[leaf-user] setserial for Bering 1.2
Can anybody direct me to a version of setserial I can run on Bering 1.2? I'm trying to use a USR 3CP5610A. These modems apparently have some idiosyncracies, e.g. insisting on being COM5, etc. I looked on the site, and some of the developers' pages, but didn't see one. Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/ http://www.angelfire.com/or/paulrogers/ Rogers' Second Law: Everything you do communicates. (I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-) The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today! --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562alloc_id=6184op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Images on web pages don't load
Ray, Thank for your review, Right. Obviously (I hope this is obvious) you cannot use a source with a 1.5 Mbps upload limit to test a 2 Mbps download ... unless, I suppose, the 2 Mbps connection is running *way* below rated speed. You might do better to find a public ftp repository (a Linux-distro mirror, for example) near you and do some downloads from it. Done, here the result : --- RETR linux-2.6.6.tar.bz2 150-Connecting to port 2403 150 34078.3 kbytes to download [] ## [] 226-File successfully transferred 226 490.382 seconds (measured here), 69.49 Kbytes per second ftp: 34896138 bytes received in 492.34Seconds 70.88Kbytes/sec. ftp I'm using the public repository one that near my place at Malaysia. ( ftp://ftp.averse.lkams.kernel.org/ ) When i run traceroute, it was about 14 hop from my local LAN : 1 *** Request timed out. 2 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 202.185.xxx.xxx 3 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms 161.142.xxx.xxx 4 4 ms 4 ms 5 ms e0.sha15.jaring.my [161.142.236.16] 5 8 ms 7 ms 7 ms s4-1-2.bkj4.jaring.my [61.6.2.93] 627 ms19 ms23 ms 161.142.173.90 7 9 ms 9 ms10 ms pos0-0.mlk90.jaring.my [161.142.25.86] 827 ms19 ms12 ms pos2-0.mea90.jaring.my [61.6.17.46] 929 ms13 ms12 ms fe-5-1-0.mea15.jaring.my [61.6.17.70] 1015 ms16 ms19 ms 203.208.152.9 1119 ms31 ms16 ms POS3-6.tp-core1.ix.singtel.com [202.160.250.9] 1217 ms30 ms18 ms 202.160.250.54 1327 ms20 ms23 ms PC2.commonwealth.singnet.com.sg [165.21.12.26] 1427 ms33 ms20 ms 203.127.221.98 Is the result makes any sense for 2Mbps line? [...] As to your Web-page problem ... Even simpler ... on the LAN host you are testing from, change its DNS from the router to use the upstream DNS resolver directly. If this improves performance, than suspect dnsmasq as the cause of the problem. If it doesn't, then use an app like host to test the response speed of the upstream DNS (which I assume is your ISP's DNS forwarder). Done, still experiance a same problems. I get a fast response's result with dns query using host : yahoo.com name server ns1.yahoo.com yahoo.com name server ns2.yahoo.com yahoo.com name server ns3.yahoo.com yahoo.com name server ns4.yahoo.com yahoo.com name server ns5.yahoo.com yahoo.com mail is handled (pri=1) by mx2.mail.yahoo.com yahoo.com mail is handled (pri=5) by mx4.mail.yahoo.com yahoo.com mail is handled (pri=1) by mx1.mail.yahoo.com www.yahoo.com is a nickname for www.yahoo.akadns.net www.yahoo.akadns.net has address 66.94.230.42 www.yahoo.akadns.net has address 66.94.230.35 www.yahoo.akadns.net has address 66.94.230.44 www.yahoo.akadns.net has address 66.94.230.37 www.yahoo.akadns.net has address 66.94.230.39 www.yahoo.akadns.net has address 66.94.230.43 www.yahoo.akadns.net has address 66.94.230.38 www.yahoo.akadns.net has address 66.94.230.34 Do you mean that images actually *stored* on your DMZ Web server (not just offsite ones referenced by it) exhibit this problem? yup, If that's the case, then problems with connections from the DMZ to the LAN (do you mean the staff ntwork or the student network? or both? you seem to have 2 local LANs) are almost surely related to the router swap. Both LAN and sorry to ask, if it was a problem with the router swap, how i could troubleshoot or correct it? if there was a way to do it. The only other thing I would direct your attention to is the extraordinarily high collision rate on eth3. As you report it ... 6: eth3: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 link/ether 00:04:ac:6e:52:b8 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff RX: bytes packets errors dropped overrun mcast 3229811836 726754647 0 0 0 0 TX: bytes packets errors dropped carrier collsns 310837687 6346146 0 0 0 2149416 ... 2 million collisions against 6 million packets is simply awful. But since I don't know if the local LAN exhibiting the problem is this one or eth0 (or both), I do not know if this is relevant to your problem. eth0 is connected to my staff network ( 192.168.0.0/24 ) and eth3 is connected to my student network ( 192.168.1.0/24 ) . Is there any how i could trace the source of collisions? Do you have any other suggestions or advice? Thanks In Advance, Regards, zamri ** i dont held any responsible with anything below than this line and it's was beyong my control and knowledge. - zamri - ** The content of this email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of individual or entity to whom they are address and may be privileged. If you are not the intended receipient or if you have received it in error, please do not read,
[leaf-user] openvpn help
I have implemented 2 basic routers with Bering-uClibc v2.1.1 and they are working. Then i add in openvpnz.lrp, libcrpto.lrp, libssl.lrp and liblzo.lrp and tun.o to get two VPN capability routers. router A has the following IP: eth0=10.1.4.1 eth1=192.168.1.254 tun0=192.168.99.1 router B eth0=10.1.4.2 eth1=192.168.2.254 tun0=192.168.99.2 the following is my configuration for both routers /etc/shorewall/zones # zonedisplay comments netNet Internet vpnVPN Remote Subnet loc Local Local networks /etc/shorewall/interfaces(for routerA) # zone interface broadcast options net eth0 detect vpn tun0192.168.2.255 loc eth1 detect /etc/shorewall/policy #sourcedest policy log level limit:burst loc vpnACCEPT vpn loc ACCEPT loc netACCEPT fw net ACCEPT fw loc ACCEPT /etc/shorewall/rules #action source dest proto dest port source ports original dest ACCEPT netfw udp /etc/shorewall/masq #INTERFACE SUBNETADDRESS eth0 eth1 /etc/shorewall/tunnels (routerA) #type zonegatewaygateway zone openvpn: net 192.168.99.2 /etc/openvpn/openvpn.conf dev tun0 ifconfig 192.168.99.1 192.168.99.2 secret secret.key I do cd /etc/openvpn openvpn --genkey --secret key How to copy this key to router B and vice versa?Or i only need to generate the key in one router? In routerA, when i try to ping 192.168.99.2, the following commands pop up: Virtual device tun0 asks to queue packet! ping: sendto: Network is down and when i do, openvpn --ping 5 --dev tun0 it says all encryption and authentication features disabled-- all data will be tunnelled as cleartext socket bind failed on local address [undef]:5000:Address already in use Exiting Is it because I didn't enable encryption and authentication?Pls help Thanks _ Download ringtones, logos and picture messages from MSN Malaysia http://www.msn.com.my/mobile/ringtones/default.asp --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562alloc_id=6184op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] CF-IDE help
On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 16:46, Peter Mueller wrote: The only time I came across something like that was when I pulled the CF out of the USB adapter before I had selected 'Eject' in windows. Any possibility of something like that? Regards, Dave. Unfortunately no. I have my CF-IDE adapters configured on secondary or primary IDE on both systems. i once had a cf-ide card... that woudnt reliably write data unless the extrernal power adapter was installed. reading and booting worked fine without. cant remember the brand tho mvh -- Ronny Aasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562alloc_id=6184op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Thomson SpeedTouch (ethernet) ADSL setup
Hi list, I'm trying to configure an ISP-link with a Thomson SpeedTouch ADSL modem (the ethernet, not USB type) via PPPoE on a Bering-uClib 2.1. I installed the ppp.lrp and pppoe.lrp packages as per the HOWTO. Yesterday, I tried with the standard PPPoE setup, explained in the howto, but without success, ppp0 never came up. I didn't have much time to debug or to test the example at the bottom of the setup. I'll do that today. In the mean time, can anyone give me pointers on how to do this correctly? I could not find anything explicit in the list archives. Thanks, Robert --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562alloc_id=6184op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Tiny Proxy Setup Problem
Hi folks. I know tinyproxy is not really supported by this group and I have posted on the tiny proxy list, but I just thought that maybe someone has some insight into the proper configuration of proxies! I am trying to set up a TinyProxy on my LEAF Bering uClib Shorewall firewall and although everything looks ok, it doesn't work!! When I try to browse through it I get 'The page cannot be displayed Would someone be prepared to have a look at my config and logs and tell me if there's anything obviously wrong? Thanks. TinyProxy Log INFO May 14 10:23:29 [32315]: Initializing tinyproxy ... INFO May 14 10:23:29 [32315]: Setting Via proxy name to: tinyproxy INFO May 14 10:23:29 [32315]: Adding Port [443] to the list allowed by CONNECT INFO May 14 10:23:29 [32315]: Adding Port [563] to the list allowed by CONNECT INFO May 14 10:23:29 [32315]: Setting stathost to tinyproxy.stats. INFO May 14 10:23:29 [27390]: Now running as group root. INFO May 14 10:23:29 [27390]: Now running as user root. INFO May 14 10:23:29 [27390]: Creating child number 1 of 10 ... INFO May 14 10:23:29 [27390]: Creating child number 2 of 10 ... INFO May 14 10:23:29 [27390]: Creating child number 3 of 10 ... INFO May 14 10:23:29 [27390]: Creating child number 4 of 10 ... INFO May 14 10:23:29 [27390]: Creating child number 5 of 10 ... INFO May 14 10:23:29 [27390]: Creating child number 6 of 10 ... INFO May 14 10:23:29 [27390]: Creating child number 7 of 10 ... INFO May 14 10:23:29 [27390]: Creating child number 8 of 10 ... INFO May 14 10:23:29 [27390]: Creating child number 9 of 10 ... INFO May 14 10:23:29 [27390]: Creating child number 10 of 10 ... INFO May 14 10:23:29 [27390]: Finished creating all children. INFO May 14 10:23:29 [27390]: Setting the various signals. INFO May 14 10:23:29 [27390]: Starting main loop. Accepting connections. CONNECT May 14 10:23:45 [7205]: Connect (file descriptor 11): lib-it-s07.lib-staff.library.uwa.edu.au [130.95.223.207] CONNECT May 14 10:23:45 [7205]: Request (file descriptor 11): GET http://directory.uwa.edu.au/ HTTP/1.1 CONNECT May 14 10:26:49 [2517]: Connect (file descriptor 11): lib-it-s07.lib-staff.library.uwa.edu.au [130.95.223.207] CONNECT May 14 10:26:49 [2517]: Request (file descriptor 11): GET http://directory.uwa.edu.au/ HTTP/1.1 CONNECT May 14 10:29:00 [559]: Connect (file descriptor 11): lib-it-s07.lib-staff.library.uwa.edu.au [130.95.223.207] CONNECT May 14 10:29:00 [559]: Request (file descriptor 11): GET http://directory.uwa.edu.au/ HTTP/1.1 CONNECT May 14 10:29:03 [1516]: Connect (file descriptor 11): lib-it-s07.lib-staff.library.uwa.edu.au [130.95.223.207] CONNECT May 14 10:29:03 [1516]: Request (file descriptor 11): GET http://directory.uwa.edu.au/ HTTP/1.1 CONNECT May 14 10:29:04 [20275]: Connect (file descriptor 11): lib-it-s07.lib-staff.library.uwa.edu.au [130.95.223.207] CONNECT May 14 10:29:04 [20275]: Request (file descriptor 11): GET http://directory.uwa.edu.au/ HTTP/1.1 CONNECT May 14 10:29:04 [7433]: Connect (file descriptor 11): lib-it-s07.lib-staff.library.uwa.edu.au [130.95.223.207] CONNECT May 14 10:29:04 [7433]: Request (file descriptor 11): GET http://directory.uwa.edu.au/ HTTP/1.1 NOTICEMay 14 10:29:04 [27390]: Waiting servers (4) is less than MinSpareServers (5). Creating new child. CONNECT May 14 10:29:05 [10301]: Connect (file descriptor 11): lib-it-s07.lib-staff.library.uwa.edu.au [130.95.223.207] CONNECT May 14 10:29:05 [10301]: Request (file descriptor 11): GET http://directory.uwa.edu.au/ HTTP/1.1 NOTICEMay 14 10:29:05 [27390]: Waiting servers (4) is less than MinSpareServers (5). Creating new child. CONNECT May 14 10:29:06 [26827]: Connect (file descriptor 11): lib-it-s07.lib-staff.library.uwa.edu.au [130.95.223.207] CONNECT May 14 10:29:06 [26827]: Request (file descriptor 11): GET http://directory.uwa.edu.au/ HTTP/1.1 NOTICEMay 14 10:29:06 [27390]: Waiting servers (4) is less than MinSpareServers (5). Creating new child. CONNECT May 14 10:29:07 [27010]: Connect (file descriptor 11): lib-it-s07.lib-staff.library.uwa.edu.au [130.95.223.207] CONNECT May 14 10:29:07 [27010]: Request (file descriptor 11): GET http://directory.uwa.edu.au/ HTTP/1.1 NOTICEMay 14 10:29:07 [27390]: Waiting servers (4) is less than MinSpareServers (5). Creating new child. CONNECT May 14 10:29:07 [3014]: Connect (file descriptor 11): lib-it-s07.lib-staff.library.uwa.edu.au [130.95.223.207] CONNECT May 14 10:29:07 [3014]: Request (file descriptor 11): GET http://directory.uwa.edu.au/ HTTP/1.1 NOTICEMay 14 10:29:07 [27390]: Waiting servers (4) is less than MinSpareServers (5). Creating new child. CONNECT May 14 10:29:07 [17217]: Connect (file descriptor 11): lib-it-s07.lib-staff.library.uwa.edu.au [130.95.223.207] CONNECT May 14 10:29:07 [17217]: Request (file descriptor 11): GET http://directory.uwa.edu.au/ HTTP/1.1 NOTICE
RE: [leaf-user] RFC1483 Bridged llc Connection
-Original Message- From: Marko Nurmenniemi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 11:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Leaf User Group Subject: Re: [leaf-user] RFC1483 Bridged llc Connection Andrew Gray wrote: Hello all, Just a quick query to ask if anyone has connected to ADSL using an RFC1483 Bridged llc connection. I have been investigating possible suppliers of ADSL and one which seems to show promise tells me their connection is of this type as opposed to a PPPOE connection. My searches have not found anything as yet so I just wondered if anyone on the list could shed some light on the subject for me. I am currently using Bering uCiblic 2.01 with updates to the latest version about to happen. Andrew Gray I have a adsl with RFC1483 routing, there is nothing to configure in leaf. No problems so far. Have been using the same connection with Dachstein, Bering and now with Bering uClibc 2.1. -M __ NOD32 1.759 (20040513) Information __ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.nod32.com Can I ask what modules you have used in your setup. Do you let the modem do the authentication and firewall behind that or is your modem in a dumb bridged mode with the firewall handling the authentication with your ISP? This is the recommended setup from this particular ISP so I wish to try it as soon as I move to the new location if possible. Andrew Gray MCSE Mobile: 0418 734 078 Home : (07) 4124 6303 _ ella for Spam Control has removed 4989 Spam messages and set aside 0 Newsletters for me You can use it too - and it's FREE! www.ellaforspam.com --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562alloc_id=6184op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] 2.0.2 .lrp problem
The 2.0.2 .lrp released yesterday contained the wrong version of /usr/share/shorewall/functions. I have updated the .lrp with the correct version of the functions file. [EMAIL PROTECTED] shorewall-2.0.2]# ls -l shorwall-2.0.2.lrp -rw-r--r--1 root ftp 78325 May 14 06:28 shorwall-2.0.2.lrp [EMAIL PROTECTED] shorewall-2.0.2]# grep shorwall 2.0.2.md5sums 3ae771fcbfe217006e88e69a597c6455 shorwall-2.0.2.lrp [EMAIL PROTECTED] shorewall-2.0.2]# You may also update your existing .lrp using the 'functions' file from CVS (project Lrp2/) Sorry for the inconvenience, -Tom -- Tom Eastep\ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Shorewall-announce mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.shorewall.net/mailman/listinfo/shorewall-announce --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562alloc_id=6184op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Both Passive and Active FTP.
Leaf: I have a Bearing 2.1 uClib box w/ Shorewall as the firewall. I have Active FTP working fine, but would also like to get passive working. Can this be done? If so how. Thanks, Jason. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562alloc_id=6184op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Both Passive and Active FTP.
Jason C. Leach wrote: I have a Bearing 2.1 uClib box w/ Shorewall as the firewall. I have Active FTP working fine, but would also like to get passive working. Can this be done? If so how. http://shorewall.net/FTP.html -Tom -- Tom Eastep\ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562alloc_id=6184op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Bering Driver for LinkSys USB 10/100 Ethernet adapter?
LinkSys now offers the Compact USB 2.0 10/100 Network Adapter (model USB200M). Is there a driver for Bering for this device? TIA, Rick --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id%62alloc_ida84op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Suggestion re doc'n of need for crc32.o for ne.o support in Bering uClibc
On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 04:27, freeman wrote: At the same time there was made mention of documenting this need for crc32.o in the FAQ. Scott, Our FAQs will be moving to a community supported wiki in the near future. I'll attend to this task right after our website is upgraded. I just wanted to add the suggestion that mention of this requirement be made within the /etc/modules file (e.g. as a comment, etc), as it is quite likely that many of us will be looking therein, first, when doing upgrades from Bering, etc. This suggestion isn't practical for embedded appliances. Space is at a premium, and documentation only subtracts space without adding functionality. -- Mike Noyes mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ SF.net Projects: ffl, leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm, sitedocs --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562alloc_id=6184op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Images on web pages don't load
Replies interspersed below. At 02:44 PM 5/14/2004 +0800, zamri wrote: Ray, Thank for your review, Right. Obviously (I hope this is obvious) you cannot use a source with a 1.5 Mbps upload limit to test a 2 Mbps download ... unless, I suppose, the 2 Mbps connection is running *way* below rated speed. You might do better to find a public ftp repository (a Linux-distro mirror, for example) near you and do some downloads from it. Done, here the result : --- RETR linux-2.6.6.tar.bz2 150-Connecting to port 2403 150 34078.3 kbytes to download [] ## [] 226-File successfully transferred 226 490.382 seconds (measured here), 69.49 Kbytes per second ftp: 34896138 bytes received in 492.34Seconds 70.88Kbytes/sec. ftp I'm using the public repository one that near my place at Malaysia. ( ftp://ftp.averse.lkams.kernel.org/ ) When i run traceroute, it was about 14 hop from my local LAN : 1 *** Request timed out. 2 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 202.185.xxx.xxx 3 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms 161.142.xxx.xxx 4 4 ms 4 ms 5 ms e0.sha15.jaring.my [161.142.236.16] 5 8 ms 7 ms 7 ms s4-1-2.bkj4.jaring.my [61.6.2.93] 627 ms19 ms23 ms 161.142.173.90 7 9 ms 9 ms10 ms pos0-0.mlk90.jaring.my [161.142.25.86] 827 ms19 ms12 ms pos2-0.mea90.jaring.my [61.6.17.46] 929 ms13 ms12 ms fe-5-1-0.mea15.jaring.my [61.6.17.70] 1015 ms16 ms19 ms 203.208.152.9 1119 ms31 ms16 ms POS3-6.tp-core1.ix.singtel.com [202.160.250.9] 1217 ms30 ms18 ms 202.160.250.54 1327 ms20 ms23 ms PC2.commonwealth.singnet.com.sg [165.21.12.26] 1427 ms33 ms20 ms 203.127.221.98 Is the result makes any sense for 2Mbps line? It *could* make ... sense, but it is unlikely to. From here in the USA, I got (on a DSL line that is nominally 384 Kbps download but that usually delivers over 1 Mbps) this result from the same site: 226 186.653 seconds (measured here), 161.00 Kbytes per second 30772389 bytes received in 186.89 secs (160.8 kB/s) So the site itself is probably not limiting you (unless it was busier when you tried ... I was one of 3 connections when I started). The speed limitation is either 1. In your router 2. In the P2P link between you and your ISP 3. Between the ISP and the Internet. You can eliminate possibility 1 by testing with a host connected directly to the P2P link. Given your uncertainties about the router (due to your having a second, completely separate problem), you should do so. Testing the P2P line itself (possibility 2) requires control over the hosts at both ends of the line, something you don't have ... but if you eliminate the router as the source of the problem, I think you easily have enough evidence (this report plus the McAffee result, plus the evidence that moving from 1 Mbps to 2 Mbps actually slowed response speed) to ask your ISP to investigate. [...] As to your Web-page problem ... I'm not reviewing the specifics you posted because they suggest nothing to me. But if the ONLY change you made was the router substitution (I'm leaving out the speed upgrade because I cannot imagine how it would affect connections between your LAN and your DMZ), the problem almost surely has to be in the router somewhere. (If you made other changes and haven't mentioned them here ... well, what sort of help do you expect to get in that case?) In this case, you're going to need help from someone who has made the same switch, something I haven't done. So I'll leave it to others to try to offer specific suggestions here. [...] eth0 is connected to my staff network ( 192.168.0.0/24 ) and eth3 is connected to my student network ( 192.168.1.0/24 ) . Is there any how i could trace the source of collisions? Do you have any other suggestions or advice? [...] How many hosts are on the student network? Do they have usage characteristics that would cause high peaks? Is the interface 10 Mbps or 100 Mbps? Over what time period were the 6 million Tx packets sent? I'm curious as to why the router sends only about 1% as much traffic (in packet count; about 10% measured in bytes) as it receives on this interface. RX: bytes packets errors dropped overrun mcast 3229811836 726754647 0 0 0 0 TX: bytes packets errors dropped carrier collsns 310837687 6346146 0 0 0 2149416 This is unusual for a LAN that is (I would expect) mainly clients ... what is generating a very large number of very small packets on this network? (The RX results indicate an average packet size of 4 bytes, while TX is 48 bytes ... the TX value looks about normal but the RX value is down around the size of a ping packet. Could this LAN have hosts that are spewing out broadcast SMB packets, for example? Collisions may just indicate high usage levels relative to capacity. So the
Re: [leaf-user] Split access or multiple uplinks/providers (Problem with aliases)
Latest update on the following issues: Strangely all the aliases have kicked in and working. There was no restart of the LRP machine and we have no clue what resulted in this sudden change of heart by the machine. All the aliases are available when we tested this morning. System seems to have gone thru' a gestation period! Our aliases problem is resolved now, all by itself. Thanks --- J Oddissy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, http://www.lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html#AEN268 We are trying to accomplish the routing for multiple uplinks/providers. We almost succeeded, except for our aliases! We have a block of 32 addresses from two different providers. We are using Bering 1.2. Following is our etc/network/interfaces file: #===Begin /etc/netowk/interfaces === auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto eth0 iface eth0 inet static address 1.2.3.98 masklen 27 broadcast 1.2.3.127 gateway 1.2.3.97 # Aliases for first ISP up ip address add 1.2.3.99/27 dev eth0 label eth0:99 #THROUGH.. up ip address add 1.2.3.126/27 dev eth0 label eth0:126 auto eth1 iface eth1 inet static address 4.5.6.98 broadcast 4.5.6.127 masklen 27 gateway 4.5.6.97 # Aliases for second ISP up ip address add 4.5.6.99/27 dev eth1 label eth1:99 #THROUGH.. up ip address add 4.5.6.126/27 dev eth1 label eth1:126 auto eth2 iface eth2 inet static address 7.8.9.98 masklen 24 broadcast 7.8.9.255 ## SPLIT ACCESS ### up ip route add 1.2.3.98/27 dev eth0 src 1.2.3.98 table ISP1 up ip route add default via 1.2.3.97 table ISP1 up ip route add 4.5.6.98/27 dev eth1 src 4.5.6.98 table ISP2 up ip route add default via 4.5.6.97 table ISP2 #ip route add 1.2.3.96/27 dev eth0 src 1.2.3.98 #ip route add 4.5.6.96/27 dev eth1 src 4.5.6.98 #ip route add default via 1.2.3.97 up ip rule add from 1.2.3.98 table ISP1 up ip rule add from 4.5.6.98 table ISP2 up ip route add 7.8.9.0/24 dev eth2 table ISP1 up ip route add 4.5.6.98/27 dev eth1 table ISP1 up ip route add 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo table ISP1 up ip route add 7.8.9.0/24 dev eth2 table ISP2 up ip route add 1.2.3.98/27 dev eth0 table ISP2 up ip route add 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo table ISP2 # Load balancing up ip route add default scope global nexthop via 1.2.3.97 dev eth0 weight 1 nexthop via 4.5.6.97 dev eth1 weight 1 #===End /etc/netowk/interfaces === Some observations: 1. 'gateway' setting seems to be playing a major role on what aliases work. In desperation we tried several of the following combinations. 2. Main interfaces work in all but one configuration and the trouble is only with aliases. 3. If eth0's gateway alone is set, then all aliases on eth0 work, but only 98,99,105,110,112,115,119,125 work on eth1, consistently 4. If the eth1's gateway alone is set, only the main eth0's interface works and others don't work. For eth1, only the above set of aliases works. 5. If eth0's gateway is set for both eth0 and eth1 then eth0 aliases all work, but the above set of aliases of eth1 give out: Destination Port Unreachable. 6. If eth1's gateway is set for both eth0 and eth1 then also for eth1 only above set of aliases work, whereas for eth0, we get Destinatin Port Unreachable for 108 and 120, rest get
Re: [leaf-user] openvpn help
chiew yock sang wrote: /etc/shorewall/tunnels (routerA) #type zonegatewaygateway zone openvpn: net 192.168.99.2 this is either a typo, or a problem - the error message you quoted later suggests openvpn runs on port 5000 - but in /etc/shorewall/tunnels you define that it uses port - this is most likely not going to work... How to copy this key to router B and vice versa?Or i only need to generate the key in one router? In any way that would be considered secure. So, either by using a connection that uses strong encryption or by simply using a floppy. Remember, when using pre-shared keys, the security of the VPN relies on how securely those keys were transferred (and kept). In routerA, when i try to ping 192.168.99.2, the following commands pop up: Virtual device tun0 asks to queue packet! ping: sendto: Network is down Hm, I've never seen that error - but I must say, I'm not quite sure how commands actually pop up - do you mean that the message you quoted appears on the console? Or in the logs (and if so, which log)? and when i do, openvpn --ping 5 --dev tun0 it says all encryption and authentication features disabled-- all data will be tunnelled as cleartext socket bind failed on local address [undef]:5000:Address already in use Exiting Do a ps aux on the router in question to find out if openvpn is already running, most likely, this is the source of your error. You can also use netstat to find out if something is indeed already listening on port 5000. Openvpn should not really be started by hand (by entering openvpn at the prompt) buit rather by the init-script). So, if you want to start openvpn, do a svi openvpn start the --ping 5 option can also be specified in the config file (and tun0 as dev is already specified in your config file, so that would be redundant). Martin --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562alloc_id=6184op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] OpenVPN and routing
ALParada wrote: Are tun and tap devices associated with any one interface? Not that I know of - for all I know, they _are_ interfaces themselves. I forgot to ask: Is a route add command the best/only way to handle this situation? I'd say, the the easiest solution to set up is to use the route keyword in the openvpn config file. This will automatically generate the proper entry in the routing table (pointing to the other end of the tunnel) when the tunnel is established, and also remove the route again, when the tunnel goes down. Martin --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562alloc_id=6184op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Module won't load
Hi Everyone, I am having problems booting with the e1000 module, or at least I think that is the problem. It boots fine until it gets to configuring network interfaces then it hangs. I have tried it on several machines successfully, but they don't use that module. I tried a couple of different e1000 modules but with same result. I renamed the module and it booted, so I think that's the problem. I got the module from the modules.tar file which I think is the latest. I am currently running Bering on the PC that doesn't boot, and it works fine, so I don't think it is a hardware issue. Has anyone had this problem and how do I solve it? TIA --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562alloc_id=6184op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Module won't load
At 08:27 PM 5/14/2004 -0400, ALParada wrote: Hi Everyone, I am having problems booting with the e1000 module, or at least I think that is the problem. It boots fine until it gets to configuring network interfaces then it hangs. I have tried it on several machines successfully, but they don't use that module. I tried a couple of different e1000 modules but with same result. I renamed the module and it booted, so I think that's the problem. I got the module from the modules.tar file which I think is the latest. I am currently running Bering on the PC that doesn't boot, and it works fine, so I don't think it is a hardware issue. Has anyone had this problem and how do I solve it? Your description is, I think, too hard to follow. Certainly too hard for me, and I suspect for others as well. Please try again, and be more exact about ... 1. What version of Bering you are using. 2. What version of the e1000 module you are using. (One fromthe modules.tar file which you think is the latest is too vague.) Why do you think it is the correct version for the kernel you are booting? 3. What NIC you are attempting to use the module with. And does this NIC work in some other context (under Windows, or with a different Linux distro)? 4. If you do not use /etc/modules to load the module, but instead wait until boot/init is finished, then insmod it from the command line, what the result is. Do you get any error message back to the console? 5. The meaning of hangs. How long do you wait before giving up? Does CTRL-C not work? Does CTRL-ALT-DEL not work? 6. Nouns in many places where you use it. For example, when you write, I have tried it on several machines successfully, but they don't use that module ... is it e1000.o, an unspecified version of Bering, or something else? And if it does mean the module, in what sense is it successful in these tries? Other examples are It boots fine until it gets to 'configuring network interfaces' then it hangs and I am currently running Bering on the PC that doesn't boot, and it works fine (also, what does works fine mean?). 7. What I renamed the module and it booted means. What did you change the name from, and to? Is the it that booted the Bering kernel (with or without an interface for the NIC in question), or do you mean that the renamed e1000 module in this instance successfully created an eth0 (or whatever) interface? (Normal rules of English diction say that it refers to a module here ... but modules don't boot, kernels do. So I'm unclear what you mean by boot if it applies to the module, not the kernel.) You *probably have a simple problem, easy to correct. But without a clear description, I ... and others, probably ... will find it difficult to help you spot it. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562alloc_id=6184op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Module won't load
Thanks for the reply. See below. - Original Message - From: Ray Olszewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 11:15 PM Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Module won't load At 08:27 PM 5/14/2004 -0400, ALParada wrote: Hi Everyone, I am having problems booting with the e1000 module, or at least I think that is the problem. It boots fine until it gets to configuring network interfaces then it hangs. I have tried it on several machines successfully, but they don't use that module. I tried a couple of different e1000 modules but with same result. I renamed the module and it booted, so I think that's the problem. I got the module from the modules.tar file which I think is the latest. I am currently running Bering on the PC that doesn't boot, and it works fine, so I don't think it is a hardware issue. Has anyone had this problem and how do I solve it? Your description is, I think, too hard to follow. Certainly too hard for me, and I suspect for others as well. Please try again, and be more exact about ... 1. What version of Bering you are using. I am using uClibc 2.1.1 2. What version of the e1000 module you are using. (One fromthe modules.tar file which you think is the latest is too vague.) Why do you think it is the correct version for the kernel you are booting? It was the latest I could find: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/leaf/bin/bering-uclibc/packages/modules.lrp 3. What NIC you are attempting to use the module with. And does this NIC work in some other context (under Windows, or with a different Linux distro)? Intel Pro1000 currently working under Bering 1.2 4. If you do not use /etc/modules to load the module, but instead wait until boot/init is finished, then insmod it from the command line, what the result is. Do you get any error message back to the console? I have not tried this. 5. The meaning of hangs. How long do you wait before giving up? Does CTRL-C not work? Does CTRL-ALT-DEL not work? I waited about 3 minutes. I did not try ^C and ^ALT-DEL does not work. Normally it zips right by and you don't notice it so 3 minutes was enough. 6. Nouns in many places where you use it. For example, when you write, I have tried it on several machines successfully, but they don't use that module ... is it e1000.o, an unspecified version of Bering, or something else? And if it does mean the module, in what sense is it successful in these tries? Other examples are It boots fine until it gets to 'configuring network interfaces' then it hangs and I am currently running Bering on the PC that doesn't boot, and it works fine (also, what does works fine mean?). I am booting from a floppy and loading the packages from USB. I have one uClibc 2.1.1 distro with all the modules and packages that I need. What I mean, is that the distro loads to the login prompt with the e1000 module on any machine that doesn't use the e1000.o module. On the PC that does use the modules it stops at the 'configuring network interfaces' line. Bering 1.2 is running on this machine that hangs with uClibc, so I believe the hardware is good. 7. What I renamed the module and it booted means. What did you change the name from, and to? What I mean is that I commented out the /etc/modules e1000 line. It made no difference. I then renamed the e1000 module at /lib/modules to e1000.o.old. Once I did this the PC in question booted to the login prompt. Is the it that booted the Bering kernel (with or without an interface for the NIC in question), or do you mean that the renamed e1000 module in this instance successfully created an eth0 (or whatever) interface? (Normal rules of English diction say that it refers to a module here ... but modules don't boot, kernels do. So I'm unclear what you mean by boot if it applies to the module, not the kernel.) Either the kernel or the PC. I got to the login prompt which is what I consider booted. I did not check whether an ethernet adapter was created but I suspect that it wasn't. You *probably have a simple problem, easy to correct. But without a clear description, I ... and others, probably ... will find it difficult to help you spot it. I am hoping it is a simple problem. It is all that is keeping me from upgrading to uClibc, but more importantly openvpn. Many thanks, --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562alloc_id=6184op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
