Re: [leaf-user] Name resolution (dnscache?) difficulty, on the firewall only - RESOLVED

2004-05-05 Thread freeman
Mike Noyes wrote:

Scott,
The list is configured this way on purpose. 

Yeah, I know :(

It's a way to error on the
side of least harmful user action. Would you rather mistakenly post
private information to the whole list, or occasionally forget to
reply-to-all/reply-to-list?
 

I guess because I am subscribed to so many yahoo groups, where the 
default reply goes to the list, I am accustomed to it and act 
accordingly. I _very_ rarely have cause to reply-all; but I often find 
myself having to re-send a reply (to include this /this/ list) because I 
omitted doing that in the first place. Arguably carelessness on my part 
by not checking the To: field, before clicking 'Send'.

Though I would argue that if I receive a msg via a list, I ought expect 
(and act accordingly) that my reply would go to the same list - after 
all, I got the msg due to my being a member of the list and not because 
someone emailed me privately. I.E. If I'm sending private/sensitive info 
I _do_ double check the To: list, but not as a matter of course.

I do agree that it is an opportunity/cost trade-off. The cost is (at 
least) that a constructive reply (solution to my problem!) such as 
Victor's might go to me alone and the list would not benefit (unless 
Victor remembered, and went to the trouble, to ensure the list was among 
his reply-to).

I would not have expected that anyone's _reply_ to a post would contain 
sensitive info?! Possibly the original post, but not someone's reply so 
maybe I don't see the 'danger' (of default reply-to going to the list) 
being as significant as you.

I guess that my experience is that I often forget to reply-all for this 
LEAF group, and nearly never, ever post publicly when I intended a 
private reply (for all the other groups).

As I understand this is a contentious issue and has been decided upon, 
and I respect the right of the administrators to make this decision (and 
hugely, appreciate the time and trouble of the administrators to setup  
run the list). But respectfully I would disagree with the trade-off.

Thanks Mike (et al), for all your fantastic LEAF work - no disagreement 
there, methinks :)

scott; canada

PS: I _almost_ forgot to adjust /this/ reply ... jeepers, I'm dense...

PPS: I Changed the reply-to on this msg to be the LEAF list - please 
point out to me if this is improper, impolite or unwelcome. I won't do 
it again if so, but I'd prefer people's replies to my posts go to the 
list for the elucidation of all.



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. 
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. 
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149alloc_id=8166op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] vpn capability router

2004-05-05 Thread Erich Titl
Hi

At 12:12 05.05.2004 +0800, chiew yock sang wrote:
I'm currently studying, my lecturer asked me to do a router with VPN capability with 
floppy disk(s). I have tried a for quite long and still haven get the result. I don't 
know what has gone wrong.

Can anyone show me the proper way to start? I'm willing to start all over again to 
make sure I'm in the right track.

You can use any floppy based distribution from http://download.sourceforge.net/leaf/ . 
I would suggest to either take the latest Bering uClibc or Bering 1.2.

Then, you will have to dig into the docs for the set up. Most reports I read was that 
the LEAF box is up within a few hours.

cheers
Erich


THINK 
Püntenstrasse 39 
8143 Stallikon 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024 8D8A B7D4 FF9D 05B8 0A16




---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149alloc_id66op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] RFE, Details of my hack: Storing different LEAF setups in different h/d folders

2004-05-05 Thread freeman
I moved back to a HD setup because I was doing some testing and changes 
which required frequent reboots.

What I also decided to do was have some different folders on my HD, to 
keep various different configs. It has worked quite well for me so my 
RFE is this: do the powers to be see any merit for built-in support for 
the .LRP packages living within a subfolder of the storage partition, 
instead of the root folder of this partition? I suspect that I'm nearly 
unique in my desire and employment of this. If not, this following info 
might be helpful to others...

This is what I found worked (for my Bering 1.2 setup). Please note that 
I use a separate lrpkg.cfg file, as opposed to the singular syslinux.cfg.
   These files /have/ to live in the root of the the storage partition 
(no simple work-around that I found):
   initrd.lrp
   ldlinux.sys
   linux
   lrpkg.cfg
   syslinux.cfg
   syslinux.dpy
   ... the only one that _might_ concern you here is initrd.lrp, but 
even that one is ever-so-rarely changed so it will probably be the same 
for all your different configs. All the rest of the .LRP files can live 
within an individualized sub-folder.

   So say you have a folder SOME_DIR on your h/d. Here's 1) how to tell 
LEAF where to find the .LRP files, and 2) how to make backing up happen 
properly (the tougher part).

   1) Simple - have the folder name as part of the .LRP filename within 
lrpkg.cfg, e.g.:
  
SOME_DIR/root,SOME_DIR/etc,SOME_DIR/local,SOME_DIR/modules,SOME_DIR/iptables,SOME_DIR/ppp, 
etc...

   2) Make these changes:
  a) - to the file /etc/profile add in the lines:
   export HD_DIR=SOME_DIR
   mkdir /tmp/$HD_DIR 2/dev/nul
   mkdir /var/lib/lrpkg/$HD_DIR 2/dev/nul
   mkdir /var/lib/lrpkg/$HD_DIR/mnt
   cp /var/lib/lrpkg/* /var/lib/lrpkg/$HD_DIR/. 2/dev/nul
  - this sets an environment variable so other scripts know 
what the folder_name is ('export'). It will get set anytime that you 
login, which you must do before you do a backup! It also makes the 
necessary folder names and copies the package info to a dedicated 
folder. This is probably excessive but it's what I settled on and it 
worked for me.

  b) Adjust the backup script, /usr/sbin/lrcfg.back.script:
- Change
   INCLUDE=/tmp/INCLUDE
  To
   INCLUDE=/tmp/$HD_DIR/INCLUDE
- Change
   EXCLUDE=/tmp/EXCLUDE
  To
   EXCLUDE=/tmp/$HD_DIR/EXCLUDE
- Change
   TMP_EXCLUDE=/tmp/TMP_EXCLUDE
  To
   TMP_EXCLUDE=/tmp/$HD_DIR/TMP_EXCLUDE
- Change
   cat /var/lib/lrpkg/*.list /var/lib/lrpkg/*.links 
$TMP_EXCLUDE
  To
   cat /var/lib/lrpkg/$HD_DIR/*.list 
/var/lib/lrpkg/$HD_DIR/*.links $TMP_EXCLUDE

- Below
   [ $PACKAGE = root ]  cat  $TMP_EXCLUDE  
$EXCLUDE
  Add
   [ $PACKAGE = $HD_DIR/root ]  cat  $TMP_EXCLUDE  
$EXCLUDE

   That should be it. I agree, my use of $HD_DIR beneath 
/var/lib/lrpkg, etc, is probably unnecessary but it's where I ended up.

   A precautionary tale: Backup your .LRP packages elsewhere before 
trying this. If something's amiss you may overwrite a valid .LRP package 
with an empty one. The way I verify I'm setup properly is that the 
'C'onfirm Writes=On, and when I backup a .LRP I verify that the new 
package is about the same size as the old one.

   How to make it all easy to change between different configs: The 
only thing different, from a boot-up standpoint, is that I have various 
lrpkg.XXX files in my root folder, and copy them over the lrpkg.cfg file 
to tell LEAF where my current setup is. After a new setup boots up I 
have to change the HD_DIR var within /etc/profile, save the file (but 
don't backup yet), re-login (so the updated HD_DIR is now live) ... then 
I can go in and backup my LEAF packages.

   I created some scripts to:
   - mount the h/d
   - copy over the adjusted lrpkg.XXX file onto \lrpkg.cfg
   - unmount the h/d
   - reboot
  and voila! I have a quick  easy way to switch between different 
configs. It's really, really nice  sweet, once it's setup.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

I tried to make the HD_DIR issue invisible to LEAF by mucking with 
syslinux.cfg but got no success. Specifically, what doesn't work (or at 
least not for me):
   Within syslinux.cfg, trying something like:
  default... init=/SOME_DIR/linuxrc ...
 or
  default... boot=/dev/hda1/SOME_DIR:msdos ...
 or
  default... PKGPATH=/dev/hda1/SOME_DIR ...
   My experience was that all these options had to point to the root of 
a partition (or rather, a partition 'proper' if you prefer).

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

So, is there any interest in the LEAF developers to include subfolder 
support for storing .LRP packages? I'd spend 

[leaf-user] BadThing: Doc links broken (404) at leaf.sourceforge.net

2004-05-05 Thread freeman
Mucho links are broken in the doc section of the LEAF website. To reproduce:
   - visit:
   http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
   - at left, click on 'Documentation'; this takes us to:
  http://leaf.sourceforge.net/mod.php?mod=userpagemenu=13page_id=6
   - Click on 'Guides'; this takes us to:
  http://leaf.sourceforge.net/mod.php?mod=userpagemenu=1301page_id=10
   All guides (excepting two for WISP) come up as 404, e.g.:
  http://leaf.sourceforge.net/doc/guide/binstall.html
   HowTo's and ManualPages are similarly miscreant. FAQ's seem to be OK.

   Not complaining, just bringing it to the attention of those who can 
fix it. :)

   Thanks for LEAF!

scott; canada



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. 
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. 
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149alloc_id=8166op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] RFE, Details of my hack: Storing different LEAF setups in different h/d folders

2004-05-05 Thread Erich Titl
Hi scott

At 05:57 05.05.2004 -0400, freeman wrote:
...
  b) Adjust the backup script, /usr/sbin/lrcfg.back.script:
- Change
   INCLUDE=/tmp/INCLUDE
  To
   INCLUDE=/tmp/$HD_DIR/INCLUDE

- Change
   EXCLUDE=/tmp/EXCLUDE
  To
   EXCLUDE=/tmp/$HD_DIR/EXCLUDE

- Change
   TMP_EXCLUDE=/tmp/TMP_EXCLUDE
  To
   TMP_EXCLUDE=/tmp/$HD_DIR/TMP_EXCLUDE

- Change
   cat /var/lib/lrpkg/*.list /var/lib/lrpkg/*.links $TMP_EXCLUDE
  To
   cat /var/lib/lrpkg/$HD_DIR/*.list /var/lib/lrpkg/$HD_DIR/*.links 
 $TMP_EXCLUDE

- Below
   [ $PACKAGE = root ]  cat  $TMP_EXCLUDE  $EXCLUDE
  Add
   [ $PACKAGE = $HD_DIR/root ]  cat  $TMP_EXCLUDE  $EXCLUDE

Why do you need to make temporary files dependent on HD_DIR?


   That should be it. I agree, my use of $HD_DIR beneath /var/lib/lrpkg, etc, is 
 probably unnecessary but it's where I ended up.

see above.


   A precautionary tale: Backup your .LRP packages elsewhere before trying this. If 
 something's amiss you may overwrite a valid .LRP package with an empty one. The way 
 I verify I'm setup properly is that the 'C'onfirm Writes=On, and when I backup a 
 .LRP I verify that the new package is about the same size as the old one.

   How to make it all easy to change between different configs: The only thing 
 different, from a boot-up standpoint, is that I have various lrpkg.XXX files in my 
 root folder, and copy them over the lrpkg.cfg file to tell LEAF where my current 
 setup is. After a new setup boots up I have to change the HD_DIR var within 
 /etc/profile, save the file (but don't backup yet), re-login (so the updated HD_DIR 
 is now live) ... then I can go in and backup my LEAF packages.

Couldn't you pass a parameter to linuxrc through the bootloader, possibly using GRUB?

cheers
Erich

THINK 
Püntenstrasse 39 
8143 Stallikon 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024 8D8A B7D4 FF9D 05B8 0A16




---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149alloc_id66op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


RE: [leaf-user] Routing Question

2004-05-05 Thread Rob Asher
Joey,
I personally only have experience with the 3Com 3CRDW696 PCI 
card.  It's worked great so far with Bering-uClibc 2.1 but I've only had it 
running for a couple of weeks now in testing.  I've also had it working on 
Pebble and RH9 in between my searches for info on how to setup Bering as an 
AP.  You can look for some compatible cards at 
http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Jean_Tourrilhes/Linux/Linux.Wireless.drivers.802.11b.html#Prism2 
There may be a more complete list of prism2+ cards elsewhere though.  A 
quick google of prism2 card list turned up this one 
http://www.personaltelco.net/index.cgi/Prism2Card and several others that 
might be helpful.

Good luck,
Rob
At 11:59 PM 05/04/04, Joey Officer wrote:


I'm currently testing with a Belkin (read: barely working) 802.11b card.
Based off of admtek 8211 chipset.  Finally got a stable link tonight,
however what my ultimate goal is to setup my leaf box as an access point.
Can you recommend a specific prism card to use?  I have no current
investment, so anything I begin to purchase can be planned.
Thanks for the links, I'll be sure to browse them tonight and research.

Joey

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rob Asher
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 8:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Routing Question
At 10:23 AM 05/01/04, Ray Olszewski wrote:

At 07:46 AM 5/1/2004 -0500, Joey Officer wrote:
 Forgive my ignorance, but I have what seems to be a very simple question.
I
 have a wireless card that I'm still attempting to setup, and while I
think I
 have the link issues corrected, I do have some questions about the
routing
 itself.
 
 My configuration is as follows:
 
 eth0 : internet/dhcp
 eth1 : wired local network 192.168.1.254
 eth2 : wireless network (current IP 10.10.55.254 - can be configured
 differently)
 
 What I want to do is to setup an open wireless gateway that will allow
 anyone in the area to use the wireless connection, but only after
 registerring.  Basically I want to forward any requests to a site on my
 bering box that says something like, hey its free, just tell me who you
are
 and I'll add you, after that they would be able to get through.
 
 Has anyone configured this type of setup?  Is there anything I should be
 paying attention to.  One thing that is important is that I don't want
the
 eth2 traffic to be able to get to my local wired LAN, on eth1.

The old hand Linux application for approximately this purpose is called
NoCat; find it at NoCat.net . A Google search (wifi public access linux)
just now found a custom distro called PublicIP (http://www.publicip.net/)
that builds on NoCat.

My hunch (based partly on some work I did about 2 years ago on a similar
idea, but one involving charging usage fees) is that the required
infrastructure is a bit large for LEAF, particularly the parts needed for
reliable user authentication. But I haven't actually tried anything like
this in quite some time, so I may be unaware of newer solutions to some of
the problems.
If you have a Prism2+ based card, the HostAP - http://hostap.epitest.fi/
driver has worked great for me on Bering-uClibc 2.1 as an access
point.  There are alot of other things that can be done with this card and
driver that might be what you're looking for.  While not based off
LEAF/Bering, you might look into some alternative options like Pebble -
http://www.nycwireless.net/pebble/   or hack this modified version of
Pebble that runs off hard disk to suit your needs -
http://www.burngreave.net/~aland/it/bcan/ .  The stock Pebble includes
NoCat and from the sound of what you're wanting, I'd agree that it might be
exactly what you're looking for.  And yet more info for options with the
HostAP driver if that is the card that you have -
http://trekweb.com/~jasonb/articles/hostap_20030727.shtml .
HTH,
Rob


--
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 7.0.240 / Virus Database: 262.9.15 - Release Date: 05/04/04


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. 
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. 
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149alloc_id=8166op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re:[leaf-user] vpn capability router

2004-05-05 Thread Doug Hite
If I were pressed on time, I would do this - 

Use Bering 1.2 stock.
Set up 1 router, and get it working.
add the ifconfig and openvpn packages as found here -
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/packages/
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net/Packages.htm 

add tun.o as found here -
http://download.sourceforge.net/leaf/Bering_1.2_modules_2.4.20.tar.gz

Set up openvpn using the instructions here and here -
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/doc/guide/buopenvpn.html 
http://www.shorewall.net/OPENVPN.html 

Duplicate to 2nd router, and adjust configuration.

I set up a test vpn using these steps in about an hour.  Its very easy if 
you have experience with LEAF.  

Things to watch out for -
1) Watch the size on the disk - you will need to remove unused packages
2) In setting up the VPN, use shorewall clear and get it working, then
reactivate the firewall and test again.
3) If you follow the shorewall steps exactly - the firewall will not have 
access to the vpn, so testing connection from the firewall to the remote
vpn may not be the best place to do it.  Use clients behind the
firewall, or open up access.

Doug

I'm currently studying, my lecturer asked me to do a router with VPN 
capability with floppy disk(s). I have tried a for quite long and still 
haven get the result. I don't know what has gone wrong.

Can anyone show me the proper way to start? I'm willing to start all over 
again to make sure I'm in the right track.

I'm just hoping I can finish this project on time.

Thanks.




---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149alloc_id66op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] BadThing: Doc links broken (404) atleaf.sourceforge.net

2004-05-05 Thread Mike Noyes
On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 09:15, ALParada wrote:
 There are still several links not working. How-To, Manuals and the lrp
 mirror site. Did it fail or is it just me?

Everyone,
The documentation auto-built properly.

http://leaf-project.org/doc/

There are known problems with our website at this time. I'm working on
an upgrade.

Al,
What issue are you seeing? Be specific. Generic it doesn't work
statements aren't very useful in diagnosing problems.

Note: the problems you are seeing may not be addressed until the
new website is put in place.

-- 
Mike Noyes mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
SF.net Projects: ffl, leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm, sitedocs



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson  Lucent use to 
deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] BadThing: Doc links broken (404)atleaf.sourceforge.net

2004-05-05 Thread ALParada
Sorry, didn't think I needed to be specific since someone else commented on
the problem already.

These links come up with HTTP 404 file not found.

http://leaf.sourceforge.net/mod.php?mod=userpagemenu=1302page_id=11
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/mod.php?mod=userpagemenu=1303page_id=12
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/thc/


- Original Message - 
From: Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 1:14 PM
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] BadThing: Doc links broken
(404)atleaf.sourceforge.net


 On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 09:15, ALParada wrote:
  There are still several links not working. How-To, Manuals and the lrp
  mirror site. Did it fail or is it just me?

 Everyone,
 The documentation auto-built properly.

 http://leaf-project.org/doc/

 There are known problems with our website at this time. I'm working on
 an upgrade.

 Al,
 What issue are you seeing? Be specific. Generic it doesn't work
 statements aren't very useful in diagnosing problems.

 Note: the problems you are seeing may not be addressed until the
 new website is put in place.

 -- 
 Mike Noyes mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net
 http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
 SF.net Projects: ffl, leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm, sitedocs



 ---
 This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
 Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson  Lucent use to
 deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
 http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3
 
 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
 SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson  Lucent use to 
deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] BadThing: Doc links broken (404)atleaf.sourceforge.net

2004-05-05 Thread Mike Noyes
On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 10:45, ALParada wrote:
 Sorry, didn't think I needed to be specific since someone else commented on
 the problem already.

Al,
Thanks for supplying detailed information.

 These links come up with HTTP 404 file not found.
 
 http://leaf.sourceforge.net/mod.php?mod=userpagemenu=1302page_id=11
 http://leaf.sourceforge.net/mod.php?mod=userpagemenu=1303page_id=12

These two issues won't be addressed at this time. The will be addressed
when our new website becomes available. I apologize for any
inconvenience this has caused you.

 http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/thc/

Our lrp.c0wz.org mirror was archived and taken off-line. This was done
in preparation for our new website structure. You can download the
archived website here:

http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/leaf/website_lrp-c0wz-com.tar.gz?download

Other developer websites that were also archived are available here:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=13751package_id=11519release_id=124474

-- 
Mike Noyes mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
SF.net Projects: ffl, leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm, sitedocs



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson  Lucent use to 
deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] BadThing: Doc links broken (404)atleaf.sourceforge.net

2004-05-05 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
Mike Noyes wrote:

snip
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/thc/
Our lrp.c0wz.org mirror was archived and taken off-line. This was done
in preparation for our new website structure. You can download the
archived website here:
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/leaf/website_lrp-c0wz-com.tar.gz?download
Or you could use my mirrors of the c0wz site:
http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net/   (Slow SDSL)
http://c0wz2.steinkuehler.net/  (Fast CoLo)
Other developer websites that were also archived are available here:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=13751package_id=11519release_id=124474
My developer site is still available at:
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net/(slow)
http://lrp2.steinkuehler.net/   (fast)
Mike:  Any interest in me keeping the rest of the developer tree online 
as a website (so folks don't have to download a huge tarball for a 
single file or two)?  I could do this pretty easily, and it shouldn't 
take any more webspace than it was taking before (when it was part of 
the SF web site I was mirroring anyway).

--
Charles Steinkuehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson  Lucent use to 
deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] Thinkpad 755C boot problem

2004-05-05 Thread isandro belli
Hello again,


I managed to get the boot process finishing,
( 1.68MB floppy, Bering 2.4.16, thinkpad 755C,
2 3com589D PCMCIA net cards, 20MB RAM)

i found out that I had to put

append floppy=thinkpad

just after

default linux



Now

I'm trying to finish with this installation
and I'm currently stuck with the eth0-eth1 not been
connected, and not responding to ping either.

I think it is a problem of interrupt not being
tied to the PCMCIA cards, altough the card's LEDs lit up.
(but not the LEDs on the switch and the dlink router)


my network is like this:
  ----
  !PCMCIA  !!PCMCIA  !
  !   3com589D !!   3com589C !
inet   192.168.0.1!eth0 192.168.0.2!!eth1 192.168.1.254
___dlink_IBM 755Cswitch___PC
firewall/router !  Bering  !  !PC
!--!


I put the 4 PCMCIA modules (3c589_cs, ds, i82365, pcmcia_core) into

 /boot/lib/modules


then set /etc/network/interfaces with:

auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
 address 192.168.0.2
 network 192.168.0.0
 netmask 255.255.255.0

auto eth1
iface eth1 inet static
 address 192.168.1.254
 network 192.168.1.0
 netmask 255.255.255.0

then set   /etc/hosts  with:

192.168.0.1 localhost
192.168.1.254 firewall

_DON'T KNOW WHAT TO PUT INTO_   /etc/hosts  /etc/resolv.conf :

nameserver 127.0.0.1  ???
nameserver 192.168.1.254  ???


cat /proc/interrupts gives:

0:   478326 XT-PIC timer
1:   329XT-PIC keyboard
2:   0  XT-PIC cascade
8:   1  XT-PIC rtc
NMI: 0
ERR: 0

the boot process gives:

snip
   isa to PCMCIA port 0x3e0 ofs 0x00
   isa irqs (scanned) = 4 5 7 9

validating interfaces file...
Error:invalid zone (local) in record:
local eth1 192.168.1.255
terminated

snip

there's no message from Intel PCIC probe

lsmod gives:

ip_nat_irc  0 (unused)
ip_nat_ftp  0 (unused)
ip_conntrack_irc1
ip_conntrack_ftp1
3c589_cs0 unused
ds  0 [3c589_cs]
i82365  2
pcmcia_core 0 [3c589_cs ds i82365]

ip address gives:

1: lo: LOOPBACK,UP mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 brd 127.255.255.255 scope host lo
2: dummy0: BROADCAST,NOARP mtu 1500 qdisc noop
link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff



hoping for some more help...

roberto




Find what you are looking for with the Lycos Yellow Pages
http://r.lycos.com/r/yp_emailfooter/http://yellowpages.lycos.com/default.asp?SRC=lycos10


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson  Lucent use to 
deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] Can't mount usb flash drive

2004-05-05 Thread ALParada
Hello Everyone,

Trying to mount a usb flash drive with little luck. I have added the usb and
scsi files to lib/modules and etc/modules. I see the device under
/proc/bus/usb/devices and I see no errors under /var/log/messages. It seems
to be picked up and assigned but when I try to mount it I get  Mounting
/dev/sdaX on /usb failed: No such file or directory. Any ideas?

TIA

dmesg
---
usb.c: registered new driver usbdevfs
usb.c: registered new driver hub
usb-uhci.c: $Revision: 1.275 $ time 21:01:10 Feb 11 2004
usb-uhci.c: High bandwidth mode enabled
PCI: Found IRQ 9 for device 00:07.2
PCI: Sharing IRQ 9 with 00:10.0
usb-uhci.c: USB UHCI at I/O 0x1800, IRQ 9
usb-uhci.c: Detected 2 ports
usb.c: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1
hub.c: USB hub found
hub.c: 2 ports detected
usb-uhci.c: v1.275:USB Universal Host Controller Interface driver
SCSI subsystem driver Revision: 1.00
Initializing USB Mass Storage driver...
usb.c: registered new driver usb-storage
USB Mass Storage support registered.
hub.c: new USB device 00:07.2-2, assigned address 2
scsi0 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices
  Vendor: 64MB  Model: HardDrive Rev: 1.88
  Type:   Direct-Access  ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Attached scsi removable disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0
SCSI device sda: 128000 512-byte hdwr sectors (66 MB)
sda: Write Protect is off
Partition check:
 sda: sda1
WARNING: USB Mass Storage data integrity not assured
USB Mass Storage device found at 2

lsmod
--

odule  Size  Used byNot tainted
vfat9036   0 (unused)
softdog 1508   1
ip_nat_irc  2128   0 (unused)
ip_nat_ftp  2736   0 (unused)
ip_conntrack_irc2864   1
ip_conntrack_ftp3472   1
tun 3456   6
rtl813912616   1
pci-scan3532   1 [rtl8139]
natsemi15208   1
sd_mod 10300   0 (unused)
usb-storage60788   0 (unused)
scsi_mod   53960   2 [sd_mod usb-storage]
usb-uhci   21352   0 (unused)
usbcore55904   1 [usb-storage usb-uhci]
isofs  17012   0 (unused)
ide-detect   144   0 (unused)
ide-cd 28572   0
ide-disk   12492   0
ide-core   88752   0 [usb-storage ide-detect ide-cd ide-disk]
cdrom  26976   0 [ide-cd]



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson  Lucent use to 
deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] vpn capability router

2004-05-05 Thread hey poh
What is the difference between IPSec and openVPN. Which one is easier to 
configure? I also want to do a VPN capability router. Do I need to configure 
the client in order to get this router work?

_
Are you in love? Find a date on MSN Personals http://match.msn.com.my/


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson  Lucent use to 
deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html