Re: [LegacyUG] Hints - MyHeritage

[steven perkins]

A few months ago I thought that Legacy was importing links from Family
Search and I asked how to turn that off. After I got an answer I found out
that I did not have it turned on.
I went through my Legacy database and unlinked all the Family Search links
I had not added or confirmed.

A few weeks ago I printed a 15 generation pedigree chart report and found
many of the links had reappeared in my Legacy database. After thinking
about it, I believe these are automatically
made if you confirm a MyHeritage Hint request. It seems doing so for one
person adds all of their supposed siblings and ancestors. Is that correct?

Several of my lines are ones people are always trying to link to some
famous people, even though there is historical documentation and DNA to
show the links are wrong.

I don't think any of the World Tree attempts have enough error correction
and just present an opportunity for people to make conscious or mistaken
links to enhance their ancestry. The ease of using
the Internet leads many people to take the bad links and run with them.

Really annoying.

Steven


On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 6:57 PM Chris Hill 
wrote:

> Hi
>
> On the very bottom line where there are the three people you can specify
> as shortcuts. Double-click on the 1 before the first name - don't think it
> is the right click but my PC is currently down. It will show you the stats
> and a few options. Does not seem to be in the help index, or not obvious.
>
> MyHeritage is Israelian, as I recall, and probably started with good
> European links, but has grown to try and match Ancestry.
>
> FindMyPast is UK based and good for UK information, and has been extending
> to cover the ex-UK colonies and USA.
>
> GenealogyBank seems to be USA only in terms of content.
>
> FamilySearch is the LDS site and is very strong on USA and Europe, and
> growing elsewhere, with the target of building a single tree for the world
> (which FindMyPast has also suggested for UK based on users trees).
>
> The other sites are obviously Ancestry which good for USA, UK, Europe,
> Canada, Australia and NZ. Genealogist is a UK site and Geneanet is a
> European site.
>
> My biggest issue is that all have some common information and then each
> have different collections of various information, so you need to search
> through many of them, certainly in the UK.
>
> Regards
>
> Chris
>
> From my Motorola G6+
>
> On Sat, 7 Sep 2019, 22:34 Andrew Robbie, 
> wrote:
>
>> Chris/Cathy/et al,
>>
>>
>>
>> Curious – where exactly is that hints status info? Chris mentioned “*right
>> click on the 1 button in the bottom right line*” – which ‘1’ button on
>> which window/view is that on?  Images are appreciated, even if not
>> recommended on this forum… J
>>
>>
>>
>> And regarding these services, who can chime in regarding their usefulness
>> in certain regions, periods, etc. of research?  I know mileage may vary
>> based on your lineage and study geos/timelines…
>>
>>
>>
>> My take
>>
>>
>>
>> *MyHeritage*: Seems to be merged/merging with FamilySearch now…
>>
>>
>>
>> *FamilySearch*: I like the -XXX unique numbering system, and
>> Legacy’s Family Search tool (accessed from the D  icon) that helps
>> manage and merge Legacy records with Family Search.  I must admit, I don’t
>> see many hits in this category anymore, maybe since I have all my FS IDs
>> covered now.  Others’ opinions?
>>
>>
>>
>> *FindMyPast*: Mainly advertises as UK and NAM, but I find most of my
>> hits only come from UK.  I need Australia and New Zealand hits also. Anyone
>> got other perspectives?
>>
>>
>>
>> *GenealogyBank*: does show info in config that this is mostly American
>> history for past 300 years (this is useful to know before subscribing). I
>> do not subscribe to this service currently.  I do find that it shows many
>> hundreds of hits, maybe due to simply name match (no dates considered) but
>> are these hits useful? Also, no Canada hits despite advertising US and
>> Canada coverage. Anyone got any other observations?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Andrew ROBBIE
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* LegacyUserGroup  *On
>> Behalf Of *Chris Hill
>> *Sent:* Saturday, September 7, 2019 5:58 AM
>> *To:* Legacy User Group 
>> *Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] Hints - MyHeritage
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi
>>
>>
>>
>> Yes, I asked the question about the speed of Hints appearing or not,
>> after I reset my tree to reset the Hints list.
>>
>>
>>
>> The first response was that the Hints list is not the list of
>> individuals in the tree, mine was 3,000 vs 11,850, but it is driven by the
>> number of individuals that you have opened in the Family or Pedigree views.
>> That has become obvious to me over the last couple of weeks and the list is
>> now 4,187 long.
>>
>>
>>
>> The other response was on the speed in which they are processed. My
>> stats, right click on the 1 button in the bottom right line, now show
>>
>>
>>
>> My Heritage:   Pending 1655   Waiting 2146   Processed 386
>>
>> GenealogyBank : 

Re: [LegacyUG] How to stop Family Search Integration?

[steven perkins]

Otso:

Thanks very much,
Steven

On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 9:19 PM Otso Havu  wrote:

> my toobar  > customize >  1. general settigs >  1.8  integrate with
> Familysearch : select/UNselect
>
>
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail>
>  Ei
> viruksia. www.avast.com
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail>
> <#m_906561302806504967_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
> to 2. toukok. 2019 klo 3.26 steven perkins (scperk...@gmail.com)
> kirjoitti:
>
>> I seem to have Family Search Integration turned on and am finding a lot
>> of wishful connections in my Legacy database. I looked at the Help file and
>> did not see any info on stopping these.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Steven
>>
>> --
>> Steven C. Perkins   scperk...@gmail.com
>> http://stevencperkins.com/
>> Indigenous Peoples' Rights
>> http://intelligent-internet.info/law/ipr2.html
>> Indigenous & Ethnic Minority Legal News http://iemlnews.blogspot.com/
>> Online Journal of Genetics and Genealogy  http://jgg-online.blogspot.com/
>> S.C. Perkins' Genealogy Page  http://stevencperkins.com/genealogy.html
>> S.C. Perkins' Genealogy Blog   http://scpgen.blogspot.com/
>> --
>>
>> LegacyUserGroup mailing list
>> LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
>> To manage your subscription and unsubscribe
>> http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
>> Archives at:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
>>
>
>
> --
> Otso Havu +358 50 5534170  +358 50 408 2248
> otso.havu..gmail.com
> Sulkapolku 6 B 13
> FI-00370 Helsinki
> Finland
> skype:  otso.havu
> --
>
> LegacyUserGroup mailing list
> LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
> To manage your subscription and unsubscribe
> http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
> Archives at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
>


-- 
Steven C. Perkins   scperk...@gmail.com http://stevencperkins.com/
Indigenous Peoples' Rights  http://intelligent-internet.info/law/ipr2.html
Indigenous & Ethnic Minority Legal News http://iemlnews.blogspot.com/
Online Journal of Genetics and Genealogy  http://jgg-online.blogspot.com/
S.C. Perkins' Genealogy Page  http://stevencperkins.com/genealogy.html
S.C. Perkins' Genealogy Blog   http://scpgen.blogspot.com/
-- 

LegacyUserGroup mailing list
LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
To manage your subscription and unsubscribe 
http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
Archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

[LegacyUG] How to stop Family Search Integration?

[steven perkins]

I seem to have Family Search Integration turned on and am finding a lot of
wishful connections in my Legacy database. I looked at the Help file and
did not see any info on stopping these.

Thanks,
Steven

-- 
Steven C. Perkins   scperk...@gmail.com http://stevencperkins.com/
Indigenous Peoples' Rights  http://intelligent-internet.info/law/ipr2.html
Indigenous & Ethnic Minority Legal News http://iemlnews.blogspot.com/
Online Journal of Genetics and Genealogy  http://jgg-online.blogspot.com/
S.C. Perkins' Genealogy Page  http://stevencperkins.com/genealogy.html
S.C. Perkins' Genealogy Blog   http://scpgen.blogspot.com/
-- 

LegacyUserGroup mailing list
LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
To manage your subscription and unsubscribe 
http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
Archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Re: [LegacyUG] MyHeritage DNA test

[steven perkins]

If you took the MyHeritage autosomal DNA test, you can transfer the results
to Family Tree DNA and get their analysis of your ethnic ancestry. You can
also transfer to GEDMATCH.com and see what ethnicity they find for you.

Ethnicity estimates beyond continental origins, Africa, Europe, Asia,
depend on the people in the databases you are being compared to. Each
company uses a different set of people for comparison purposes. If your
ancestors were in the US before the Civil War, European Americans can have
up to 5% African ancestry; African American males can have up to 30%
European ancestry; African American females have up to 5% European
ancestry. See reports from 23andMe about the ethic composition of the US
population.

After about 6 generations back, it is unusual to find evidence of Native
American ancestry in the autosomal tests. Y DNA and mtDNA can show that you
have Native American, or African, ancestry in your direct paternal or
direct maternal line due to the way Y DNA and mtDNA are inherited.

I hope this helps explain some of the unexpected results.

Steven



On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Edward Fenn  wrote:

> This little flurry of erroneous DNA results reinforces my view that the
> current obsession with DNA as a genealogy tool serves more the commercial
> profiting from a quite recent and important scientific discovery, than
> adding any certainty to our family tree.
>
> Edward
>
>
>
> *From:* LegacyUserGroup [mailto:legacyusergroup-boun...@legacyusers.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Ward Walker
> *Sent:* Monday, 22 January 2018 10:19 a.m.
> *To:* Legacy User Group
>
> *Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] MyHeritage DNA test
>
>
>
> Agree, and you can create events or notes to document specific matches or
> triangulations that you might find (as you could with Y-DNA matches).
>
>
>
> I think that the broad ethnic background tests are still a bit of a black
> art. Different companies produce different results. And how far back do you
> go? If a British ancestor has ancestors that originally came from Normandy
> in the 11th century, is that British or NW Europe? My Italian ancestry is
> partly shown as Iberian and Greek, even though those people came to Italy
> several hundred years ago.
>
>
>
>Ward
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Steven C. Perkins   scperk...@gmail.com http://stevencperkins.com/
Indigenous Peoples' Rights  http://intelligent-internet.info/law/ipr2.html
Indigenous & Ethnic Minority Legal News http://iemlnews.blogspot.com/
Online Journal of Genetics and Genealogy  http://jgg-online.blogspot.com/
S.C. Perkins' Genealogy Page  http://stevencperkins.com/genealogy.html
S.C. Perkins' Genealogy Blog   http://scpgen.blogspot.com/
-- 

LegacyUserGroup mailing list
LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
To manage your subscription and unsubscribe 
http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
Archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Re: [LegacyUG] Copying Sources from FamilySearch.org to Legacy and Ancestry.com

[steven perkins]

William:

You can put your tree at Rootsweb and then refer people to that one.

If you have done the atsomal DNA test at Ancestry, you can link those
results at Ancestry
to the pedigree at Rootsweb and people can see it free of charge and
without an Ancestry
or Rootsweb subscription.

http://searches.rootsweb.ancestry.com/share.html

Upload your family tree to the WorldConnect Project
, a database of family trees submitted
by thousands of RootsWeb.com researchers. There are currently more than
712,839,000 ancestor names. With your family tree posted here, other
researchers with common ancestors can find you.


Regards,
Steven





On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 10:47 AM, William Boswell 
wrote:

> I couldn’t get it to work without first signing in.  Somebody who doesn’t
> have an account would be a better candidate, but I think you are required
> to create an account first.  Since I don’t keep an ongoing membership with
> Ancestry I could try it out after I get rid of my current membership.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* LegacyUserGroup [mailto:legacyusergroup-boun...@legacyusers.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Sandi Koscak
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 28, 2016 10:10 AM
> *To:* Legacy User Group 
>
> *Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] Copying Sources from FamilySearch.org to Legacy
> and Ancestry.com
>
>
>
> When I called ancestry, It was only for the question of public trees. I
> was told that everyone can view your public tree and do not have to have a
> membership... Maybe someone should test it...
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 7:52 AM, William Boswell 
> wrote:
>
> It was my understanding that a public tree reveals everything.  I could be
> wrong about that since I cannot verify it since Ancestry requires a
> membership to view public or private trees.  My relatives complain about
> that all the time because they cannot see my public tree and only have a
> casual interest in genealogy.
>
>
>
> I would never give Editor privileges to anyone unless I know them very
> well.  I always give Guest to unknowns and Contributor if I personally know
> them or have been trading with them for years otherwise Editor gives free
> reign for someone to destroy my tree especially if they don’t know what
> they’re doing or decide they’re an expert on my own family (I’ve had a few
> of those lately).
>
>
>
> Your mention of invitees reminds me of a situation a distant cousin had.
> She allowed someone to have access to her private tree not knowing this
> guest invitee was stealing her information and photos then reposting them
> to a public tree under her own name.  This distant cousin had given me the
> exact same photos and information which I never shared with anybody else or
> online so I couldn’t figure out why it was reposted under another person’s
> name.
>
>
>
> That’s something to think about when somebody asks for an invite to your
> tree.  If you don’t make your information public then somebody else might
> do it for you.
>
>
>
> Bill Boswell
>
>
>
> *From:* LegacyUserGroup [mailto:legacyusergroup-boun...@legacyusers.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Graham Lambert
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 27, 2016 8:22 PM
> *To:* legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com
> *Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] Copying Sources from FamilySearch.org to Legacy
> and Ancestry.com
>
>
>
> The other thing is that the 'notes' uploaded via gedcom to Ancestry are
> not viewable by ordinary Ancestry members.
>
> I assume this is correct because, Quoted from my tree - "Notes can only be
> viewed by the owner and by those invited to the tree as an 'Editor' "
>
> Graham
>
>
>
> On 28/12/2016 11:35 AM, Cathy Pinner wrote:
>
> Bill and others,
>
> 1) It sounds as if you haven't discovered Privacy Brackets in Legacy.
> Privacy Brackets are double square brackets that can be used in any field.
> Anything between the brackets is only printed/published/exported to gedcom
> or new Legacy file IF you override that element of the Privacy options.
> [[anything in here is private]]
> So as I add data I add privacy brackets if anything is sensitive or
> irrelevant or too long. eg I may add the whole email to an Event note or
> Source Detail text but then edit it with Privacy Brackets.
>
> 2)Also control what parts of sources are shared via Gedcom.
> When you enter a Master Source you choose whether or not to include this.
> When you enter specific Source Detail you choose whether to include this
> citation.
> When you enter Source Detail Text or Comments, you choose whether to
> include those as par t of the Source.
> If you haven't realised that - take a look for the checkboxes on all those
> screens.
> These can be globally reset from Options - Customise 7.2 and 7.3 by
> choosing your defaults for these checkboxes and then clicking Apply to
> Apply to existing sources. If you just change the default at 7.2 and 7.3
> those settings only apply to new sources.
> THEN when you export to Gedcom as a way of 

Re: [LegacyUG] We just upgraded our mail server

[steven perkins]

Those of us with an assembly language/UNIX background and who have
been programming and using computers since before there was an
Internet are quite familiar with the RFCs and are frustrated by the
failure of current software products to follow the RFC. A competent
programmer would know the RFCs applicable to his program and not
release it if it does not meet the requirements of the RFC. We also
realize that most people have no knowledge of or interest in what the
RFCs attempt to do.

Just because we don't spend a lot of time complaining doesn't mean we
like the situation.

Stiofan

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Larry McCumber lemccum...@gmail.com wrote:
 Not everything makes it to the archives, and sorting by subject doesn't
 necessarily put them in discussion order.  But thanks for taking the time
 out of your short life to suggest it.

 I really love this forum.




--
Steven C. Perkins       scperk...@gmail.com     http://stevencperkins.com/
Indigenous Peoples' Rights  http://intelligent-internet.info/law/ipr2.html
Indigenous  Ethnic Minority Legal News http://iemlnews.blogspot.com/
Online Journal of Genetics and Genealogy  http://jgg-online.blogspot.com/
S.C. Perkins' Genealogy Page  http://stevencperkins.com/genealogy.html
S.C. Perkins' Genealogy Blog   http://scpgen.blogspot.com/



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Location for Bristol England

[steven perkins]

Not every location in the USA is a city. In Ohio, when I was growing up,
any populated place with less than 5000 inhabitants was a Village. After
5000 you could become a City.  Also, in states that use the township system
a specific location could be Deerfield (Twp), Mason (village or city),
Warren (County), Ohio (State or territory), USA.  Of course there are also
Indian Reservations which can have interesting location names. And the
pre-USA locations have been discussed several times on the list.

Steven


On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Marc Scott scottmw...@yahoo.com wrote:

 The extra comma for the 4 place holder is only needed for the geo-coding.
 Once you've got the geo-code, you can edit the the location name on the way
 out before saving. i foten do that for old colonial cites that have since
 changed name, or cities that have csince changes jurisdiction at the
 county/state level. I use the modern name and location to geo-code, then
 edit to the original name before saving. This can be done with European 3
 place addresses as well to remove the fourth place comma after geo-coding.


--
Steven C. Perkins   scperk...@gmail.com http://stevencperkins.com/
Researching Indigenous Peoples' Rights
http://intelligent-internet.info/law/ipr2.html
Indigenous and Ethnic Minority Legal News http://iemlnews.blogspot.com/
Online Journal of Genetics and Genealogy   http://jgg-online.blogspot.com/
Steven C. Perkins' Genealogy Page
http://stevencperkins.com/genealogy.html
Steven C. Perkins' Genealogy Blog http://scpgen.blogspot.com/


Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Help from across the pond

[steven perkins]

Charles:

If you are near a large university library, check the library catalog
for the Victoria History of the Counties of England.  This will tell
you the civil and ecclesiastical locations for most parishes and towns
in different time periods.  Some volumes are online in Google, or the
Internet Archive, or BYU, or at English History.

Good Luck,

Steven C. Perkins


On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Charles Apple
apple1...@embarqmail.com wrote:
 I have traced one of my ancestral lines to Cratfield, Suffolk, England
 during the early 1500's. While researching Cratfield, I found a variety of
 location entries, therefore, I am specifically looking for information as to
 how the people of England correctly identify this location. The following
 are some of my findings.

 Cratfield is a Parish Village, located in the Diocese of Norwich, with the
 Postal town being Halesworth, in the Shire County of Suffolk, and the
 Country of England, within the Sovereign State of the United Kingdom.

 Legacy Geo Code shows Cratfield, ,Suffolk, England
 FamilySearch Labs Location Finder shows Cratfield, Suffolk, England

 Others have shown;

 Cratfield, Halesworth, Suffolk, England
 Cratfield, Halesworth, Suffolk, United Kingdom

 Could someone please provide assistance as to how the people of England
 would have identified this location as it existed in the early years of 1500
 - 1550? To my knowledge the Sovereign State of the United Kingdom did not
 exist during that period, and I further believe that the United Kingdom
 would be incorrect as the Country is in reality England.

 It is not my intent to ignite the previous firestorm of International
 Location controversy, which I followed intently and gained much insight. It
 is my intent, however, to enter locations in a manner that follows the
 generally accepted standard among the people of that particular country.

 Thank you for your assistance,

 Charles


--
Steven C. Perkins       scperk...@gmail.com
http://stevencperkins.com/
Online Journal of Genetics and Genealogy
http://jgg-online.blogspot.com/
Steven C. Perkins' Genealogy Page
http://stevencperkins.com/genealogy.html
Steven C. Perkins' Genealogy Blog
http://scpgen.blogspot.com/



Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Medical History

[steven perkins]

Rita:

This is from the US Surgeon General:

https://familyhistory.hhs.gov/fhh-web/home.action

Steven


On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Rita Lynn McKale cagr...@comporium.net wrote:
 Hi all,
 My daughter has just found out she is pregnant.  Her doctor has asked her
 for her medical history.

 Has anyone ever used Legacy to create a Medical Pedigree?  If so please
 could you give me some pointers? I'm too excited to think!

 Thanks,
 Rita in South Carolina




Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] How to enter an unnamed child

[steven perkins]

See below.

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Bruce Jones juicebo...@gmail.com wrote:

 It seems we are missing the point.  I don't think ANYONE is suggesting
 that we not include ancestral relatives; they just don't think we
 should CALL them ANCESTORS instead of ancestral relatives.


Correct.


Steven C. Perkins



Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp