Leonardo M. Ramé Griensu S.A. - Medical IT Córdoba Tel.: 0351-4247979 -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Possible bug
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:09:29 -0300 Leonardo M. Ramé l.r...@griensu.com wrote: Hi, I can't log-in to Mantis to report this. Please, if anyone can access create a report for this. The bug is this: When you press CTRL+SPACE after typing an object name in the editor, it shows its methods and properties (autocompletion, code insight, you_name_it), that's ok, but, when the user selects a property or method, the cursor disappears from the editor, instead of letting the user continue writing as it should. This bug is here since at least two weeks. Tested on Revision 26392 - Linux x86_64 - GTK2. What gtk version do you use? Can you try to find the svn revision that broke it? Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Possible bug
El vie, 02-07-2010 a las 00:25 +0200, Mattias Gaertner escribió: On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:09:29 -0300 Leonardo M. Ramé l.r...@griensu.com wrote: What gtk version do you use? Can you try to find the svn revision that broke it? Mattias My libgtk2.0-0 is 2.20.1-0ubuntu2. Is that what do you need?. About trying to find which revision broke it, it's a difficult task, I think it could be easier to try to find and fix the bug, I don't have any problem in doing this. Could someone point me to the sources that implement this feature?. I don't even know how do you call it, is it AutoCompletion?. -- Leonardo M. Ramé Griensu S.A. - Medical IT Córdoba Tel.: 0351-4247979 -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
