Re: FW: [leaf-user] My leaf crashed

2004-11-11 Thread Livio Ravetto
You may have run out of memory space on your RAM disk while you 
were doing the full backup (Or something like that ;)

This could have caused the package to go corrupted. My experience of kernel 
panic in leaf is often due to some lack of memory.

This is what I would investigate if I were you.
Regards,
Livio @ ravetto DOT org
Joe Nelson wrote:
Apparently, I didn't realize that when I responded to this earlier, it went
to ALParada personally and not to the list.  (Sorry, I'm new on this
particular list.)  I'm resending this to the list so that everyone can
benefit from the discusion:

-Original Message-
From: ALParada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 9:46 PM
To: Joe Nelson
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] My leaf crashed

Now that you mention it, I did do a full backup before I rebooted. I am
using a Flash Drive so it isn't a big deal to back up everything. I tend to
backup everything and not only just the package that I modified. Even though
I have done this countless times, I wonder.
- Original Message - 
From: Joe Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'ALParada' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 11:26 PM
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] My leaf crashed

I'm not sure if its related, but last week we added bash.lrp to our leaf
router and then we made some changes to it.  After the changes we backed it
up.  Then we ended up rebooting the device while we moved it to a new power
plug.  When we tried to boot it back up, bash was missing and that caused
some issues cause the default shell for root was bash.  After some digging
we found out that anytime we backed up bash.lrp, it would somehow create a
very small file.  Its like it doesn't know what to put in the .lrp or maybe
its being truncated or something.
I guess I just throwing out some ideas.  Your root.lrp may have been a
victim of the same issue as our bash.lrp. ???
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ALParada
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 7:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [leaf-user] My leaf crashed
Hello,
I had a problem with Leaf yesterday that surprised me a little bit. Last
night I rebooted it via Putty and well it never came back up. This morning I
showed up to find a kernel panic. This was a working system not something
new. It has been flawless for about 6 months now. It goes to load root and
stalls then loads some more packages and then it says can't find
\var\lib\lrpkg\root.dev.own. I opened the *.lrp and the file was there. I
ended up replacing the root.lrp with a backup and it was happy again. Has
anyone seen this before or know why this would happen. I am using uClibc
2.1.0.
TIA

---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's
Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588alloc_id=12065op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idU88alloc_id065op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html

---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588alloc_id=12065op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] Natsemi.o

2004-11-11 Thread Robert K Coffman Jr - Info From Data Corporation
I have not had luck with Bering uclibc -- some of my nics are natsemi,
and I could not get a working natsemi.o.

Is this really an issue?  I've got several 1.2 boxes that I was planning on
eventually moving to uclibc but this would be a showstopper.

- Bob Coffman




---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588alloc_id=12065op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


RE: [leaf-user] Natsemi.o

2004-11-11 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi! 

 -Original Message-
 From: Robert K Coffman Jr - Info From Data Corporation 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 2:31 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [leaf-user] Natsemi.o
 
 I have not had luck with Bering uclibc -- some of my nics 
 are natsemi,
 and I could not get a working natsemi.o.
 
 Is this really an issue?  I've got several 1.2 boxes that I 
 was planning on
 eventually moving to uclibc but this would be a showstopper.
 
 - Bob Coffman
 

All you will need to do is grab the modules file and extract
natsemi.o

Luis Correia   
Bering uClibc Team Member

PGP Fingerprint: BC44 D7DA 5A17 F92A CA21 9ABE DFF0 3540 2322 21F6 
Key Server: http://pgp.mit.edu


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588alloc_id=12065op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] Natsemi.o

2004-11-11 Thread Martin Hejl
Hi Bob,
Robert K Coffman Jr - Info From Data Corporation wrote:
I have not had luck with Bering uclibc -- some of my nics are natsemi,
and I could not get a working natsemi.o.
Is this really an issue?  I've got several 1.2 boxes that I was planning on
eventually moving to uclibc but this would be a showstopper.
It is no issue that I'm aware of (and I have 5 boxes that need the 
natsemi driver, all running various versions of Bering uClibc). 
natsemi.o is even part of modules.lrp on the base image, so you don't 
even need to use the modules tarball.

The only real change from Bering (that I'm aware of) is that with the 
Bering uClibc kernel, natsemi.o depends on crc32.o, so you'll need to 
load that module too.

Martin

---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588alloc_id=12065op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


RE: [leaf-user] Natsemi.o

2004-11-11 Thread Tibbs, Richard
I think I tried it on uclibc 2.0.2 or whatnot.
Maybe 2.2 is working.
Didn't mean to spread FUD!
Rick.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Hejl
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 1:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Natsemi.o

Hi Bob,

Robert K Coffman Jr - Info From Data Corporation wrote:
I have not had luck with Bering uclibc -- some of my nics are natsemi,
 
 and I could not get a working natsemi.o.
 
 Is this really an issue?  I've got several 1.2 boxes that I was
planning on
 eventually moving to uclibc but this would be a showstopper.
It is no issue that I'm aware of (and I have 5 boxes that need the 
natsemi driver, all running various versions of Bering uClibc). 
natsemi.o is even part of modules.lrp on the base image, so you don't 
even need to use the modules tarball.

The only real change from Bering (that I'm aware of) is that with the 
Bering uClibc kernel, natsemi.o depends on crc32.o, so you'll need to 
load that module too.

Martin



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588alloc_id=12065op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idU88alloc_id065op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


RE: [leaf-user] What is latest Freeswan for Bering 1.2?

2004-11-11 Thread Tibbs, Richard

OK, the verdict seems to be that Charles' suggestion worked (for pings
-- we are only testing the connection with pings) --- so I doubt that
ping tests the CLAMPMSS parm. A large file transfer would probably need
it so I put CLAMPMSS=yes in shorwall.conf.

We are now able to ping across campus.  Today ping, tomorrow MP3s!  

Thanks all
Rick. 







---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idU88alloc_id065op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html