Re: [Lazarus] Contribute to a book instead of wiki?

2012-03-04 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 3 March 2012 22:37, Michael Van Canneyt  wrote:

 I type text, and latex makes a layout that is 99% perfect; I really don't
 care about the last 1%.
 I've never been able to achieve the same speed with any wordprocessor.

Make no mistake, latex makes beautiful documents (so can OpenOffice),
but it is not the  layout I have an issue with. My issue with latex is
simply to display certain characters. I often have to escape common
English characters, so that latex interprets them correctly. This is
what slows me down, and what obfuscates the text I am writing - and
most importantly, breaks my flow of information. I'm sure with years
of latex experience, like you have, those escaped characters and
obscure text you need to type to insert a table etc will come
naturally.

But the generalization that to create beautiful and complex documents,
is only possible when using latex, is just not true. OpenOffice is
perfectly capable, with a much lower learning curve. And if somebody
doesn't use styles in a OpenOffice document, they are at fault, not
the OpenOffice product.

-- 
Regards,
  - Graeme -


___
fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit
http://fpgui.sourceforge.net

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Contribute to a book instead of wiki?u

2012-03-04 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 3 March 2012 22:20, Marco van de Voort  wrote:

 With OO I'm always thinking about how I got the effect
 in that way. In Latex if I have something the way it
 should look, I at the same time have the way to duplicate it.

If the effect was applied using a Style (which is what you should
have used - just like you do in latex), then there is no problem. You
can export or copy a specific (or all) style from one document to
another.

latex comes with well defined styles out of the box. OpenOffice also
comes with styles out of the box - though not very well designed (from
a typographical point of view). Like I mentioned. I created well
designed styles and various document templates using those styles. So
I just double click the template for whatever document I want to write
(chapter, article, news letter etc) and away I go.


-- 
Regards,
  - Graeme -


___
fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit
http://fpgui.sourceforge.net

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Contribute to a book instead of wiki?

2012-03-04 Thread Michael Van Canneyt



On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:


On 3 March 2012 22:37, Michael Van Canneyt  wrote:


I type text, and latex makes a layout that is 99% perfect; I really don't
care about the last 1%.
I've never been able to achieve the same speed with any wordprocessor.


Make no mistake, latex makes beautiful documents (so can OpenOffice),
but it is not the  layout I have an issue with. My issue with latex is
simply to display certain characters. I often have to escape common
English characters, so that latex interprets them correctly. This is
what slows me down, and what obfuscates the text I am writing - and
most importantly, breaks my flow of information. I'm sure with years
of latex experience, like you have, those escaped characters and
obscure text you need to type to insert a table etc will come
naturally.

But the generalization that to create beautiful and complex documents,
is only possible when using latex, is just not true.


I didn't mean to state that either. I just wanted to say that 
for me personally, LaTeX works best.


I 100% agree with your statement about using styles, but will make the 
observation that 99% of all people I know does not know/use them in either 
MS-office or OO, and uses hand-crafted layout. Latex applies the styles
automatically, which is one of the reasons I forced it on the help writers 
here in the company.


Anyway, enough about wordprocessors :)

Michael.

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Contribute to a book instead of wiki?

2012-03-04 Thread Michael Van Canneyt



On Sat, 3 Mar 2012, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:


Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:

I type text, and latex makes a layout that is 99% perfect; I really don't 
care about the last 1%.

I've never been able to achieve the same speed with any wordprocessor.


I don't see a difference here. In a wordprocessor I define templates which 
can be applied to every section or paragraph, initially or later.


See my response to Graeme.

Michael.

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Contribute to a book instead of wiki?

2012-03-04 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On Sunday, 4 March 2012, Michael Van Canneyt michae.org wrote:


Latex applies the styles
 automatically, which is one of the reasons I forced it on the help
writers here in the company.

Technically, in is not done automatically. You have to tell latex that you
are working on a chapter, section, subsection etc. You also have to tell it
which type of document you are working with, so the correct styling can be
applied. That's exactly the same as in OpenOffice when you double click on
a style (but without having to escape English text characters). ;-)

But, like you educating your office, I like to educate people to use
OpenOffice (also applies to other products) correctly by using styles. It's
just a matter of  them changing some habits.


 Anyway, enough about wordprocessors :)

+1.:-)



Graeme.



-- 
Regards,
  - Graeme -


___
fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit
http://fpgui.sourceforge.net
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Contribute to a book instead of wiki?

2012-03-03 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
I've have to check the version for you when I am back at work on
Monday, but I think I have LibreOffice 3.5.0 (not 100% sure though).

-- 
Regards,
  - Graeme -


___
fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit
http://fpgui.sourceforge.net

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Contribute to a book instead of wiki?

2012-03-03 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 03/03/2012, Alexsander Rosa alexsander.r...@gmail.com wrote:
 The problem with secretary's editors like MS Word or Open/LibreOffice is
 that they waste user's time with formatting and other non-content related
 activities. With LaTeX and derivatives such as LyX, the user is free to be
 productive. When I was working on my MSc paper, ages ago, I wrote some 40
 pages in two months on Word, then converted it to LyX and created 40 more
 pages in just one week.


I have used LaTeX and OpenOffice many many
published articles and technical papers, project
specifications etc.

I can honestly say, in my experience LaTeX just
made me slower. I had to fight to figure out how
to get certain text to display correctly, because
it was constantly some or other reserved LaTeX
tag some something.

As for OpenOffice. I have created years ago
various templates for all the different type of
documents I need. They are all designed with Styles.
So no, I don't have to think about formatting
either, just what is the structure I am currenty
typing, and apply the correct (already available
style to it). My documents are well layed out and
formatted, with very little effort from my end.
I tend to write articles in 2 days (evenings really) and
they normally consist of so 11-18 pages.
Writting speed (meaning getting content from your
head to the computer / paper) is not affected by
the editor you use. Well, not in my case. I write
paragraphs as I think of ideas. Then once done,
I go back and rearrange chapters, paragraphs etc
and double click on the relevent Style to apply them.

I guess each writter works differently.

Regards,
  Graeme.













___

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Contribute to a book instead of wiki?u

2012-03-03 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
 I can honestly say, in my experience LaTeX just
 made me slower. I had to fight to figure out how
 to get certain text to display correctly, because
 it was constantly some or other reserved LaTeX
 tag some something.

For me it is the other way around. The main reason being if that if I have
something in a way that I like, copying it is really
easy (even if 1 year later).

With OO I'm always thinking about how I got the effect
in that way. In Latex if I have something the way it 
should look, I at the same time have the way to duplicate it.
 

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Contribute to a book instead of wiki?

2012-03-03 Thread Michael Van Canneyt



On Sat, 3 Mar 2012, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:


On 03/03/2012, Alexsander Rosa alexsander.r...@gmail.com wrote:

The problem with secretary's editors like MS Word or Open/LibreOffice is
that they waste user's time with formatting and other non-content related
activities. With LaTeX and derivatives such as LyX, the user is free to be
productive. When I was working on my MSc paper, ages ago, I wrote some 40
pages in two months on Word, then converted it to LyX and created 40 more
pages in just one week.



I have used LaTeX and OpenOffice many many
published articles and technical papers, project
specifications etc.

I can honestly say, in my experience LaTeX just
made me slower. I had to fight to figure out how
to get certain text to display correctly, because
it was constantly some or other reserved LaTeX
tag some something.


I believe that.

You should let latex worry about displaying the text correctly.

If you want everything placed just there with just that width 
and whatnot, then LaTeX is indeed not your tool, you need a desktop 
publishing tool.


I type text, and latex makes a layout that is 99% perfect; 
I really don't care about the last 1%.

I've never been able to achieve the same speed with any wordprocessor.

Michael.

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Contribute to a book instead of wiki?

2012-03-03 Thread Andrew Haines

On 03/03/2012 03:37 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:


If you want everything placed just there with just that width and
whatnot, then LaTeX is indeed not your tool, you need a desktop
publishing tool.

I type text, and latex makes a layout that is 99% perfect; I really
don't care about the last 1%.
I've never been able to achieve the same speed with any wordprocessor.

Michael.




I of course recommend WordPerfect though the Windows version never 
achieved the same usability as the dos version :)


Andrew


*waits for hail of arrows and stones*

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Contribute to a book instead of wiki?

2012-03-03 Thread Rich Saunders
On 3/3/12 4:14 PM, Andrew Haines wrote:
 I of course recommend WordPerfect though the Windows version never
 achieved the same usability as the dos version :)
+1000

I've even found the recent Windows versions to be equal to the DOS version.

Ignoring WordPerfect has been one of the biggest mistakes ever of the
greater Windows community.

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Contribute to a book instead of wiki?

2012-03-03 Thread Hans-Peter Diettrich

Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:

I type text, and latex makes a layout that is 99% perfect; I really 
don't care about the last 1%.

I've never been able to achieve the same speed with any wordprocessor.


I don't see a difference here. In a wordprocessor I define templates 
which can be applied to every section or paragraph, initially or later.


DoDi


--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Contribute to a book instead of wiki?

2012-03-02 Thread Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
graemeg.li...@gmail.com wrote:
 Trying to do a 'svn diff' might be an issue. Git has a filter that
 converts ODT files to text before it shows such a diff, so in Git it
 is not a problem either. I don't know if svn supports such a feature.

If you use tortoiseSVN it does support showing the differences between
document files. I was amazed when I first saw and it clearly something
new (maybe 1 or 2 years, dont know)

-- 
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Contribute to a book instead of wiki?

2012-03-02 Thread Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com wrote:
 If you use tortoiseSVN it does support showing the differences between
 document files. I was amazed when I first saw and it clearly something
 new (maybe 1 or 2 years, dont know)

Oh yes, and it shows them grafically, not as raw text.

-- 
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Contribute to a book instead of wiki?

2012-03-02 Thread Lukasz Sokol
On 02/03/2012 09:04, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
 On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
 felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com wrote:
 If you use tortoiseSVN it does support showing the differences between
 document files. I was amazed when I first saw and it clearly something
 new (maybe 1 or 2 years, dont know)
 
 Oh yes, and it shows them grafically, not as raw text.
 

AFAIMR, ODF files are essentially compacted XML; 

Lukasz


--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Contribute to a book instead of wiki?

2012-03-02 Thread leledumbo
 Oh yes, and it shows them grafically, not as raw text. 

Now that's something I don't know :)

--
View this message in context: 
http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-Contribute-to-a-book-instead-of-wiki-tp3789922p3793507.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - Lazarus mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Contribute to a book instead of wiki?

2012-03-02 Thread Alexsander Rosa
I suggest convert it to LyX format.

2012/3/2 leledumbo leledumbo_c...@yahoo.co.id

  Oh yes, and it shows them grafically, not as raw text.

 Now that's something I don't know :)

 --
 View this message in context:
 http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-Contribute-to-a-book-instead-of-wiki-tp3789922p3793507.html
 Sent from the Free Pascal - Lazarus mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

 --
 ___
 Lazarus mailing list
 Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
 http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus




-- 
Atenciosamente,
Alexsander da Rosa
http://rednaxel.com
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Contribute to a book instead of wiki?

2012-03-02 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
2012/3/2 Alexsander Rosa :
 I suggest convert it to LyX format.

No need really. The newer OpenOffice and LibreOffice also supports the
Flattened ODT format (older versions of OOo can install the plugin for
this too). That is basically just an XML file (no zip archive like
ODT). This makes it much better for version control systems to manage
document revisions and patches. I'm not sure how Flattened ODT handles
images though, but then again, for any large documents (like a book)
it is anyway recommended (think of it as best practice) to link to
images, and not embed images.


-- 
Regards,
  - Graeme -


___
fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit
http://fpgui.sourceforge.net

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Contribute to a book instead of wiki?

2012-03-02 Thread Alexsander Rosa
The problem with secretary's editors like MS Word or Open/LibreOffice is
that they waste user's time with formatting and other non-content related
activities. With LaTeX and derivatives such as LyX, the user is free to be
productive. When I was working on my MSc paper, ages ago, I wrote some 40
pages in two months on Word, then converted it to LyX and created 40 more
pages in just one week.

2012/3/2 Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com

 2012/3/2 Alexsander Rosa :
  I suggest convert it to LyX format.

 No need really. The newer OpenOffice and LibreOffice also supports the
 Flattened ODT format (older versions of OOo can install the plugin for
 this too). That is basically just an XML file (no zip archive like
 ODT). This makes it much better for version control systems to manage
 document revisions and patches. I'm not sure how Flattened ODT handles
 images though, but then again, for any large documents (like a book)
 it is anyway recommended (think of it as best practice) to link to
 images, and not embed images.


 --
 Regards,
  - Graeme -


 ___
 fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit
 http://fpgui.sourceforge.net

 --
 ___
 Lazarus mailing list
 Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
 http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus




-- 
Atenciosamente,
Alexsander da Rosa
http://rednaxel.com
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Contribute to a book instead of wiki?

2012-03-02 Thread Marc Santhoff
Am Freitag, den 02.03.2012, 23:49 +0200 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
 2012/3/2 Alexsander Rosa :
  I suggest convert it to LyX format.
 
 No need really. The newer OpenOffice and LibreOffice also supports the
 Flattened ODT format (older versions of OOo can install the plugin for
 this too). That is basically just an XML file (no zip archive like
 ODT). 

I just aksed for this feature elsewhere, it has been in and out an seems
to be in again. Do you now which version is necessary? (My last test was
done on 3.0 or 3.2 or so)

-- 
Marc Santhoff m.santh...@web.de


--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Contribute to a book instead of wiki?

2012-03-01 Thread Reinier Olislagers
On 1-3-2012 12:05, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
 Reinier Olislagers schrieb:
 Hi list,

 Noticed some people said they don't want to contribute to the Lazarus
 wiki for various reasons.

 If those people want to contribute their knowledge and help others with
 it, there are alternatives,
 
 Essentially the same problem: where to search for existing documentation?
I don't really see your problem.

What do you mean with existing documentation? Link/refer from the book
to the wiki and vice versa.

Also - haven't checked - the licenses of book  wiki may very well be
compatible, so it would be possible to copy over stuff literally
(instead of rephrasing it).

Regards,
Reinier

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Contribute to a book instead of wiki?

2012-03-01 Thread Hans-Peter Diettrich

Reinier Olislagers schrieb:


Essentially the same problem: where to search for existing documentation?

I don't really see your problem.

What do you mean with existing documentation? Link/refer from the book
to the wiki and vice versa.


Okay, so far, but how many documentation sources will be linked, and how 
to determine which of these links to follow? Scattering information into 
many places is not a good idea, when it comes to searching for specific 
topics.


DoDi


--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Contribute to a book instead of wiki?

2012-03-01 Thread Reinier Olislagers
On 1-3-2012 16:54, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
 Reinier Olislagers schrieb:
 
 Essentially the same problem: where to search for existing
 documentation?
 I don't really see your problem.

 What do you mean with existing documentation? Link/refer from the book
 to the wiki and vice versa.
 
 Okay, so far, but how many documentation sources will be linked, and how
 to determine which of these links to follow? Scattering information into
 many places is not a good idea, when it comes to searching for specific
 topics.

Well, I don't know but saying there's more information to be found at
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal would be sufficient... but it's not up to me.

And I DON'T mean to suggest you should write part of a book with links
to the wiki all over the place. Otherwise, why write a book ;)

You complained the wiki is a poor format to store help in, so I just
wanted to show you an alternative: put your information in a book.
That's all.

Regards,
Reinier

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Contribute to a book instead of wiki?

2012-03-01 Thread leledumbo
The book seems to be written with OpenOffice.org / LibreOffice, that would be
difficult to track changes.

--
View this message in context: 
http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-Contribute-to-a-book-instead-of-wiki-tp3789922p3792385.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - Lazarus mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus